The outcomes of laparoscopic omentum-preserving gastrectomy compared to open surgery with omentectomy in gastric cancer patients: a propensity score matched study of 249 UICC stage 0-IV gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: We performed a propensity score matched study comparing patients' short- and long-term results after laparoscopic omentum-preserving gastrectomy and open surgery with omentectomy with UICC stages 0-IV. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2022, 311 patients with gastric cancer underwent surgery at the University Clinical Centre Maribor. Of these, 249 met the inclusion criteria and 198 were included in the study group after PSM. RESULTS: Patients in both groups were well-balanced in demographic and pathological characteristics after PSM. There was no significant difference in the 5-year survival between groups (LAP: 62.2% vs. OPN: 54.4%; p = 0.950). The Cox regression model identified UICC stage and age as significant predictors for survival. In both groups, peritoneal dissemination was the most common site of recurrence. The multivariate analysis identified the UICC stage as a significant predictor for peritoneal recurrence, while omental preservation was not associated with a higher risk of peritoneal dissemination. Omentum preservation was not associated with more intestinal obstruction. Patients in the LAP group had significantly shorter hospital stays (LAP: 9(6) vs. OPN: 10(5); p = 0.009), less postoperative morbidity (LAP: 17% vs. OPN: 23.4%; p = 0.009), and significantly more extracted LNs per operation compared to open surgery (LAP: 31 ± 11 LNs vs. OPN: 25 ± 12 LNs; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we recommend the use of laparoscopic omentum-preserving gastrectomy in patients with early and advanced gastric cancer.

Evaluation of focused sentinel lymph node RT-qPCR screening for micrometastases with the use of the Maruyama computer program.

BACKGROUND: In this preliminary study, we investigated the sensitivity and specificity of reverse transcriptase (RT)-qPCR lymph node (LN) metastases detection, the accuracy of intraoperative dye navigation, and the incidence of micrometastasis (MM) detection with this protocol, compared to other published studies. METHODS: A total of 23 patients were enrolled in the study. The first stained LN was analyzed using RT-qPCR for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 (CK-20) expression, as markers for MM involvement. The Maruyama computer program was used to determine the most likely first metastatic site. These results were compared with the actual staining patterns to evaluate whether the first draining LN was extracted. We analyzed the correlations between MM and tumor characteristics. The incidence of MM detected with the present method was compared to other studies, as markers of the accuracy of the present protocol. RESULTS: At 35 threshold cycles, the RT-qPCR had a negative predictive value of 100 % and a positive predictive value of 83.3 %. MM were detected in 4 out of 14 node-negative patients (28.6 %). The extracted sentinel LN coincided in 76.9 % of cases with the most probable first metastatic LN predicted by the Maruyama program. MM were found more frequently in these 'high-risk' LNs. Significant differences were found in the Lauren's histological type distribution and the age distribution among the MM-positive and MM-negative groups. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results confirm that RT-qPCR is an accurate method of MM detection, that the dye navigation enables the determination of the first draining LN, and that the incidence of MM detection with this focused sentinel LN protocol is comparable to other studies.

Evaluation of a focused sentinel lymph node protocol in node-negative gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A specific preoperative work-up was used to access a limited number of high-risk lymph nodes with RT-qPCR for micrometastatic sentinel lymph node involvement. We validated our protocol with IHC screening for micrometastases and long-term survival analysis. METHODOLOGY: From the 32 patients included 22 were node-negative patients. With a specific preoperative protocol sentinel lymph nodes (1-2 per patient) were extracted for further RT-qPCR analysis for CEA and CK20 expression. In 10 patients from the study group, the remaining lymph nodes around the extracted sentinel lymph node from the first compartment were additionally screened using IHC for missed micrometastases. RESULTS: Micrometastases were detected in seven of 22 (31.8%) node-negative patients. RT-qPCR identified micrometastases in four of 10 haematoxylin-eosin-negative lymph nodes (40%), and in three of eight IHC negative lymph nodes (37.5%). The cumulative 3-year survival for the study group was 80.8%. The 3-year survival in the RT-qPCR-negative group was 90%, compared with 66.7% in the RT-qPCR-positive group (p=0.289). CONCLUSIONS: Encouraged by these results, we will include more patients in our focused sentinel lymph node protocol. With a refinement of our method, we believe the focused sentinel lymph node protocol can be implemented for intraoperative tailoring of extent of lymphadenectomy.