Effects of a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist for the prevention of recurrent acute pancreatitis: study protocol for an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial (PAMORA-RAP trial).

BACKGROUND: Acute and chronic pancreatitis constitute a continuum of inflammatory disease of the pancreas with an increasing incidence in most high-income countries. A subset of patients with a history of pancreatitis suffer from recurrence of acute pancreatitis attacks, which accelerate disease progression towards end-stage chronic pancreatitis with loss of exocrine and endocrine function. There is currently no available prophylactic treatment for recurrent acute pancreatitis apart from removing risk factors, which is not always possible. Pain is the primary symptom of acute pancreatitis, which induces the endogenous release of opioids. This may further be potentiated by opioid administration for pain management. Increased exposure to opioids leads to potentially harmful effects on the gastrointestinal tract, including, e.g. increased sphincter tones and decreased fluid secretion, which may impair pancreatic ductal clearance and elevate the risk for new pancreatitis attacks and accelerate disease progression. Peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) have been developed to counteract the adverse effects of opioids on the gastrointestinal tract. We hypothesize that the PAMORA naldemedine will reduce the risk of new pancreatitis attacks in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis and hence decelerate disease progression. METHODS: The study is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial with allocation of patients to either 0.2 mg naldemedine daily or matching placebo for 12 months. A total of 120 outpatients will be enrolled from five specialist centres in Denmark and Sweden. The main inclusion criteria is a history of recurrent acute pancreatitis (minimum of two confirmed pancreatitis attacks). The primary endpoint is time to acute pancreatitis recurrence after randomization. Secondary outcomes include changes in quality of life, gastrointestinal symptom scores, new-onset diabetes, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, disease severity, health care utilization, adherence to treatment, and frequency of adverse events. Exploratory outcomes are included for mechanistic linkage and include the progression of chronic pancreatitis-related findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and changes in circulating blood markers of inflammation and fibrosis. DISCUSSION: This study investigates if naldemedine can change the natural course of pancreatitis in patients with recurrent acute pancreatitis and improve patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT no. 2021-000069-34. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT04966559. Registered on July 8, 2021.

International consensus guidelines on surveillance for pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) have an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. We present the international consensus guidelines for surveillance of pancreatic cancer in CP. METHODS: The international group evaluated 10 statements generated from evidence on 5 questions relating to pancreatic cancer in CP. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the level of evidence available per statement. The working group voted on each statement for strength of agreement, using a nine-point Likert scale in order to calculate Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. RESULTS: In the following domains there was strong consensus: (1) the risk of pancreatic cancer in affected individuals with hereditary pancreatitis due to inherited PRSS1 mutations is high enough to justify surveillance; (2) the risk of pancreatic cancer in patients with CP associated with SPINK1 p. N34S is not high enough to justify surveillance; (3) surveillance should be undertaken in pancreatic specialist centers; (4) surveillance should only be introduced after the age of 40 years and stopped when the patient would no longer be suitable for surgical intervention. All patients with CP should be advised to lead a healthy lifestyle aimed at avoiding risk factors for progression of CP and pancreatic cancer. There was only moderate or weak agreement on the best methods of screening and surveillance in other types of environmental, familial and genetic forms of CP. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inherited PRSS1 mutations should undergo surveillance for pancreatic cancer, but the best methods for cancer detection need further investigation.

[Hereditary pancreatitis].

Hereditary pancreatitis (HP) is an autosomal dominant disease with 80% penetrance. HP is characterised by the debut of recurrent acute pancreatitis episodes during childhood with gradual progression to chronic pancreatitis. Patients with phenotypic HP have a significantly increased lifetime risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Patients with HP represent a rare but important group of high-risk individuals in need of early diagnosis and screening for potential PDAC. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the epidemiology, genetics and clinical aspects of HP.

The variable phenotype of the p.A16V mutation of cationic trypsinogen (PRSS1) in pancreatitis families.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the phenotypes associated with the p.A16V mutation of PRSS1. DESIGN: Clinical and epidemiological data were collected for any family in which a p.A16V mutation was identified, either referred directly to the European Registry of Hereditary Pancreatitis and Familial Pancreatic Cancer or via a collaborator. DNA samples were tested for mutations in PRSS1, SPINK1, CFTR and CTRC. PATIENTS: Participants were recruited on the basis of either family history of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) or the results of genetic testing. Families were categorised as having hereditary pancreatitis (HP), idiopathic disease or pancreatitis in a single generation. HP was defined as >or=2 cases in >or=2 generations. Main outcome measures Onset of painful episodes of pancreatitis, death from pancreatic cancer, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and exocrine pancreatic failure. RESULTS: Ten families with p.A16V mutations were identified (22 affected individuals): six HP families, three with idiopathic disease and one with only a single generation affected. The median age of onset, ignoring non-penetrants, was 10 years (95% CI 5 to 25). There were eight confirmed cases of exocrine failure, four of whom also had diabetes mellitus. There were three pancreatic cancer cases. Two of these were confirmed as p.A16V carriers, only one of whom was affected by pancreatitis. Those with p.A16V pancreatitis were compared to affected individuals with p.R122H, p.N29I and no PRSS1 mutation. No significant differences were proven using logrank or Mann-Whitney U tests. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrance of p.A16V is highly variable and family dependent, suggesting it contributes to multigenic inheritance of a predisposition to pancreatitis.

[Hereditary pancreatitis]. / Hereditaer pancreatitis.

Hereditary pancreatitis (HP) is a disease which has been discovered quite recently. The inheritance is autosomally dominant with 80% penetrance. It gives the same symptoms as acute pancreatitis in early childhood and ends up with chronic pancreatitis. In 60% of the patients, a mutation in the trypsinogen gene can be demonstrated. The remaining 40% of the HP patients are diagnosed on the basis of clinical criteria. The acute and the chronic pancreatitis are treated as usual. It is important to recognize the disease because patients with HP have a 50 times increased risk of developing pancreatic cancer. At the age of 70, 40% have developed pancreatic cancer. This risk doubles for cigarette smokers. Screening programmes for HP in order to prevent pancreatic cancer are, however, expensive and troublesome.