Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Clin Epidemiol ; 10: 1649-1655, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30519113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Danish national screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC) consists of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) followed by colonoscopy. The Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database (DCCSD) records data on the incidence of hospital-registered complications after colonoscopy. However, the validity of these data is unknown, and the incidence of complications is potentially underreported. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the colonoscopy complications registered in the DCCSD by using medical records as the reference. Further, to evaluate the incidence of complications leading to hospital contact. METHODS: Among 14,671 individuals with a positive iFOBT result and a colonoscopy procedure performed from March 3, 2014 to December 31, 2014, we selected 295 individuals for medical record review. We calculated sensitivity as the proportion of true complications registered in the DCCSD out of all complications found in the medical records, and the positive predictive value (PPV) as the number of true complications in the DCCSD out of all DCCSD-registered complications. On the basis of the medical record data, we calculated the incidence proportion of hospital-registered complications overall and by subtype. RESULTS: In total, we reviewed 286 records and found 102 individuals with at least one complication. The sensitivity of the DCCSD for any complication was 29.4% (95% CI: 20.8-39.3) and the PPV was 88.2% (95% CI: 72.6-96.7). On the basis of the medical record data, the incidence proportion of any complication after colonoscopy was 0.70% (95% CI: 0.57-0.84) and that of perforation or lesion was 0.10% (95% CI: 0.06-0.17); bleeding, 0.41% (95% CI: 0.31-0.53); post-polypectomy syndrome, 0.16% (95% CI: 0.10-0.24); and other medical complications, 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02-0.09). CONCLUSION: The DCCSD has low sensitivity for complications, and improvements in data registration are warranted. The incidence proportion of any hospital-treated post-colonoscopy complication was 0.70% in 2014, which was the first year of the Danish national CRC screening program. This is within the range of complications reported by other studies.

2.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 57: 39-44, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30292899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Danish National Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme was implemented in March 2014 and is offered free of charge to all residents aged 50-74 years. The aim of this study is to compare performance indicators from the Danish National Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme to the recommendations from European Guidelines in order to assure the quality of the programme and to provide findings relevant to other population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes. METHODS: Based on data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database, we evaluated all performance indicators for which the European Guidelines provided acceptable level, desirable level or the level from first screening rounds in population-based studies using FIT. RESULTS: All performance indicators were above the acceptable level and/or in line with the level from the first screening round in population-based studies using FIT. Whenever the European Guidelines provided a desirable level for a performance indicator, the Danish National Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme was close to or above this desirable level. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the European Guidelines, all performance indicators were above the acceptable level and close to the desirable level. Based on these findings, the implementation of the National Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme is considered a success and the programme is hopefully in the process of reducing colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality in Denmark. This study provides relevant information for comparisons to other population-based public service colorectal cancer screening programmes as well as for future revisions of guidelines.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Early Detection of Cancer/standards , Aged , Databases, Factual , Denmark , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , Middle Aged
3.
Clin Epidemiol ; 9: 105-111, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28255255

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Denmark, a nationwide screening program for colorectal cancer was implemented in March 2014. Along with this, a clinical database for program monitoring and research purposes was established. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the agreement and validity of diagnosis and procedure codes in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database (DCCSD). METHODS: All individuals with a positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) result who were invited to screening in the first 3 months since program initiation were identified. From these, a sample of 150 individuals was selected using stratified random sampling by age, gender and region of residence. Data from the DCCSD were compared with data from hospital records, which were used as the reference. Agreement, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were estimated for categories of codes "clean colon", "colonoscopy performed", "overall completeness of colonoscopy", "incomplete colonoscopy", "polypectomy", "tumor tissue left behind", "number of polyps", "lost polyps", "risk group of polyps" and "colorectal cancer and polyps/benign tumor". RESULTS: Hospital records were available for 136 individuals. Agreement was highest for "colorectal cancer" (97.1%) and lowest for "lost polyps" (88.2%). Sensitivity varied between moderate and high, with 60.0% for "incomplete colonoscopy" and 98.5% for "colonoscopy performed". Specificity was 92.7% or above, except for the categories "colonoscopy performed" and "overall completeness of colonoscopy", where the specificity was low; however, the estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSION: A high level of agreement between categories of codes in DCCSD and hospital records indicates that DCCSD reflects the hospital records well. Further, the validity of the categories of codes varied from moderate to high. Thus, the DCCSD may be a valuable data source for future research on colorectal cancer screening.

4.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 173(48): 3112-3, 2011 Nov 28.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22118654

ABSTRACT

Internal hernias are rare with an incidence of 0.2-2% and 8% of these are described as herniation through foramen Winslowii. We describe two cases in which caecum is herniating into ''lesser sac'' through foramen Winslowii. Both cases presented with acute upper abdominal pain were diagnosed on a CT-scan within the first days af admission. The patients had acute operations and had a dexter hemicolectomy because of a necrotic part of caecum.


Subject(s)
Abdomen, Acute , Cecum , Hernia , Intestinal Diseases , Abdomen, Acute/diagnostic imaging , Abdomen, Acute/etiology , Aged , Cecum/diagnostic imaging , Colectomy , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Hernia/complications , Hernia/diagnostic imaging , Herniorrhaphy , Humans , Intestinal Diseases/complications , Intestinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Histopathology ; 59(1): 18-21, 2011 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21771024

ABSTRACT

AIMS: High-dose chemoradiation is now considered the standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. To provide feedback on the effect of this treatment, several regression grading systems have been proposed. For a grading system to be useful it has to be reproducible. The aim of this study was to test the reproducibility of a five-point grading system, proposed originally by Mandard, and to describe the sources of disagreement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Tumour regression was assessed independently by two observers on 100 consecutive chemoradiated rectal cancer specimens. The grading system was extremely reproducible, with weighted and unweighted kappa values of 0.89 and 0.82, respectively. The most frequent source of disagreement was assessment of the relative amount of fibrosis. Displacement of epithelium was a minor source of disagreement. CONCLUSIONS: The five-point grading system of Mandard is extremely reproducible.


Subject(s)
Chemoradiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Fibrosis , Humans , Neoplasm Grading/methods , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL