Albumin-Globulin Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients who Received Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) is a useful biomarker for predicting postoperative complications and a poor prognosis in patients with various types of cancer and can be evaluated without invasive testing or surgery. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the AGR in predicting the short- and long-term prognoses of patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical resection at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis in which eligible patients were selected from the medical records of patients who underwent radical resection for gastric cancer at Yokohama City University from 2000 to 2020 and their medical records were reviewed. A total of 240 patients with gastric cancer were classified into high-AGR (>1.57) and low-AGR (≤1.57) groups and their overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and postoperative complication rates were compared. RESULTS: Of the total 240 patients, 87 were classified into the high AGR group and 153 were classified into the low AGR group; the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent (34.4% vs. 39.2%, p=0.491). The long-term findings showed that the 5-year OS and RFS rates were significantly better in the high AGR group [84.0% vs. 64.8% (p=0.005), 80.0% vs. 61.9% (p=0.015), respectively]. CONCLUSION: Preoperative low AGR is a risk factor for OS and DFS in patients with gastric cancer who undergo surgery. The AGR may be a useful biomarker that can be applied as a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.

Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Prognosis in Postoperative Patients With Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been reported as an immunonutritional index that can easily evaluate nutritional status and immunocompetence from blood tests. The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of PNI as a prognostic factor in postoperative gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 258 patients with pStage I-III gastric cancer who underwent radical resection at Yokohama City University Hospital, from 2015 to 2021. To examine the association with prognosis, we analyzed clinicopathological factors including PNI (<47/≥47), age (<75/≥75), sex (male/female), depth (pT1/≥pT2), lymph node metastasis (pN+/pN-), lymphatic invasion (ly+/ly-), vascular invasion (v+/v-), histological type (enteric/spread) and postoperative complications. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, PNI (p<0.001), depth of tumor invasion (p<0.001), lymph node involvement (p<0.001), age (p=0.002), lymphatic invasion (p<0.001), vascular invasion (p<0.001), and postoperative complications (p=0.003) were associated with overall survival. In multivariate analysis, PNI (HR=2.100, 95% confidence interval 1.225-3.601, p=0.007), tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, and postoperative complications were shown as poor prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: PNI is an independent prognostic factor for overall and recurrence-free survival in postoperative gastric cancer patients. PNI could be implemented in clinical practice to identify patients at higher risk for poor outcomes.

Characteristics of tumor thrombosis in the inferior mesenteric vein from colorectal cancer: A report of three cases and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous tumor thrombosis is a rare condition in colorectal cancer and shows a locally aggressive biological behavior. We herein report three cases of colorectal cancer with tumor thrombosis in the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) treated by colorectal resection combined with resection of the IMV under laparoscopic surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: In these three colorectal cancer patients with IMV tumor thrombus, IMV tumor thrombus was detected in all instances on preoperative computed tomography. Preoperative chemotherapy was also performed in one patient with concurrent liver metastasis. All patients underwent laparoscopic locally R0 resection; however, the pathological findings showed a positive margin for IMV resection in all patients. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: We reviewed 19 previously reported cases along with our 3 present cases and clarified the characteristics of colorectal cancer accompanied by IMV tumor thrombosis. IMV tumor thrombosis may be a risk factor for liver metastasis and R1 resection, and systemic treatment, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), may be quite important. CONCLUSION: IMV tumor thrombosis may have a tendency to cause hematogenous metastasis. Systemic therapy, including NAC, may be useful, but since this is a rare condition, the accumulation of further cases is needed.

Prognostic Value of the Perioperative Systemic Inflammation Score for Patients With Curatively Resected Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The systemic inflammation score (SIS) is a promising tool for the evaluation of prognosis. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the preoperative SIS status in gastric cancer (GC) patients who underwent curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 258 patients with primary gastric cancer who received curative treatment at Yokohama City University. The SIS was evaluated before surgery as determined by the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (cut-off value=4.44) and serum albumin level (cut-off value=4.0 g/dl). RESULTS: A high SIS was identified as an independent predictor of overall survival [hazard ratio (HR)=1.784, p<0.05] and multivariate analysis showed marginal significance for recurrence-free survival (HR=1.710, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The preoperative SIS score was correlated with both the OS and RFS of GC patients, as well as the clinical course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Thus, the SIS score is a promising prognostic factor for GC.

The Clinical Impact of Other Primary Cancer in Patients Who Received Curative Treatment for Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The present study evaluated the clinical impact of other metachronous or synchronous primary cancer (OPC) in patients who received curative treatment for esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study included 168 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2018. Prognosis and differences between the OPC status (metachronous/synchronous) and clinic pathological parameters was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients were included in this study. Forty patients were diagnosed with metachronous/synchronous OPC. When comparing the clinicopathological factors between the patients with and without OPC, the patients' background and postoperative clinical courses were very similar between the two groups. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with esophageal cancer with OPC were 66.0% and 54.5%, respectively, while those in patients without OPC were 50.1% and 41.4%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in these rates (p=0.156). The OPC status was not included in the final multivariate analysis model. CONCLUSION: The OPC status was not found to be a prognostic factor for patients who received curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Therefore, it is not necessary to avoid performing curative treatment for esophageal cancer because of a patient's OPC status.

The Albumin-Bilirubin Score Is a Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score is a promising tool for the evaluation of the perioperative hepatic function. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the preoperative ALBI status in patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study included 244 patients who underwent curative treatment for GC between 2005 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. RESULTS: Based on the 3- and 5-year OS rates, we set the cut-off value for the ALBI score at -2.7849. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 87.3% and 80.9%, respectively, in the ALBI-low group, and 66.9% and 60.6% in the ALBI-high group; these differences were statistically significant (p<0.001). The ALBI score was included in the final multivariate analysis model [Hazard ratio (HR)=2.120, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.177-3.818, p=0.012]. Similar results were observed for RFS. In addition, the ALBI score correlated with the introduction of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The preoperative ALBI score correlated with both the OS and RFS of GC patients as well as the clinical course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Taken together, the ALBI score is a promising prognostic factor for GC.

Clinical Impact of Platelet-to-albumin Ratio on Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Perioperative nutrition and inflammation affect the oncological outcomes of various malignancies. We evaluated the clinical impact of the preoperative platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR) in resectable esophageal cancer patients who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 168 patients who underwent curative surgery followed by perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. RESULTS: Based on the 3- and 5-year OS rates, we set the cut-off value for the PAR at 80×103 in the present study. Among 168 patients, 134 (79.8%) were defined as the PAR-low and 34 (20.2%) as the PAR-high group. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 60.2% and 51.7% in the PAR-low group and 30.2% and 18.9% in the PAR-high group, respectively. There were significant differences in OS (p=0.005). The PAR was therefore selected for the final multivariate analysis model [hazard ratio=1.997, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.230-3.241, p=0.037]. On comparing the perioperative clinical course between the PAR-high and PAR-low groups, there were marginally significant differences in the postoperative surgical complications and intraoperative blood loss between the groups. CONCLUSION: The PAR had clinical influence on the long-term oncological outcomes of esophageal cancer patients and might thus be a promising prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients.

The Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative systemic inflammation affects the long-term oncological outcomes of patients with malignancies. We evaluated the clinical impact of the preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in patients with resectable esophageal cancer who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 168 patients who underwent curative surgery followed by perioperative adjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2018. The risk factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. RESULTS: Based on the 3- and 5-year OS rates, we set the cut-off value of the PLR at 150 in the present study. Among 168 patients, 78 patients (46.4%) were categorized into the PLR-low group and 90 patients (53.6%) were categorized into the PLR-high group. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 64.4% and 53.8%, respectively, in the PLR-low group, and 46.9% and 38.1% in the PLR-high group; the difference in OS was significant (p=0.046). PLR was therefore selected for the final multivariate analysis model (hazard ratio=1.553, 95% confidence interval=1.026-2.350, p=0.037). When the perioperative clinical course was compared between the two groups, the incidence of grade 2 or more anastomotic leakage after surgery was significantly lower in the PLR-low group at 26.9% compared to 43.3% in the PLR-high group (p=0.027). CONCLUSION: The PLR had a clinical impact on the long-term oncological outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer treated with curative intent. Therefore, the PLR might be a promising prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer.