Intradermal Fractional ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Booster Vaccine Induces Memory T Cells: A Follow-Up Study.

The administration of viral vector and mRNA vaccine booster effectively induces humoral and cellular immune responses. Effector T cell responses after fractional intradermal (ID) vaccination are comparable to those after intramuscular (IM) boosters. Here, we quantified T cell responses after booster vaccination. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination induced higher numbers of S1-specific CD8+ memory T cells, consistent with the antibody responses. Effector memory T cell phenotypes elicited by mRNA vaccination showed a similar trend to those elicited by the viral vector vaccine booster. Three months post-vaccination, cytokine responses remained detectable, confirming effector T cell responses induced by both vaccines. The ID fractional dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 elicited higher effector CD8+ T cell responses than IM vaccination. This study confirmed that an ID dose-reduction vaccination strategy effectively stimulates effector memory T cell responses. ID injection could be an improved approach for effective vaccination programs.

Humoral Immunogenicity of mRNA Booster Vaccination after Heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or Homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Preliminary Report.

Immunogenicity data on the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster after completing a primary series vaccination, other than the mRNA vaccine, in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) is scarce. In this study, we reported the humoral immunogenicity of an mRNA booster 90-180 days after completing heterologous CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 19) or homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (n = 14) vaccination by measuring the anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG levels at one and three months after mRNA booster vaccination. This study included 33 patients with ARDs [78.8% women; mean (SD) age: 42.9 (10.6) years]. Most patients received prednisolone (75.8%, mean [IQR] daily dose: 7.5 [5, 7.5] mg) and azathioprine (45.5%). The seropositivity rates were 100% and 92.9% in CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 and ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1, respectively. The median (IQR) anti-RBD IgG level was lower in the ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 group than in the CoronaVac/ChAdOx1 group (1867.8 [591.6, 2548.6] vs. 3735.8 [2347.9, 5014.0] BAU/mL, p = 0.061). A similar trend was significant in the third month [597.8 (735.5) vs. 1609.9 (828.4) BAU/mL, p = 0.003]. Minor disease flare-ups occurred in 18.2% of the patients. Our findings demonstrated satisfactory humoral immunogenicity of mRNA vaccine boosters after a primary series, with vaccine strategies other than the mRNA platform. Notably, the vaccine-induced immunity was lower in the ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1 primary series.

Humoral SARS-CoV-2 immunogenicity wanes 3 months after heterologous inactivated vaccine followed by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

BACKGROUND: Alongside vaccine hesitancy, impaired and waning immunity in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) are barriers to immunization. The timeframe of immunity waning in ARD remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the waning of humoral immunogenicity in a cohort of ARD patients who received the heterologous inactivated vaccine followed by the adenoviral vector SAR-CoV-2 vaccine at a 3-month follow-up. METHODS: The levels of SARS-CoV-2 anti-RBD IgG were evaluated at 1 and 3 months in adults with ARDs (n = 29) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) that received the heterologous prime-boost CoronaVac vaccine followed by the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Seropositivity was defined as anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG levels of ≥ 7.15 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL. The kinetic properties of the vaccines were evaluated based on the ratio of anti-RBD IgG values obtained at each follow-up. Disease activity was evaluated. RESULTS: The seropositivity rate was lower among patients with ARDs than among HCs (89.7% vs. 100%, p = 0.237). At 3 months, the median (IQR) anti-RBD IgG level was lower among patients with ARDs than among HCs (122.3 [30.6, 247.8] vs. 294.2 [127.4,605.7] BAU/mL, p = 0.006). Mean antibody levels in patients with ARDs decreased 3.5 (1.9)-fold within 3 months post-vaccination (122.3 [30.6, 247.8] vs. 279.9 [86,1076.5] BAU/mL, p < 0.001). Disease flare-ups occurred in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings included changes to anti-RBD IgG levels and may inform vaccination strategies. SAR-CoV2 vaccine-induced immunity was lower in patients with ARDs than in HCs and decreased within 3 months, suggesting a need for booster vaccinations.

Impaired neutralizing antibodies and preserved cellular immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Reports on vaccine immunogenicity in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) have been inconclusive. Here, we report the immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost with an inactivated vaccine followed by an adenoviral vector vaccine in patients with SARDs using anti-RBD antibodies, neutralizing capacity against Omicron BA.2 [plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT)], T cell phenotypes, and effector cytokine production at 4 weeks after vaccination. SARD patients had lower median (IQR) anti-RBD-IgG levels and neutralizing function against the Omicron BA.2 variant than the healthy group (p = 0.003, p = 0.004, respectively). T cell analysis revealed higher levels of IFN-γ- and TNF-α-secreting CD4 + T cells (p < 0.001, p = 0.0322, respectively) in SARD patients than in the healthy group. Effector cytokine production by CD8 + T cells was consistent with Th responses. These results suggest that this vaccine regimen revealed mildly impaired humoral response while preserving cellular immunogenicity and may be an alternative for individuals for whom mRNA vaccines are contraindicated.

T-Cell Responses Induced by an Intradermal BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Booster Following Primary Vaccination with Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.

A practical booster vaccine is urgently needed to control the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. We have previously reported the safety and immunogenicity of a fractional intradermal booster, using the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in healthy volunteers who had completed two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In this study, an intramuscular booster at full dosage was used as a control, and a half-dose vaccination was included for reciprocal comparison. Detailed T-cell studies are essential to understand cellular responses to vaccination. T-cell immunity was examined using S1 peptide restimulation and flow cytometry. The fractional dose (1:5) of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine enhanced antigen-specific effector T-cells, but the responses were less remarkable compared to the intramuscular booster at full dosage. However, the intradermal regimen was not inferior to the intramuscular booster a month after boosting. An intradermal booster using only one-fifth of the standard dosage could provide comparable T-cell responses with the fractional intramuscular booster. This work confirms the efficacy of intradermal and fractional vaccination in terms of T-cell immunogenicity in previously immunised populations.

Immunogenicity and safety of an intradermal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 boost in a healthy population.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic. Two doses of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) have been shown to be insufficient to protect against variants of concern (VOCs), while viral vector vaccines remain protective against the infection. Herein, we conducted a preliminary study to evaluate the safety and immunity in an adult population who received the conventional 2 dosage-regimen of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; with an additional intradermal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 reciprocal dosage (1:5). An Intramuscular ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 booster was also included as a control. Immediate and delayed local reactions were frequently observed in the fractional intradermal boost, but systemic side effects were significantly decreased compared to the conventional intramuscular boost. The anti-RBD-IgG levels, the neutralising function against delta variants, and T cell responses were significantly increased after boosting via both routes. Interestingly, the shorter interval elicited higher immunogenicity compared to the extended interval. Taken together, a reciprocal dosage of intradermal ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 booster reduces systemic adverse reactions and enhances non inferiority humoral and cellular immune responses compared to a full dose of intramuscular boosting. These findings provide for an effective vaccine management during the shortages of vaccine supply.

Immunogenicity and Safety of an Intradermal BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Booster after Two Doses of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Healthy Population.

Effective vaccine coverage is urgently needed to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. Inactivated vaccines have been introduced in many countries for emergency usage, but have only provided limited protection. Heterologous vaccination is a promising strategy to maximise vaccine immunogenicity. Here, we conducted a phase I, randomised control trial to observe the safety and immunogenicity after an intradermal boost, using a fractional dosage (1:5) of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in healthy participants in Songkhla, Thailand. In total, 91 volunteers who had been administered with two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 (CoronaVac) were recruited into the study, and then randomised (1:1:1) to received different regimens of the third dose. An intramuscular booster with a full dose of BNT162b2 was included as a conventional control, and a half dose group was included as reciprocal comparator. Both, immediate and delayed adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) were monitored. Humoral and cellular immune responses were examined to observe the booster effects. The intradermal booster provided significantly fewer systemic side effects, from 70% down to 19.4% (p < 0.001); however, they were comparable to local reactions with the conventional intramuscular booster. In the intradermal group after receiving only one fifth of the conventional dosage, serum Anti-RBD IgG was halved compared to the full dose of an intramuscular injection. However, the neutralising function against the Delta strain remained intact. T cell responses were also less effective in the intradermal group compared to the intramuscular booster. Together, the intradermal booster, using a fractional dose of BNT162b2, can reduce systemic reactions and provides a good level and function of antibody responses compared to the conventional booster. This favourable intradermal boosting strategy provides a suitable alternative for vaccines and effective vaccine management to increase the coverage during the vaccine shortage.

Thai Patients With Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis: Outcomes and Risk Factors for Mortality.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) have an increased risk of premature death. Different subtypes, predictors, and ethnicities may affect the overall survival. However, the overall survival of Thai AAV patients has not been reported. We examined the mortality and prognosis of these patients. METHODS: This medical record review study included adult AAV patients, admitted to Songklanagarind Hospital from 2007 to 2017. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis was diagnosed according to the 1990 American College of Rheumatology criteria or 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Follow-up data were collected until June 2018. Prognostic factors and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 57 AAV patients, mean (SD) age was 49.3 (16.1) years. Microscopic polyangiitis was the predominant diagnosis (42%). Kidneys (67%) and lungs (65%) were the 2 most affected organs. Initial Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) greater than 20 was found in 61% of patients. Corticosteroids were the main drugs, and 58% received cyclophosphamide during the induction phase. Overall mean survival time was 38.8 (42.2) months. Patient survival was 91% and 82% at 1 and 6 months, respectively. One-year and 5-year survival rates were 78% and 63%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that initial BVAS of greater than 20, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than 5.8, and need for invasive ventilator were significant predictors of mortality. Initial BVAS of greater than 20 was the only predictor of death in multivariate analyses (odds ratio, 4.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-17.63; p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate of Thai AAV patients is high and strongly related to high disease activity. An early recognition and referral system are warranted to improve outcomes.

Erythematous auricular papules in the fatal cases of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive interstitial lung disease.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: The anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (Anti-MDA5) antibody is associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD) and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM). The predictors of treatment response would help in classifying the subgroups and decision-making. Here, we aimed to report an observational skin lesion that might be associated with a grave prognosis in six patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive ILD. METHODS: This case series included 6 anti-MDA5 antibody-positive ILD patients, who were admitted to Songklanagarind Hospital between January 2018 and June 2020. Their medical records were reviewed for clinical phenotypes, laboratory results, imaging studies, treatment, and outcomes. The cutaneous manifestations associated with fatal outcomes were observed and reported. RESULTS: Among 6 patients with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive ILD, 5 patients had CADM and one patient had no skin involvement. Four patients manifested as RP-ILD within a few months. Three deaths occurred despite highly intensive immunosuppressive treatment. All the patients in the dead group exhibited erythematous papules on their auricles and a presence of pulmonary consolidation at lower lung fields was additionally observed. CONCLUSION: Erythematous auricular papules may be a hallmark of grave prognosis in anti-MDA5 positive CADM with ILD.

Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis for non-rheumatologists: Integrating systematic literature research and expert opinion of the Thai Rheumatism Association.

AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease leading to joint damage, functional disability, poor quality of life and shortened life expectancy. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are a principal strategy to improve outcomes. To provide best practices in the diagnosis and management of patients with RA, the Thai Rheumatism Association (TRA) developed scientifically sound and clinically relevant evidence-based recommendations for general practitioners, internists, orthopedists, and physiatrists. METHODS: Thirty-seven rheumatologists from across Thailand formulated 18 clinically relevant questions: three for diagnosis, 10 for treatments, four for monitoring, and one for referral. A bibliographic team systematically reviewed the relevant literature on these topics up to December 2013. A set of recommendations was proposed based on the results of systematic reviews combined with expert opinions. Group consensus was achieved for all statements and recommendations using the nominal group technique. RESULTS: A set of recommendations was proposed. For diagnosis, either American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 or ACR/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 classification criteria can be applied. For treatment, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoid, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including antimalarials, methotrexate and sulfasalazine are recommended. Physiotherapy should be suggested to all patients. Tight control strategy and monitoring for efficacy and side effects of treatments, as well as indications for referral to a rheumatologist are provided. CONCLUSIONS: These evidence-based recommendations provide practical guidance for diagnosis, fundamental management and referral of patients with RA for non-rheumatologists. However, it should be incorporated with clinical judgments and decisions about care for each individual patient.