Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Syst Rev ; 9(1): 21, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32007104

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stakeholder engagement has become widely accepted as a necessary component of guideline development and implementation. While frameworks for developing guidelines express the need for those potentially affected by guideline recommendations to be involved in their development, there is a lack of consensus on how this should be done in practice. Further, there is a lack of guidance on how to equitably and meaningfully engage multiple stakeholders. We aim to develop guidance for the meaningful and equitable engagement of multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation. METHODS: This will be a multi-stage project. The first stage is to conduct a series of four systematic reviews. These will (1) describe existing guidance and methods for stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (2) characterize barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation, (3) explore the impact of stakeholder engagement on guideline development and implementation, and (4) identify issues related to conflicts of interest when engaging multiple stakeholders in guideline development and implementation. DISCUSSION: We will collaborate with our multiple and diverse stakeholders to develop guidance for multi-stakeholder engagement in guideline development and implementation. We will use the results of the systematic reviews to develop a candidate list of draft guidance recommendations and will seek broad feedback on the draft guidance via an online survey of guideline developers and external stakeholders. An invited group of representatives from all stakeholder groups will discuss the results of the survey at a consensus meeting which will inform the development of the final guidance papers. Our overall goal is to improve the development of guidelines through meaningful and equitable multi-stakeholder engagement, and subsequently to improve health outcomes and reduce inequities in health.


Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Guidelines as Topic , Stakeholder Participation , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Feedback , Humans
3.
J Adv Nurs ; 75(8): 1667-1677, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30666686

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To identify the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, levels of chronic occupational fatigue, and how they vary with individual and work organization factors. DESIGN: A multi-hospital cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Nurses from 39 hospitals completed self-reported questionnaires from June to September 2015. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize hospitals and nurses' characteristics, fatigue levels and prevalence, and type of musculoskeletal disorders. Linear and logistic regression analyses were used to identify correlational factors. RESULTS: The results revealed that 71.3% of participants reported a work-related musculoskeletal disorder in the previous 12 months, mainly back pain. The reported musculoskeletal disorders were significantly correlated with years of experience, nurse to patient ratios, and chronic occupational fatigue. Higher chronic occupational fatigue levels were associated with education, age, years of experience, nurse to patient ratio, and model of care. CONCLUSION: Preventive work organization strategies are needed to ensure healthier occupational environment for nurses.


Subject(s)
Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Workplace/organization & administration , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospital Administration , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL