Antibacterial effect of coffee: calcium concentration in a culture containing teeth/biofilm exposed to Coffea Canephora aqueous extract.

UNLABELLED: This study determined the changes of calcium concentration in a medium containing teeth/biofilm exposed to Coffea canephora extract (CCE). Enamel fragments were randomly fixed into two 24-well polystyrene plates containing BHI. Pooled human saliva was added to form biofilm on fragments. Specimens were divided into treatment groups (G, n = 8 per group) and treated with 50 µl daily for 1 min per week, as follows: G1, 20% CCE; G2, Milli-Q water (negative control); G3, antibiotic (positive control). Six fragments represented the blank control (G4). The calcium content was observed at baseline, 4 and 7 days of treatment by atomic-absorption spectrophotometry. Cross-sectional hardness of enamel was a demineralization indicator. Calcium increased in the medium after 4 and 7 days of treatment in G1 (3·80 ± 1·3 mg l(-1) and 4·93 ± 2·1 mg l(-1) , respectively) and G3 (4th day = 5·7 ± 1·8 mg l(-1) ; 7th day = 6·7 ± 3·5 mg l(-1) ) (P > 0·05). Calcium from G2 decreased after 7 days, which was different from G3 (P < 0·05). The lower calcium content, at the end of the experiment, was represented by G4, 2·16 ± 0·2 mg l(-1) . The increase in calcium after treatment with CCE is probably due to its antibacterial effect, which caused the bacterial lysis and consequent release of calcium in the medium. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study revealed an inhibitory action of Coffea canephora against dental biofilm. This coffee species caused bacterial lysis and consequent release of calcium into the medium. Furthermore, the advantage of coffee as an antibacterial beverage is that it is consumed in a concentrated form (6-10%) as opposed to various medicinal infusions that have shown such effect in vitro and are usually consumed at 1-2%. Therefore, a light roasted C. canephora aqueous extract can be considered as a potential anticariogenic substance.

Antimicrobial synergism against different lineages of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying SCCmec IV.

AIM: To evaluate the synergistic activity of antimicrobial drugs against lineages of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrying SCCmec IV. The biofilm production and related genes were also detected. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty two MRSA isolates were tested for biofilm production and related genes. Biofilm/biomass susceptibility to gentamicin (G), linezolid (L), rifampicin (R) and vancomycin (V) was determined for six isolates from three lineages prevalent in Rio de Janeiro hospitals in concentrations ranging from 0·25 to 64 µg ml(-1). Biomass was evaluated by microtitre plate test and number of viable cells (CFU cm(-2)) and inspected by epifluorescence microscopy. All isolates presented the icaA and sasG genes, but only 38% were biofilm producers. There were 50 and 45% biomass reductions when concentrations ≥4 µg ml(-1) of R or L and ≥16 µg ml(-1) of G or V, respectively, were used. Synergism tests produced a 55% biomass reduction with R(2µgml-1) + G(16µgml-1), R(2µgml-1) + L(2µgml-1), R(2µgml-1) + V(4µgml-1), and L(2µgml-1) + V(4µgml-1). Number of viable cells was reduced from 2 to 3 logs with R(2µgml-1) + L(2µgml-1) and R(2µgml-1) + V(4µgml-1). CONCLUSIONS: Synergisms involving R plus L and R plus V caused important reductions in biofilm/biomass and the number of viable cells. Drug combinations should be considered in the chemotherapies of MRSA-SCCmec IV infections. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Biofilms in MRSA infections restrict the clinical choice of antimicrobials. Thus, knowledge of the best options for monotherapy and drug synergisms could improve clinical results.

Inhibitory properties of Coffea canephora extract against oral bacteria and its effect on demineralisation of deciduous teeth.

OBJECTIVES: The antibacterial activity of Coffea canephora extract was evaluated in vitro against Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. The viability of planktonic cells was analysed by susceptibility tests (MIC and MBC) and time-kill assays. The effect of the extract on dental demineralisation was also investigated. METHODS: Primary 1st molar fragments (n=24) were inoculated with a saliva pool and sustained in a multiple plaque growth system for 10 days to form biofilm. The biofilm was treated with light roasted C. canephora extract at 20%, Milli-Q water (negative control) and chlorhexidine (positive control) once a day, during a week. Blank controls comprised fragments without treatment. Biofilm pH was monitored in the last day of treatment. Changes in tooth mineralisation were assessed by cross-sectional microhardness (CSMH) test. RESULTS: MIC and MBC for S. mutans were 7±2 mg/mL and 160±0 mg/mL, respectively, showing no activity for S. sobrinus. The extract produced a 4-log reduction in the number of colonies of S. mutans after 3-h treatment (p<0.05) with undiluted extract (20%) and MBC concentration (16%). There was no difference among negative/blank controls and coffee plaque pH. Differences between CSMH values of dental fragments subjected to the coffee extract and to chlorhexidine were not significant. At depths up to 30 µm from the enamel surface, coffee extract and chlorhexidine promoted higher CSMH values when compared to blank/negative controls (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that light roasted C. canephora extract is beneficial as an anticariogenic substance.