ABSTRACT
Back pain and neck pain are common in clinical practice, but significant challenges and pitfalls exist in their diagnosis, treatment, and management. From the neurologic standpoint, cervical radiculopathy and lumbosacral radiculopathy are characterized by neck pain or back pain accompanied by sensory and motor symptoms in an arm or leg. The basic neurologic examination is vital, but testing like electromyography and MRI is often needed especially in cases that fail conservative management. Oral medications, injection-based therapies, physical therapy, and surgical evaluation all have a place in the comprehensive neurologic management of back and neck pain and associated radiculopathy.
Subject(s)
Back Pain , Neck Pain , Radiculopathy , Humans , Radiculopathy/diagnosis , Radiculopathy/therapy , Neck Pain/therapy , Neck Pain/diagnosis , Back Pain/therapy , Back Pain/diagnosis , Back Pain/etiology , Neurologic Examination/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Physical Therapy Modalities , ElectromyographySubject(s)
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease/diagnosis , Electrodiagnosis , Polyneuropathies/diagnosis , Axons/physiology , Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease/genetics , Female , GTP Phosphohydrolases/genetics , Humans , Middle Aged , Mitochondrial Proteins/genetics , Neural Conduction/physiology , Polyneuropathies/physiopathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review is to describe the scope of neurological complications associated with monoclonal antibody-based therapies, applied across medical specialties, to demonstrate the common and rare neurological syndromes that may be encountered in clinical practice according to the therapeutic agent being receive, and to explain appropriate work-up, diagnosis, and management of drug complications, as supported by the literature. RECENT FINDINGS: The number of commercially available, evidence-based therapeutic monoclonal antibodies continues to expand. In oncology, immune checkpoint inhibitors are particularly important, as a wide range of central and peripheral nervous system complications are described. In rheumatology, anti-TNF alpha drugs remain associated with demyelinating syndromes. The number of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies encountered in practice continues to grow, as does the number of described neurological complications. Recognition of a possible drug complication is key, as these are typically complex patients at risk of other causes of neurological injury. Identification of a complication of therapy often leads to intervention and a change in management.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Medical Oncology/trends , Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Rheumatology/trends , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Immunotherapy/trends , Infliximab/adverse effects , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Nervous System Diseases/immunology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolismSubject(s)
Electrodiagnosis/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Neural Conduction/physiology , Reimbursement Mechanisms/statistics & numerical data , Electrodiagnosis/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
On October 2, 1919, President Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke that paralyzed the left half of his body. Wilson's stroke forced the American public to confront stroke, and laypeople came to identify stroke as a nervous disorder, rather than a condition rooted solely in psychological phenomena. His medical care was overseen by Cary Grayson, his personal internist, and Francis X. Dercum, a remarkably accomplished neurologist from Philadelphia. Dercum was very involved in the treatment of the President, from the day of the stroke until years later. While the medical records have been destroyed, some basic facts of Wilson's treatment and rehabilitation can be inferred from the literature. Although Woodrow Wilson was an exceptional patient, his care, albeit administered by some of the most famous physicians of the era, was typical of the time. Therefore, this paper's approach to Wilson's 1919 stroke contextualizes the President's case into the larger scheme of early twentieth-century neurology.