Comparative analysis of Basiliximab and Alemtuzumab induction therapies in blood type A2-to-B kidney transplantation: Impact on kidney function and de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies.

PURPOSE: Blood group B kidney transplant candidates have lower transplantation rates and longer waiting times compared to other blood groups. Kidney transplantation from blood group A2-to-B has offered a solution for these patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Basiliximab and Alemtuzumab induction therapies on kidney function and de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in blood type A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients within the first 12 months of post-transplant. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 110 consecutive A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients between January 2015 and December 2022. Of these, 46 (41.8%) received Basiliximab, while 64 (58.2%) received Alemtuzumab as induction therapy. Demographics and comorbidities data were collected and compared between the two groups. Serum samples collected at 4- and 12-month intervals post-transplant were used to assess the presence of de novo DSA. Kidney allograft function was evaluated by monitoring serum creatinine levels and assessing Creatinine Clearance based on 24-h urine collection at various time points. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 20.00% of patients who received Alemtuzumab developed de novo DSA, whereas none of the patients induced with Basiliximab developed de novo DSA (p = 0.038). Recipients who received Basiliximab were older (mean age = 72.00) and received higher Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) kidneys (mean = 75) compared to those induced with Alemtuzumab (mean age = 58.00, mean KDPI = 49) (p < 0.001), with no significant difference observed in the last follow-up creatinine clearance or creatinine levels between the two groups (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: The use of Basiliximab as induction immunosuppression in A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients is associated with a lower incidence of de novo HLA DSA formation without significant differences in overall renal function compared to Alemtuzumab.

Basiliximab is associated with a lower incidence of De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Induction immunosuppression has improved the long-term outcomes after kidney transplant. This study explores the association of different induction immunosuppression medications (Basiliximab vs. Alemtuzumab vs. rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin) used at the time of kidney transplant with the development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in the first 12 months post-transplant period. METHODS: A total of 390 consecutive kidney transplant recipients (KTR), between 2016 and 2018, were included in the analysis. A 104 (26.6%) received Basiliximab, 186 (47.6%) received Alemtuzumab, and 100 (25.6%) received rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG) for induction. All recipients had a negative flow cytometry crossmatch before transplant. Serum samples at 4- and 12-months post-transplant were assessed for the presence of de novo HLA DSA. kidney allograft function was compared among the three groups with calculated Creatinine Clearance on 24 h urine collection. RESULTS: De novo HLA DSA were detected in total of 81 (20.8%) patients within 12 months post-transplant. De novo HLA DSA were detected in 12/104 (11.5%), 43/186 (23.11%), and 26/100 (26%) KTR that received Basiliximab, Alemtuzumab, and rATG respectively (p = 0.006). KTR that received Basiliximab were significantly older, and the last follow-up creatinine clearance was significantly lower at 42 ml/min compared to KTR that received Alemtuzumab or rATG (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Induction immunosuppression utilizing Basiliximab is associated with significant reduction in development of de novo DSA within the first 12-months post kidney transplant but had lower creatinine clearance with long-term follow up.

The Outcome of Tapered Steroid Regimen When Used to Treat Acute Borderline Cellular Rejection After Kidney Transplant: A Single-Center Experience.

Background: Treatment of acute borderline cellular rejection (BCR) after kidney transplant has shown mixed results with no consensus on the necessity and modality of interventions. Methods: The emphasis of our study was to assess the histopathologic response when BCR of kidney transplant is being treated with rapid steroid regimen. We analyzed all diagnosed acute BCR between 2018 and 2020. Patients were divided to a treatment responder group (RG) and non-responder group (NRG). All diagnosed BCR were treated with rapid steroid regimen and followed by a biopsy to assess response. Demographic data, recipients' comorbidities and clinical data, donor type, and induction immunosuppression regimen data were collected. Results: Ninety-one patients had acute BCR and were treated with rapid steroid followed by a repeat biopsy. Sixty-three (69%) patients showed persistence BCR and were considered NRG. Age, gender, and race were similar between the two groups. Class I and II calculated panel reactive antibodies were similar between the groups. No significant difference in the median serum creatinine (SCr) was noted between the groups. RG and NRG had a median SCr of 1.6 mg/dL (1.2 - 2.1) and 1.5 mg/dL (1.4 - 2.0), respectively (P < 0.79). The median SCr at the time of the follow-up biopsy was not different between the groups: SCr of 1.6 mg/dL (1.2 - 2.0) vs. 1.4 mg/dL (1.2 - 2.2) for the RG and NRG, respectively (P < 0.93). Conclusion: When rapid steroid regimen was used to treat acute BCR after kidney transplant, only smaller number of patients showed response based on the histology evaluation of the follow-up post-treatment biopsies.

Association of Abdominal Arterial Calcification Score with Patients' Survival and Kidney Allograft Function after Kidney Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal arterial calcification (AAC) is common among candidates for kidney transplant. The aim of this study is to correlate AAC score value with post-kidney transplant outcomes. METHODS: We modified the coronary calcium score by changing the intake data points and used it to quantitate the AAC. We conducted a retrospective clinical study of all adult patients who were transplanted at our center, between 2010 and 2013, and had abdominal computed tomography scan done before transplantation. Outcomes included mortality, pulse pressure (PP) measured by 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring system, and kidney allograft function measured by iothalamate clearance. RESULTS: For each 1000 increase of AAC score value, there is an associated 1.05 increase in the risk of death (95% CI 1.02, 1.08) (p < 0.001). Overall median AAC value for all patients was 1784; Kaplan-Meier curve showed reduced survival of all-cause mortality for patients with AAC score value above median and reduced survival among patients with cardiac related mortality. The iothalamate clearance was lower among patients with total AAC score value above the median. Patients with abnormal PP (< 40 or > 60 mmHg) had an elevated median AAC score value at 4319.3 (IQR 1210.4, 11097.1) compared to patients with normal PP with AAC score value at 595.9 (IQR 9.9, 2959.9) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We showed an association of AAC with patients' survival and kidney allograft function after kidney transplant. The AAC score value could be used as a risk stratification when patients are considered for kidney transplant.