Meta-analysis examining impact of age on overall survival with pemetrexed for the treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In clinical practice, elderly patients are often undertreated relative to younger patients. This meta-analysis was designed to determine whether older patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could derive an overall survival (OS) benefit from pemetrexed treatment comparable to that experienced by younger patients in the first-line, second-line, or maintenance settings. METHODS: Data from 2671 patients with non-squamous NSCLC participating in four pemetrexed phase III studies were included in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Studies included were: JMEI (second-line pemetrexed, N=399); JMDB (first-line pemetrexed/cisplatin, N=1252); JMEN (pemetrexed maintenance after non-pemetrexed/platinum doublet, N=481); and PARAMOUNT (pemetrexed maintenance after first-line pemetrexed/cisplatin, N=539). Patients were predominantly Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0/1. The ratio of OS hazard ratio (HR) (pemetrexed versus control) for younger patients over that for older patients within each study was used as the measure of the differential effect of pemetrexed. Data were examined using age cutoffs of 65 and 70 years. RESULTS: Among the four studies, 32% of patients were aged ≥65 years and 14% were aged ≥70 years. The test of heterogeneity among studies was non-significant for subgroups defined by age 65 (P=0.083) and age 70 (P=0.848). The pooled ratio of the OS HR (pemetrexed versus control) in patients <65years to that in patients ≥65 years was 0.92 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.67-1.25). Similar results were seen for the analysis using the age 70 years cut-off (0.80 [95% CI 0.62-1.04]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-squamous NSCLC with good PS, the effect of pemetrexed on OS was not found to be different in younger and older patients undergoing treatment in the first-line, second-line, or maintenance settings.

Importance of baseline mini-mental state examination as a prognostic factor for patients with low-grade glioma.

PURPOSE: The outcome and cognitive performance data collected in a prospective, intergroup clinical trial were analyzed to assess the prognostic importance of the baseline (before radiotherapy) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score in patients with low-grade glioma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The patients studied were 203 adults with a supratentorial low-grade glioma randomly assigned to low-dose (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) or high-dose (64.8 Gy in 36 fractions) localized radiotherapy. Folstein MMSE scores and neurologic function scores at baseline in combination with multiple other baseline variables were analyzed. The median follow-up was 7.4 years for the 101 patients still alive. RESULTS: Patients (n = 36) with an abnormal baseline MMSE score (< or =26) had a worse 5-year progression-free survival rate (27% vs. 60%; p <0.001) and overall survival rate (31% vs. 76%; p <0.001) compared with those with a normal score. On multivariate analysis, the baseline MMSE score was a statistically significant predictor of survival. Other factors associated with overall survival were age, tumor size, and tumor histologic type. CONCLUSION: The presence of an abnormal baseline MMSE score was a strong predictor of poorer progression-free and overall survival for patients with a low-grade glioma. The baseline MMSE should be considered in future prognostic scoring systems.

Adult patients with supratentorial pilocytic astrocytomas: a prospective multicenter clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Supratentorial pilocytic astrocytomas in adults are uncommon. A prospective clinical trial was conducted to obtain clinical and outcome data in these patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1986 and 1994, 20 eligible adults with supratentorial pilocytic astrocytomas were enrolled in a prospective intergroup trial of radiotherapy (RT) after biopsy (3 patients) or observation after gross (11 patients) or subtotal (6 patients) resection. RESULTS: At the time of analysis (median follow-up, 10 years), 1 patient (5%) had died and 19 patients (95%) were alive. The 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 95%. The cause of death in the patient who died (2.1 years after enrollment) was unknown; a radiographic examination obtained shortly before the patient's demise revealed no signs of progression. Progression in 1 patient approximately 1 month after enrollment required injection of (32)P into an enlarging cyst. The patient required RT approximately 18 months later because of further progression. This patient was alive without evidence of progression 9 years after RT. No toxic effects had been recorded at the latest follow-up examinations. CONCLUSION: With follow-up comparable or superior to that in many retrospective studies, the results of this prospective trial confirm that adults with pilocytic astrocytomas have a favorable prognosis with regard to survival and neurologic function. The vast majority of patients remained stable after gross or subtotal resection and no adjuvant therapy. RT need not be offered to adults with supratentorial pilocytic astrocytoma after gross or subtotal resection; instead, close observation is recommended. Because only 3 patients received RT after biopsy, it is difficult to comment on the effect of RT on their outcome as a group.

Effects of radiotherapy on cognitive function in patients with low-grade glioma measured by the folstein mini-mental state examination.

PURPOSE: To assess the neurocognitive effects of cranial radiotherapy on patients with low-grade gliomas, we analyzed cognitive performance data collected in a prospective, intergroup clinical trial. METHODS: Patients included 203 adults with supratentorial low-grade gliomas randomly assigned to a lower dose (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) or a higher dose (64.8 Gy in 36 fractions) of localized radiotherapy. Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and neurologic function scores (NFS) at baseline and key evaluations were analyzed. Median follow-up was 7.4 years in 101 patients still alive. A change of more than three MMSE points was considered clinically significant. RESULTS: In patients without tumor progression, significant deterioration from baseline occurred at years 1, 2, and 5 in 8.2%, 4.6%, and 5.3% of patients, respectively. Most patients with an abnormal baseline MMSE score (< 27) experienced significant increases. Baseline variables such as radiation dose, conformal versus conventional radiotherapy, number of radiation fields, age, sex, tumor size, NFS, seizures, and seizure medications did not predict cognitive function changes. CONCLUSION: In this population, most low-grade glioma patients maintained a stable neurocognitive status after focal radiotherapy as measured by the MMSE. Patients with an abnormal baseline MMSE were more likely to have an improvement in cognitive abilities than deterioration after receiving radiotherapy. Only a small percentage of patients had cognitive deterioration after radiotherapy. However, more discriminating neurocognitive assessment tools may identify cognitive decline not apparent with the use of the MMSE.

A comparison of surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of solitary brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To determine whether neurosurgery (NS) or stereotactic radiosurgery (RS) provided better local tumor control and enhanced patient survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective review of all solitary brain metastases (SBM) patients newly diagnosed at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1991 and 1999. Eligible patients satisfied tumor size and SBM site criteria to qualify for both NS and RS. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between 74 NS and 23 RS patients in terms of baseline characteristics (age, gender, systemic disease type, systemic disease status, signs/symptoms at SBM presentation) or percent of patients who received whole brain radiotherapy. Median follow-up for alive patients was 20 months (range 0-106 months). There was no significant difference in patient survival (p = 0.15); the 1-year survival rate was 56% for the RS patients and 62% for the NS patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis found that a significant prognostic factor for survival was a performance score of 0 or 1. There was a significant (p = 0.020) difference in local tumor control between NS and RS for solitary brain metastasis; none of the RS group had local recurrence compared to 19 (58%) of the NS group. CONCLUSION: The need for a Phase III study comparing these two techniques appears to be supported by the data from this study.

Response rate, durability of response, and survival after thalidomide therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with relapsed multiple myeloma were entered into the study between April 29, 1999, and June 20, 2000. They were given oral thalidomide at a dosage of 200 mg/d for 2 weeks, which was then increased as tolerated to a maximum of 800 mg/d. The primary end point of the study was response rate. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 67 years (range, 36-78 years). Prior chemotherapy had failed in all patients, and stem cell transplantation had failed in 5 patients (16%). There were 10 confirmed responses, yielding a response rate of 31%. In addition, there was 1 unconfirmed partial response and 7 minimal responses with no complete responses. The median duration of response was 11.9 months (range, 3.7-203 months). Overall, 20 patients have died, and 26 patients have experienced disease progression. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 28.5 months (range, 193-34.0 months), with a median progression-free survival of 8.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7-16 months). The median progression-free survival among the responding patients was 15.7 months (95% CI, 8.6-25.6 months). The median overall survival for the entire group was 22 months (95% CI, 10.6-35.9 months). The most common treatment-related nonhematologic toxic effects (grade >3) were neuropathy (16%), sedation (13%), febrile neutropenia (6%), and constipation (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Thalidomide is useful in the treatment of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and produced durable response in approximately one third of patients, with median response duration of nearly 1 year.

Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma.

PURPOSE: Multiple myeloma is a malignancy of plasma cells and is characterized by increased marrow angiogenesis. Thalidomide, an agent with antiangiogenic properties, is effective in relapsed myeloma. We report the results of a study combining thalidomide and dexamethasone as initial therapy for myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with newly diagnosed myeloma were studied. Thalidomide was given at a dose of 200 mg/d orally. Dexamethasone was given at a dose of 40 mg/d orally on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 (odd cycles) and 40 mg/d on days 1 to 4 (even cycles), repeated monthly. RESULTS: Of all 50 patients, a confirmed response was seen in 32 patients yielding a response rate of 64% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 77%). Thirty-one patients (62%) proceeded to stem-cell collection after four cycles of therapy including 26 who underwent stem-cell transplantation and five who chose stem-cell cryopreservation. Major grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed in 16 patients (32%), and the most frequent were deep vein thrombosis (six patients), constipation (four patients), rash (three patients), and dyspnea (two patients). Three deaths occurred during active therapy because of a pancreatitis, pulmonary embolism, and infection. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of thalidomide plus dexamethasone is a feasible and active regimen in the treatment of multiple myeloma. It merits further study as an oral alternative to infusional chemotherapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone and other intravenous regimens currently used as pretransplantation induction therapy for myeloma.