Digital Subtraction Angiography of Cerebral Arteries: Influence of Cranial Dimensions on X-ray Tube Performance.

(1) Background. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is indispensable for diagnosing cerebral aneurysms due to its superior imaging precision. However, optimizing X-ray parameters is crucial for accurate diagnosis, with X-ray tube settings significantly influencing image quality. Understanding the relationship between skull dimensions and X-ray parameters is pivotal for tailoring imaging protocols to individual patients. (2) Methods. A retrospective analysis of DSA data from a single center was conducted, involving 251 patients. Cephalometric measurements and statistical analyses were performed to assess correlations between skull dimensions and X-ray tube parameters (voltage and current). (3) Results. The study revealed significant correlations between skull dimensions and X-ray tube parameters, highlighting the importance of considering individual anatomical variations. Gender-based differences in X-ray parameters were observed, emphasizing the need for personalized imaging protocols. (4) Conclusions. Personalized approaches to DSA imaging, integrating individual anatomical variations and gender-specific differences, are essential for optimizing diagnostic outcomes. While this study provides valuable insights, further research across multiple centers and diverse imaging equipment is warranted to validate these findings.

Mobile applications in radiology: own study based on polish data.

As the number of smartphones increases, so does the number of medical apps. Medical mobile applications are widely used in many medical fields by both patients and doctors. However, there are still few approved mobile applications that can be used in the diagnostic-therapeutic process and radiological apps are affected as well. We conducted our research by classifying radiological applications from the Google Play® store into appropriate categories, according to our own qualification system developed by researchers for the purposes of this study. In addition, we also evaluated apps from the App Store®. The radiology application rating system we created has not been previously used in other articles. Out of 228 applications from the Google Play store, only 6 of them were classified as "A" category with the highest standard. Apps from the App Store (157) were not categorized due to the lack of download counts, which was necessary in our app-rating system. The vast majority of applications are for educational purposes and are not used in clinical practice. This is due to the need of obtaining special permits and certificates from relevant institutions in order to use them in medical practice. We recommend applications from the Google Play store that have been classified in the "A" category, evaluating them as the most valuable. App Store apps data is described and presented in the form of diagrams and tables.

Will ChatGPT pass the Polish specialty exam in radiology and diagnostic imaging? Insights into strengths and limitations.

Purpose: Rapid development of artificial intelligence has aroused curiosity regarding its potential applications in medical field. The purpose of this article was to present the performance of ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art language model in relation to pass rate of national specialty examination (PES) in radiology and imaging diagnostics within Polish education system. Additionally, the study aimed to identify the strengths and limitations of the model through a detailed analysis of issues raised by exam questions. Material and methods: The present study utilized a PES exam consisting of 120 questions, provided by Medical Exami-nations Center in Lodz. Questions were administered using openai.com platform that grants free access to GPT-3.5 model. All questions were categorized according to Bloom's taxonomy to assess their complexity and difficulty. Following the answer to each exam question, ChatGPT was asked to rate its confidence on a scale of 1 to 5 to evaluate the accuracy of its response. Results: ChatGPT did not reach the pass rate threshold of PES exam (52%); however, it was close in certain question categories. No significant differences were observed in the percentage of correct answers across question types and sub-types. Conclusions: The performance of the ChatGPT model in the pass rate of PES exam in radiology and imaging diagnostics in Poland is yet to be determined, which requires further research on improved versions of ChatGPT.

What Is Machine Learning, Artificial Neural Networks and Deep Learning?-Examples of Practical Applications in Medicine.

Machine learning (ML), artificial neural networks (ANNs), and deep learning (DL) are all topics that fall under the heading of artificial intelligence (AI) and have gained popularity in recent years. ML involves the application of algorithms to automate decision-making processes using models that have not been manually programmed but have been trained on data. ANNs that are a part of ML aim to simulate the structure and function of the human brain. DL, on the other hand, uses multiple layers of interconnected neurons. This enables the processing and analysis of large and complex databases. In medicine, these techniques are being introduced to improve the speed and efficiency of disease diagnosis and treatment. Each of the AI techniques presented in the paper is supported with an example of a possible medical application. Given the rapid development of technology, the use of AI in medicine shows promising results in the context of patient care. It is particularly important to keep a close eye on this issue and conduct further research in order to fully explore the potential of ML, ANNs, and DL, and bring further applications into clinical use in the future.

Revisional bariatric surgery after adjustable gastric band: a multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS).

BACKGROUND: Adjustable gastric band (AGB) hadbeen the preferred treatment for morbid obesity because it is minimally invasive and reversible. But now it seems to be slowly becoming a historic procedure due to the disappointing effects. The aim of the study was to systematize and present the available data on revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) after AGB among Polish patients. METHODS: It is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic RBS after AGB in 12 Polish bariatric centers. The database included patient demographics, comorbidities and surgical outcomes. RESULTS: The group consisted of 234 patients who underwent AGB, which accounted for 29% of revisional cases recorded in the Polish Revisional Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS). 195 were women (83%), and 39 were men (17%). One hundred seventy-five patients after AGB experienced a weight regain (74.5%), 36 patients a gastric band slippage (15.0%), 14 patients had gastric band intolerance (6.0%). Types of RBS included 116 sleeve gastrectomies (SG) (49.4%), 86 Roux-en Y gastric by-passes (RYGB) (36.6%), 20 one anastomosis gastric by-passes (OAGB) (8,5%). The highest weight loss expressed as %EBMIL was observed after OAGB (63.5 ± 32.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The main indication for RBS after AGB was weight regain. SG was the most frequently chosen type of RBS after AGB. RBS after AGB leads to weight loss and improvement in type 2 diabetes and hypertension with an acceptable low risk of complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05108532.

The effect of bariatric surgery on reducing the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 3,233,044 patients.

BACKGROUND: The published literature presents conflicting results regarding the impact of bariatric surgery on the incidence of colorectal cancer. There are important new studies that have addressed this question with longer follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of bariatric surgery on the risk of developing colorectal cancer in patients with obesity. SETTING: Meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched for relevant articles. Articles published by November 2021 were retrieved; data were extracted according to the evidence-based PICO (population, intervention, control, outcome) model and analyzed using a random-effects model to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval. The heterogeneity of studies was tested and quantified using Cochran's Q. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 327 articles. After evaluation, 13 studies were analyzed. The thorough evaluation resulted in 13 articles, which were analyzed. A total number of 3,233,044 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The mean time of follow-up was 9.5 ± 7.9 years. The pooled estimate of the adjusted RR was .63 (95% confidence interval, .50-.79). Heterogeneity χ2 was 107.96 (df = 12; P < .001; I2 = 89%). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent bariatric surgery had a 37% reduction in the risk of developing colorectal cancer compared with patients with obesity who had no surgery.

Duodenal switch without versus with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a perioperative risk comparative analysis of the MBSAQIP database (2015-2019).

BACKGROUND: The results of concurrent cholecystectomy with Roux-en Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy have been well elucidated. Large-scale data on the outcomes of concomitant cholecystectomy during biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) are still lacking. Our study aimed to explore whether simultaneous cholecystectomy with BPD-DS alters the 30-day postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database between 2015 and 2019. Propensity-score matching (PSM) in BPD-DS with cholecystectomy (Group 1) and BPD-DS without cholecystectomy (Group 2) cohorts was performed (PSM ratio 1:2). The two groups were matched for a total of 21 baseline variables including age, gender, BMI, ASA class, and other medical comorbidities and conditions. The 30-day postoperative morbidity, mortality, reoperation, reintervention, and readmissions were obtained. RESULTS: Initially, 568 patients in Group 1 and 5079 in Group 2 were identified. After performing PSM, 564 and 1128 patients respectively were compared. The BPD-DS with cholecystectomy group reported a higher rate of reoperation and reintervention compared to BPD-DS alone (3.9% versus 2.4% and 3.2% versus 2%, respectively), even though it did not reach statistical significance. The intervention time was significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (192.4 ± 77.6 versus 126.4 ± 61.4 min). Clavien-Dindo complications (1-5) were similar between these two PSM cohorts. CONCLUSION: Concomitant cholecystectomy during BPD-DS increases operative times but does not affect the other outcomes. Based on our results, the decision of cholecystectomy at the time of BPD-DS should be left to the surgeon's judgment.

Influence of staple line reinforcement on the occurrence of bleeding complications following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis.

Introduction: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained prominence as a therapeutic option for obesity and metabolic diseases. The choice of staple line reinforcement technique in LSG remains a subject of debate, particularly concerning postoperative bleeding complications. Aim: The aim of this retrospective analysis is to assess the influence of different staple line reinforcement techniques on the occurrence of bleeding complications LSG. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LSG between September 2021 and April 2023 at our institution. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the staple line reinforcement method: continuous suturing (n = 53) and clipping (n = 28). Surgical outcomes, including operative time, length of hospital stay, and bleeding complications, were assessed. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: Continuous suturing was associated with a significantly longer operative time (88.15 min vs. 74.64 min, p < 0.05) but a similar length of hospital stay. Notably, no bleeding complications occurred in the continuous suturing group, while the clipping group experienced postoperative bleeding in 7.14% of cases (p < 0.05). Continuous suturing exhibited a slightly higher incidence of minor complications classified as Class I in the Clavien-Dindo classification (7.55% vs. 0%). Conclusions: This retrospective analysis suggests that continuous suturing may provide enhanced hemostasis along the staple line, reducing the risk of postoperative bleeding compared to clipping. Despite the longer operative time and a slightly higher rate of minor complications, the clinical significance of these findings should be considered within the context of individual patient risk profiles.

Five-Year Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database: Are We Getting Better?

BACKGROUND: The MBSAQIP has been used to evaluate risk and create risk models. Previous studies have determined what complications matter most. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a registry-based analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, at centers participating in MBSAQIP. Cases were identified using Current Procedural Terminology. Patients less than 18 years old were excluded. A chi-square test was used to assess differences in the prevalence of complications and effects across years. Using a multivariable Poisson regression model with a link log and robust estimation, prevalence ratio estimates and 95% CI were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 690,770 observations met the inclusion criteria. Mean (SD) age was 44.5 (±12.0) years, and mean (SD) BMI was 45.2 kg/m2 (±7.9). SG cases accounted for 73.45% of all observations. There was a significant relative reduction in readmissions, end-organ dysfunction, and all-cause mortality from 2015 to 2019 in the SG subgroup. There were also noticeable reductions in 30-day readmission, ICU admission, and end-organ dysfunction in the RYGB subgroup. For complications, bleeding, postoperative pneumonia, and stroke were significantly decreased in the RYGB subgroup, but only bleeding was significantly decreased in the SG subgroup during the 5-year study period. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a continuous improvement in several (but not all) outcomes through the years that the MBSAQIP has been collecting data. Different outcomes were reduced between the SG and RYGB subgroups, and the decrease in all-cause mortality was only noted in the SG subgroup.

Effect of Significant Postoperative Complications on Decision Regret After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Thus far, no data are available on decision regret about sleeve gastrectomy (SG), particularly in patients who experienced perioperative complications. This study aimed to assess whether patients with postoperative complications regret their decision to undergo laparoscopic SG more than patients with an uneventful postoperative course. METHODS: The study group comprised patients with complications after laparoscopic SG (cases). The control group comprised patients who did not experience any postoperative complications (controls). A telephone survey was conducted on all patients. Patients' satisfaction regarding their decision to undergo surgery was assessed using the Decision Regret Scale. RESULTS: In total, 21 patients who experienced postoperative complications and 69 controls were included. The patients in the study and control groups achieved similar percentages of total weight loss (32.9 ± 11.9 vs. 33.8 ± 15.0, p = 0.717) and excessive body mass index loss (74.9 ± 30.7 vs. 73.1 ± 36.7, p = 0.398) at 1 year postoperatively. The difference in weight change at 12 months postoperatively was not significant in both groups. The mean regret scores in the study and control groups were 13.2 ± 1.2 (range, 28-63) and 13.3 ± 1.1 (range, 12-66) (p = 0.818), respectively. Moreover, no significant difference was found among patients who expressed regret between the study and control groups (regret score > 50; 4.76% vs. 4.35%) (p = 1.000). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with postoperative complications do not regret their decision to undergo SG more than patients with an uneventful postoperative course.

The impact of the last ten minutes of surgery on hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are among the most common adverse events. The last 10 min of LSG are essential in terms of hemostasis. AIM: To assess the blood pressure profile in the last 10 min of LSG in patients who experienced hemorrhagic complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study. The medical records of 867 patients who underwent primary LSG were analyzed. Cases were defined as patients who required surgical revision due to hemorrhagic complications within 72 h. Controls were matched (1 : 1) with cases by age, body mass index, gender, staple line reinforcement, comorbidities and surgeon's experience. Comparison of the last three intraoperative blood pressure measurements at the end of surgery was made. RESULTS: The bleeding rate was 3.0%. A total of 24 subjects (12 matched pairs) were included in the study. Cases had statistically significant increased mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg) 5 min before the end of surgery (87.8 ±11.9 vs. 79.4 ±8.8 mm Hg, p = 0.049) and at the end of surgery (89.2 ±11.7 vs. 77.5 ±11.8 mm Hg, p = 0.011). Higher diastolic blood pressure measurements were observed 5 min before the end (72.1 ±10.7 vs. 62.8 ±8.1 mm Hg, p = 0.023) and at the end of surgery (74.2 ±10.0 vs. 60.8 ±11.2 mm Hg, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with closely matched control subjects, patients with HC after LSG have increased mean arterial pressure in the last 5 min of surgery. This phenomenon has not been reported in the literature before.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Patient's Decision about Bariatric Surgery: Results of a National Survey.

Background: the COVID-19 pandemic and the implemented restrictions have changed the functioning of healthcare systems worldwide. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of the present epidemiological situation on patients' decisions about undergoing weight loss surgery. Methods: data were collected from 906 bariatric patients by the means of a national online survey, the majority of whom were women (87.9%). The survey started on 9 April 2020 and was open until 28 April 2020. The questionnaire included multiple choice and open questions, divided into three chapters: general information about the patient, life during the COVID-19 pandemic, and bariatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: despite the pandemic and the associated risk of COVID-19 infection, 443 responders (48.9%) would have decided to undergo bariatric surgery. Awareness of the negative impact of obesity on the course of COVID-19 illness had only marginable impact on patients' decision-making (76.6% vs. 75.3%; p < 0.80). Contact with COVID-19 prior to the survey had a negative impact on the willingness to undergo bariatric surgery (3.0% vs. 4.4%; p < 0.55). There was a positive correlation between the BMI and preference for bariatric surgery in the time of the pandemic (37.4 ± 9.0 vs. 34.9 ± 8.7; p < 0.001). Conclusions: the level of awareness about the advantages of operative treatment of obesity is high among bariatric patients. The majority of patients awaiting bariatric surgery at the moment of the survey were positive about undergoing bariatric surgery despite the increased risk of a serious course of COVID-19 infection. Therefore, a large proportion of patients was determined to have bariatric treatment even during the pandemic, being aware of the increased risk of worse pace of COVID-19 disease in case of obesity and related diseases.

Influence of COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown on Patients from the Bariatric Surgery Waiting List.

Background and Objectives: Social isolation and lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic have influenced dietary habits and physical activity of all the population, but the obese population is the most vulnerable to weight gain. Material and Methods: A group of 189 patients (166 female and 23 male) from the bariatric surgery waiting list filled in a survey about the influence of COVID-19 pandemic lockdown on their dietary habits, physical activity, and the possibility of contact with their bariatric care center. Results: The majority of patients with weight gain declared a decrease in physical activity, compared to half of the patients without weight gain (50.5% vs. 74.5%, p < 0.05). The continuation of bariatric care and the possibility of contact with a bariatric surgeon, dietician, and psychologist had each significant influence on reducing the risk of patients' weight gain (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Maintaining physical activity and contact with bariatric care specialists are important factors in allowing to avoid weight gain in patients waiting for bariatric surgery.

Decision Regret after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy-5 Years' Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Patient's satisfaction after weight loss surgery is in the research spotlight. However, there are still no quantitative data regarding whether patients regret their decision to undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate whether patients regret their decision to undergo SG 5 years after surgery. The secondary objective was to identify whether weight loss and a higher quality of life (QoL) score correlate with the regret expressed by patients. SETTING: Military Hospital, Poland METHODS: A telephone survey was carried out among patients 5 years after surgery. Patient satisfaction regarding their decision to undergo SG was assessed using the Decision Regret Scale. QoL scores were determined using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: One hundred and four patients who answered a full telephone survey were enrolled in the study. Change in body mass index (ΔBMI) was 12.31±6.2, excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) was 55.45%±25.52%, and percent total weight loss (%TWL) was 25.20%±11.7%. At the 5-year postoperative telephone survey, the mean general health score was 50.96±14.0 and the mean regret score was 32.33±13.24 (range, 25-85). A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between %EBMIL and regret score (r=-0.435; p<0.001). There was a significant negative association between regret score and energy/fatigue QoL (r=-0.205; p=0.040). Only eight patients (7.69%) scored >50 on the Decision Regret Scale, which was considered to represent overall regret for their decision. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that, in general, patients did not regret their decision to undergo SG. KEY POINTS: The majority of patients did not regret their decision to undergo SG. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between weight loss and patients' feelings of regret. Energy/fatigue QoL was the strongest correlate of whether patients regretted their decision to undergo SG.

The effect of smoking on bariatric surgical 30-day outcomes: propensity-score-matched analysis of the MBSAQIP.

BACKGROUND: The exact impact of smoking within the last 12 months on the safety outcome of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-Y gastric bypass is not well known. The study aimed to assess the effects of smoking on 30-day surgical outcomes. METHODS: Preoperative characteristics and outcomes from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program dataset 2015-2018 were selected for all patients who underwent primary sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-Y gastric bypass. 30-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. We used propensity score matching to control for potential confounding. RESULTS: In laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy group, 29 165 pairs were included in the analysis. Smoking increased risk for inpatients readmission rate (3.67% vs. 3.10%; RR, 1.18; 95%CI 1.08-1.29, p < 0.001), intervention rate (1.03% vs. 0.84%; RR, 1.22; 95%CI 1.00-1.24, p = 0.020), reoperation rate (0.99% vs. 0.79%; RR, 1.25; 95%CI 1.05-1.48, p = 0.010), and leak rate (0.59% vs. 0.32%; RR, 1.83; 95%CI 1.43-2.37, p < 0.001). In laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass cohort,11 895 pairs were included in the ultimate analysis. Smoking increased risk for inpatients readmission rate (7.54% vs. 5.88%; RR, 1.28; 95%CI 1.16-1.41, p < 0.001), intervention rate (3.53% vs. 2.30%; RR, 1.54; 95%CI 1.32-1.80, p < 001), reoperation rate (3.17% vs. 1.86%; RR, 1.70; 95%CI 1.45-2.00, p < 0.001), leak rate (1.05% vs. 0.59%; RR, 1.78; 95%CI 1.33-2.39, p < 0.001), bleed rate (2.03% vs. 1.45%; RR, 1.39; 95%CI 1.15-1.69, p < 0.001), and morbidity (4.20% vs. 3.38%; RR, 1.24; 95%CI 1.09-1.41, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Smoking cigarettes at any point within the 12 months before admission for surgery increased the risk for surgical short-term complications in bariatric patients. The effect was the most significant regarding leaks.

Safety of Single Stage Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Compared to Laparoscopic Roux-Y Gastric Bypass after Failed Gastric Banding.

BACKGROUND: Reoperation, after failed gastric banding, is a controversial topic. A common approach is band removal with conversion to laparoscopic Roux-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in a single-step procedure. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the safety of revisional surgery to LSG compared to LRYGB after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) based on MBSAQIP Participant User File from 2015 to 2018. METHODS: Patients who underwent a one-stage conversion of LAGB to LSG (Conv-LSG) or LRYGB (Conv-LRYGB) were identified in the MBSAQIP PUF from 2015 to 2017. Conv-LRYGB cases were matched (1:1) with Conv-LSG patients using propensity scoring to control for potential confounding. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 9974 patients (4987 matched pairs) were included in the study. Conv-LRYGB, as compared with conv-SG, was associated with a similar risk of mortality (0.02% vs. 0.06%; relative risk [RR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 3.20, p = 0.32). Conversion to LRYGB increased the risk for readmission (6.16% vs. 3.77%; RR, 1.63; 95%CI, 1.37 to 1.94, p < 0.01); reoperation (2.15% vs. 1.36%; RR, 1.57; 95%CI, 1.17 to 2.12, p = <0.01); leak (1.76% vs. 1.02%; RR, 1.57; 95%CI, 1.72 to 2.42, p < 0.01); and bleeding (1.66% vs. 1.00%; RR, 1.66; 95%CI, 1.7 to 2.34, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that single-stage LRYGB and LSG as revisional surgery after gastric banding, are safe in the 30-day observation with an acceptable complication rate and low mortality. However, conversion to LRYGB increased the risk of perioperative complications.

Safety of same-day discharge after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: propensity score-matched analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Registry.

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety of outpatient sleeve gastrectomy is sparse. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the safety of sleeve gastrectomy as a day case surgery. SETTING: University health network, United States. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary sleeve gastrectomy were identified in the 2015-2017 MBSAQIP database. Day case surgery procedure was defined as having a hospital length of stay of 0 days. Day case surgery patients were matched with inpatient controls using propensity score matching. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 271,658 sleeve gastrectomy patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, only 7825 (2.88 %) were day case surgery procedures. There was no mortality in the group. Day case surgery, compared with inpatient sleeve gastrectomy, was associated with a similar risk of a leak (.56% versus .40%; relative risk [RR], 1.419; 95% CI, .896-2.245; P = .133), bleeding (.38% versus .31%; RR, 1.250; 95% CI, .731-2.138; P = .414), 30-day reoperation (.81% versus .56%; RR, 1.432; 95% CI, .975-2.104; P = .066), and 30-day morbidity (1.15% versus 1.01%; RR, 1.139; 95% CI, .842-1.541; P = .397). Outpatients' SG increased the risk for 30-day readmission (3.35% versus 2.79%; RR, 1.202; 95% CI, 1.009-1.432; P = .039). CONCLUSIONS: Sleeve gastrectomy in the outpatient setting as a day case surgery was associated with no mortality and no statistically significant risk of reoperation, leakage, or bleeding compared with patients admitted to inpatient units. The readmission rate was higher in the day case surgery group.

Bariatric tourists. Foreign bariatric patients treated in Poland - a survey based study.

<b>Introduction:</b> Bariatric procedures are becoming more popular worldwide. We present a current situation of foreign patients treated by high-volume bariatric surgeons in Poland in 2016. <br><b>Material and Methods:</b> We sent an online survey to twenty high-volume bariatric surgeons. The questionnaire regarded the year 2016. We asked for number and types of bariatric procedures performed or supervised, number of foreign bariatric patients, their qualification process, country of origin, types of procedure, and post-op recommendations. <br><b>Results:</b> We received 9 surveys (45%). Five surgeons performed or supervised from 100 to 300 bariatric procedures, 2 performed or supervised over 300 procedures, 2 performed or supervised from 50 to 100 procedures. All of the respondents performed laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LRYGB), four carried out mini gastric bypass, two - gastric banding (LAGB), one - SADI-S and duodenal switch (DS). Six surgeons operated on the total of 64 foreign patients, mainly performing LSG, LRYGB and mini gastric bypass. Most of the patients were qualified based on international criteria [body mass index (BMI) over 40 kg/m² or BMI over 35 kg/m² with comorbidities]. United Kingdom was the most popular country of origin, followed by Germany, USA, Ireland and Sweden. Qualification for surgery was based on a personal visit. After surgery, 83.3% (n = 5) of the respondents gave out discharge documents in English, recommending long-term bariatric follow-up in the country of origin. Every respondent carried out 3-month personal follow-up of every foreign patient. <br><b>Conclusions:</b> Foreign bariatric patients travelling to Poland are qualified for surgery according to known international standards. Most of the patients receive post-op discharge documents in English, with a 3-month follow-up performed by their surgeon. Further bariatric supervision in the country of origin is routinely recommended.

The Influence of Bariatric Surgery on Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes-A Case-Control Study.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity in pregnant women increases the incidence of pregnancy-induced comorbidities and the rate of operative deliveries. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: As bariatric surgery is the reference method of treatment of obesity, we wanted to evaluate its influence on the course of pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data was collected from 627 female patients after bariatric surgery, of whom 107 had a history of pregnancy after the surgery, and 345 non-bariatric patients who had a delivery at a tertiary perinatal center. Sixty-one cases were matched (1:1) with controls for age, pre-pregnancy BMI and presence of pre-pregnancy comorbidities. The main endpoints were gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), small (SGA) and large for gestational age infants (LGA) and cesarean sections (CS). RESULTS: Patients after bariatric procedures were significantly less likely to have GDM (19.67%/37.7%; p = 0.0433), PIH (11.47%/16.39%; p = 0.6072) and preterm delivery (13.11%/37.7%; p = 0.0026). The CS rate was higher (57.38%/40.98%; p = 0.0987). There was an increased risk of SGA (18.03%/13.11%; p = 0.6072) and a decreased risk of LGA (6.56%/16.39%; p = 0.146). CONCLUSIONS: Patients after bariatric surgery have a decreased risk of pregnancy-induced comorbidities, preterm deliveries and LGA infants, with an increase in rate of CS and SGA infants compared to general population matched for pre-pregnancy BMI, age and presence of pre-pregnancy comorbidities.

Outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy in patients older than 60 years: a multicenter matched case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of obesity is increasing according to the World Health Organization. Furthermore, global aging is increasing, especially in developed countries in Europe. Whether bariatric surgery should be performed in elderly people is still controversial. AIM: To determine the clinical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomies (SG) in older central European patients. We compared the safety and efficacy of SG in patients older than 60 years with younger patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients older than 60 years, who underwent SG, were included in the study. Eighty-nine younger patients (aged 18-40 years) were matched according to body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities. The analyzed data included age, sex, total body weight, BMI, length of hospital stay, 30-day complications and improvement in comorbidities. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the 2 age groups (p = 0.59). An improvement in hypertension was observed in 73.1% of older patients and in 69.2% of younger patients (p = 0.67). There was improvement in diabetes mellitus in 40% of older patients and in 31.1% of younger patients (p = 0.25). The ΔBMI after 12, 24 and 36 months was significantly lower in older patients than in younger patients (p = 0.002, p = 0.001; p = 0.043, respectively). Percent excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) after 12, 24, and 60 months was significantly lower in older than in younger patients (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, p = 0.028, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Better weight loss is achieved in younger than in older patients, while maintaining a similar effect on the risk of complications and improvement in comorbidities. Therefore, SG is safe and effective in older people.