Assessment of Patient Characteristics Influencing the Analgesic Effects of Ibuprofen Gargle After Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.

Introduction In our previous work, we investigated the analgesic effects of ibuprofen gargle after mandibular third molar extractions. However, a subsequent detailed review of individual patient data revealed variations in postoperative pain reduction among patients. Consequently, the present study was designed to conduct post-hoc subanalyses that identified factors contributing to variation in the analgesic response to ibuprofen gargle after third molar extractions. Materials and methods This study involved thirty-five Japanese patients from a prior randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, which focused on the analgesic effects of ibuprofen gargle after mandibular third molar extractions. Participants were categorized as responders (n = 13) and non-responders (n = 22) based on the within-subject difference (ibuprofen-placebo, IP) of visual analog scale (VAS) changes. Baseline characteristics were compared, along with variables, such as age, sex, the reason for extraction, extraction site, Pell Gregory (space and depth) classification, Winter's classification, surgeon's experience, and surgery time. Baseline characteristics predicting responder status were examined using multivariate logistic regression. Results In the univariate analysis, variables such as age, sex, and baseline VAS scores with p-values <0.2 were evaluated using a stepwise approach. This analysis identified age (per -10 years) with an odds ratio of 4.163 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.170-31.952, p = 0.0233) and sex (female) with an odds ratio of 9.977 (95% CI: 1.336-208.256, p = 0.0213) as significant predictors of responder status. Conclusions In young and female patients, ibuprofen gargle decreased postoperative pain after mandibular third molar extractions.

The Efficacy of Bepotastine Besilate Compared With Hydroxyzine Pamoate for Preventing Infusion Reactions to the First Dose of Rituximab in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Protocol for a Phase II, Double-Blind, Multicenter Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, can cause infusion reactions (IRs), especially during the initial rituximab infusion therapy. Generally, patients are administered a histamine H1-receptor antagonist before the rituximab infusion, along with an antipyretic analgesic, to prevent or reduce IRs. Multiple retrospective case-control studies indicate that the second generation of histamine H1-receptor antagonists might be more effective than the first generation in suppressing IRs caused by the rituximab infusion. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of first- and second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists for preventing IRs resulting from the initial infusion of rituximab in patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: This is a phase II, double-blind, active-controlled randomized trial. It will be a multicenter study conducted across 3 facilities that aims to enroll a total of 40 patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma who will receive their initial rituximab infusion. Participating patients will be administered hydroxyzine pamoate or bepotastine besilate, representing first- or second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists, respectively. This will be combined with 400-mg acetaminophen tablets taken approximately 30 minutes before the first infusion of rituximab. The primary end point of this trial is to assess severe IRs, equivalent to grade 2 or higher as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, that occur within a 4-hour period after the initiation of rituximab infusion. The secondary end points include assessing the severity of the initial IR, the maximum severity of the IR, and the duration between rituximab infusion initiation and the onset of the first IR within a 4-hour period. Additionally, the trial will evaluate histamine H1-receptor antagonist-induced drowsiness using the visual analogue scale, with each patient providing their individual response. RESULTS: This study began with patient recruitment in April 2023, with 17 participants enrolled as of November 12, 2023. The anticipated study completion is set for February 2026. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of oral first- and second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists in preventing IRs induced by the initial administration of rituximab. The findings from this study hold the potential to establish the rationale for a phase III study aimed at determining the standard premedication protocol for rituximab infusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs051220169; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs051220169. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54882.

Efficacy and safety of ibuprofen gargle for postoperative pain after mandibular third molar extraction: A phase II, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the postoperative efficacy and safety of using an ibuprofen gargle as a pain management strategy for patients who have undergone mandibular third molar extraction. We also ensured that the quality of treatment was not compromised throughout the study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: the ibuprofen-placebo (IP) group and the placebo-ibuprofen (PI) group. On postoperative Day (POD) 1, the IP group initiated ibuprofen administration, while the PI group started taking placebo. On POD 2, the IP group switched to using placebo, whereas the PI group switched to ibuprofen. From PODs 3-5, both groups were prescribed ibuprofen gargle. The primary endpoint was within-subject visual analog scale (VAS) score before and 5 min after the first use of the ibuprofen or placebo gargle on PODs 1 and 2 (ΔVAS5_ibuprofen - ΔVAS5_placebo ). The incidence and severity of adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and a subjective rating scale. RESULTS: This study enrolled 40 patients. The within-subject VAS5 of the IP and PI groups were 1.25 ± 12.0 and -5.26 ± 8.93 mm, respectively. The treatment effect of ibuprofen gargle was -2.01 ± 10.62 mm (p = .246). None of the patients in each group presented with serious adverse events or clinically significant complications (including dry sockets) after extraction. Transient adverse events, such as throat tingling and oral discomfort (grade 1), were observed in each group. CONCLUSION: Ibuprofen gargle was safe but did not provide significant pain relief when used after mandibular third molar extraction.

Efficacy and Long-Term Safety of Ibuprofen Gargle for Oral Lichen Planus: A Study Protocol of Randomized Crossover and Long-Term Extension Trials.

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a type of chronic and refractory stomatitis characterized by abnormal keratinization, which is often painful. There is no consensus regarding treatment options for OLP, particularly in the presence of pain. The current study protocol focuses on the short-term efficacy and long-term safety of an ibuprofen gargle for pain management in patients with OLP. Patients (n = 24) with painful OLP will be enrolled. During a crossover study period, patients in the ibuprofen-placebo (IP) group will receive an ibuprofen gargle (0.6%) on day 1, a placebo gargle on day 2, and an ibuprofen gargle on days 3-5 at least once daily. Patients in the placebo-ibuprofen (PI) group will receive a placebo gargle on day 1, an ibuprofen gargle on day 2, and an ibuprofen gargle on days 3-5 at least once daily. The primary endpoint of the crossover study period is the change in pain level as measured by a visual analogue scale score from before gargle administration to 5 min after gargle administration on days 1 and 2. The primary endpoint of the long-term extension study is assessment of long-term safety. The results of this study may support existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of ibuprofen rinses in treating OLP.

Efficacy of Ibuprofen Gargle for Postoperative Pain After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: Protocol for a Phase II, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Crossover Trial.

BACKGROUND: Extraction of mandibular third molars is one of the most commonly performed oral surgical procedures, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used for pain management. Oral NSAIDs are associated with adverse events such as gastrointestinal disorders, renal and hepatic dysfunction, and platelet dysfunction. Topical analgesics have been proposed as alternatives to oral and injectable medications to safely improve postoperative pain relief. We will conduct a single-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover trial to assess the pain-relieving effect of an ibuprofen-containing gargle in patients undergoing extraction of mandibular third molars when compared with a placebo gargle. OBJECTIVE: This will be the first clinical study to compare the efficacy of an ibuprofen gargle with that of a placebo for relieving postoperative pain in addition to loxoprofen after mandibular third molar extraction. METHODS: This study will be performed at Kobe University Hospital. Participants (N=40) will be randomized equally to 1 of 2 groups. The ibuprofen-placebo group will receive an ibuprofen gargle on postoperative day (POD) 1 and a placebo gargle on POD 2. The placebo-ibuprofen group will receive a placebo gargle on POD 1 and an ibuprofen gargle on POD 2. Both groups will receive ibuprofen gargles on PODs 3-5 at least once daily. The primary objective is to estimate the within-subject difference on a visual analog scale (VAS) before and 5 minutes after using the ibuprofen or placebo gargle on PODs 1 and 2. The secondary objectives are to estimate the within-subject differences in ΔVAS before and 15 minutes after using the ibuprofen or placebo gargle on PODs 1 and 2, ΔVAS before and 5 or 15 minutes after using the ibuprofen gargle on PODs 3-5, overall efficacy (self-completion, 5 scales) on PODs 1-5, daily frequency of use (ibuprofen or placebo gargle and analgesics) on PODs 1-7, and the occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: The Certified Review Board of Kobe University approved the study. The intervention was implemented in May 2021. For the primary analysis, we will calculate the mean and SD of ΔVAS5 on PODs 1 and 2 and the within-study difference in ΔVAS5. The treatment effect will be estimated by dividing the mean ΔVAS5 in the within-subject difference by 2 and calculating the P value using an unpaired t test. For the secondary analysis, we will calculate the mean and SD of ΔVAS15 on PODs 1 and 2 and the within-study difference in ΔVAS15. The treatment effect will be estimated as in the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This trial will provide exploratory evidence of the efficacy and safety of an ibuprofen gargle for pain reduction after mandibular third molar extraction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs051210022; https://tinyurl.com/39ej23zu. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/35533.

Safety and Efficacy of Bis-Glyceryl Ascorbate as Prophylaxis for Hand-Foot Skin Reaction: A Single-Arm, Open-Label Phase I/II Study (DGA Study).

BACKGROUND: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) induced by multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is a serious side effect that can cause treatment interruption or decreased dosing. This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bis-glyceryl ascorbate (Amitose bis(di)-glyceryl ascorbate [DGA])-containing cream (DGA cream) for the prevention of sunitinib-induced HFSR. METHODS: A single-arm, open-label phase I/II study was conducted, targeting patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who were receiving sunitinib therapy with a schedule of 2 weeks on/1 week off. The participants applied DGA cream to both palmar and plantar surfaces in combination with a moisturizing agent as standard-of-care prophylaxis during two sunitinib treatment cycles (6 weeks). The primary endpoint in phase I was safety defined as dermatological abnormalities and it was determined in the first five participants. The primary endpoint in phase II was efficacy defined as development of grade 1 or higher HFSR defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events within 6 weeks and it was determined on a full analysis set (FAS) defined as the population including all participants who used DGA cream once in the study duration. Efficacy in the per protocol set (PPS) defined as the population excluding seven patients whose study treatment was interrupted was evaluated as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled as a FAS. No dermatological abnormalities occurred in the first 5 patients enrolled in the phase I study. Three patients developed HFSR (grade 1: n = 2, grade 2: n = 1) in the observation period. The HFSR incidence rate was 12.5% (3/24; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7%-32.4%) in the FAS, which was significantly lower than the incidence rate predefined as a threshold of 33.3% by a previous report from our hospital (P = .030). The incidence rate in the 17 patients of the PPS was 17.6% (3/17; 95%CI: 3.8%-43.4%). CONCLUSION: DGA cream may be safe and effective in the prophylaxis of HFSR in mRCC patients who receive sunitinib therapy (Trial ID: jRCTs051180051).

STAT3 Polymorphism Associates With mTOR Inhibitor-Induced Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma.

We evaluated the association of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) polymorphisms with the incidence of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We also used lung-derived cell lines to investigate the mechanisms of this association. Japanese patients with metastatic RCC who were treated with mTOR inhibitors were genotyped for the STAT3 polymorphism, rs4796793 (1697C/G). We evaluated the association of the STAT3 genotype with the incidence of ILD and therapeutic outcome. In the 57 patients included in the primary analysis, the ILD rate within 140 days was significantly higher in patients with the GG genotype compared with those with other genotypes (77.8% vs. 23.1%, odds ratio=11.67, 95% confidential interval=3.0644.46). There were no significant differences in progression-free survival or time-to-treatment failure between the patients with the GG genotype and those with other genotypes. An in vitro study demonstrated that some lung-derived cell lines carrying the GG genotype exhibited an increase in the expression of mesenchymal markers, such as fibronectin, N-cadherin, and vimentin, and decreases in E-cadherin, which is an epithelial marker associated with exposure to everolimus, although STAT3 expression and activity were not related to the genotype. In conclusion, the GG genotype of the STAT3 rs4796793 polymorphism increases the risk of mTOR inhibitor-induced ILD, supporting its use as a predictive marker for RCC.

Ibuprofen gargle for chemo- or Chemoradiotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis frequently occurs in cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This study examined the safety and efficacy of ibuprofen gargle in healthy volunteers and patients with chemotherapy- and concomitant CRT-induced oral mucositis. METHODS: We enrolled healthy volunteers and patients with chemotherapy- and CRT-induced oral mucositis. In cohort I, single and multiple doses of ibuprofen gargle (0.6% or 1.0%) were administered to healthy volunteers on day 1 and days 4-10. In cohort II, multiple doses of ibuprofen gargle (0.6%) were administered to patients with complicated grade 2-3 oral mucositis based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. The primary endpoint of cohort I was the treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) as defined by CTCAE version 4.0. The primary endpoint of cohort II was the change in the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score from before to 15 min after gargle use on day 3. The incidence and severity of TRAEs were assessed based on the CTCAE version 4.0 and a subjective rating scale completed by healthy volunteers and patients. RESULTS: In cohort I, 9 of 10 healthy volunteers were evaluable for safety. All 9 healthy volunteers reported the TRAE of oral irritation with single or multiple use of the gargle. In cohort II, 10 patients were enrolled and evaluable for safety and 7 of 10 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The mean change in the VAS pain score from before to 15 min after using the gargle on day 3 was - 1.28 (95% confidence interval: - 2.06, - 0.51), and all patients experienced some degree of pain relief (range: - 0.2 to - 2.5). All 10 patients reported the TRAE of oral irritation. No other TRAEs of ibuprofen gargle were observed in the healthy volunteers and patients. CONCLUSION: Despite oral irritation, the ibuprofen gargle appeared to be safe and effective for the pain related to chemo- or CRT-induced oral mucositis. However, ibuprofen-related oral irritation warrants further formulation improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000014433).

Efficacy of pharmacists' assessment and intervention based on Screening Tool for Older Persons' Appropriate Prescriptions for Japanese compared with Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions criteria version 2 in older patients with cardiovascular disease.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacists' assessment and intervention using the Screening Tool for Older Persons' Appropriate Prescriptions for Japanese (STOPP-J) to detect and correct potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) compared with the Screening Tool of Older Persons' Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria version 2. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out at a medical unit of Cardiovascular Surgery and Cardiovascular Internal Medicine in a Japanese university hospital involving new inpatients aged ≥65 years prescribed one or more daily medication. Pharmacists detected PIM based on STOPP-J and STOPP criteria version 2, and corrected them with physicians. The number of patients with PIM, the content and changes in PIM were compared between both criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 230 patients were included (mean age 75.4 years, 162 men, mean number of medications 8.3). STOPP-J detected significantly more patients with PIM than STOPP criteria version 2 (122 [53%] vs 75 [33%], P < 0.001). The number of PIM based on STOPP-J was 232, the physicians were recommended to change 61 (26%) and 50 (22%) were changed. Meanwhile, the number of PIM based on STOPP criteria version 2 was 133, the physicians were recommended to change 61 (46%) and 54 (41%) were changed. Several medications detected as PIM using STOPP-J were not detected using STOPP criteria version 2. CONCLUSIONS: STOPP-J detected significantly more patients with PIM than STOPP criteria version 2, and pharmacists' assessment and intervention based on STOPP-J were suggested to be effective for detecting and correcting PIM. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 1101-1107.

Safety and Efficacy of Bis-Glyceryl Ascorbate (Amitose DGA) to Prevent Hand-Foot Skin Reaction in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib Therapy: Protocol for a Phase I/II, Uncontrolled, Single-Arm, Open-Label Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a serious side effect induced by multiple-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). HFSR can cause treatment interruption or decreased dosing. HFSR also markedly decreases quality of life and is associated with the therapeutic efficacy of multiple-TKIs. Therefore, the management and prevention of HFSR is an important issue; however, an effective method for its prevention has not been established. Specific ascorbic acid derivatives can reverse multiple-TKI-induced keratinocyte growth and pathological changes in vitro. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the safety of bis-glyceryl ascorbate (Amitose DGA), a novel, hydrosoluble, and moisturizing ascorbic acid derivative, in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving sunitinib therapy. This study was also designed to evaluate Amitose DGA's preventive efficacy for sunitinib-induced HFSR. METHODS: This is a Phase I/II, single-center, uncontrolled, single-arm, open-label trial. We will recruit a total of 30 patients with RCC receiving sunitinib therapy, with a 2-week-on and 1-week-off schedule. The participants will apply Amitose DGA-containing cream over both palmar and plantar surfaces within two treatment cycles (ie, 6 weeks) of sunitinib in combination with a general moisturizing agent, in addition to standard-of-care processes. Safety assessments will include dermatological abnormalities, clinical laboratory tests, and incidence of adverse events. Efficacy assessments will include development of HFSR and therapeutic outcomes associated with sunitinib. RESULTS: Recruitment to the study began in August 2017 and is ongoing in Japan. To date, 21 subjects have been recruited. Study completion is expected in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first clinical study of Amitose DGA-containing cream in patients with RCC who are receiving sunitinib therapy. The single-center, single-arm, open-label design was selected to maximize subject exposure and increase the likelihood of achieving our study endpoints. The results will provide valuable and preliminary evidence of the effects of Amitose DGA-containing cream on HFSR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000027209; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr /ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000031174. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14636.

Phase II study of palonosetron, aprepitant and dexamethasone to prevent nausea and vomiting induced by multiple-day emetogenic chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the antiemetic efficacy and safety of palonosetron, aprepitant and dexamethasone in patients with testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) receiving 5-day cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. METHODS: In this open-label, single-arm, single-centre study, the antiemetic therapy consisted of palonosetron 0.75 mg on day 1, aprepitant 125 mg on day 1 and 80 mg on days 2-7 and dexamethasone 6.6 mg on days 1-7. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no vomiting/retching or rescue medication) in the overall period (0-240 h), and secondary endpoints included complete protection (CP; defined as CR and no more than mild nausea) and total control (TC; defined as CR and no nausea). The incidence and severity of nausea were assessed on the basis of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 and a subjective rating scale completed by patients. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled and evaluated for safety, and 24 patients were evaluated for efficacy. CR was achieved in 62.5% of patients (95% confidence interval [CI] = 40.6-81.2, p = 0.043) in the overall period. CP and TC were achieved in 62.5% (95% CI = 40.6-81.2) and 25.0% of patients (95% CI = 9.8-46.7), respectively, in the overall period. The primary adverse drug reaction was hiccups (48.0%). The events were expected, and none was grade 3 or 4. CONCLUSIONS: The examined combination antiemetic therapy was effective and well-tolerated in patients with TGCTs receiving 5-day cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.

Long-term efficacy of comprehensive multidisciplinary antibiotic stewardship programs centered on weekly prospective audit and feedback.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of comprehensive antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) on antibiotic use, antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and clinical outcomes. DESIGN: Before-after study. SETTING: National university hospital with 934 beds. INTERVENTION: Implementation in March 2010 of a comprehensive ASPs including, among other strategies, weekly prospective audit and feedback with multidisciplinary collaboration. METHODS: The primary outcome was the use of antipseudomonal antibiotics as measured by the monthly mean days of therapy per 1000 patient days each year. Secondary outcomes included overall antibiotic use and that of each antibiotic class, susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the proportion of patients isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among all patients isolated S. aureus, the incidence of MRSA, and the 30-day mortality attributable to bacteremia. RESULTS: The mean monthly use of antipseudomonal antibiotics significantly decreased in 2011 and after as compared with 2009. Susceptibility to levofloxacin was significantly increased from 2009 to 2016 (P = 0.01 for trend). Its susceptibility to other antibiotics remained over 84% and did not change significantly during the study period. The proportion of patients isolated MRSA and the incidence of MRSA decreased significantly from 2009 to 2016 (P < 0.001 and = 0.02 for trend, respectively). There were no significant changes in the 30-day mortality attributable to bacteremia during the study period (P = 0.57 for trend). CONCLUSION: The comprehensive ASPs had long-term efficacy for reducing the use of the targeted broad-spectrum antibiotics, maintaining the antibiotic susceptibility of P. aeruginosa, and decreasing the prevalence of MRSA, without adversely affecting clinical outcome.

Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in STAT3, ABCB1, and ABCG2 with Stomatitis in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Sunitinib: A Retrospective Analysis in Japanese Patients.

Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 is a key factor in homeostasis of the oral mucosa by regulating the production of inflammatory cytokines. Sunitinib is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (multidrug resistance (MDR)-1/ABCB1) and breast-cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). In this retrospective study, we evaluated the association between sunitinib-induced stomatitis and STAT3, ABCB1, and ABCG2 polymorphisms in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Fifty-two Japanese patients with RCC treated with sunitinib were retrospectively genotyped to elucidate a potential association between STAT3, ABCB1, and ABCG2 polymorphisms and stomatitis development. Stomatitis occurred in 22 out of 52 patients. The TT+TC genotypes at STAT3 rs744166 had an odds ratio of 5.00 against CC genotype for the stomatitis development (95% confident interval, 0.97-25.8). In the Kaplan-Meier method for the cumulative incidence of stomatitis, a statistically significant difference was observed between the TT+TC and CC genotypes in STAT3 rs744166 (p=0.037). Both multiple logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis show STAT3 rs744166 TT+TC genotypes and serum creatinine in each patient were significant independent factors for stomatitis development. In conclusion, STAT3 polymorphism may be a novel risk factor for sunitinib-induced stomatitis in patients with mRCC.

STAT3 polymorphism rs4796793 may be a predictive factor of tumor response to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japanese population.

Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 3 is a key factor in multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor (mTKI)-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells. This study aimed to identify associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the STAT3 gene and tumor response to mTKIs in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC). Seventy-one patients with clear cell RCC treated with any mTKI were retrospectively genotyped to elucidate a potential association between STAT3 SNPs and overall best response to drugs. Of 50 patients included for analysis, a partial or complete response was observed in 17. A significant association was found between rs4796793 alleles and tumor response [G vs. C, odds ratio (OR) 3.25, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.30-8.07]. There were a higher percentage of responders with the C/C genotype at rs4796793 than with the G/C + G/G genotypes (OR 4.46, 95 % CI 1.31-15.28). Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference between patients with the CC genotype and those with G/C + G/G genotypes in time-to-treatment response, but not in progression-free survival or time-to-treatment failure. The rs4796793 genotype is a novel predictive factor of the response to mTKIs in patients with mRCC. However, prospective translational trials with larger patient cohorts are required to confirm these results.

Association of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in STAT3 with Hand-Foot Skin Reactions in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Multiple Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis in Japanese Patients.

BACKGROUND: Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 is a reported mediator of molecular-targeted drug-induced keratinocyte toxicity. AIM: Our purpose was to assess the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in STAT3 with hand-foot skin reactions (HFSR) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five Japanese patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma who were treated with any mTKI at Kobe University Hospital were retrospectively genotyped to elucidate a potential association between STAT3 polymorphisms and HFSR development. RESULTS: The final analysis included 60 patients. HFSR was observed in 46 patients. The GG, GC, and CC genotypes at rs4796793 were found in 9, 27, and 24 patients, respectively. Three other STAT3 polymorphisms exhibited tight linkage disequilibrium with rs4796793. A significant association was found between the rs4796793 allele and HFSR [G vs. C; odds ratio [OR], 4.33; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.80-10.45; P = 0.001]. The GG genotype had the highest OR compared with GC + CC genotypes (OR, 10.75; 95 % CI, 2.38-48.07; P = 0.001). In a time-to-event Kaplan-Meier analysis, a statistically significant difference was observed between the GC + CC and the GG genotypes (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: The rs4796793 genotype appears to be a novel factor for mTKI-induced HFSR in patients with mRCC. Prospective translational trials with larger numbers of patients are required to confirm our results. This research suggests a potential benefit of STAT3 polymorphism screening in patients treated with mTKIs.

Data analysis methods for assessing palliative care interventions in one-group pre-post studies.

OBJECTIVES: Studies of palliative care are often performed using single-arm pre-post study designs that lack causal inference. Thus, in this study, we propose a novel data analysis approach that incorporates risk factors from single-arm studies instead of using paired t-tests to assess intervention effects. METHODS: Physical, psychological and social evaluations of eligible cancer inpatients were conducted by a hospital-based palliative care team. Quality of life was assessed at baseline and after 7 days of symptomatic treatment using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-PAL. Among 35 patients, 9 were discharged within 1 week and 26 were included in analyses. Structural equation models with observed measurements were applied to estimate direct and indirect intervention effects and simultaneously consider risk factors. RESULTS: Parameters were estimated using full models that included associations among covariates and reduced models that excluded covariates with small effects. The total effect was calculated as the sum of intervention and covariate effects and was equal to the mean of the difference (0.513) between pre- and post-intervention quality of life (reduced model intervention effect, 14.749; 95% confidence intervals, -4.407 and 33.905; p = 0.131; covariate effect, -14.236; 95% confidence interval, -33.708 and 5.236; p = 0.152). CONCLUSION: Using the present analytical method for single-arm pre-post study designs, factors that modulate effects of interventions were modelled, and intervention and covariate effects were distinguished based on structural equation model.

Serum lactate dehydrogenase levels as a predictive marker of oxaliplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical laboratory test data obtained prior to treatments were previously analyzed from the standpoint of susceptibility to hypersensitivity reactions in patients treated with the platimun anticancer agent, oxaliplatin (L-OHP). In the present study, the time course from the first to last cycle of the treatment was additionally analyzed to determine a better predictor of these reactions. METHODS: A total of 20 laboratory test data were obtained from 108 Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer who were treated with the L-OHP-containing regimens, FOLFOX4 and/or mFOLFOX6. The averages and variation coefficients (CV%) of the data until the last cycle of the treatment were compared between patients with hypersensitivity reactions and those without. RESULTS: The average serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level was lower in patients with grade 1/2 reactions (P=0.016), whereas its CV% value was higher in patients with grade 3/4 reactions (P=0.005) than in those without reactions. An increase in serum LDH levels was observed in some patients with grade 3/4 reactions as the cycle number increased, and thereafter hypersensitivity reactions occurred. This phenomenon was not always observed, but was never detected in patients with grade 1/2 reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Serum LDH levels may be a predictive marker of hypersensitivity reactions in patients treated with L-OHP. Further extensive examinations with a larger number of patients are needed to establish a patient management strategy.

Risk factors for oxaliplatin-induced hypersensitivity reactions in Japanese patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Previously, we suggested that oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-related grade 3/4 hypersensitivity reactions occurred immediately after the initiation, but grade 1/2 reactions did not. This study was conducted to clarify the risk factors for L-OHP-related hypersensitivity reactions. METHODS: Clinical data from 108 Japanese patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed, who were treated with L-OHP-containing regimens, FOLFOX4 and/or mFOLFOX6. The risk factors examined included demographic data, preexisting allergies, laboratory test data, treatment regimen, treatment line of therapy, pretreatment with steroids, total number of cycles and cumulative amount of L-OHP. RESULTS: The incidence of grade 1/2 and grade 3/4 hypersensitivity reactions were found at 13.0% (14/108) and 9.3% (10/108), respectively. Female (P = 0.037), preexisting allergies (P = 0.004) and lower level of lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.003) were risk factors for grade 1/2 hypersensitivity reactions, and higher neutrophil count (P = 0.043) and lower monocyte count (P = 0.007) were for grade 3/4 reactions. Total number of cycles were larger in the patients with grade 3/4 reactions than those without reactions (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Further extensive examination with a large number of patients is needed to establish a patient management strategy.

Serum cystatin C levels to predict serum concentration of digoxin in Japanese patients.

Cystatin C (Cys-C) has been recently paid great attention as a better endogenous marker of the glomerular filtration rate than creatinine (Cr). In this study, the usefulness of Cys-C was compared with Cr in terms of the estimation of the steady-state serum trough concentrations of digoxin in Japanese patients. Forty patients treated with digoxin and 56 healthy elderly subjects were participated in this study. The serum levels of Cys-C and Cr in the patients were higher than those in the healthy elderly subjects, but the increase of Cys-C was more predominant in the patients. Their levels were well-correlated for both of the healthy elderly subjects (r=0.691) and patients (r=0.774), but the serum concentrations of digoxin were better correlated with those of the reciprocal values of Cr (r=0.667) than those of Cys-C (r=0.383), presumably due to the fact that digoxin and Cr were excreted via both glomerular filtration and tubular secretion. Cys-C is useful for the substratification of the patients diagnosed to have normal renal function with Cr of < 1.3 mg/dL into those with normal and pseudo-normal renal function, resulting in the corresponding serum concentrations of digoxin.

Critical role of angiotensin II in excess salt-induced brain oxidative stress of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detailed role of angiotensin II in salt-exacerbated stroke is unclear. We examined the role of angiotensin II in salt-accelerated stroke of stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP). METHODS: Salt-loaded SHRSP were orally given the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker candesartan (0.3 to 3 mg/kg per day) and calcium channel blocker amlodipine (1 mg/kg per day), and the effects on stroke (n=61) and brain superoxide were compared between them. We also examined the effect of angiotensin II infusion (200 ng/kg per min) on brain superoxide production and blood-brain barrier. RESULTS: Despite the comparable hypotensive effect between candesartan and amlodipine, candesartan prolonged survival of salt-loaded SHRSP much more than amlodipine (P<0.01), being associated with more improvement of cerebral arteriolar thickening, cerebral arteriolar cell proliferation, and hippocampal CA1 neuronal cell reduction (1024.9+/-20.6 versus 724.9+/-22.8 cells/mm2; P<0.01; n=7 to 10 in each group) in SHRSP by candesartan (P<0.05) than amlodipine. Salt loading increased superoxide and NADPH oxidase activity in brain cortex and hippocampus of SHRSP, and this increase was prevented by candesartan (P<0.01) but not amlodipine. Angiotensin II infusion, via AT1 receptor, directly increased brain superoxide by 1.8-fold (P<0.05; n=6 to 7 in each group) and impaired blood-brain barrier in salt-loaded SHRSP by 1.7-fold (P<0.05), and this increase in brain superoxide and blood-brain barrier impairment was prevented by tempol as well as candesartan. CONCLUSIONS: Excess salt, via oxidative stress, accelerates stroke, and angiotensin II, via AT1 receptor, plays a pivotal role in brain superoxide production of SHRSP by excess salt.