Use of Optimal Medical Therapy in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Undergoing Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Optimal medical therapy (OMT) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or heart failure (HF) is underused despite the established benefits of these medications. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) may be one place where OMT could be promoted. We sought to describe the prevalence and characteristics of OMT use in patients with CAD or HF undergoing CR. We included patients with CAD (myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, angina) and HF enrolled in our CR program. For patients with CAD, we defined OMT to consist of aspirin or other antiplatelets, statins, and beta-blockers (BB). For patients with HF or EF ≤ 40%, OMT included BB, spironolactone, and either Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI). For CAD patients with normal EF, OMT also included ACEi/ARB/ARNI if they also had diabetes type 2. From January 2015 to December 2019, 828 patients were referred to CR and 743 attended. Among 612 patients (mean age: 65, 23% female) with CAD, 483 (79%) patients were on OMT. Of the 131 HF patients (mean age: 64, 21% female) enrolled in CR, only 23 (18%) met all 3 OMT criteria, whereas most patients were on only 1 (93 %) or 2 (76%) HF specific medications. Spironolactone was the least prescribed (22%) medication. Over the study period, we observed a steady increase in the use of ARNI (2015: 0% vs 2019: 27%, p < 0.01). Among the individuals, 69 patients experienced both CAD and HF, while only 7 patients were under OMT for both CAD and HF. Most patients attending CR with CAD are receiving OMT, but most patients with HF are not. Although OMT has improved over time, there remains room for improvement, particularly among patients with HF.

Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has proven to be beneficial for patients with heart failure (HF), potentially reducing morbidity and mortality while improving fitness and psychological outcomes. Intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) represents an emerging form of CR that has demonstrated advantages for patients with various cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, the specific outcomes of ICR in patients with HF remain unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of ICR in patients with HF. METHODS: This retrospective study involved 12,950 patients who participated in ICR at 46 centers from January 2016 to December 2020. Patients were categorized into two groups: the HF group, comprising 1400 patients (11%), and the non-HF group, consisting of 11,550 patients (89%). The primary endpoints included the ICR completion rate, changes in body mass index (BMI), exercise minutes per week (EMW), and depression scores (CESD). A t-test was employed to compare variables between the two groups. RESULTS: The HF group comprises older patients, with 37% being females (compared to 44% in the non-HF group). The ICR completion rate was higher in the non-HF group. After ICR completion, adjusted analyses revealed that patients without HF demonstrated a greater improvement in BMI. There were no differences in fitness, as measured via EMW, or in depression scores, as measured via CESD, between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lower baseline functional status and psychosocial scores of HF patients compared to non-HF patients, patients with HF were able to attain similar or even better functional and psychosocial outcomes after ICR.

No Evidence for Oversizing Hearts and Donor Size Impact on 1-Year Survival in Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device.

The predicted heart mass (PHM) ratio has recently emerged as a better metric for donor-to-recipient size-matching than weight ratios. It is unknown whether this applies to transplant candidates on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Our study examines if PHM ratio is optimal for size-matching specifically in the LVAD patient population. Patients with LVAD who received a heart transplant from January 1997 to December 2020 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were studied. We compared 5 size-matching metrics, including donor-recipient ratios of weight, height, body mass index, body surface area, and PHM. Single and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models for 1-year mortality were calculated. Our sample consisted of 11,891 patients. In our multivariate analysis, we found that patients in the undersized group with PHM ratios <0.83 had a hazard ratio for 1-year mortality of 1.34 (95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.65, p = 0.007) suggestive of increased mortality with the use of undersized donors. There was no statistical difference in mortality between the matched (PHM ratio 0.83 to 1.2) and oversized group (PHM ratio ≥1.2). In heart transplant recipients on LVAD support, the PHM ratio provides better risk stratification than other metrics. Use of undersized donor hearts with PHM ratio <0.83 confers higher 1-year mortality. Using oversized donor hearts for transplantation in recipients on LVAD support has no benefit.

Physical and Psychological Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation and Intensive Cardiac Rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Both traditional cardiac rehabilitation (TCR) and intensive cardiac rehabilitation (ICR) have proven benefits for patients with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to compare ICR versus TCR on cardiac rehabilitation (CR) outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study of 970 patients (n = 251, ICR; n = 719, TCR) who were referred for CR between January 2018 and December 2019, 693 (71.4%) patients completed it. The TCR sessions were 90 min (60-min exercise) three times/wk for 12 wk, while ICR sessions were 4 hr (60-min exercise) two times/wk for 9 wk. Primary endpoints were change in cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) (by difference in exercise prescription metabolic equivalents [METs] between the last session and the average of the second and third sessions), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) scores, percent depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale) scores, and health status (36-item Short Form Health Survey physical and mental composite scores). Linear regression adjusted for imbalanced baseline characteristics (age, race, and diagnosis of angina). RESULTS: Of the 693 patients who completed CR (ICR = 204/251 [81%] vs TCR = 489/719 [68%], P < .01), mean age was 66 yr and 31% were female. Patients in TCR had a higher improvement in CRF (CR session METs: ICR +1.5 ± 1.2 vs TCR +1.9 ± 1.5, P < .01) but no difference in health status scores. Conversely, patients in ICR had more reduction in anxiety scores (-2 ± 4 vs -1 ± 3, P < .01) and percent reduction in depression scores (-8.3 ± 13.7% vs -5.0 ± 11.7%, P < .01) than patients in TCR. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in TCR had higher improvement in CRF while patients in ICR had higher improvement in anxiety and depression scores.

Weight Loss and Its Predictors During Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation.

We aimed to assess the prevalence and magnitude of clinically meaningful weight loss among cardiac rehabilitation (CR) participants who were overweight or obese and identify its predictors. We analyzed subjects with body mass index (BMI) ≥25 who were enrolled in a 12-week CR outpatient program from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, and had paired pre- and post-CR weight data. Patients who lost 3% or more of their body weight by the end of the program were compared with the remaining participants. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of weight loss. Overall, 129 of 485 subjects (27%) with overweight or obesity reduced their weight by at least 3% (average percent weight change: -5.0% ± 1.8% vs -0.02% ± 2.2%, average weight change: -10.9 ± 5.0 vs -0.1 ± 4.4 pounds, and average BMI change: -1.7 ± 0.7 vs -0.02 ± 0.7 kg/m2). Compared with the remaining 356 patients, those who achieved the defined weight loss were younger (p = 0.016) and had higher baseline weight (p = 0.002) and BMI (p <0.001). The weight loss group tended to be enrolled more likely for an acute myocardial infarction or percutaneous coronary intervention (p <0.001) and less likely for coronary artery bypass grafting (p = 0.001) or a heart valve procedure (p = 0.05). By the end of the CR program, the weight loss group demonstrated a greater increase in Rate Your Plate - Heart score (7 [3, 11] vs 4 [1, 8]; p <0.001) and a greater decrease in triglycerides (-20 ± 45 vs -7 ± 55 mg/dL; p = 0.026) and glycated hemoglobin (-0.1 [-0.5, 0.1] vs 0.1 [-0.3, 0.4] %; p = 0.05, among patients with diabetes or prediabetes). In a multivariable logistic regression model, baseline predictors of clinically meaningful weight loss included higher BMI and not being enrolled for a surgical CR indication (p = 0.001). In conclusion, throughout 12 weeks of CR participation, 129 of 485 subjects (27%) with BMI ≥25 had a 3% or more reduction in body weight. Patients with higher baseline BMI and participants without a surgical enrollment diagnosis were more likely to achieve the defined weight loss. Efforts to improve CR referral and enrollment for eligible patients with overweight and obesity should be encouraged, and suitable and efficient weight reduction interventions in CR settings need to be further studied.

Association Between Periodontal Disease and Cardiovascular Disease (from the NHANES).

As observational studies support the association between periodontal disease (PD) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), we examined this relationship using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013 to 2014 data. This cross-sectional study involved 2,830 adult participants, aged ≥30 years who underwent a home interview, followed by a standardized assessment at a mobile examination center from 2013 to 2014. PD was defined using the new classification scheme issued by American Academy of Periodontology Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions in 2017, and CVD was defined as the composite of coronary artery disease and stroke. The gathered data were subjected to weighted statistical analysis to examine the relation between CVD prevalence and PD. The sample (mean age 51.5 ± 13.6 years) comprised 50.1% men and 69.5% White participants. Stage I (mild/subclinical), II (moderate), and III to IV (severe) PD was noted in 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.7 to 21.7), 57.4% (95% CI 53.9 to 60.9), and 25.9% (95% CI 21.4 to 30.8) of the participants, respectively. Patients with stage III and IV PD were more likely to have CVD than those with stage I (adjusted odds ratio 3.59, 95% CI 1.12 to 11.54, p = 0.03). Similarly, participants who reported fair/poor gum health were more likely to have CVD than those who reported excellent/very good gum health (adjusted odds ratio 2.17, 95% CI 0.98 to 4.79, p = 0.055). In conclusion, the data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013 to 2014 demonstrated that PD severity is associated with CVD risk. However, the information gathered by trained professionals during periodontal examinations is a more reliable predictor of PD-CVD associations compared with self-reported measures of oral health.

Cardiovascular Outcomes of Patients Referred to Home Based Cardiac Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Home Based Cardiac Rehabilitation (HBCR) has been considered a reasonable alternative to Center-based Cardiac Rehabilitation (CBCR) in patients with established cardiovascular disease, especially in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic. However, the long-term cardiovascular outcomes of patients referred to HBCR remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of patients who were referred and attended HBCR vs patients referred but did not attend HBCR (Non-HBCR). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 269 patients referred to HBCR at Providence Veterans Affairs Medical Center (PVAMC). From November 2017 to March 2020, 427 patients were eligible and referred for Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) at PVAMC. Of total patients, 158 patients were referred to CBCR and 269 patients to HBCR based on patient and/or clinician preference. The analysis of outcomes was focused on HBCR patients. We compared outcomes of patients who were referred and attended HBCR vs patients referred but did not attend HBCR (Non-HBCR) from 3 to 12 months of the referral date. HBCR consisted of face-to-face entry exam with exercise prescription, weekly phone calls for education and exercise monitoring, with adjustments where applicable, for 12-weeks and an exit exam. Primary outcome was composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes were all-cause hospitalization, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations, separately. We used cox proportional methods to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI. We adjusted for imbalanced characteristics at baseline: smoking, left ventricular ejection fraction and CABG status. RESULTS: A total of 269 patients (mean age: 72, 98% Male) were referred to HBCR, however, only 157 (58%) patients attended HBCR. The primary outcome occurred in 30 patients (19.1%) in the HBCR group and 30 patients (30%) in the Non-HBCR group (adjusted HR=0.56, CI 0.33-0.95, P=.03). All-cause mortality occurred in 6.4% of patients in the HBCR group and 13% patients in the Non-HBCR group 3 to 12 months after HBCR referral (adjusted HR=0.43, CI 0.18-1.0, P= .05). There was no difference in cardiovascular hospitalizations (HBCR: 5.7% vs Non-HBCR: 10%, adjusted HR 0.57, CI 0.22-1.4, P= .23) or all cause hospitalizations at 3 to 12 months between the groups (HBCR: 12.7% vs Non-HBCR: 21%, adjusted HR 0.53, CI 0.28-1.01, P= .05). CONCLUSION: Completion of HBCR among referred patients was associated with a lower risk of the combined all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalizations up to 12 months. Based on the outcomes, HBCR is a reasonable option that can improve access to CR for patients who are not candidates of or cannot attend CBCR. Randomized-controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Physical and Psychological Well-being Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Patients Following Mitral Valve and Aortic Valve Procedures.

PURPOSE: Patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following an aortic valve procedure demonstrate improvements in physical capacity and psychological well-being. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate baseline exercise capacity and psychological well-being for mitral valve patients participating in CR and to compare physical and psychological outcomes between mitral valve and aortic valve patients. METHODS: The primary endpoint was improvement in 6-min walk test (6MWT) distance. Secondary endpoints included change in exercise min/wk, depression scores (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), anxiety scores (General Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD-7]), and overall quality of life (Dartmouth Cooperative Functional Assessment [COOP]) scores. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and December 2019, 94 patients who underwent an aortic valve procedure and 46 patients who underwent mitral valve procedures were enrolled prospectively in CR. At the completion of their CR program, patients had similar improvements in their 6MWT (mitral valve: 173 ft [125, 238] vs aortic valve 197 ft [121, 295], P = .42); exercise min/wk (mitral valve: 90 min [45, 175] vs aortic valve: 80 min [40, 130], P = .44). Changes in anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9), and COOP scores were smaller but similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: CR participation resulted in similar improvements in physical activity between patients undergoing mitral valve and aortic valve procedures. Psychological well-being and quality of life scores improved minimally and similarly between the two groups.