ABSTRACT
With growing awareness of the environmental, economic, and social costs associated with food waste, there is a concerted effort on multiple scales to recover the nutrient value of discarded food. These developments are positive, but the rapid movement toward alternatives and the complexity of solving problems located at the intersection of economic, social, and environmental systems also have the potential to produce unanticipated risks. This paper draws upon long-term stakeholder-engaged research throughout New England, with a focus on Maine, to develop a transdisciplinary, systems-based model of the potential social, economic, and environmental risks of food waste nutrient cycling. Our effort is intended to help inform the creation of safe, functional, and environmentally benign circular food systems.
ABSTRACT
Food waste recycling is needed to create a more sustainable, circular food system; however, the process must be carefully managed to avoid the introduction and build-up of contaminants. We collected and screened source-separated food waste for five classes of contaminants (physical contaminants, heavy metals, halogenated organics, pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes) from two regulatory environments (voluntary vs mandated food separation) to quantify contamination. Physical contamination was frequently found; 57% of samples contained non-compostable waste. Most heavy metals were not detected, and although copper and zinc were present in most samples, they were always below the most stringent global standards for compost. Some samples had detectable halogenated organics, including perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which is cause for concern because some of these accumulate in the food chain. PFBA was detected in 60%, PFHxS in 8% and PFNA in 4% of samples tested. The pathogen Salmonella was present in 3% (2/71) and L. monocytogenes in 11% (8/71) of samples. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli was not detected. Next generation sequencing showed the presence of several genera that contain foodborne pathogens, most commonly Yersinia. Antibiotic resistance genes tet(M) and blaTEM were present in 96% and 97% of samples respectively, however the last-resort colistin resistance gene mcr-1 was not detected. Overall contamination in our source-separated samples was low, with the exception of some antibiotic resistance genes, however our processing method might have underestimated packaging-associated contamination. Regulatory environment did not affect contamination, but carbon, nitrogen phosphorus, calcium, copper, tet (M), and physical contamination varied by source type.
Subject(s)
Metals, Heavy , Refuse Disposal , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Copper , Food , Food Contamination , SalmonellaABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused dramatic and unprecedented impacts on both global health and economies. Many governments are now proposing recovery packages to get back to normal, but the 2019 Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Global Assessment indicated that business as usual has created widespread ecosystem degradation. Therefore, a post-COVID world needs to tackle the economic drivers that create ecological disruptions. In this perspective, we discuss a number of tools across a range of actors for both short-term stimulus measures and longer-term revamping of global, national, and local economies that take biodiversity into account. These include measures to shift away from activities that damage biodiversity and toward those supporting ecosystem resilience, including through incentives, regulations, fiscal policy, and employment programs. By treating the crisis as an opportunity to reset the global economy, we have a chance to reverse decades of biodiversity and ecosystem losses.