Clinical Significance of Albumin-Bilirubin Grade in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score evaluates liver dysfunction severity. However, this score had prognostic effects in patients with hepatocellular, pancreatic, and gastric carcinomas. We aimed to assess the predictive value of the ALBI score in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). METHODS: Data from 154 patients with ESCC who consecutively underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and subtotal esophagectomy were retrospectively investigated. The ALBI score was calculated as pre-NAC ALBI and categorized into grades 1, 2a, 2b, and 3; low-ALBI group (n = 134) was assigned with ALBI grade 1 and the other grades were assigned to the high-ALBI group (n = 20). RESULTS: The pre-NAC ALBI was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (P = 0.003 and P = 0.014, respectively). Based on multivariate analysis, pre-NAC ALBI, pathological T factor, and N factor were identified as independent prognostic factors for poor RFS. Multivariate and univariate analyses limited to factors were obtained before treatment, indicating high pre-NAC ALBI as an independent prognostic factor of poor overall survival (P = 0.039) and RFS (P = 0.008). With respect to pathological response to NAC, patients in the high pre-NAC ALBI group had a significantly lower response than patients in the low pre-NAC ALBI group (P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that the pre-NAC ALBI marker predicts the long-term outcome and pathological response to NAC in patients with ESCC consecutively undergoing NAC and a subtotal esophagectomy.

Ramelteon and suvorexant for postoperative delirium in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear evidence on the prevention of postoperative delirium with pharmacotherapy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ramelteon and suvorexant in preventing postoperative delirium in this patient group. METHODS: Data on 251 patients who received radical esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer were collected from January 2010 to September 2021. In total, 74 patients did not receive preventive intervention, and 177 received ramelteon and suvorexant. After propensity score matching, the rate of postoperative delirium was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Seventy-two well-balanced patients in each group demonstrated similar clinical and pathological characteristics. The mean ages of the intervention and control groups were 70.8 and 70.3 years, respectively. All the patients underwent McKeown esophagectomy, and in the volume of intraoperative blood loss or operative time did not significantly differ between the two groups. The incidence rates of postoperative hyperactive delirium were 7% (5/72) in the intervention group and 32% (23/72) in the control group (p < 0.001). No severe adverse event potentially attributable to the intervention drug was observed. The multivariate analysis showed that the use of ramelteon and suvorexant was the only independent protective factor against postoperative delirium (hazard ratio 0.157, 95% CI 0.055-0.448, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ramelteon and suvorexant may play an important role in reducing postoperative delirium in elderly patients with esophageal cancer.

Prognostic impact of perioperative change in serum p53 antibody titers in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The clinical effectiveness of tumor markers for estimating prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. We assessed the clinical impact of changes in perioperative serum p53 antibodies (s-p53-Abs) titers in ESCC. METHODS: From January 2011 to March 2021, 249 patients were enrolled in this study. Titers of s-p53-Abs were measured before the initial treatment and 3 months after esophagectomy. Patients were divided into a s-p53-Abs decreased or unchanged group (Group D, n = 217) and an increased group (Group I, n = 32). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There was no correlation between the changes in squamous cell carcinoma antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen titers and recurrence site, number of recurrent lesions, and prognosis. However, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in Group I than in Group D (53.1% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.008), especially for distant organ recurrence (37.5% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.019). Furthermore, the rate of polyrecurrence was higher in Group I than in Group D (34.4% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.009). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was significantly worse in Group I than in Group D (median survival time, 21.2 months vs. 36.7 months, p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphatic vessel infiltration (hazard ratio [HR], 1.721; 95% CI 1.069-2.772; p = 0.026), blood vessel infiltration (HR, 2.348; 95% CI 1.385-3.982; p = 0.002), advanced pathological stage (≥ III) (HR, 3.937; 95% CI 2.295-6.754; p < 0.001), and increased s-p53-Abs titers (HR, 2.635; 95% CI 1.488-4.667; p = 0.001) were independent predictors of poor RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of s-p53-Abs titers after esophagectomy can predict polyrecurrence in distant organs and poor prognosis.

Selective Lymphadenectomy for Salvage Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Extensive lymph node dissection increases the risk of postoperative complications, especially in salvage surgery, after definitive chemoradiotherapy (≥ 50 Gy) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the outcomes of salvage esophagectomy with selective lymphadenectomy of only clinically positive lymph nodes. METHODS: Clinically positive lymph nodes, diagnosed as metastases using computed and positron emission tomography performed before chemoradiotherapy or salvage surgery, were targeted for dissection in selective lymphadenectomy. We compared postoperative complications between 52 patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy with selective lymphadenectomy and 207 controls who underwent nonsalvage esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy. We also analyzed postoperative recurrence pattern and survival in salvage group. RESULTS: The mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 12.9 in the salvage esophagectomy group compared with 48.1 in the 3-field lymphadenectomy group (p < 0.001). Differences in the number of postoperative complications, comparing Clavien-Dindo all-grade and ≥ grade 3, were not significant between the groups. Both 30- and 90-day mortality were 0% (0/52) in the salvage group. Five cases had recurrence only in the locoregional area without distant metastasis. Of these five cases, only one had recurrence in the subcarinal lymph node without prophylactic mediastinal lymphadenectomy. A 3-year recurrence-free survival and 3-year overall survival from salvage esophagectomy were 43.3% and 46.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It may contribute to obtaining good short- and long-term outcomes by dissecting only clinically positive lymph nodes in salvage esophagectomy.

Difficult to treat esophageal perforation after endoscopic balloon dilation for stenosis due to endoscopic submucosal dissection followed by chemoradiotherapy: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: There is no clear consensus on a specific treatment for esophageal perforation. The surgical approach is deemed necessary for local severe infection and pleural contamination requiring debridement. PRESENTATIONS OF CASE: We have reported herein the case of a patient with esophageal perforation with severe mediastinal and thoracic abscess after endoscopic balloon dilation for stenosis due to endoscopic submucosal dissection and chemoradiotherapy. A surgical approach with primary closure was performed, but not found effective; while conservative treatment with mediastinal drainage via posterior neck and recovery of nutritional status was found to be effective. For the recovery of nutritional status, enteral nutrition was assessed using a polymeric formula through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy tube. DISCUSSION: Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening condition. Iatrogenic injuries are the frequent cause of esophageal perforation. For esophageal perforation, not only surgical interventions but also conservative treatments including various endoscopic approaches have been performed. If the inflammation is not localized, surgical intervention is often needed; however, if the patient's general condition is stable, conservative treatment with drainage, antibiotics, and nutritional management may be considered, even in cases of esophageal perforation. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal perforation with a large perforation site with widespread inflammation can be improved with proper thoracic and mediastinal drainage and adequate nutrition support if the patient's condition is mild.

Tissue Oxygen Saturation during Gastric Tube Reconstruction with Cervical Anastomosis for Esophagectomy: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: One cause of anastomotic leakage after radical esophagectomy is blood flow insufficiency at the cervical anastomosis site. . METHODS: Eighteen patients, who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction, were studied. The regional tissue oxygen saturation (rSO2) was measured at the tip (point pre 0) and 2, 4, and 6 cm on the distal side of the tip (point pre 1, pre 2, and pre 3, respectively) before the gastric tube was raised to the cervical site through the retrosternal route. After that, rSO2 was measured at the tip, 2 and 4 cm on the distal side of the tip (points post 0, post 1, and post 2), the actual anastomotic site (point AN), and the chest skin as an indicator of whole-body oxygenation. The relationship between rSO2 scores and the rate of anastomotic leakage was determined. RESULTS: The mean rSO2 at pre 0, pre 1, pre 2, and pre 3 were 48.9%, 52.3%, 54.8%, and 56.9%, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean rSO2 at post 0, post 1, and post 2 were 47.8%, 50.5%, and 52.3%, respectively, and the rSO2 at point AN was 52.1%.Anastomotic leakage was found in 6 patients. The rSO2 at points pre 0, pre 1, and pre 2, post 0 and point AN were significantly lower in patients with anastomosis leakage than those without (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tissue oxygen saturation monitoring was a useful indicator of blood flow insufficiency in the gastric tube during radical esophagectomy.

Whole exome sequencing and deep sequencing of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in Japanese patients using the Japanese version of the Genome Atlas, JCGA.

BACKGROUND: Recent comprehensive mutation analyses have revealed a relatively small number of driver mutations in esophageal cancer, implicating a limited number of molecular targets, most of which are also implicated in squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: In this study, we investigated genetic alterations in 44 esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCC) and 8 adenocarcinomas (EAC) from Japanese patients as potential molecular targets, based on data from the Japanese version of The Genome Atlas (JCGA). RESULTS: Esophageal cancer was characterized by TP53 somatic mutations in ESCC (39/44, 88.6%) and EAC (5/8, 62.5%). In addition to TP53 mutations, somatic mutations in NFE2L2 (16/44, 36.4%), CDKN2A (7/44, 15.9%), and KMT2D (7/44, 15.9%) were more frequently detected in ESCC than in EAC. WRN-truncated type mutations that lead to genomic instability correlate with EAC, but not ESCC. ESCC samples were enriched in ALDH2-associated mutational signature 16 as well as the APOBEC signature. Patients with FAT2 mutations had significantly poorer overall survival compared with those with wild-type status at FAT2 (p < 0.05). Patients with EP300 or PTPRD mutations also had poor progression-free survival compared with respective wild-types (p < 0.05 or p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings may facilitate future precision medicine approaches based on genomic profiling in ESCC and EAC.

Evaluation of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radical Esophagectomy in Clinical T1bN0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is radical esophagectomy. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is regarded as a treatment option, and recently, good clinical outcomes of this treatment have been reported. This study compared prognosis after definitive chemoradiotherapy with radical esophagectomy. METHODS: From January 2011 to December 2019, 68 consecutive patients who were diagnosed clinical T1bN0M0 squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled and investigated retrospectively. Patients were classified into two groups whether treated by surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy. Survival outcomes were compared, and subsequent therapies after recurrence were also investigated. RESULTS: Among 68 patients, 39 patients underwent surgery and 29 patients received definitive chemoradiotherapy. No significant difference was noted in overall survival between the two groups. However, the rate of 5-year recurrence-free survival was significantly lower in definitive chemoradiotherapy group than that of surgery group (91.1 vs. 62.7%, hazard ratio 3.976, 95% confidence interval 1.076-14.696, p = 0.039). Patients who had local recurrence after definitive chemoradiotherapy received endoscopic submucosal dissection or photodynamic therapy as salvage therapies, which resulted in no disease progression and a good prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive chemoradiotherapy may become a promising alternative therapy comparable with radical esophagectomy in patients with clinical T1bN0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Early detection of recurrence by frequent follow-up after definitive chemoradiotherapy is important to control disease within local recurrence, and salvage therapy for local lesions could contribute to long-term survival.

Utility of the evaluation of blood flow of remnant esophagus with indocyanine green in esophagectomy with jejunum reconstruction: Case series.

BACKGROUND: Pedicled jejunal flap can be utilized with various tips for esophageal reconstruction in patients with a history of gastrectomy or those who have undergone synchronous esophagogastrectomy. However, the rate of anastomosis leakage is high; therefore, we considered the evaluation of blood flow of the remnant esophagus with indocyanine green in setting the anastomosis site. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with pedicled jejunal flap between January 2011 and June 2020 were identified. From June 2019, blood flow in the pedicled jejunum and remnant esophagus were evaluated to set the anastomosis site of the latter. Usually, the second and third jejunal vessels are transected, and if the jejunal flap cannot reach to the anastomosis point, we actively transect the marginal vessels to stretch the jejunal flap. Microvascular anastomosis between the jejunal branches and the internal thoracic vessels is usually made, and the anastomosis site is set at the well-stained part of the esophagus. RESULTS: Overall, 39 patients underwent the procedure before June 2019 (Group A), and 11 patients underwent the procedure since June 2019 (Group B). No significant difference was found in the patients' background, type of preoperative therapy, presence or absence of ligation of marginal vessels and two-stage operation between the groups. Group A had 16 cases of anastomosis leakage; B had only 1 case (p < 0.05). There were no cases of pedicled jejunum graft necrosis. CONCLUSION: Assessing remnant esophageal perfusion by indocyanine green imaging in pedicled jejunum reconstruction resulted in a lower anastomotic leak rate.

The Negative Impact of Preoperative Chemotherapy on Survival After Esophagectomy for Vulnerable Elderly Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for patients 75 years of age or younger with cStage 2 or 3 esophageal cancer is preoperative chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy. The optimal treatment for elderly patients, especially those considered vulnerable, remains unclear. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed the data for 42 patients ages 75-80 years with cStage 2 or 3 esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy between October 2002 and February 2019. The patients who received preoperative chemotherapy were compared with those who did not. The study also examined short- and long-term outcomes and the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) stratified by performance status (PS). RESULTS: Of the 42 patients, 18 underwent esophagectomy without preoperative chemotherapy and 24 underwent esophagectomy after preoperative chemotherapy. A significantly greater proportion of the patients with PS 0 received preoperative chemotherapy than the patients with PS 1 (P =0.007). The multivariate analysis showed preoperative chemotherapy to be an independent negative prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.025; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.136-22.222; P = 0.033). Subgroup analysis showed that preoperative chemotherapy had a significant negative impact on the OS of the patients with PS 1 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemotherapy was ineffective for the patients with PS 0 and had a significantly negative impact on the OS of the patients with PS 1. Preoperative chemotherapy should not be administered to patients 75 years of age or older with cStage 2 or 3 esophageal cancer.

Palliative radiotherapy to maintain outpatient status in elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Radiation monotherapy effectively relieves symptoms of esophageal cancer. Many studies have reported relief from dysphagia with this treatment; however, the degree of the dysphagia is subjective. On the other hand, the length of outpatient management is objective. In this study, we investigated how radiation monotherapy can contribute to helping elderly patients with esophageal cancer remain as outpatients. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2017, we followed 42 patients aged >75 years who underwent radiation monotherapy for esophageal carcinoma. Of these patients, 36 were included in the study. We retrospectively collected data on the patients' characteristics, tumor extension around the circumference of the esophagus, medical procedures, prognosis, cause of death, and outpatient management period. We also analyzed the relationships between the outpatient management period, the clinical stage, and the circumferential extension of the tumor. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients (26 males, 10 females), 27 were treated using doses of 60 or 66 Gy, and 9 received 40 or 50 Gy. The median survival period of the patients who died during the study was 14 months, and their median period of outpatient management was 9 months. Eight of the 12 patients with tumors extending across four-fifths or the entire circumference of the esophagus required medical intervention to administer nutrition. There were no significant differences in the period of outpatient management among the patients who died during the study in terms of clinical stage and horizontal location. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation monotherapy may facilitate outpatient management; however, patients with tumors extending all or most of the circumference of the esophagus required an additional medical procedure.

Postoperative chylothorax with a duplicated left-sided thoracic duct: a case report and review of the literature.

Postoperative chylothorax is a potentially lethal complication after esophagectomy. A 53-year-old woman underwent subtotal esophagectomy. The thoracic duct was resected due to swollen lymph nodes. Postoperative chylothorax was diagnosed but conservative treatment was ineffective. Lipiodol lymphangiography revealed leakage from a duplicated left-sided thoracic duct. Left-sided video-assisted thoracoscopic ligation of the left-sided thoracic duct was performed. Because anatomical variations in the thoracic duct contribute to refractory chylothorax, lymphangiography is useful in detecting the position of thoracic duct injury as well as any duct anomalies. Based on lymphangiography, left-sided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery could be considered in case of left-sided thoracic duct injury.

Appropriate Candidates for Salvage Esophagectomy of Initially Unresectable Locally Advanced T4 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Although salvage esophagectomy is the only curative treatment available following dCRT failure, the appropriate candidates for salvage esophagectomy remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventeen patients who underwent dCRT from April 2004 to December 2016 were stratified into three study groups-a complete response (CR) group, chemotherapy or best supportive care (BSC) group, and salvage esophagectomy group-and compared. We also investigated the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of salvage esophagectomy. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (22.4%) achieved CR after dCRT, 18 patients (5.7%) underwent salvage esophagectomy, and 228 patients (71.9%) underwent palliative chemotherapy or BSC. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the CR group, salvage esophagectomy group, and chemotherapy or BSC group were 83.0%, 51.6%, and 1.3%, respectively. Salvage esophagectomy recipients had a worse OS rate than CR patients (p < 0.001) but a better OS rate than those in the chemotherapy or BSC group (p < 0.001). Incomplete resection was the only significant variable associated with poor OS on univariate Cox proportional-hazards analysis (hazard ratio: 7.633, 95% confidence interval: 1.692-34.482; p = 0.008). Patients with tumors in the upper thoracic esophagus were more likely to undergo incomplete resection (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who achieve R0 resection are good candidates for salvage esophagectomy regardless of their response to dCRT. Those with upper thoracic esophageal tumors are at risk of incomplete resection; careful attention is required when considering these patients for salvage esophagectomy.

Ability of Laparoscopic Gastric Mobilization to Prevent Pulmonary Complications After Open Thoracotomy or Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy has a high risk of postoperative morbidity, and pulmonary complications are the most common causes of serious morbidity. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy has been reported to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications; however, it remains unclear whether laparoscopic gastric mobilization can reduce the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after open thoracotomy or thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The present meta-analysis assessed the ability of laparoscopic gastric mobilization to prevent postoperative complications after open thoracotomy or thoracoscopic esophagectomy. METHOD: Studies reported between January 2000 and April 2019 in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases that analyzed the impact of laparoscopy on postoperative complications were systematically reviewed. In the meta-analysis, data were pooled and the primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications. The secondary outcomes were other postoperative complications, operative details, length of hospital stay and postoperative mortality. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies (1915 patients; 1 randomized trial, 1 prospective study and 11 observational studies) were included. Laparoscopic gastric mobilization after open thoracotomy resulted in significantly reduced postoperative pulmonary complications (OR = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.82, p = 0.008) and postoperative mortality (OR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.25-0.94, p = 0.03). Similarly, laparoscopic gastric mobilization after thoracoscopic esophagectomy resulted in significantly reduced postoperative pulmonary complications (OR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.37-0.84, p = 0.005) and anastomotic leakage (OR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.39-0.91, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic gastric mobilization could be recommended for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications after esophagectomy irrespective of the thoracic approach.

Changes in the nutritional status of elderly patients after esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is a highly invasive procedure for patients aged > 70 years. Here, we compared the actual nutritional status of older and younger patients who underwent esophagectomy. METHODS: A total of 118 patients who underwent radical esophagectomy between April 2013 and December 2016 were enrolled and divided into two groups based on age: group A (n = 41; ≥ 70 years) and group B (n = 77; < 70 years). Data pertaining to body mass index and nutritional variables (albumin; total cholesterol; cholinesterase; and prealbumin) were retrospectively analyzed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Significant preoperative between-group differences were found in the cholinesterase, albumin, and prealbumin levels. The body mass index gradually decreased over the first 12 months after surgery in both groups, without significant between-group differences. Significant differences were observed in prealbumin and cholinesterase levels at 3 months postoperatively. 1 year postoperatively, both groups showed slight improvements; however, the between-group differences were not statistically significant. Group A had a significantly lower amount of the degree of decrement of BMI and chE than group B. CONCLUSION: Thus, patients aged > 70 years can recover within 12 months of esophagectomy.

Perforation of abdominal esophagus following nasogastric feeding tube intubation: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Perforation of the abdominal esophagus caused by nasogastric tube (NGT) intubation has been rarely reported in adults. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 73-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with pneumonia. He had been bedridden long-term and had previously undergone a gastrectomy for gastric ulcer. Since admission was prolonged, and he required enteral feeding because of his inability to swallow, a NGT was inserted blindly. The next day, he had a high fever and abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography scan revealed that the tube was inserted through the wall of the abdominal esophagus into the abdominal cavity. In the emergency surgery, we sutured the perforated site of abdominal esophagus and patched it with lesser omentum. The postoperative course was good. DISCUSSION: Abdominal esophageal perforation due to NGT insertion is very rare. The cause of perforation was suggested to be an abnormal deformity created by adhesion due to previous distal gastrectomy and long-term bedridden status. A chest X-ray usually is performed to confirm the position of the NGT tube. In this case, a frontal radiographic view apparently showed the NGT placed in the stomach. CONCLUSION: When NGT is inserted to such patients, frontal and lateral radiographic views or fluoroscopic guidance should be obtained.

Duodenal rupture due to giant inguinal hernia: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Giant inguinal hernia is unusual, and duodenal rupture accompanying it is particularly very rare and significantly hard to manage surgically. PRESENTATION OF CASE: An 81-year-old man was admitted to our institution with upper abdominal pain. He had tenderness of the upper mid abdomen and a bilateral large inguinal hernia but he did not have pain in the inguinal-scrotal area. Computed tomography (CT) showed slight dilatation of the small bowel and stomach. There were no remarkable signs of incarceration of the inguinal hernia. Therefore, he was admitted to the internal ward. On the second day in hospital, he suddenly went into shock. CT revealed that there was free air and ascites in the inguinal hernia and therefore an emergency operation was performed. The tranverse colon, ascending colon, and ileum were incarcerated, and perfolation of the cecum was found. We also detected duodenal rupture at the inferior duodenal angle. We resected the terminal ileal (almost 90cm) and ileocecal area, followed by side-to-side anastomosis of duodenum and jejunum. We only repaired the peritoneum at the internal hernia ring. After the operation, despite intensive-care therapy, this patient passed away on the 18th postoperative day. DISCUSSION: The mesocolon and third portion of the duodenum were strongly pulled down into giant inguinal hernia, probably causing the rupture of the inferior duodenal angle. CONCLUSION: Giant inguinal hernia possibly provokes duodenal rupture and therefore should definitively be repaired if feasible.