ABSTRACT
COVID-19 caused significant disruption to cancer services around the world. The health system in Aotearoa New Zealand has fared better than many other regions, with the country being successful, so far, in avoiding sustained community transmission. However, there was a significant initial disruption to services across the cancer continuum, resulting in a decrease in the number of new diagnoses of cancer in March and April 2020. Te Aho o Te Kahu, Aotearoa New Zealand's national Cancer Control Agency, coordinated a nationwide response to minimise the impact of COVID-19 on people with cancer. The response, outlined in this paper, included rapid clinical governance, a strong equity focus, development of national clinical guidance, utilising new ways of delivering care, identifying and addressing systems issues and close monitoring and reporting of the impact on cancer services. Diagnostic procedures and new cancer registrations increased in the months following the national lockdown, and the cumulative number of cancer registrations in 2020 surpassed the number of registrations in 2019 by the end of September. Cancer treatment services - surgery, medical oncology, radiation oncology and haematology - continued during the national COVID-19 lockdown in March and April 2020 and continued to be delivered at pre-COVID-19 volumes in the months since. We are cautiously optimistic that, in general, the COVID-19 pandemic does not appear to have increased inequities in cancer diagnosis and treatment for Maori in Aotearoa New Zealand.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To investigate differences in survival after diagnosis with colorectal cancer (CRC) by rurality, ethnicity and deprivation. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, clinical records and National Collections data were merged for all patients diagnosed with CRC in New Zealand in 2007-2008. Prioritised ethnicity was classified using New Zealand Cancer Registry data; meshblock of residence at diagnosis was used to determine rurality and socioeconomic deprivation. RESULTS: Of the 4,950 patients included, 1,938 had died of CRC by May 2014. The five-year risks of death from CRC were: Maori 47%; Pacific 59%; non-Maori-non-Pacific (nMnP) 38%. After adjustment for demographic characteristics, comorbidity and disease stage at diagnosis, compared to nMnP the relative risk (RR) for Maori was 1.1 (95%CI: 0.8-1.3) and for Pacific 1.8 (95% CI: 1.4-2.5). We found no differences in risk of death from CRC by rurality, but some differences by deprivation. CONCLUSIONS: Disparity in outcome following diagnosis with CRC exists in New Zealand. Much of this disparity can be explained by stage of disease at diagnosis for Maori, but for Pacific peoples and those in deprived areas other factors may influence outcome. Further analyses of the PIPER data will explore the impact of any differences in management.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Health Status Disparities , Adenocarcinoma/economics , Adenocarcinoma/ethnology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , New Zealand/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Survival AnalysisSubject(s)
Life Style , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Global Health , Humans , Male , Morbidity/trends , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers, and second-leading cause of cancer-related death, in New Zealand. The PIPER (Presentations, Investigations, Pathways, Evaluation, Rx [treatment]) project was undertaken to compare presentation, investigations, management and outcomes by rurality, ethnicity and deprivation. This paper reports the methods of the project, a comparison of PIPER patient diagnoses to the New Zealand Cancer Registry (NZCR) data, and the characteristics of the PIPER cohort. METHOD: National, retrospective cohort review of secondary care medical records (public and private) of all cases of ICD-10-AM C18-C20 on the NZCR in the calendar years 2007 and 2008 (main cohort) and an extended sample of Maori and Pacific cases, and non-Maori non-Pacific controls in 2006 and 2009 (extended cohort). RESULTS: Of the 6,387 patients identified from the NZCR 5,610 (88%) were eligible for PIPER. Reasons for exclusion were non-adenocarcinoma histology (3%) and non-colorectal primary (2%). Data were collected on 3,695 patients with colon cancer, 1,385 with rectal cancer and 466 with cancer of the recto sigmoid junction. CONCLUSIONS: The PIPER Project has generated comprehensive population level data detailing the diagnosis and management of colorectal adenocarcinoma in New Zealand. This will be used to assess the care provided to patients, and the impact of variations in care occurring between patient groups.