Differences in muscle magnetic resonance imaging findings between anti-signal recognition particle antibody-positive myopathy and anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody-positive myositis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the findings of muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between anti-signal recognition particle antibody-positive myopathy (anti-SRP myopathy) and anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase antibody-positive myositis (anti-ARS myositis). METHODS: Of the patients newly diagnosed with polymyositis (PM)/dermatomyositis (DM) and immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) admitted to our Department between April 2012 and December 2021, those who met the eligibility criteria of positive for anti-SRP or anti-ARS antibodies and thigh MRI at the time of diagnosis were included. We compared the lesion sites and MRI findings of the thigh muscles that were classified into oedema, fascial oedema, fatty replacement, and muscle atrophy between the three groups of anti-SRP myopathy, anti-Jo-1 antibody-positive myositis, and non-Jo-1 antibody-positive myositis. RESULTS: Of the 98 PM/DM and IMNM patients, five anti-SRP myopathy patients and 11 anti-Jo-1-positive and 22 non-Jo-1 antibody-positive patients with myositis were included. The SRP group showed significantly higher blood levels of myogenic enzymes such as serum creatinine kinase (CK) than the other groups (p=0.01). In thigh MRI findings, despite oedema in most cases in anti-SRP and anti-ARS groups, fascial oedema was identified only in the ARS group, frequently in Jo-1 positive patients in particular. Moreover, gluteus maximus muscle lesions occurred more frequently in the SRP group than in the ARS group (p=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: A comparison of thigh MRI between anti-SRP myopathy and anti-ARS myositis showed different findings and lesion sites reflecting the different pathophysiology that may contribute to their diagnosis.

Assessment of type I interferon signatures in undifferentiated inflammatory diseases: A Japanese multicenter experience.

Purpose: Upregulation of type I interferon (IFN) signaling has been increasingly detected in inflammatory diseases. Recently, upregulation of the IFN signature has been suggested as a potential biomarker of IFN-driven inflammatory diseases. Yet, it remains unclear to what extent type I IFN is involved in the pathogenesis of undifferentiated inflammatory diseases. This study aimed to quantify the type I IFN signature in clinically undiagnosed patients and assess clinical characteristics in those with a high IFN signature. Methods: The type I IFN signature was measured in patients' whole blood cells. Clinical and biological data were collected retrospectively, and an intensive genetic analysis was performed in undiagnosed patients with a high IFN signature. Results: A total of 117 samples from 94 patients with inflammatory diseases, including 37 undiagnosed cases, were analyzed. Increased IFN signaling was observed in 19 undiagnosed patients, with 10 exhibiting clinical features commonly found in type I interferonopathies. Skin manifestations, observed in eight patients, were macroscopically and histologically similar to those found in proteasome-associated autoinflammatory syndrome. Genetic analysis identified novel mutations in the PSMB8 gene of one patient, and rare variants of unknown significance in genes linked to type I IFN signaling in four patients. A JAK inhibitor effectively treated the patient with the PSMB8 mutations. Patients with clinically quiescent idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis and A20 haploinsufficiency showed enhanced IFN signaling. Conclusions: Half of the patients examined in this study, with undifferentiated inflammatory diseases, clinically quiescent A20 haploinsufficiency, or idiopathic pulmonary hemosiderosis, had an elevated type I IFN signature.