Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep ; 19(2): 154-165, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35147855

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Effective ways to diagnose the remaining people living with HIV who do not know their status are a global priority. We reviewed the use of risk-based tools, a set of criteria to identify individuals who would not otherwise be tested (screen in) or excluded people from testing (screen out). RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies suggest that there may be value in risk-based tools to improve testing efficiency (i.e. identifying those who need to be tested). However, there has not been any systematic reviews to synthesize these studies. We identified 18,238 citations, and 71 were included. The risk-based tools identified were most commonly from high-income (51%) and low HIV (<5%) prevalence countries (73%). The majority were for "screening in" (70%), with the highest performance tools related to identifying MSM with acute HIV. Screening in tools may be helpful in settings where it is not feasible or recommended to offer testing routinely. Caution is needed for screening out tools, where there is a trade-off between reducing costs of testing with missing cases of people living with HIV.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Delivery of Health Care , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Testing , Humans , Mass Screening , Prevalence
2.
Mymensingh Med J ; 30(2): 292-300, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33830105

ABSTRACT

This study is aimed to find out various clinical, radio-graphical and echocardiographic variables to predict mitral valvular disease and their correlation with Echocardiography. This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiology and Imaging, in collaboration with Department of Cardiology, Mymensingh Medical College Hospital (MMCH), Mymensingh, Bangladesh from January 2017 to December 2018. Total 50 consecutive cases enrolled in this study who was the patients of mitral valvular disease. Both chest radiograph and echocardiograph were done for each patient. There were 76% female and 26% male with a female-male ratio 3.16:1 with mean±SD (41.54±12.44). About 42% patients had previous history of rheumatic fever. The most common x-ray findings of heart were increased central density (90%) followed by enlargement in transverse diameter (88%), straightening of the left border (88%), widening of the carina (86%), full pulmonary conus (84%) and double contour of right border (76%). About 47(94%) patients confirmed mitral valvular heart disease on echocardiography. The prominent findings included left atrium was predominantly severely dilated (50%), severely reduced mitral valve orifice area (68%), mild mitral regurgitation (46%) and mild pulmonary hypertension (38%). And overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of chest radiograph in the detection of mitral valvular heart disease were 85.11%, 66.67%, 97.56%, 14.89% and 84%, respectively. These findings suggest that chest radiograph could be used as an adjunct tool with echocardiography.


Subject(s)
Heart Valve Diseases , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Heart Valve Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Radiography
3.
BMC Public Health ; 16: 83, 2016 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26822715

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia retesting three months after treatment is recommended to detect reinfections, but retesting rates are typically low. The REACT (retest after Chlamydia trachomatis) randomised trial demonstrated that home-based retesting using postal home-collection kits and SMS reminders, resulted in substantial improvements in retesting rates in women, heterosexual men and men who have sex with men (MSM), with detection of more repeat positive tests compared with SMS reminder alone. In the context of this trial, the acceptability of the home-based strategy was evaluated and the costs of the two strategies were compared. METHODS: REACT participants (200 women, 200 heterosexual men, 200 MSM) were asked to complete an online survey that included home-testing acceptability and preferred methods of retesting. The demographics, sexual behaviour and acceptability of home collection were compared between those preferring home-testing versus clinic-based retesting or no preference, using a chi-square test. The costs to the health system of the clinic-based and home retesting strategies and the cost per infection for each were also compared. RESULTS: Overall 445/600 (74 %) participants completed the survey; 236/445 from the home-testing arm, and 141 of these (60 %) retested at home. The majority of home arm retesters were comfortable having the kit posted to their home (86 %); found it easy to follow the instructions and collect the specimens (96 %); were confident they had collected the specimens correctly (90 %); and reported no problems (70 %). Most (65 %) preferred home retesting, 21 % had no preference and 14 % preferred clinic retesting. Comparing those with a preference for home testing to those who didn't, there were significant differences in being comfortable having a kit sent to their home (p = 0.045); not having been diagnosed with chlamydia previously (p = 0.030); and living with friends (p = 0.034). The overall cost for the home retest pathway was $154 (AUD), compared to $169 for the clinic-based retesting pathway and the cost per repeat infection detected was $1409 vs $3133. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals initially diagnosed with chlamydia in a sexual health clinic setting, home-based retesting was shown to be highly acceptable, preferred by most participants, and cost-efficient. However some clients preferred clinic-based testing, often due to confidentiality concerns in their home environment. Both options should be provided to maximise retesting rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry on September 9, 2011: ACTRN12611000968976.


Subject(s)
Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia Infections/economics , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/statistics & numerical data , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Chlamydia Infections/prevention & control , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Self Care/methods , Young Adult
4.
Int J STD AIDS ; 27(10): 882-9, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26378192

ABSTRACT

Reactive arthritis is an under-studied complication of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection (chlamydia). We assessed trends and risk factors for reactive arthritis in a large urban sexual health clinic. Using a case-control design, data on reactive arthritis cases and controls at the Sydney Sexual Health Centre over the period 1992-2012 were extracted and multivariate analyses were performed. Trend analyses were performed on reactive arthritis diagnoses. Over the 1992-2012 study period, 85 reactive arthritis cases were diagnosed at Sydney Sexual Health Centre. The rate of reactive arthritis diagnoses decreased over time (23 in 1992-1996 to one in 2007-2011 and none in 2012), while chlamydia diagnoses increased (770 in 1992-1996 to 2257 in 2007-2011). In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with a reactive arthritis diagnosis were: being male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-10.32; p = 0.043) or born overseas (aOR 2.69; 95% CI 1.27-5.70; p = 0.010), while a past sexually transmitted infection other than chlamydia or non-gonococcal urethritis was protective (aOR 0.21; 95% CI 0.10-0.45; p < 0.001). Reactive arthritis was not associated with current or recent chlamydia infection (p = 0.184) but was marginally associated with past non-gonococcal urethritis (p = 0.080). This study found a decline in reactive arthritis diagnoses despite an increase in chlamydia diagnoses.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Reactive/epidemiology , Arthritis, Reactive/microbiology , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Chlamydia trachomatis/isolation & purification , Adult , Arthritis, Reactive/diagnosis , Arthritis, Reactive/drug therapy , Australia/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Chlamydia Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Urban Population , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...