Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Perioper Pract ; 33(1-2): 24-29, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34380351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dislocation following hip hemiarthroplasty is a major complication with increased mortality and morbidity. Data looking at dislocation following contemporary bipolar stems are lacking in literature. METHODS: Retrospective review of our prospective national hip fracture database over a two-year period. Group 1 comprised of consecutive patients receiving bipolar Furlong prosthesis (N222) while Group 2 was made up of a historical cohort (uncemented; N254). Clinical and radiological records were reviewed to determine dislocation rates, causes and associative factors of dislocations. Data were analysed using SPSS. RESULTS: Following 476 hemiarthroplasties performed during the study period, 12 (2.5%) dislocations were reported (eight in Group 1; four in Group 2). There was no significant difference in dislocation rates (3.6% vs 1.6%) between groups (p = 0.159). Subgroup analysis of Group 1 demonstrated a significant difference in dislocations with Furlong cemented (6%) as compared with Furlong uncemented (0%) hemiarthroplasties (p = 0.024). Following dislocation, death rates increased to 8.3% from 1.7% in both groups. CONCLUSION: There is a statistically significant increase in dislocation rate following use of cemented Furlong prosthesis when compared to similar uncemented prosthesis at the same treatment period. However, when compared to traditional uncemented prosthesis, there is no difference in dislocation rates.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Femoral Neck Fractures , Hemiarthroplasty , Hip Prosthesis , Humans , Hip Prosthesis/adverse effects , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Hemiarthroplasty/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Prosthesis Design , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
2.
J Perioper Pract ; 23(12): 273-6, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24404704

ABSTRACT

This retrospective audit evaluates the compliance of our operation notes with the British Orthopaedic Society Primary Hip Arthroplasty 'A guide to good practice' using a 24-data point question (BOA 2006). Ninety-nine notes reviewed, of which 94% had patient identifiers, the surgical team was documented in 92.5%, post-operative instruction in 97%, and prosthesis stability in 97% of cases. Despite high standards, we did not achieve the 100% gold standard. We suggest that increased awareness of the 24-point BOA guideline via education and proformas would help to ensure better practice


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Medical Records/standards , Societies, Medical , Humans , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...