ABSTRACT
Subject(s)
Bronchiectasis , Disease Progression , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Bronchiectasis/physiopathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Risk Factors , Glomerular Filtration Rate , AdultSubject(s)
Eczema , Skin , Humans , Eczema/microbiology , Female , Male , Skin/microbiology , Birth Cohort , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Microbiota , Hong KongABSTRACT
Infections with invasive Group A streptococcus can have a wide range of presentations and be life threatening if not diagnosed and managed rapidly. Limb presentations in children can be especially challenging and we present our experience to help manage such cases. There can be multiple foci of infection with seeding to avascular structures. Therefore, we advocate maintaining a high degree of clinical suspicion when assessing this group of patients, who are often critically unwell, and have varying presentation. Early and aggressive surgical intervention may be key for disease control.
ABSTRACT
SETTING: There has been growing recognition on the importance of phenotyping of airway diseases. The eosinophilic phenotype was proposed in bronchiectasis; however, there has not been any evidence on its association with the risk of hospitalised bronchiectasis exacerbations.OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between baseline blood eosinophil count (BEC) and bronchiectasis exacerbations requiring hospitalisation with validation by an independent cohort.DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study.RESULTS: Over a 24-month period, 37/318 (11.6%) study participants experienced an exacerbation requiring hospitalisation. The mean baseline serum eosinophil was 135 ± 92 cells/µL in those who had exacerbations, and 188 ± 161 cells/µL in those who did not. A serum eosinophil level of 250 cells/µL at stable state was the most significant cut-off for predicting hospitalised bronchiectasis exacerbation, which was validated by the independent cohort.CONCLUSIONS: Patients with BEC below 250 cells/µL at stable state are at increased risk of having hospitalised bronchiectasis exacerbations.
Subject(s)
Bronchiectasis , Eosinophils , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Leukocyte Count , HospitalizationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) among older adults in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), and this contributes to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to determine the antibiotic prescribing rate for RTIs among LTCF residents, and to analyse the antibiotic consumption patterns with the AwaRe monitoring tool, developed by the World Health Organization. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from inception to March 2022. Original articles reporting antibiotic use for RTIs in LTCFs were included in this review. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Data. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed to calculate the pooled estimates. Subgroup analysis was conducted by type of RTI, country, and study start year. RESULTS: In total, 47 articles consisting of 50 studies were included. The antibiotic prescribing rate ranged from 21.5% to 100% (pooled estimate 69.8%, 95% confidence interval 55.2-82.6%). The antibiotic prescribing rate for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) was higher than the rates for viral and general RTIs. Compared with Italy, France and the USA, the Netherlands had lower antibiotic use for LRTIs. A proportion of viral RTIs were treated with antibiotics, and all the antibiotics were from the Watch group. Use of antibiotics in the Access group was higher in the Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland and Slovenia compared with the USA and Australia. CONCLUSION: The antibiotic prescribing rate for RTIs in LTCFs was high, and AWaRe antibiotic use patterns varied by type of RTI and country. Improving antibiotic use may require coordination efforts.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Long-Term Care , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Health Facilities , Skilled Nursing FacilitiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Sleep problems are prevalent among the general population and can cause various health problems, which may lead to decreased quality of life. However, little is known about nonrestorative sleep and its implications. This study aimed to examine the association between nonrestorative sleep and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in Chinese adults. METHODS: Data were collected through a cross-sectional study of 500 adults in Hong Kong (66.4% female, average age of 39 years). The Short-Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2), Nonrestorative Sleep Scale (NRSS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, ENRICHD Social Support Instrument, Patient Health Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were administered. Objective sleep parameters were based on participants' sleep condition over 1 week, as measured using an ActiGraph GT9X Link. RESULTS: Mean standardized scores for the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) of the SF-12v2 and the NRSS were 50.33 ± 6.50, 49.00 ± 9.03, and 64.77 ± 12.75, respectively. After adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics, sleep quality, objective sleep parameters, social support, somatic symptoms, stress, anxiety, and depression, NRSS scores were associated with PCS (b = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.18, p < 0.001) and MCS (b = 0.08, 95%CI: 0.02 to 0.15, p = 0.013) scores. Furthermore, associations of NRSS score with PCS as well as MCS scores were stronger in women than in men. CONCLUSION: Nonrestorative sleep is a potentially modifiable risk factor for poor HRQL. Thus, interventions to relieve or decrease nonrestorative sleep could be beneficial for improving HRQL.
Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Sleep Wake Disorders , Adult , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Quality of Life/psychology , Sleep , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in millions of patients infected worldwide and indirectly affecting even more individuals through disruption of daily living. Long-term adverse outcomes have been reported with similar diseases from other coronaviruses, namely Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Emerging evidence suggests that COVID-19 adversely affects different systems in the human body. This review summarizes the current evidence on the short-term adverse health outcomes and assesses the risk of potential long-term adverse outcomes of COVID-19. Major adverse outcomes were found to affect different body systems: immune system (including but not limited to Guillain-Barré syndrome and paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome), respiratory system (lung fibrosis and pulmonary thromboembolism), cardiovascular system (cardiomyopathy and coagulopathy), neurological system (sensory dysfunction and stroke), as well as cutaneous and gastrointestinal manifestations, impaired hepatic and renal function. Mental health in patients with COVID-19 was also found to be adversely affected. The burden of caring for COVID-19 survivors is likely to be huge. Therefore, it is important for policy makers to develop comprehensive strategies in providing resources and capacity in the healthcare system. Future epidemiological studies are needed to further investigate the long-term impact on COVID-19 survivors.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Patient Outcome Assessment , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus/immunology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Humans , Organ Specificity , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Previous research has suggested the essential unidimensionality of the 12-item traditional Chinese version of the Nonrestorative Sleep Scale (NRSS). This study aimed to develop a short form of the traditional Chinese version of the NRSS without compromising its reliability and validity. METHODS: Data were collected from 2 cross-sectional studies with identical target groups of adults residing in Hong Kong. An iterative Wald test was used to assess differential item functioning by gender. Based on the generalized partial credit model, we first obtained a shortened version such that further shortening would result in substantial sacrifice of test information and standard error of measurement. Another shortened version was obtained by the optimal test assembly (OTA). The two shortened versions were compared for test information, Cronbach's alpha, and convergent validity. RESULTS: Data from a total of 404 Chinese adults (60.0% female) who had completed the Chinese NRSS were gathered. All items were invariant by gender. A 6-item version was obtained beyond which the test performance substantially deteriorated, and a 9-item version was obtained by OTA. The 9-item version performed better than the 6-item version in test information and convergent validity. It had discrimination and difficulty indices ranging from 0.44 to 2.23 and - 7.58 to 2.13, respectively, and retained 92% of the test information of the original 12-item version. CONCLUSION: The 9-item Chinese NRSS is a reliable and valid tool to measure nonrestorative sleep for epidemiological studies.
Subject(s)
Psychometrics/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Sleep/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Asian People , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultSubject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Environment , State Medicine , Sustainable Development , HumansABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To conduct a linguistic and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the Nonrestorative Sleep Scale (NRSS). METHODS: The Chinese NRSS was created from a standard forward-backward translation and trialed on 10 Chinese adults. Telephone interviews were then conducted with 100 adults, who completed the Chinese NRSS, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and the Toronto Hospital Alertness Test (THAT). A household survey was conducted with 20 subjects, followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and a bifactor model was developed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the NRSS. RESULTS: The bifactor model had the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), and comparative fit index (CFI) of 0.06, 0.06, and 0.97, respectively. Convergent validity was shown from the moderate associations with PSQI (r = - 0.66, P < 0.01), AIS (r = - 0.65, P < 0.01), CES-D (r = - 0.54, P < 0.01), and THAT (r = 0.68, P < 0.01). The coefficient omega (0.92), omega hierarchical (0.81), factor determinacy (0.93), H value (0.91), explained common variance (0.63), and percentage of uncontaminated correlations (0.80) derived from the bifactor CFA supported the essential unidimensionality of NRSS. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese NRSS is a valid and reliable essential unidimensional tool for the assessment of nonrestorative sleep in the Chinese population.
Subject(s)
Psychometrics/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Sleep Wake Disorders/diagnosis , Asian People , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sleep Wake Disorders/pathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , TranslationsSubject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Pneumococcal Infections/microbiology , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Carrier State/microbiology , Female , Heptavalent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine/therapeutic use , Hong Kong , Humans , Infant , Logistic Models , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Multivariate Analysis , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcus pneumoniae/geneticsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Apart from individual small-scale outbreaks, infections with vancomycin-resistant enterococci are uncommon in Hong Kong. A major outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci, however, occurred at a large tertiary hospital in 2013. We describe the successful control of this outbreak and share the lessons learned. METHODS: In 2013, there was an abnormal increase in the incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci carriage compared with baseline in multiple clinical departments at Queen Elizabeth Hospital. A multipronged approach was adopted that included a 10-week hospital-wide active screening programme, which aimed to identify and isolate hidden vancomycin-resistant enterococci carriers among all in-patients. The identified carriers were completely segregated in designated wards where applicable. Other critical infection control measures included directly observed hand hygiene and environmental hygiene. A transparent and open disclosure approach was adopted throughout the outbreak. RESULTS: The infection control measures were successfully implemented. The active screening of vancomycin-resistant enterococci was conducted between 30 September and 10 November 2013. A total of 7053 rectal swabs were collected from patients in 46 hospital wards from 11 departments. The overall carriage rate of vancomycin-resistant enterococci was 2.8% (201/7053). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed a predominant outbreak clone. We curbed the outbreak and kept the colonisation of vancomycin-resistant enterococci among patients at a pre-upsurge low level. CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest cohesive effort to control spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in Hong Kong. Coupled with other infection control measures, we successfully controlled vancomycin-resistant enterococci to the pre-outbreak level. We have demonstrated that the monumental tasks can be achieved with meticulous planning, and thorough communication and understanding between all stakeholders.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Vancomycin Resistance , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci/isolation & purification , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Disease Outbreaks , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Feces/microbiology , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Hand Disinfection , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Humans , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Isolation , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
Early initiation of antifungal treatment for invasive candidiasis is associated with change in mortality. Beta-D-glucan (BDG) is a fungal cell wall component and a serum diagnostic biomarker of fungal infection. Clinical findings suggested an association between reduced invasive candidiasis incidence in intensive care units (ICUs) and BDG-guided preemptive antifungal therapy. We evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of active BDG surveillance with preemptive antifungal therapy in patients admitted to adult ICUs from the perspective of Hong Kong healthcare providers. A Markov model was designed to simulate the outcomes of active BDG surveillance with preemptive therapy (surveillance group) and no surveillance (standard care group). Candidiasis-associated outcome measures included mortality rate, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) loss, and direct medical cost. Model inputs were derived from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of model results. In base-case analysis, the surveillance group was more costly (1387 USD versus 664 USD) (1 USD = 7.8 HKD), with lower candidiasis-associated mortality rate (0.653 versus 1.426 per 100 ICU admissions) and QALY loss (0.116 versus 0.254) than the standard care group. The incremental cost per QALY saved by the surveillance group was 5239 USD/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses found base-case results to be robust to variations of all model inputs. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the surveillance group was cost-effective in 50 % and 100 % of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of 7200 USD/QALY and ≥27,800 USD/QALY, respectively. Active BDG surveillance with preemptive therapy appears to be highly cost-effective to reduce the candidiasis-associated mortality rate and save QALYs in the ICU setting.