Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Does Not Affect Deep Surgical Site Infection Rates in Neuromuscular Scoliosis Surgery.

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a devastating complication in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) undergoing posterior spinal instrumented fusion (PSIF) for progressive scoliosis. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (INPWT) has been used in other surgical fields to reduce SSI. Our purpose was to examine the prophylactic use of INPWT after NMS surgery to decrease SSI. At a single institution, 71 consecutive patients with NMS underwent PSIF from 2015 to 2019. Starting in 2017, all patients with NMS received INPWT postoperatively until discharge. Rates of deep SSI were compared between the two cohorts of patients. Additionally, patient demographic and operative factors such as American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of levels instrumented, need for an anterior spinal release, need for spinal fusion to pelvis, blood loss, operative time, fluoroscopy time, length of stay, and transfusion requirement were analyzed for potential influence on deep SSI. There was no significant difference in deep SSI rates between patients who received INPWT (2 of 41) and those treated with a standard postoperative dressing (2 of 30; P=1.0). Although INPWT theoretically can stabilize the wound environment and prevent deep SSI, our findings do not support this. More research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of INPWT after PSIF for NMS. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):373-378.].

Restoration of sagittal alignment in high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis using the reverse Bohlman technique with anterior lumbar interbody fusion using a hyperlordotic cage at L4-5: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Circumferential fusion with or without reduction is the preferred treatment for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Reduction presents significant risk of neurological injury. The authors present one case in which the "reverse Bohlman" technique was used with the addition of a hyperlordotic interbody cage at L4-5 as a means to correct sagittal malalignment while avoiding the reduction of L5 on S1. OBSERVATIONS: The patient was a 22-year-old woman with a long-term history of lower back pain and bilateral L5 radiculopathy secondary to high-grade isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis. She underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion using the reverse Bohlman technique plus a hyperlordotic interbody cage at L4-5, followed by decompression and posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion from L4 to the pelvis. At 2-year follow-up, she was found to have complete resolution of symptoms with clinical and radiographic evidence of fusion. Her spinopelvic parameters had significantly improved. LESSONS: The reverse Bohlman technique with the addition of a hyperlordotic interbody cage at L4-5 is a potential alternative treatment method to correct sagittal malalignment while avoiding possible injury to the L5 nerve roots that can be seen in the reduction of high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Premature spinal fusion after insertion of magnetically controlled growing rods for treatment of early-onset scoliosis: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) systems have gained attention for their use in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis. Although traditional growing rods require frequent operations to lengthen the construct, MCGR allows for fewer open procedures and more frequent distractions by externally controlling rod elongation. Despite its appealing advantages, MCGR is not without limitations. OBSERVATIONS: The authors describe a case of premature spinal autofusion before growing rod removal and termination of rod distraction. LESSONS: This case highlights the limitations of MCGR systems, including length of use, body habitus restrictions, and risk of autofusion.

Severe Cervical Kyphosis and Spondyloptosis with Myelopathy in Larsen Syndrome: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: Two patients (ages 5 and 14 years) with Larsen syndrome and severe cervical kyphosis (patient 1) and spondyloptosis (patient 2), as well as complete anterior-posterior dissociation of the cervical spine, presented with severe, progressive myelopathy. Both patients underwent preoperative halo-gravity traction to slowly reduce the deformity followed by staged anterior-posterior decompression and fusion. Both patients demonstrated complete return of neurologic function. CONCLUSION: Patients with Larsen syndrome should be screened for cervical deformity at the time of diagnosis. Proper screening will facilitate early detection and treatment of significant deformities to prevent neurologic deterioration, which can be catastrophic in these patients.