Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943444

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of preoperative chemoprophylaxis (PEC) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients undergoing oncologic procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic center. METHODS: HNC patients with Caprini risk score (CRS) ≥5 who underwent inpatient surgery ≥3 hours between 2015 and 2020 were included. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, PEC and control, based on whether or not they received a single dose of low molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was the 30-day rate of major bleeding events. RESULTS: A total of 539 patients were included; 427 patients received PEC prior to surgery. The rate of major bleeding was 6.7%. The PEC cohort was more likely to have received concurrent aspirin or ketorolac (225 of 427 patients vs 36 of 112 patients; P = .0002), greater duration of chemoprophylaxis (7.8 vs 5.0 days; P < .0001), have higher CRS (7.2 vs 6.6; P < .0001), longer operative times (596 vs 512 minutes; P < .0001), higher blood loss (265 vs 214 ml; P = .02), and higher bleeding rates when compared to the control (34 of 427 patients; P = .03). On multivariate analysis, only PEC was associated with bleeding (odds ratio, 8.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-66.5). The rate of VTE was 1.3% and was not significantly different between cohorts. CONCLUSION: PEC was associated with an increase in bleeding and did not result in lower rates of VTE in patients with HNC. This study highlights the need to determine the optimal regimen of chemoprophylaxis in this patient cohort.

3.
Laryngoscope ; 132(10): 2036-2043, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882792

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the timing of acoustic hearing changes among hearing preservation Cochlear implant (CI) recipients. To determine differences in hearing outcomes based on device type and demographic factors. To determine if there is a relationship between the extent of early hearing loss after CI and the subsequent rate of continued hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single subject study. METHODS: Two hundred and eleven subjects who received a hearing preservation CI were included in the study-80 Nucleus Hybrid L24 (Cochlear), 47 422/522 (Cochlear), 24 S8 (Cochlear), 14 S12 (Cochlear), 6 SRW (Cochlear), 21 SLIM J (Advanced Bionics), and 19 Flex (Med-EL). Of these, 127 were included in the subsequent analyses. Audiometric thresholds (low frequency pure-tone-averages) were collected and compared pre and postoperatively. RESULTS: Long-term hearing preservation rates were 65% (52/80) for L24, 83% (20/24) for S8, 79% (11/14) for S12, 83% (5/6) for SRW, 54% (25/47) for 422/522, 91% (21/23) for SLIM J, and 84% (16/19) for Flex. Hearing loss was not related to device type (P = .9105) or gender (P = .2169). Older subjects (age ≥65) had worse hearing outcomes than younger subjects after initial device activation (age <65, P = .0262). There was no significant difference in rate of hearing loss over time between older and younger patients (P = .0938). Initial postoperative hearing loss was not associated with the rate of long-term hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term low frequency hearing preservation is possible for CI recipients and is not associated with gender or device type. Rate of hearing loss over time is not dependent on patient age. Early hearing loss after CI does not predict the rate of long-term hearing loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:2036-2043, 2022.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Hearing Loss , Speech Perception , Acoustics , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Deafness/surgery , Hearing , Hearing Loss/surgery , Humans , Prospective Studies , Speech Perception/physiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(3): 314-318, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32772562

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Petrous apicitis (PA) is a serious infection involving the apical portion of the petrous temporal bone. The classic triad of purulent otorrhea, ipsilateral abducens nerve palsy and retroorbital pain is rarely seen due to early detection and widespread use of antibiotics. Medical management is the primary treatment modality with surgery reserved for cases of recalcitrant petrous apex abscess. METHODS AND RESULTS: We presented a case of PA with previously untreated otitis media. After multidisciplinary evaluation, the patient was initially treated with intravenous antibiotics followed by drainage of the abscess using a combined transmastoid and middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach. The patient recovered well with no recurrence of the infection based on imaging and symptoms. DISCUSSION: While a variety of different surgical approaches can be used in treatment of PA, we recommend the MCF approach in cases where access to the anterior petrous apex may be challenging via transcanal or transmastoid approach.


Subject(s)
Abscess/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cerebral Ventriculitis/therapy , Drainage/methods , Mastoidectomy/methods , Mastoiditis/therapy , Meningitis/therapy , Otitis Media, Suppurative/therapy , Petrositis/therapy , Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Ventriculitis/diagnosis , Cerebral Ventriculitis/etiology , Confusion/etiology , Cranial Fossa, Middle , Earache , Humans , Male , Mastoiditis/diagnostic imaging , Meningitis/diagnosis , Meningitis/etiology , Middle Aged , Otitis Media, Suppurative/diagnostic imaging , Petrositis/diagnostic imaging , Photophobia/etiology , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...