A Statewide Multi-Institutional Study of Asymptomatic Pretreatment Testing of Radiation Therapy Patients for SARS-CoV-2 in a High-Incidence Region of the United States.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to establish the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in asymptomatic patients scheduled to receive radiation therapy and its effect on management decisions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 2020 and July 2020, patients without influenza-like illness symptoms at four radiation oncology departments (two academic university hospitals and two community hospitals) underwent polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2 before the initiation of treatment. Patients were tested either before radiation therapy simulation or after simulation but before treatment initiation. Patients tested for indications of influenza-like illness symptoms were excluded from this analysis. Management of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was individualized based on disease site and acuity. RESULTS: Over a 3-month period, a total of 385 tests were performed in 336 asymptomatic patients either before simulation (n = 75), post-simulation, before treatment (n = 230), or on-treatment (n = 49). A total of five patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, for a pretreatment prevalence of 1.3% (2.6% in north/central New Jersey and 0.4% in southern New Jersey/southeast Pennsylvania). The median age of positive patients was 58 years (range, 38-78 years). All positive patients were white and were relatively equally distributed with regard to sex (2 male, 3 female) and ethnicity (2 Hispanic and 3 non-Hispanic). The median Charlson comorbidity score among positive patients was five. All five patients were treated for different primary tumor sites, the large majority had advanced disease (80%), and all were treated for curative intent. The majority of positive patients were being treated with either sequential or concurrent immunosuppressive systemic therapy (80%). Initiation of treatment was delayed for 14 days with the addition of retesting for four patients, and one patient was treated without delay but with additional infectious-disease precautions. CONCLUSIONS: Broad-based pretreatment asymptomatic testing of radiation oncology patients for SARS-CoV-2 is of limited value, even in a high-incidence region. Future strategies may include focused risk-stratified asymptomatic testing.

Evaluation of a Multidisciplinary Immunotherapy Toxicity Monitoring Program for Patients Receiving Ipilimumab for Metastatic Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Ipilimumab is an effective treatment for melanoma; however, toxicity rates remain high. The objective of this study was to describe the rates of adverse events (AEs), emergency room (ER) visits, hospitalizations, and nursing resource utilization for patients enrolled in a nurse-led telephone toxicity monitoring program. METHODS: Patients received weekly telephone calls from nursing to review a toxicity checklist during ipilimumab treatment and for 8 weeks after completion. To evaluate this program, a single-center retrospective review was performed for patients treated between July 2012 and September 2017 with single agent ipilimumab for advanced melanoma. Data were collected up to 3 months post-ipilimumab. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were included, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 61 (14.6) years. Thirty-three (49%) patients received four doses of ipilimumab, and 17 (25%) had one dose delay. The median (IQR) of any AEs reported per patient was 11 (8-17). There were 44 (66%) patients with AEs deemed to be definitely or probably related to ipilimumab, and of those, 3 (4%) experienced a grade 3 AE, whereas 4 (6%) experienced grade 4 AEs. Twenty patients (30%) had ER visits, and 31 (46%) were hospitalized during follow-up (9% ER visits and 6% hospitalizations were related to drug toxicity). CONCLUSION: Ipilimumab is associated with high rates of toxicity; however, a proactive nurse-led monitoring program was feasible and patients had low rates of grade 3-4 toxicity. Hospitalization rates and ER visits remained high; however, the minority of those were related to drug toxicity.

Initial Data Pooling for Radiation Dose-Volume Tolerance for Carotid Artery Blowout and Other Bleeding Events in Hypofractionated Head and Neck Retreatments.

PURPOSE: Dose-volume data for injury to carotid artery and other major vessels in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)/SABR head and neck reirradiation were reviewed, modeled, and summarized. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A PubMed search of the English-language literature (stereotactic and carotid and radiation) in April 2018 found 238 major vessel maximum point doses in 6 articles that were pooled for logistic modeling. Two subsequent studies with dose-volume major vessel data were modeled separately for comparison. Attempts were made to separate carotid blowout syndrome from other bleeding events (BE) in the analysis, but we acknowledge that all except 1 data set has some element of BE interspersed. RESULTS: Prior radiation therapy (RT) dose was not uniformly reported per patient in the studies included, but a course on the order of conventionally fractionated 70 Gy was considered for the purposes of the analysis (with an approximately ≥6-month estimated interval between prior and subsequent treatment in most cases). Factors likely associated with reduced risk of BE include nonconsecutive daily treatment, lower extent of circumferential tumor involvement around the vessel, and no surgical manipulation before or after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS: Initial data pooling for reirradiation involving the carotid artery resulted in 3 preliminary models compared in this Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic (HyTEC) report. More recent experiences with alternating fractionation schedules and additional risk-reduction strategies are also presented. Complications data for the most critical structures such as spinal cord and carotid artery are so limited that they cannot be viewed as strong conclusions of probability of risk, but rather, as a general guideline for consideration. There is a great need for better reporting standards as noted in the High Dose per Fraction, Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic introductory paper.

Head and Neck Tumor Control Probability: Radiation Dose-Volume Effects in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Previously-Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer: Report of the AAPM Working Group.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a viable reirradiation strategy for locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancer. Doses in the literature have varied, which challenges clinical application of SBRT as well as clinical trial design. MATERIAL & METHODS: A working group was formed through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to study tumor control probabilities for SBRT in head and neck cancer. We herein present a systematic review of the available literature addressing the dose/volume data for tumor control probability with SBRT in patients with locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancer. Dose-response models are generated that present tumor control probability as a function of dose. RESULTS: Data from more than 300 cases in 8 publications suggest that there is a dose-response relationship, with superior local control and possibly improved overall survival for doses of 35 to 45 Gy (in 5 fractions) compared with <30 Gy. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiation therapy doses equivalent to 5-fraction doses of 40 to 50 Gy are suggested for retreatment.

Esophageal Dose Tolerance in Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Mediastinal critical structures such as trachea, bronchus, esophagus, and heart are among the dose-limiting factors for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to central lung lesions. The purpose of this study was to characterize the risk of esophagitis for patients treated with SBRT and to develop a statistical dose-response model to assess the equivalent uniform dose, D10%, D5cc, D1cc, and Dmax, to the esophagus and the risk of toxicity. Toxicity outcomes of a dose-escalation study of 56 patients who had taken CyberKnife treatment from 45-60Gy in 3-7 fractions at the Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center were utilized to create the dose-response model for esophagus. A total of 5 grade 2 esophageal complications were reported (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0); 4 complications were early effects and 1 complication was a late effect. All analyses were performed in terms of 5-fraction equivalent dosing. According to our study, D1cc at a dose of 32.9Gy and Dmax dose of 43.4Gy corresponded to a complication probability of 50% for grade 2 toxicity. In this series of 58 CyberKnife mediastinal lung cases, no grade 3 or higher esophageal toxicity occurred. Our estimates of esophageal toxicity are compared with the data in the literature. Further research needs to be performed to establish more reliable dose limits as longer follow-up and toxicity outcomes are reported in patients treated with SBRT for central lung lesions.

Factors that may determine the targeting accuracy of image-guided radiosurgery.

PURPOSE: The AAPM TG-135 report is a landmark recommendation for the quality assurance (QA) of image-guided robotic radiosurgery. The purpose of this paper is to present results pertaining to intentionally offsetting the phantom as recommended by TG-135 and to present data on targeting algorithm accuracy as a function of imager parameters in less than ideal circumstances, which had not been available at the time of publication of TG-135. METHODS: All tests in this study were performed at the Cooper University Hospital CyberKnife Center in Mt. Laurel, NJ. For intentional offsets, initial tests were performed on the Accuray-supplied anthropomorphic head and neck phantom, whereas for subsequent tests, the Accuray-supplied alignment quality assurance (AQA) phantom was used. To simulate the effects of imager parameters for larger patients, slabs of Blue Water (Standard Imaging, Inc., Middleton, WI) were added to attenuate the x-ray images in some of the tests. In conjunction with attenuated x-ray tests, the number of fiducials was varied by systematically deselecting them one at a time at the CyberKnife console. RESULTS: Tests using the AQA phantom verified that submillimeter alignments were consistently achieved even with intentional shifts and rotations of up to 10.0 mm and 1.0°, respectively. An analysis of 17 months of daily QA alignment tests showed that submillimeter alignments were achieved more than 99% of the time even with such intentional shifts and rotations of the phantom. When additional slabs of Blue Water were added to simulate patient attenuation of the x-ray images, targeting errors could be induced depending on imager parameters and the amount of Blue Water used. A series of consecutive tests showed that two helpful variables to ensure good accuracy of the system were (1) the fiducial extraction confidence level (FECL) system parameter and (2) the number of targeted fiducials. When fewer than four fiducials were used, the FECL reported by the CyberKnife was sometimes high even when a false lock occurred, so using multiple fiducials helped to ensure reliable targeting. CONCLUSIONS: Radiosurgery requires the highest degree of targeting accuracy, and in our experience, the CyberKnife has been able to maintain submillimeter accuracy consistently. It has been verified that our CyberKnife can correct for phantom shifts of up to 10.0 mm and rotations of up to 1.0°. It has also been discovered that false locks are more likely to occur with a single fiducial than with multiple fiducials. Although targeting accuracy can only be measured on a phantom, the insight gained from analyzing the QA tests can help us in devising better strategies for achieving the best treatment for our patients.

Total skin electron beam radiation in a pediatric patient with leukemia cutis: a case report.

Leukemia cutis, a form of extramedullary leukemia involving the skin, is a poor prognostic marker and indicator of imminent hematologic relapse and chemotherapeutic resistance in leukemia patients. Although total skin electron beam radiotherapy is commonly recommended for patients with leukemia cutis, its role and effectiveness remains unclear. Here we describe a 19-month-old infant with acute myelogenous leukemia first diagnosed at 15 months of age. It relapsed in her skin at 18 months of age, associated with raised hyperpigmented lesions on her chest and scalp. Radiation treatment to the total skin surface with radiation therapy resulted in relief of her symptoms before relapse in the bone marrow.

Dosimetric and toxicity comparison between prone and supine position IMRT for endometrial cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the dosimetric and toxicity differences between prone and supine position intensity-modulate radiotherapy in endometrial cancer patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive endometrial cancer patients treated with adjuvant RT were analyzed. Of these, 21 were treated in prone position and 26 in the supine position. Dose-volume histograms for normal tissue structures and targets were compared between the two groups. Acute and chronic toxicity were also compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: The percentage of volume receiving 10, 20, 30, 40, 45, and 50 Gy for small bowel was 89.5%, 69%, 33%, 12.2%, 5%, and 0% in the prone group and 87.5%, 62.7%, 26.4%, 8%, 4.3%, and 0% in the supine group, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant. The dose-volume histograms for bladder and rectum were also comparable, except for a slightly greater percentage of volume receiving 10 Gy (1.5%) and 20 Gy (5%) for the rectum in the prone group. Acute small bowel toxicities were Grade 1 in 7 patients and Grade 2 in 14 patients in the prone group vs. Grade 1 in 6 patients and Grade 2 in 19 patients in the supine group. Chronic toxicity was Grade 1 in 7 patients and Grade 3 in 1 patient in the prone group and Grade 1 in 5 patients in the supine group. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that no difference exists in the dose to the normal tissue and toxicity between prone and supine intensity-modulated radiotherapy for endometrial cancer. Longer follow-up and more outcome studies are needed to determine whether any differences exist between the two approaches.

Clinical outcome with adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma using intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess local control and chronic toxicity with IMRT for adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with endometrial cancer were treated with adjuvant IMRT and HDR brachytherapy (HDRB). The external beam dose was between 45 and 50.4 Gy, and all patients received 10 Gy in 2 fractions of HDRB to the vaginal cuff. Eight of these patients were treated with extended field to include the paraaortic region. RESULTS: IMRT dosimetry showed excellent coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) with mean PTV 95, PTV 110 and PTV 120 of 97.8%, 8.2% and 0.9% respectively. At a median follow-up of 20 months, four patients have recurred at extra pelvic sites. No patient had pelvic recurrence. The treatment was well tolerated with late toxicities as follows: small bowel grade 1: 25%, rectal grade 1: 2% and bladder grade 1: 13%. One patient had grade 3 small bowel toxicity. The 3-year actuarial rate of grade 2 or greater toxicity, disease-free survival and overall survival rate were 3.3%, 84% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary analysis of IMRT for adjuvant treatment of endometrial carcinoma shows excellent local control and low toxicity. However, longer follow-up and more patients are needed to ascertain whether the benefits of IMRT treatment seen here translate into long-term reductions in toxicities and local recurrence.