Axillary Management Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trial data indicate that omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is feasible and may reduce morbidity for carefully selected patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). However, there remains a need to understand how these findings translate to broader clinical practice and to identify which patients benefit most. This study utilizes a national dataset to assess outcomes in axillary management, aiming to inform best practice in axillary de-escalation. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify women diagnosed with clinically node-positive invasive breast cancer between 2012 to 2020 who received NCT and subsequent ALND. Associations between clinicopathologic factors and axillary pCR were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: Of the 59,791 patients included, 8,827 (14.76%) achieved nodal pCR. Patients with HR-negative and HER2-positive receptor status more frequently underwent ALND instead of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conversely, patients over the age of 70, those with private or public insurance, and cases classified as ypT1 or ypT2 were less likely to undergo ALND. CONCLUSION: A subset of patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer received ALND despite achieving axillary pCR following NCT. This highlights an opportunity to enhance precision in identifying candidates for axillary de-escalation, potentially reducing morbidity and tailoring treatment more closely to individual patient needs.

Reliability of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to frequently asked questions in breast surgical oncology.

INTRODUCTION: Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots, capable of simulating human-like conversations, are becoming more prevalent in healthcare. While this technology offers potential benefits in patient engagement and information accessibility, it raises concerns about potential misuse, misinformation, inaccuracies, and ethical challenges. METHODS: This study evaluated a publicly available AI chatbot, ChatGPT, in its responses to nine questions related to breast cancer surgery selected from the American Society of Breast Surgeons' frequently asked questions (FAQ) patient education website. Four breast surgical oncologists assessed the responses for accuracy and reliability using a five-point Likert scale and the Patient Education Materials Assessment (PEMAT) Tool. RESULTS: The average reliability score for ChatGPT in answering breast cancer surgery questions was 3.98 out of 5.00. Surgeons unanimously found the responses understandable and actionable per the PEMAT criteria. The consensus found ChatGPT's overall performance was appropriate, with minor or no inaccuracies. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT demonstrates good reliability in responding to breast cancer surgery queries, with minor, nonharmful inaccuracies. Its answers are accurate, clear, and easy to comprehend. Notably, ChatGPT acknowledged its informational role and did not attempt to replace medical advice or discourage users from seeking input from a healthcare professional.

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction: Lessons learned over eight years.

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is recognized as a surgical approach used to reduce the risk of developing secondary lymphedema, and evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ILR is favorable. Our Lymphatic Center has become a centralized location offering ILR for the risk-reduction in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in New England. Over the course of our experience, we made several modifications and adapted our approach to enhance the operative success of this procedure. These include advancements in our use of indocyanine green (ICG) imaging to identify baseline lymphatic anatomical variation, utilization of fluorescein isothiocyanate for lymphatic vessel visualization, application of the lymphosome concept to guide arm injection sites, verification of anastomotic patency (using ICG), localization of reconstruction to guide radiation therapy, incorporation of intraoperative tools to facilitate better anatomic visualization of the axilla, and addition of a lower extremity vein graft to mitigate venous-related complications. Collecting information from each surgery in a standardized manner, including intraoperative lymphatic channel measurements, and deploying clips for possible future radiation exposure, enables future studies on ILR patient outcomes. In this contribution, we aimed to share our institutional modifications with the surgical community to facilitate further adoption, conversation, and advancement of ILR for the risk-reduction in BCRL.

Expanding Access to Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction Through an Axillary Surgery Referral Program: A 6-Year Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in breast cancer have progressed toward less aggressive axillary surgery. However, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains necessary in specific cases and can increase the risk of lymphedema. Performing ALND with immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) can help lower this risk. This report outlines the implementation of an Axillary Surgery Referral Program (ASRP) to broaden access to ILR, providing insights for institutions considering similar initiatives. METHODS: A retrospective study analyzed patients referred to the ASRP at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) between 6 January 2017 and 10 December 2022. Patients were identified from a prospective registry, with data subsequently extracted from electronic medical records. This analysis specifically centered on patients referred from external institutions to undergo ALND with ILR. RESULTS: The program received referrals for 131 patients from institutions across five different states. Annual referrals steadily increased over time. The primary indication for referral was residual axillary disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (41.2%). Among the referrals, 20 patients (15.3%) no longer required ALND due to axillary pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. Care coordination played a crucial role in streamlining the patient care process for both efficiency and effectiveness. CONCLUSION: The ASRP expands access to ILR for patients with breast cancer, the majority referred for surgical management of residual disease after chemotherapy. The program provides a model for health care institutions aiming to establish similar specialized referral services. Continued program evaluation will be instrumental in refining axillary surgery referral practices and ensuring optimal patient care.

Assessing the "healthy immigrant effect" in mental health: Intra- and inter-cohort trends in mood and/or anxiety disorders.

BACKGROUND: The healthy immigrant effect implies that, at the time of immigration, new immigrants are typically healthier than the Canadian-born population. Furthermore, this health advantage fades the longer cohorts of immigrants remain in the host country. METHODS: Most studies assessing the healthy immigrant effect rely on strong, untestable assumptions to extract unique effects for length of stay (LOS) (i.e., how long an immigrant has been in a host country), period (i.e., year of observation), and cohort (i.e., year of immigration). Rather than attempting to parse out separate effects for LOS, period, and cohort, we adopt a descriptive, cohort-centric approach to study immigrant mental health, which examines intra- and inter-cohort trends, that is, joint LOS-period and cohort-period parameters, respectively. While intra-cohort trends show how immigrants' mental health change with LOS across periods, inter-cohort trends reveal how the mental health of successive cohorts of immigrants differ across time periods. To provide a thorough assessment of the healthy immigrant effect, we use both survey and administrative data on cohorts of Canadian immigrants from 2003 to 2013. RESULTS: The survey data reveal that mental health declines steeply (i.e., there is an increase in mood and/or anxiety disorders) within and across immigrant cohorts, while the administrative data show little overall change in mental health care utilization within and across cohorts. The divergent results may reflect issues related to barriers in access to mental health services because the administrative data, which are based on health care utilization, do not the capture the increase in mental disorders seen in the survey data. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the benefit of a cohort-based approach to assess the healthy immigrant effect as it pertains to mental health as well as the importance of using different types of data, which may be measuring different aspects of immigrant mental health and health care utilization.

Socioeconomic Status Among Cochlear Implant Candidates and Association With Surgical Pursuance.

Importance: Despite the sizeable global burden of hearing loss, cochlear implants have poor penetrance among eligible hearing-impaired individuals. Identifying populations who may benefit from a cochlear implant but among whom penetrance is poor is an important aim in reducing the health-related and economic effects of hearing loss on both individuals and society. Objectives: To explore the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with cochlear implant candidacy and the decision to undergo cochlear implantation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary academic center. All adult patients evaluated for cochlear implant candidacy from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2022, were included in the analysis. Exposures: Household income quintile and rural or urban residence were used as proxies for SES based on zip code linkage to US Census and US Department of Agriculture data. Main Outcomes and Measures: Odds of cochlear implant candidacy and surgery. Results: A total of 754 individuals underwent candidacy evaluations and were included in the analysis (386 [51.2%] women; mean [SD] age, 64.0 [15.7] years). Of these, 693 (91.9%) were cochlear implant candidates, and 623 candidates (89.9%) underwent cochlear implantation. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that individuals in the highest income quintile had lower odds of cochlear implant candidacy compared with those in the lowest income quintile (odds ratio [OR], 0.26 [95% CI, 0.08-0.91]), and candidates in the highest income quintile had greater odds of undergoing cochlear implant surgery compared with those in the lowest quintile (OR, 2.59 [95% CI, 1.14-5.86]). Living in a small town or a micropolitan or rural area was associated with lower odds of undergoing cochlear implant surgery compared with living in a metropolitan core (OR, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.04-0.83]) after controlling for distance to the primary implant center. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that individuals with higher SES are less likely to qualify for a cochlear implant; however, those who qualify are more likely to undergo surgery compared with those with lower SES. These findings highlight a hearing health care disparity that should be addressed through further studies to guide population-based initiatives.

Discordant Breast and Axillary Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer has the advantage of determining in vivo response to treatment, enabling more conservative surgery, and facilitating the understanding of tumor biology. Pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC is a predictor of improved overall survival. However, some patients demonstrate a discordant response to NAC between the breast and axillary nodes. This study was designed to identify factors that correlate to achieving a breast pCR without an axillary node pCR following NAC and explore the potential clinical implications. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with clinical T1-4, N1-3 breast cancer between 2004 and 2017. Patients underwent NAC followed surgical resection of the breast cancer and axillary node surgery. Multivariable analyses were used to identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with discordant pathologic response. RESULTS: In total, 13,934 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 4292 (30.8%) patients demonstrated a breast pCR without a corresponding axillary pCR on final pathology. After adjusting for covariates, factors associated with higher discordance between axillary response in our cohort of breast pCR patients included older age (≥ 54), treatment at a community facility, T1 tumors, HR-positive, HER2 negative, low-grade tumors, and cN2/3 disease. CONCLUSIONS: Discordance between breast and axillary pCR is not infrequent and may be related to a number of patient-related factors and tumor characteristics impacting nodal response to NAC. Further investigation into differing responses to NAC is warranted to better understand the mechanism of this phenomenon and to determine how these findings may influence treatment.

Comparison of socio-economic determinants of COVID-19 testing and positivity in Canada: A multi-provincial analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have been more pronounced for socially disadvantaged populations. We sought to determine how access to SARS-CoV-2 testing and the likelihood of testing positive for COVID-19 were associated with demographic factors, socioeconomic status (SES) and social determinants of health (SDH) in three Canadian provinces. METHODS: An observational population-based cross-sectional study was conducted for the provinces of Ontario, Manitoba and New Brunswick between March 1, 2020 and April 27, 2021, using provincial health administrative data. After excluding residents of long-term care homes, those without current provincial health insurance and those who were tested for COVID-19 out of province, records from provincial healthcare administrative databases were reviewed for 16,900,661 healthcare users. Data was modelled separately for each province in accordance to a prespecified protocol and follow-up consultations among provincial statisticians and collaborators. We employed univariate and multivariate regression models to examine determinants of testing and test results. RESULTS: After adjustment for other variables, female sex and urban residency were positively associated with testing, while female sex was negatively associated with test positivity. In New Brunswick and Ontario, individuals living in higher income areas were more likely to be tested, whereas in Manitoba higher income was negatively associated with both testing and positivity. High ethnocultural composition was associated with lower testing rates. Both high ethnocultural composition and high situational vulnerability increased the odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. DISCUSSION: We observed that multiple demographic, income and SDH factors were associated with SARS-CoV-2 testing and test positivity. Barriers to healthcare access identified in this study specifically relate to COVID-19 testing but may reflect broader inequities for certain at-risk groups.

A 4-Year Institutional Experience of Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Up to one in three patients may go on to develop breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) after treatment. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) has been shown in early studies to reduce the risk of BCRL, but long-term outcomes are limited because of its recent introduction and institutions' differing eligibility requirements. This study evaluated the incidence of BCRL in a cohort that underwent ILR over the long term. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients referred for ILR at the authors' institution from September of 2016 through September of 2020 was performed. Patients with preoperative measurements, a minimum of 6 months of follow-up data, and at least one completed lymphovenous bypass were identified. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, cancer treatment data, intraoperative management, and lymphedema incidence. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients with unilateral node-positive breast cancer underwent axillary nodal surgery and an attempt at ILR over the study period. Ninety patients underwent successful ILR and met all eligibility criteria, with a mean patient age of 54 ± 12.1 years and median body mass index of 26.6 kg/m 2 [interquartile range (IQR), 24.0 to 30.7 kg/m 2 ]. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 14 (IQR, eight to 19). Median follow-up was 17 months (range, 6 to 49 months). Eighty-seven percent of patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, and among them, 97% received regional lymph node irradiation. The overall rate of lymphedema was 9% at the end of the study period. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of strict follow-up guidelines over the long term, the authors' findings support that ILR at the time of axillary lymph node dissection is an effective procedure that reduces the risk of BCRL in a high-risk patient population. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Variable Anatomy of the Lateral Upper Arm Lymphatic Channel: An Anatomical Risk Factor for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.

BACKGROUND: The lateral upper arm channel is an accessory lymphatic pathway that drains the upper extremity by means of the deltopectoral groove and supraclavicular nodes, thereby bypassing the axilla. Its variable connectivity to the forearm has not been studied in vivo. METHODS: Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography was performed preoperatively to map the superficial and functional arm lymphatics in breast cancer patients without clinical or objective evidence of lymphedema. A retrospective review was performed to extract demographic, ICG imaging, and surgical data. RESULTS: Sixty patients underwent ICG lymphography before axillary lymph node dissection between June of 2019 and October of 2020. In 59%, the lateral upper arm lymphatic channel was contiguous with the forearm (long bundle). In 38%, the lateral upper arm lymphatic channel was present but not contiguous with the forearm (short bundle). In 3%, the lateral upper arm pathway was entirely absent. Seven patients developed at least one sign of lymphedema during postoperative surveillance, of which 71% demonstrated the short bundle variant. CONCLUSION: Although the lateral upper arm pathway is most often present, its connections to the forearm are frequently absent (short bundle), which, in this pilot report, appears to represent a potential risk factor for the development of lymphedema. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, V.

Evaluating Axillary Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The benefits that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) provides in treating patients with breast cancer are well known. However, its effects on axillary lymph nodes and lymph node yield (LNY) following axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remain unclear. Given the importance of LNY for accurate axillary staging in patients with breast cancer, we retrospectively reviewed a large national cancer database to determine if NAC has an effect on LNY following axillary surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database was performed. Patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 with T0-T4, clinical N0-3, and M0 breast cancer who underwent ALND were included. Patients were categorized by NAC and primary surgery (PS). A descriptive analysis of patient and tumor characteristics, as well as extrinsic factors, was performed. A univariate analysis using Student's t-test was performed to evaluate LNY between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 118,108 patients were included in our study. We found that 29,066 (24.6%) patients underwent NAC, and 89,042 (75.4%) had surgery as initial treatment (PS group). The median LNY by ALND in the NAC group was 11 (Q1, Q3: 6, 16). The median LNY in the PS group was 11 (Q1, Q3: 6, 17), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in patient characteristics and external factors, we found no difference in LNY following ALND between patients who underwent NAC and those who had initial surgery. Efforts should be made to achieve equivalent LNY whether or not patients receive NAC.

Essential requirements for the governance and management of data trusts, data repositories, and other data collaborations.

Introduction: Around the world, many organisations are working on ways to increase the use, sharing, and reuse of person-level data for research, evaluation, planning, and innovation while ensuring that data are secure and privacy is protected. As a contribution to broader efforts to improve data governance and management, in 2020 members of our team published 12 minimum specification essential requirements (min specs) to provide practical guidance for organisations establishing or operating data trusts and other forms of data infrastructure. Approach and Aims: We convened an international team, consisting mostly of participants from Canada and the United States of America, to test and refine the original 12 min specs. Twenty-three (23) data-focused organisations and initiatives recorded the various ways they address the min specs. Sub-teams analysed the results, used the findings to make improvements to the min specs, and identified materials to support organisations/initiatives in addressing the min specs. Results: Analyses and discussion led to an updated set of 15 min specs covering five categories: one min spec for Legal, five for Governance, four for Management, two for Data Users, and three for Stakeholder & Public Engagement. Multiple changes were made to make the min specs language more technically complete and precise. The updated set of 15 min specs has been integrated into a Canadian national standard that, to our knowledge, is the first to include requirements for public engagement and Indigenous Data Sovereignty. Conclusions: The testing and refinement of the min specs led to significant additions and improvements. The min specs helped the 23 organisations/initiatives involved in this project communicate and compare how they achieve responsible and trustworthy data governance and management. By extension, the min specs, and the Canadian national standard based on them, are likely to be useful for other data-focused organisations and initiatives.

Utilizing a lower extremity vein graft for immediate lymphatic reconstruction.

Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) is targeted at preventing breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) by anastomosing disrupted arm lymphatic channels to axillary vein tributaries. Inadequate vein length and venous back-bleeding are two technical reasons that lead to ILR procedures being aborted intraoperatively. Recently, our team began routinely harvesting a lower extremity vein graft (LEVG) for all ILR procedures to reduce our abort rate. We describe the surgical approach of an LEVG and evaluate the effects on aborted case rates and intraoperative time. A retrospective review of our institutional lymphatic database was conducted. Two hundred and forty-seven breast cancer patients were taken to the operating room for attempted ILR in the past 5 years. Prior to the use of an LEVG (n = 205), our abort rate was 14%. Since routinely performing an LEVG with ILR (n = 42), we have not aborted a single case. Despite an LEVG requiring one additional anastomosis to connect the vein graft to the native axillary vein tributary, this technique has not changed the intraoperative time for ILR procedures. In this technical contribution, we describe our early experience performing immediate lymphatic reconstruction utilizing a lower extremity vein graft. Implementation of this technique appears to have promising effects on aborted case rates without affecting intraoperative time, and greatly facilitates the lymphovenous anastomosis.

Home Recovery After Mastectomy: Review of Literature and Strategies for Implementation American Society of Breast Surgeons Working Group.

BACKGROUND: Practices regarding recovery after mastectomy vary significantly, including overnight stay versus discharge same day. Expanded use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) algorithms and the recent COVID pandemic have led to increased number of patients who undergo home recovery after mastectomy (HRAM). METHODS: The Patient Safety Quality Committee of the American Society of Breast Surgeons created a multispecialty working group to review the literature evaluating HRAM after mastectomy with and without implant-based reconstruction. A literature review was performed regarding this topic; the group then developed guidance for patient selection and tools for implementation. RESULTS: Multiple, retrospective series have reported that patients discharged day of mastectomy have similar risk of complications compared with those kept overnight, including risk of hematoma (0-5.1%). Multimodal strategies that improve nausea and analgesia improve likelihood of HRAM. Patients who undergo surgery in ambulatory surgery centers and by high-volume breast surgeons are more likely to be discharged day of surgery. When evaluating unplanned return to care, the only significant factors are African American race and increased comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Review of current literature demonstrates that HRAM is a safe option in appropriate patients. Choice of method of recovery should consider patient factors, such as comorbidities and social situation, and requires input from the multidisciplinary team. Preoperative education regarding pain management, drain care, and after-hour access to medical care are crucial components to a successful program. Additional investigation is needed as these programs become more prevalent to assess quality measures such as unplanned return to care, complications, and patient satisfaction.