The BTA stat test: a tumor marker for the detection of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To conduct a prospective evaluation to determine the utility of the BTA stat test in the detection of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (UTTCC). Monitoring for UTTCC currently relies on invasive procedures such as upper tract imaging, ureteral washing cytology (UWC) and/or ureteroscopy, or voided urine cytology (VUC). The BTA stat test is a sensitive qualitative immunoassay that detects human complement factor H-related protein in voided urine. METHODS: A total of 81 patients participated, 27 with histopathologically confirmed UTTCC, 26 with upper tract calculi, and 28 with microscopic hematuria but no evidence of urologic disease. Voided specimens collected before surgery or treatment were tested with the BTA stat test and VUC. UWC was performed in specimens collected by a ureteral catheter. RESULTS: The BTA stat test was significantly more sensitive and specific than VUC or UWC. The overall sensitivity for each was 82%, 11%, and 48%; the specificity was 89%, 54%, and 33%. The positive predictive value for the BTA stat test was 79% and the negative predictive value was 91%, both the highest of the three tests. CONCLUSIONS: The BTA stat test was superior to VUC and UWC in the detection of UTTCC. These results may support the adoption of a less aggressive follow-up policy when monitoring for UTTCC when the BTA stat result is negative. If cystoscopy is negative and the BTA stat test is positive, upper tract investigations should be expedited and, if the bladder is in place, bladder biopsies performed.

The relationship between serial measurements of the level of a bladder tumor associated antigen and the potential for recurrence.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the relationship between a serially assessed quantitative diagnostic marker (QDM) and the hazard function for the diagnosis of recurrence of bladder cancer. The marker is based on a bladder tumor associated antigen (BTA TRAK) assay. We present a rigorous approach to the evaluation of diagnostic markers to be used for recurrence monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Archival voided urine samples serially collected from 187 patients with a prior diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder were measured for BTA TRAK, an assay performed in clinical laboratories. All patients had been treated for stage Ta or T1 transitional cell carcinoma and were undergoing periodic assessments for recurrence. The results from the QDM were not used in case management. Time to histologically confirmed recurrence of transitional cell carcinoma was modeled using proportional hazard regression with the serial measurements of QDM levels and other variables as covariates. QDM levels are in the model as a time dependent covariate on the base 10 logarithmic scale. RESULTS: The estimated hazard ratio for QDM level indicated a 60% increase in the hazard for the diagnosis of recurrence for each 10-fold increment in the marker level (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant relationship between the serially assessed QDM levels and the hazard for the diagnosis of recurrence has been established but the definition of optimum strategies for use of this relationship in clinical practice will require further study. Meanwhile, a prudent action based on the statistical relationship would be to shorten surveillance intervals for patients with high QDM levels.

Clinical evaluation of the BTA TRAK assay and comparison to voided urine cytology and the Bard BTA test in patients with recurrent bladder tumors. The Multi Center Study Group.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical performance of the BTA TRAK assay and to compare it with that of voided urine cytology (VUC) and the Bard BTA test (BTA) in the detection of recurrent bladder cancer (BC). METHODS: The study was performed on randomly selected archival voided urine samples for many of which VUC and/or BTA information was available. Sensitivity was determined in samples from patients with histologically confirmed recurrent BC. Specificity was determined in samples from healthy volunteers, patients with three categories of current medical conditions, and patients with a history of BC but no current evidence of disease. RESULTS: The TRAK assay was positive in 156 of 216 samples for patients diagnosed with BC, for an overall sensitivity of 72%. Mean values increased with progressing grade and stage of disease. In the comparison between TRAK and VUC, the overall sensitivities were 68% and 25%, respectively (P < 0.001). For Stages Ta and T1 and for all tumor grades, the sensitivity of the TRAK assay was significantly greater than that of VUC (P < 0.001). TRAK sensitivity was also significantly better than that of BTA (73% versus 58%, P = 0.005). The specificity of the TRAK assay ranged from 75% in samples from patients with genitourinary disease to 97% in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The TRAK assay is superior to VUC and the original BTA test in the detection of BC. The results of the study indicate that the TRAK assay may be a useful adjunct to cystoscopy in the management of patients with recurrent BC.