How Physician Self-Perceptions Affect the Impact of Peer Comparison Feedback on Opioid Prescribing.

Peer comparison feedback is a promising strategy for reducing opioid prescribing and opioid-related harms. Such comparisons may be particularly impactful among underestimating clinicians who do not perceive themselves as high prescribers relative to their peers. But peer comparisons could also unintentionally increase prescribing among overestimating clinicians who do not perceive themselves as lower prescribers than peers. The objective of this study was to assess if the impact of peer comparisons varied by clinicians' preexisting opioid prescribing self-perceptions. Subgroup analysis of a randomized trial of peer comparison interventions among emergency department and urgent care clinicians was used. Generalized mixed-effects models were used to assess whether the impact of peer comparisons, alone or combined with individual feedback, varied by underestimating or overestimating prescriber status. Underestimating and overestimating prescribers were defined as those who self-reported relative prescribing amounts that were lower and higher, respectively, than actual relative baseline amounts. The primary outcome was pills per opioid prescription. Among 438 clinicians, 54% (n = 236) provided baseline prescribing self-perceptions and were included in this analysis. Overall, 17% (n = 40) were underestimating prescribers whereas 5% (n = 11) were overestimating prescribers. Underestimating prescribers exhibited a differentially greater decrease in pills per prescription compared to nonunderestimating clinicians when receiving peer comparison feedback (1.7 pills, 95% CI, -3.2 to -0.2 pills) or combined peer and individual feedback (2.8 pills, 95% CI, -4.8 to -0.8 pills). In contrast, there were no differential changes in pills per prescription for overestimating versus nonoverestimating prescribers after receiving peer comparison (1.5 pills, 95% CI, -0.9 to 3.9 pills) or combined peer and individual feedback (3.0 pills, 95% CI, -0.3 to 6.2 pills). Peer comparisons were more impactful among clinicians who underestimated their prescribing compared to peers. By correcting inaccurate self-perceptions, peer comparison feedback can be an effective strategy for influencing opioid prescribing.

The Effect Of Clinician Feedback Interventions On Opioid Prescribing.

An initial opioid prescription with a greater number of pills is associated with a greater risk for future long-term opioid use, yet few interventions have reliably influenced individual clinicians' prescribing. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of feedback interventions for clinicians in reducing opioid prescribing. The interventions included feedback on a clinician's outlier prescribing (individual audit feedback), peer comparison, and both interventions combined. We conducted a four-arm factorial pragmatic cluster randomized trial at forty-eight emergency department (ED) and urgent care (UC) sites in the western US, including 263 ED and 175 UC clinicians with 294,962 patient encounters. Relative to usual care, there was a significant decrease in pills per prescription both for peer comparison feedback (-0.8) and for the combination of peer comparison and individual audit feedback (-1.2). This decrease was sustained during follow-up. There were no significant changes for individual audit feedback alone, and no interventions changed the proportion of encounters with an opioid prescription.

Sympathetic-independent bradykinin mechanical hyperalgesia induced by subdiaphragmatic vagotomy in the rat.

Bradykinin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia is sympathetically dependent and B(2)-type bradykinin receptor-mediated in the rat; however, a sympathetically independent component of bradykinin hyperalgesia is shown after subdiaphragmatic vagotomy. We evaluated the mechanism of this bradykinin-induced sympathetic-independent mechanical hyperalgesia. The dose-response curve for bradykinin mechanical hyperalgesia in sympathectomized plus vagotomized rats was similar in magnitude to that for sympathetically dependent bradykinin hyperalgesia in normal rats. Although bradykinin mechanical hyperalgesia was mediated by the B(2)-type bradykinin receptors after sympathectomy plus vagotomy, it had a much more rapid latency to onset. This hyperalgesia was significantly attenuated by inhibition of protein kinase A but not protein kinase C, similar to the hyperalgesia produced by prostaglandin E(2), an agent that directly sensitizes primary afferent nociceptors. However, unlike prostaglandin E(2)-induced mechanical hyperalgesia in normal rats, after sympathectomy plus vagotomy, bradykinin-induced hyperalgesia was not attenuated by inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis. Peripheral administration of a mu opioid agonist, [D-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin, significantly attenuated bradykinin mechanical hyperalgesia after sympathectomy plus vagotomy. These data suggest that after sympathectomy plus subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, bradykinin acts directly on primary afferents to produce mechanical hyperalgesia via a novel protein kinase A-dependent signaling mechanism.