Simultaneous local excision of synchronous rectal polyps by transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

BACKGROUND: The approach to surgical resection of multiple rectal lesions when endoscopic polypectomy is unsuccessful has historically been radical rectal resection with total mesorectal excision. This approach is fraught with high morbidity and mortality. We explored the possibility of performing one transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedure to resect multiple synchronous rectal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all adult patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery at a single institution between 2004 and 2015. Clinical, demographic, and pathologic data were analyzed for all patients with synchronous rectal lesions that were excised via one transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedure. RESULTS: Of the 158 patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery during the study period, 14 (8.8%) had two or more synchronous rectal lesions resected. The mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range 0.5-3.5). The mean distance from the anal verge for the upper/proximal lesions: 10 ± 2.5 cm, and for the lower/distal lesions: 7 ± 2 cm. Mean operative time was 112 minutes (range 75-170). Median hospitalization time was 3 days (range 2-4). Two patients had urinary retention. No other complications were noted. All the transanal endoscopic microsurgery specimens were with clear margins. CONCLUSION: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is a safe and feasible procedure for patients with multiple rectal lesions. We demonstrate no increase in surgical time, completeness of specimen resection, no increase in complications or hospital length or stay when compared to patients undergoing transanal endoscopic microsurgery for a single lesion.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Combined with Laparoscopic Colectomy for Synchronous Colorectal Tumors: A Word of Caution.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of malignant synchronous colorectal tumors (SCRT) is between 2% and 5%, and the association of synchronous adenomatous polyps in colon cancer has been reported to be 15%-50%. Surgical resection is the primary treatment option for SCRT not amendable to endoscopic resection. Lesions in adjacent segments are usually treated with more extensive resection; however, there is still some controversy on how to best treat synchronous lesions in separate segments, especially when the rectum is involved. In this study, we aimed to report the outcome of patients with SCRT treated by laparoscopic colectomy combined with Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery. METHODS: Data pertaining patients undergoing combined colectomy and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively collected. RESULTS: 141 TEM performed in the study period, 9 (6.5%) with combined laparoscopic colectomy were included. Mean age was 69.1 ± 10.6 years. There were 6 (66%) right, 2 (22%) left, and one (11%) sigmoid colectomy. All rectal lesions were benign adenomas, with mean tumor size 2.5 cm, and distance from the verge 9 ± 2.5 cm. Lesions were located in lateral rectal wall in 4, posterior in 4, and anterior in one case. Seven patients had the colectomy before TEM, and 2 had the TEM first. Mean operative time was 245 minutes (range 185-313) for the combined procedures. Median time of hospitalization was 6 days (range 4-11). Six patients (66%) had prolonged postoperative diarrhea. The final rectal pathology reports were adenoma with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in 5 patients and adenoma with low-grade dysplasia in four cases. The colon pathology was T1 N0 in 3, T2 N0 in one, T3 N1 in one, adenoma with HGD in 2, and no residual tumor in 2 patients. Two patients underwent re-TEM for recurrent adenoma of rectum at 14 and 18 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: The combination of TEM with laparoscopic colectomy is feasible and should be kept in mind as an alternative procedure in case of SCRT. However, more strict selection criteria should be considered and the disadvantages should be discussed with the patient.