Construct Validation of the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist for Individual Resident Use in Long-Term Care.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the construct validity of the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist (M-RCC) when used with individual residents. METHODS: Data was collected from 639 residents from 32 long-term care homes; M-RCC was completed at three meals for each resident and averaged. Bivariate analyses determined associations between the M-RCC and other resident level and dining room level measures. RESULTS: Resident M-RCC was positively and significantly (p < .05) associated with three of five summary scales from Dining Environment Audit Protocol and Meal Time Scan as well as resident malnutrition risk (rs = 0.23). M-RCC was negatively associated with protein intake (gram per kilogram body weight; rs = -0.13) and Cognitive Performance Score (t-value = 4.48). CONCLUSIONS: The resident level M-RCC was significantly associated with other measures in expected directions demonstrating construct validity.

Mixed methods developmental evaluation of the CHOICE program: a relationship-centred mealtime intervention for long-term care.

BACKGROUND: Mealtimes are important to quality of life for residents in long-term care (LTC). CHOICE (which stands for Connecting, Honouring dignity, Offering support, supporting Identity, Creating opportunities, and Enjoyment) is a multi-component intervention to improve relationship-centred care (RCC) and overall mealtime experience for residents. The objective of this developmental evaluation was to determine: a) if the dining experience (e.g. physical, social and RCC practices) could be modified with the CHOICE Program, and b) how program components needed to be adapted and/or if new components were required. METHODS: A mixed methods study conducted between April-November 2016 included two home areas (64 residents; 25 care staff/home management) within a single LTC home in Ontario. Mealtime Scan (MTS), which measures mealtime experience at the level of the dining room, was used to evaluate the effectiveness of CHOICE implementation at four time points. Change in physical, social, RCC dining environment ratings and overall quality of the mealtime experience over time was determined with linear mixed-effects analyses (i.e., repeated measures). Semi-structured interviews (n = 9) were conducted with home staff to identify what components of the intervention worked well and what improvements could be made. RESULTS: Physical and overall mealtime environment ratings showed improvement over time in both areas; one home area also improved social ratings (p < 0.05). Interviews revealed in-depth insights into the program and implementation process: i) Knowing the context and culture to meet staff and resident needs; ii) Getting everyone on board, including management; iii) Keeping communication lines open throughout the process; iv) Sharing responsibility and accountability for mealtime goals and challenges; v) Empowering and supporting staff's creative mealtime initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: This developmental evaluation demonstrated the potential value of CHOICE. Findings suggest a need to: extend the time to tailor program components; empower home staff in change management; and provide increased coaching.

Construct Validity of the Mealtime Scan: A Secondary Data Analysis of the Making Most of Mealtimes (M3) Study.

Long-term care (LTC) physical and psychosocial mealtime environments have been inconsistently assessed due to the lack of a standardized measure. The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of a new standardized observational measure, the Mealtime Scan (MTS), using the Making Most of Mealtimes data collected on 639 residents in 82 dining rooms in 32 LTC homes. The MTS includes physical, social, and person-centered care summary scales scored from 1 to 8. Mean ratings on these summary scales were moderate for physical (5.6 SD 0.9), social (5.0 SD 0.9), and person-centered care (PCC; 5.5 SD 0.8). Regression analyses determined which items within the MTS were associated with these summary scales: physical - music (B = 0.27, p = 0.04), number of staff passing food (B = -0.11, p = 0.03), number of residents (B = -0.03, p = 0.01); social - social sound (B = 0.31 p < 0.0001), number of residents requiring eating assistance (B = 0.11, p = 0.02); PCC - lighting (B = 0.01 p = 0.04), and total excess noise (B = 0.05, p < 0.0001). The Mealtime Relational Care Checklist (M-RCC) was associated positively with ratings on all three summary scales. Correlations revealed that the MTS summary scales were associated with other constructs: Dining Environment Audit Protocol functionality scale, resident and dining room level M-RCC, Mini Nutritional Assessment- Short Form, and resident Cognitive Performance Scale. These results demonstrate that the MTS summary scales exhibit construct validity, as the ratings were associated with expected observed mealtime characteristics and correlated with dining room and resident level constructs in anticipated directions.

Construct validity of the Dining Environment Audit Protocol: a secondary data analysis of the Making Most of Mealtimes (M3) study.

BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated the importance of physical environments at mealtimes for residents in long term care (LTC). However, a lack of a standardized measurement to assess physical dining environments has resulted in inconsistent research with potentially invalid and unreliable conclusions. The development of a standardized, construct valid instrument that assesses dining rooms is imperative to systematically examine physical environments in LTC. The purpose of this study was to determine the construct validity of the new Dining Environment Audit Protocol (DEAP) tool. METHODS: Secondary data collected from the Making Most of Mealtimes (M3) study was used for this analysis. Data were collected in 32 long term care homes, which included 82 dining rooms and 639 residents. A variety of resident and dining room level constructs were compared to the summative scales found on the DEAP using Spearman correlations and Student t-tests. A regression analysis identified individual characteristics assessed with DEAP that were associated with the summative scales of homelikeness and functionality. RESULTS: Regression analysis (p < 0.05) identified that the DEAP homelikeness scale was positively associated with a view of the garden/green space, presence of a clock and a posted menu. The functionality scale was positively associated with number of chairs and lighting, while negatively associated with furniture with rounded edges and clutter. Additionally, the functionality scale was positively associated (p < 0.05) with the Mealtime Scan physical scale (ρ = 0.52), the dining room Mealtime-Relational Care Checklist (M-RCC) (ρ = 0.25), the DEAP total score (ρ = 0.56), and the Mini Nutritional Assessment- Short Form (ρ = 0.26). Homelikeness was positively associated (p < 0.05) with the DEAP total score (ρ = 0.53), staff Person Directed Care score (ρ = 0.49) and the resident Cognitive Performance Scale (t = 2.56), while negatively associated with energy (ρ = -0.26) and protein intake (ρ = -0.24). The homelikeness and functionality scales were also associated with one another (ρ = 0.26). CONCLUSION: The construct validity of the DEAP was supported through significant correlations with a variety of measures that are theoretically related to the homelikeness and functionality of LTC dining rooms. This secondary analysis supports the use of the DEAP in future research to quantify the physical environment of LTC dining rooms. Protocol registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02800291; Registered retrospectively June 7, 2016.