Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Recent Clin Trials ; 14(2): 86-94, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30919783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several risk factors have been empirically linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Some of them are therapeutically amenable to modification; while others are not. Modifiable risk factors include physical inactivity, tobacco use, diet, "bad fats" in the blood, hypertension, and being overweight; while non-modifiable risk factors include the patient's family history, the presence versus absence of diabetes mellitus, and demographic characteristics like age, gender, ethnicity, and socio-economic status. METHODS: In this article, we review those risk factors that are both clinically important and amenable to change. CONCLUSION: To prevent cardiovascular disease, it is important to minimize modifiable risk factors, like LDL cholesterol.


Subject(s)
Myocardial Ischemia/etiology , Myocardial Ischemia/prevention & control , Humans , Risk Factors
2.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 83(6): 898-904, 2014 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23703842

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effects of postdilatation of drug-eluting stents (DES). BACKGROUND: Subotpimal stent expansion occurs after DES deployment. Postidlatation may improve DES expansion, but it is unclear whether postdilatation may also improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: Since July 2009, we adopted a strategy of routine postdilatation with noncompliant balloons of all DES, while previously postdilatation was performed only for suboptimal results. The first 279 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 9 years, 231 men) who underwent routine postilatation were compared with 262 patients (age 61 ± 9 years, 220 men) who received DES in the previous 6 months (standard treatment). RESULTS: The two groups were similar for age, sex, clinical presentation, and main risk factors, including incidence of diabetes. Routine postdilatation resulted in an improved minimal lumen diameter at the end of the procedure (2.60 ± 0.34 vs. 2.51 ± 0.37 mm, P = 0.003). At 12-month follow-up incidence of MACE (including periprocedural myocardial infarction) was 19.5% in the standard treatment group and 12.5% in routine postdilatation group (P = 0.04), with a significant difference in target vessel revascularization (10.7% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.03), while incidence of myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the two groups (10.7% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.70). Stent thrombosis (definite or probable) occurred in 3 patients in standard treatment group, while no case of stent thrombosis occurred among patients treated with routine postdilatation (1.1% vs. 0%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a strategy of routine postdilatation with non compliant balloons may improve clinical outcomes of DES.


Subject(s)
Coronary Restenosis/therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Aged , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Restenosis/diagnosis , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 75(6): 936-42, 2010 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20146326

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Use of triple therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel, and anticoagulants significantly increases bleeding, thus drug eluting stents (DES) are usually avoided in patients requiring anticoagulation. We tested use of DES vs. BMS using a long-term therapy with clopidogrel only and anticoagulants in this group of patients. METHODS: We enrolled 165 consecutive patients, 79 receiving DES (age 67 +/- 9 years, 84% with atrial fibrillation) and 86 receiving bare metal stents (BMS) (age 70 +/- 11 years, 71% with atrial fibrillation). All patients received aspirin + clopidogrel + oral anticoagulants for 4 weeks, then aspirin was stopped and clopidogrel was continued during the 12-month follow-up. Primary end point was the combined incidence of major adverse coronary events and major bleedings. RESULTS: Incidence of the primary endpoint was 10.1% in patients with DES and 26.7% in patients with BMS (P = 0.01). There was a large difference in incidence of target vessel revascularization (8.1% for DES, 23.3% for BMS, P = 0.01), whereas incidence of myocardial infarction (3.8% in DES vs. 8.1% in BMS) and major bleeding (1.3% vs. 2.3%, respectively) were not significantly different. There were no cases of stent thrombosis. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the only factor associated with a reduced risk of the primary endpoint was use of DES (hazard ratio 0.35 with 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.85, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Results of our cohort study suggest that use of DES associated with a treatment with clopidogrel only may be safe and significantly reduce the need for new revascularization in patients requiring chronic anticoagulation.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Ticlopidine/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Clopidogrel , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Ticlopidine/administration & dosage
6.
Ital Heart J ; 5(7): 548-50, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15487274

ABSTRACT

Subclavian artery stenosis or occlusion may be a cause of myocardial ischemia in patients treated using an internal mammary artery graft. Subclavian stenosis may cause myocardial ischemia during arm exercise by a coronary-subclavian steal phenomenon, with flow inversion in the graft from the coronary tree to the left subclavian artery. We here describe a case of a patient developing left subclavian occlusion after coronary artery bypass grafting with the left internal mammary artery. The lesion was successfully treated with a carotid-subclavian bypass. The article underscores the importance of an early diagnosis (possibly before bypass surgery) and discusses possible treatments. Percutaneous interventions with stent implantation appear the treatment of choice, but surgery has an important role in case of total occlusion.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Subclavian Steal Syndrome/etiology , Subclavian Steal Syndrome/surgery , Angina Pectoris/etiology , Angina Pectoris/physiopathology , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Disease/surgery , Exercise , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis/adverse effects , Internal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis/methods , Middle Aged , Reoperation/methods , Risk Assessment , Subclavian Steal Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL