Prevalence of Inherited Cardiac Conditions in Pediatric First-Degree Relatives of Patients with Idiopathic Ventricular Fibrillation.

Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is diagnosed in out-of-hospital VF survivors after comprehensive investigations have excluded structural heart disease or inherited channelopathies. Current guidelines recommend clinical screening of first-degree relatives of IVF survivors, but this approach has not been validated in children. This study aimed to assess the yield of clinical cardiac screening in child first-degree relatives of IVF victims. A retrospective observational study was conducted of all consecutive pediatric first-degree relatives of IVF patients referred to our center between December 2007 and April 2020. Patients underwent systematic evaluation including medical and family history; 12-lead resting, signal-averaged, and ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG); echocardiogram; exercise testing; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; and ajmaline provocation testing. Sixty child first-degree relatives of 32 IVF survivors were included [median follow-up time of 55 months (IQR 27.0-87.0 months); 30 (50%) females]. Eight patients (13.3%) from 6 families (18.8%) received a cardiac diagnosis: long QT syndrome (n = 4); Brugada syndrome (n = 3); and dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 1). There were no deaths during follow-up. This study demonstrates a high yield of clinical screening for inherited cardiac disease in child first-degree relatives of IVF survivors. These findings highlight the variable expression of inherited cardiac conditions and the importance of comprehensive clinical evaluation in pediatric relatives, even when extensive investigations in the proband have not identified a clear etiology. Moreover, our results support the validity of the investigations proposed by current guidelines in family relatives of IVF survivors.

Impact of sex, socio-economic status, and remoteness on therapy and survival in heart failure.

AIMS: This study aims to determine if traditional markers of disadvantage [female sex, low socio-economic status (SES), and remoteness] are associated with lower prescription of evidence-based therapy and higher mortality among patients with moderate-severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We recruited 452 consecutive class II-III heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients. Baseline clinical data were recorded prospectively. The primary outcome was the association of female sex on overall survival. Secondary outcomes included association between evidence-based therapy delivery and sex and association of SES and remoteness on heart failure therapy and survival. The Australian Bureau of Statistics generated all indices. Median follow-up was 37.9 months. One hundred and nine patients (24.3%) were women. There was no difference in overall survival based on sex (hazard ratio = 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.92, 0.48). There was no difference in prescription of beta-blockers [χ2 (1) = 0.91, 0.66], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [χ2 (1) = 0.001, 0.97], nor aldosterone antagonists [χ2 (1) = 2.71, 0.10]. There was no difference in rates of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in men compared with women [χ2 (1) = 0.35, 0.56]. Neither higher SES nor inner city residence conferred an overall survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: In this Australian cohort of heart failure patients, delivery of care and likelihood of death are comparable between the sexes, SES groups, and rural vs. city residents.

Reduction in mortality from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients is dependent on the presence of left ventricular scar.

Aims: In patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), the mortality benefit of a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been challenged. Left ventricular (LV) scar identified by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is associated with a high risk of malignant arrhythmia in NICM. We aimed to determine the impact of LV scar on the mortality benefit from a primary prevention ICD in NICM. Methods and results: We recruited 452 consecutive heart failure patients [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II/III] with NICM and LV ejection fraction ≤35% from a state-wide CMR service. All patients fulfilled European Society of Cardiology guidelines for primary prevention ICD implantation; however, the decision to implant was at the treating physician's discretion. Baseline clinical and CMR data were recorded prospectively and heart failure mortality risk (MAGGIC score) was calculated. The primary study outcome measurement was all-cause mortality based on presence or absence of ICD, stratified by LV scar. Median follow-up was 37.9 months and there was no difference in MAGGIC score between those who did and did not receive a primary prevention ICD (19.30 ± 5.46 vs. 18.90 ± 5.67, P = 0.50). In patients without LV scar, ICD implantation was not associated with improved mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-2.78, P = 0.64]. In patients with LV scar, ICD implantation was independently associated with reduced mortality (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.26-0.77, P = 0.003). Conclusions: In patients with NICM, primary prevention ICD implantation is only associated with reduced mortality in patients with LV scar. This may enable more effective selection of NICM patients for ICD implantation compared with current guidelines.