Phase I Study of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Combined with R-CVP for Relapsed/Refractory CD22+ B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of inotuzumab ozogamicin, an anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, in combination with the immunochemotherapeutic regimen, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP), in patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In part 1 (n = 16), patients received inotuzumab ozogamicin plus R-CVP on a 21-day cycle with escalating doses of cyclophosphamide first then inotuzumab ozogamicin. Part 2 (n = 10) confirmed the safety and tolerability of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), which required a dose-limiting toxicity rate of <33% in cycle 1 and <33% of patients discontinuing before cycle 3 due to treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Part 3 (n = 22) evaluated the preliminary efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus R-CVP. RESULTS: The MTD was determined to be standard-dose R-CVP plus inotuzumab ozogamicin 0.8 mg/m2 The most common treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs in the MTD cohort (n = 38) were hematologic: neutropenia (74%), thrombocytopenia (50%), lymphopenia (42%), and leukopenia (47%). Among the 48 patients treated in the study, 13 discontinued due to AEs, most commonly thrombocytopenia (n = 10). Overall, 13 patients died, including one death due to treatment-related pneumonia secondary to neutropenia. Among patients receiving the MTD (n = 38), the overall response rate (ORR) was 84% (n = 32), including 24% (n = 9) with complete response; the ORR was 100% for patients with indolent lymphoma (n = 27) and 57% for those with aggressive histology lymphoma (n = 21). CONCLUSIONS: Inotuzumab ozogamicin at 0.8 mg/m2 plus full dose R-CVP was associated with manageable toxicities and demonstrated a high rate of response in patients with relapsed/refractory CD22+ B-cell NHL. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01055496). Clin Cancer Res; 22(19); 4807-16. ©2016 AACR.

A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Drug Safety Among East Asian Populations.

Global clinical studies conducted in various countries and regions are increasing. Race and extrinsic ethnic factors are key covariates that may affect the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of the drug. Genetic similarity among East Asian populations has been confirmed; thus, PK, efficacy, and safety in these populations are expected to be similar, but this has not been confirmed. This study presents a comparison of PK and safety among East Asians from clinical studies sponsored by Pfizer. Four compounds with different characteristics, including mechanism of actions and PK profiles, were selected, and retrospective PK and safety comparisons in East Asians were conducted. No distinct differences were observed in PK and safety across the 4 compounds. These results are consistent with previous reports on PK comparisons and meet the expectations based on genetic similarity among East Asians. Extrapolation of these findings to other compounds should be done with caution, but these results should support the consideration of mutual use of clinical data among East Asian countries.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of PF-04360365 following a single-dose intravenous infusion in Japanese subjects with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study.

OBJECTIVE: PF-04360365 is a humanized IgG(2)Δa anti-amyloid ß (Aß) antibody designed to improve outcome in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Single doses of 0.1 - 10 mg/kg were safe and well tolerated in Western (mostly Caucasian) subjects with mild-to-moderate AD. This Phase 1, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation study was the first to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of PF-04360365 in Japanese subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 30 subjects with mild-to-moderate AD were enrolled. In each cohort, 3 subjects received PF-04360365 (0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg) and 1 subject received placebo as a single 2-hour intravenous infusion. Subjects were monitored as inpatients for 24 hours and then as outpatients for 1 year. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. There were no serious or National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 3 adverse events, hypersensitivity reactions, or antidrug antibodies. No clinical or MRI evidence of brain microhemorrhage, cerebral edema, or encephalitis was observed. PF-04360365 plasma concentrations increased with dose, and pharmacokinetics were consistent with a small steady-state volume of distribution, slow clearance, and long elimination half-life. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF):plasma ratios were < 0.5%. Plasma Aß species showed dose-dependent increases in C(max) and AUC(∞), but CSF biomarkers did not differ clearly between treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: PF-04360365 was safe and well tolerated in Japanese subjects. Pharmacokinetics and plasma pharmacodynamic responses in Japanese subjects were comparable to those in Western subjects. *No longer affiliated with Pfizer.

Phase I study of anti-CD22 immunoconjugate inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544), a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to the potent cytotoxic antibiotic calicheamicin, targets the CD22 antigen expressed on the majority of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. This phase I study assessed the tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin administered intravenously in combination with rituximab in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ten patients were administered rituximab 375 mg/m(2) followed by inotuzumab ozogamicin at the maximum tolerated dose (1.8 mg/m(2)). Treatment was repeated every 28 days up to eight cycles, or until occurrence of disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The safety profile was similar to that of inotuzumab ozogamicin monotherapy, with hematologic adverse events occurring most frequently. The most common grade three or higher adverse events were thrombocytopenia (70%), neutropenia (50%), leukopenia (30%), and lymphopenia (30%). The overall response rate was 80% (8/10; 95% CI, 44-98%). Drug exposure increased with successive doses, similar to the pharmacokinetic profiles observed in previous phase I monotherapy studies. Efficacy results suggested promising antitumor activity, and the overall findings support the continued clinical development of this therapeutic regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00724971.

Analysis of the success rates of new drug development in Japan and the lag behind the US.

OBJECTIVES: The launch delay of new drugs has been a major public concern in Japan. Although it is recognized that the delay results from industrial R&D behaviors and regulatory conditions in the global market, the specific mechanisms underlying the significant delay have been unexplained. This study analyzed the association between the success rates of clinical development programs of new molecular entities in Japan and the development lag behind the US and provides clues for policy planning. METHODS: The association between the success rates of clinical development and the development time lag between Japan and the US was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: The phase II transition success rates in Japan were positively associated with the lags behind US development. Cox regression analysis results of phase III success rates were similar to phase II success rate results but were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The advantageous effect of lags on development success in the latter country (i.e., Japan) appears to explain the persistent delays in development and launch. The government's countermeasures to reduce the access gap of new drugs must consider this mechanism and the influence on both the industry and the target population.

Efficacy and tolerability of varenicline, an alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, in a 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-response study with 40-week follow-up for smoking cessation in Japanese smokers.

BACKGROUND: Varenicline, a selective alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, has been developed specifically for smoking cessation. In Japan, 39.3% of men smoke and this is a major public health concern. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and dose-response relationship of varenicline in Japanese smokers. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study, subjects were randomized to receive varenicline at 0.25 mg BID, 0.5 mg BID, 1 mg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks followed by a 40-week, nontreatment follow-up phase. The primary efficacy variable was the continuous abstinence rate (CAR), defined as no reported smoking (not even a puff) or other nicotine use and confirmed by end-expiratory carbon monoxide level or=5 on the Tobacco Dependence Screener), and constituted the primary analysis group. Of these, 385 (74.8%) subjects were male, and the mean age was within the range of 39.0 to 40.2 years. Across treatment groups, subjects claimed to have smoked a mean of 23.1 to 24.9 cigarettes per day in the preceding 30 days, and the mean score on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence was within the range from 5.4 to 5.7. The CAR for weeks 9-12 was significantly higher for all doses of varenicline compared with placebo (39.5% [51/129]). The highest CAR of 65.4% (85/130) was achieved with varenicline 1 mg BID (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI] = 2.98 [1.78-4.99]; P < 0.001). The CAR for weeks 9-52 was significantly greater for varenicline 1 mg BID than placebo (34.6% [45/130] vs 23.3% [30/129]; OR [95% CI] = 1.81 [1.04-3.17]; P = 0.036). The CARs for weeks 9-24 at 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg BID were 33.6% (43/128), 35.2% (45/128), 37.7% (49/130), and for weeks 9-52 at 0.25 and 0.5 mg BID were 27.3% (35/128) and 28.9% (37/128) but failed to reach significance versus the placebo (29.5% [38/129] for weeks 9-24 and 23.3% [30/129] for weeks 9-52). Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were more prevalent among varenicline-treated subjects (79.1% [121/153] at 0.25 mg BID, 80.6% [125/155] at 0.5 mg BID, and 80.1% [125/156] at 1 mg BID) than placebo subjects (71.4% [110/154]). The 3 most prevalent AEs at varenicline 1 mg BID were nasopharyngitis (35.9% [56/156]), nausea (24.4% [38/156]), and headache (10.3% [16/156]), all of which were of mild or moderate intensity. Nausea was the only AE that appeared dose related (7.2% [11/153] at 0.25 mg BID, 9.7% [15/155] at 0.5 mg BID, and 24.4% [38/156] at 1 mg BID) versus placebo (7.8% [12/154]). CONCLUSIONS: Varenicline was associated with dose-dependent improvement in smoking abstinence rates during the last 4 weeks of treatment and in the longer term over 40 weeks of nontreatment follow-up. The dose associated with the highest efficacy was varenicline 1 mg BID.