ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Reference materials based on human cerebrospinal fluid were certified for the mass concentration of amyloid beta (Aß)1-42 (Aß42 ). They are intended to be used to calibrate diagnostic assays for Aß42 . METHODS: The three certified reference materials (CRMs), ERM-DA480/IFCC, ERM-DA481/IFCC and ERM-DA482/IFCC, were prepared at three concentration levels and characterized using isotope dilution mass spectrometry methods. Roche, EUROIMMUN, and Fujirebio used the three CRMs to re-calibrate their immunoassays. RESULTS: The certified Aß42 mass concentrations in ERM-DA480/IFCC, ERM-DA481/IFCC, and ERM-DA482/IFCC are 0.45, 0.72, and 1.22 µg/L, respectively, with expanded uncertainties (k = 2) of 0.07, 0.11, and 0.18 µg/L, respectively. Before re-calibration, a good correlation (Pearson's r > 0.97), yet large biases, were observed between results from different commercial assays. After re-calibration the between-assay bias was reduced to < 5%. DISCUSSION: The Aß42 CRMs can ensure the equivalence of results between methods and across platforms for the measurement of Aß42 .
Subject(s)
Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid , Immunoassay/standards , Calibration , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Amyloid-ß 1-42 (Aß1-42) peptide is a well-established cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Reduced levels of Aß1-42 are indicative of AD, but significant variation in the absolute concentrations of this analyte has been described for both healthy and diseased populations. Preanalytical factors such as storage tube type are reported to impact Aß recovery and quantification accuracy. Using complementary immunological and mass spectrometry-based approaches, we identified and characterized preanalytical factors that influence measured concentrations of CSF Aß peptides in stored samples. METHODS: CSF from healthy control subjects and patients with AD was aliquoted into polypropylene tubes at volumes of 0.1 ml and 0.5 ml. CSF Aß1-42 concentrations were initially measured by immunoassay; subsequent determinations of CSF Aß1-42, Aß1-40, Aß1-38, Aß1-37, and Aß1-34 concentrations were made with an absolute quantitative mass spectrometry assay. In a second study, CSF from healthy control subjects and patients with dementia was denatured with guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl) at different stages of the CSF collection and aliquoting process and then measured with the mass spectrometry assay. RESULTS: Two distinct immunoassays demonstrated that CSF Aß1-42 concentrations measured from 0.5-ml aliquots were higher than those from 0.1-ml aliquots. Tween-20 surfactant supplementation increased Aß1-42 recovery but did not effectively resolve measured concentration differences associated with aliquot size. A CSF Aß peptide mass spectrometry assay confirmed that Aß peptide recovery was linked to sample volume. Unlike the immunoassay experiments, measured differences were consistently eliminated when aliquots were denatured in the original sample tube. Recovery from a panel of low-retention polypropylene tubes was assessed, and 1.5-ml Eppendorf LoBind® tubes were determined to be the least absorptive for Aß1-42. A comparison of CSF collection and processing methods suggested that Aß peptide recovery was improved by denaturing CSF earlier in the collection/aliquoting process and that the Aß1-42/Aß1-40 ratio was a useful method to reduce variability. CONCLUSIONS: Analyte loss due to nonspecific sample tube adsorption is a significant preanalytical factor that can compromise the accuracy of CSF Aß1-42 measurements. Sample denaturation during aliquoting increases recovery of Aß peptides and improves measurement accuracy. The Aß1-42/Aß1-40 ratio can overcome some of the quantitative variability precipitated by preanalytical factors affecting recovery.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/cerebrospinal fluid , Amyloid beta-Peptides/analysis , Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid , Pre-Analytical Phase/methods , Adult , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , Female , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Male , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Middle AgedABSTRACT
The 2017 11th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (11th WRIB) took place in Los Angeles/Universal City, California from 3 April 2017 to 7 April 2017 with participation of close to 750 professionals from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5-day, weeklong event - A Full Immersion Week of Bioanalysis, Biomarkers and Immunogenicity. As usual, it was specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest including both small and large molecule analysis involving LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS and ligand-binding assay (LBA) approaches. This 2017 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2017 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts for editorial reasons. This publication (Part 1) covers the recommendations for Small Molecules, Peptides and Small Molecule Biomarkers using LCMS. Part 2 (Biotherapeutics, Biomarkers and Immunogenicity Assays using Hybrid LBA/LCMS and Regulatory Agencies' Inputs) and Part 3 (LBA: Immunogenicity, Biomarkers and PK Assays) are published in volume 9 of Bioanalysis, issues 23 and 24 (2017), respectively.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Mass Spectrometry , Peptides/analysis , Small Molecule Libraries/analysis , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , Guidelines as Topic , Ligands , Small Molecule Libraries/chemistryABSTRACT
A simple and selective bioanalytical method was developed for simultaneous determination of levodopa and carbidopa in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS. Levodopa and carbidopa are small polar molecules, posing challenges in the development of selective and efficient chromatography conditions. Perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPA), a volatile ion-pairing agent, was utilized to enhance chromatographic characteristics of both compounds in the reversed-phase mechanism. The ion-pairing chromatography played an essential role in mitigating matrix effects and achieving adequate separation between interfering background peaks and those of the analytes of interest, especially for levodopa. A 96-well based, automated liquid-liquid extraction, via the use Hamilton NIMBUS liquid handlers, was developed. Butyl alcohol, when mixed with ethyl acetate, greatly increased the recovery of both levodopa and carbidopa. The addition of PFPA further enhanced recovery for both analytes. Sodium metabisulfite, an antioxidant, was used to stabilize levodopa and carbidopa in rat plasma. The method was validated in the ranges of 50-10,000ng/mL and 25-5000ng/mL for levodopa and carbidopa, respectively, using levodopa-d3 and carbidopa-d3 as internal standards. The validated method was successfully applied to analyze rat plasma samples from in-life studies.
Subject(s)
Carbidopa/blood , Chromatography, Reverse-Phase/methods , Dopamine Agents/blood , Levodopa/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Carbidopa/analysis , Dopamine Agents/analysis , Fluorocarbons , Levodopa/analysis , Limit of Detection , Liquid-Liquid Extraction/methods , Pentanoic Acids/chemistry , RatsABSTRACT
The 42 amino acid form of amyloid ß (Aß1-42) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been widely accepted as a central biomarker for Alzheimer's disease. Several immunoassays for CSF Aß1-42 are commercially available, but can suffer from between laboratory and batch-to-batch variability as well as lack of standardisation across assays. As a consequence, no general cut-off values have been established for a specific context of use (e.g., clinical diagnostics) and selection of individuals for enrolment in clinical trials (patient stratification) remains challenging. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) has initiated a working group for CSF proteins (WG-CSF) to facilitate standardisation of CSF Aß1-42 measurement results. The efforts of the IFCC WG-CSF include the development of certified reference materials (CRMs) and reference measurement procedures (RMPs) for key biomarkers. Two candidate RMPs for quantification of Aß1-42 in CSF based on liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry have been developed and tested in two ring trials. Furthermore, two commutability studies including native CSF pools, artificial CSF and spiked materials have been completed. On the basis of these studies, human CSF pools containing only endogenous Aß1-42 at three concentrations were selected as the format for future CRMs that are now being processed.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/cerebrospinal fluid , Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid , Clinical Chemistry Tests/standards , Peptide Fragments/cerebrospinal fluid , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , Humans , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
The 2016 10th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (10th WRIB) took place in Orlando, Florida with participation of close to 700 professionals from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5-day, weeklong event - A Full Immersion Week of Bioanalysis including Biomarkers and Immunogenicity. As usual, it was specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest including both small and large molecule analysis involving LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS, and LBA approaches, with the focus on biomarkers and immunogenicity. This 2016 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. This white paper is published in 3 parts due to length. This part (Part 1) discusses the recommendations for small molecules, peptides and small molecule biomarkers by LCMS. Part 2 (Hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory inputs from major global health authorities) and Part 3 (large molecule bioanalysis using LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity) will be published in the Bioanalysis journal, issue 23.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Biotherapeutics development requires validated assays in biological matrices for pharmacokinetic assessment. Historically, ligand-binding assays have been the predominant platform available. Recently, alternative hybrid methods, combining ligand-binding analyte enrichment with LC-MS detection have emerged. Methodology & results: The validation of an immunoaffinity (IA)-LC-MS/MS method to quantify a monoclonal antibody biotherapeutic in cynomolgus monkey serum is described. This method includes immunoaffinity capture of the antibody in serum, followed by enzymatic digestion and detection of a framework peptide. Using similar method conditions, six additional biotherapeutic assays were readily validated in different nonhuman mammalian species, including mouse, rat and monkey. CONCLUSION: The immunoaffinity-LC-MS/MS assay validation results across seven antibody therapeutics, using comparable conditions, illustrate the 'plug-and-play' nature of the IA-LC-MS/MS mAb framework peptide assay format.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/blood , Chromatography, Affinity/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/blood , Humans , Limit of Detection , Macaca fascicularis/blood , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
AIM: There is an ever-increasing demand for high-throughput LC-MS/MS bioanalytical assays to support drug discovery and development. RESULTS: Matrix effects of sofosbuvir (protonated) and paclitaxel (sodiated) were thoroughly evaluated using high-throughput chromatography (defined as having a run time ≤1 min) under 14 elution conditions with extracts from protein precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction. A slight separation, in terms of retention time, between underlying matrix components and sofosbuvir/paclitaxel can greatly alleviate matrix effects. CONCLUSION: High-throughput chromatography, with proper optimization, can provide rapid and effective chromatographic separation under 1 min to alleviate matrix effects and enhance assay ruggedness for regulated bioanalysis.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/blood , Antiviral Agents/blood , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Paclitaxel/blood , Sofosbuvir/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/isolation & purification , Antiviral Agents/isolation & purification , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/economics , High-Throughput Screening Assays/economics , High-Throughput Screening Assays/methods , Humans , Liquid-Liquid Extraction/economics , Liquid-Liquid Extraction/methods , Paclitaxel/isolation & purification , Sofosbuvir/isolation & purification , Solid Phase Extraction/economics , Solid Phase Extraction/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/economicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Knowledge of antipsychotic drug levels at point of care (POC) may significantly aid therapeutic decision-making. To support the development of future POC devices and to validate the use of fingerstick capillary blood sampling, two robust hydrophilic interaction LC-ESI/MS/MS methods were developed and validated. Two PK studies were completed evaluating the correlation between fingerstick blood and plasma concentrations with corresponding venous blood and plasma concentrations for several commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics and selected metabolites. Sensitive and reliable LC-MS/MS bioanalytical assays were developed to support these studies. RESULTS: Three methods, requiring only 25-µl matrix volumes, were developed using supported liquid extraction with hydrophilic interaction LC-MS/MS detection and validated according to regulatory guidance. CONCLUSION: Robust and efficient LC-MS/MS assays were established and were effective in providing antipsychotic drug matrix comparator results in the intended clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/blood , Blood Chemical Analysis/methods , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antipsychotic Agents/standards , Blood Chemical Analysis/standards , Calibration , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/standards , Half-Life , Humans , Point-of-Care Systems , Reproducibility of Results , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To adequately support pharmacokinetic evaluations of tiotropium bromide in planned clinical studies. It was desirable to measure it with a LLOQ of sub pg/ml. RESULTS: A sensitive bioanalytical method for the determination of tiotropium in human plasma sample was successfully developed and validated in the range of 0.2-100 pg/ml. The method was successfully applied to support two clinical studies of over 3000 samples. The overall incurred sample reanalysis passing rate was 93.7%. CONCLUSION: The combination of a dual stage liquid-liquid extraction and a 2D ultra-HPLC greatly reduced matrix effects and increased assay sensitivity. When developing effective ultrasensitive assays, it is imperative to balance the aspects related to sensitivity with those that will ensure assay ruggedness.
Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Tiotropium Bromide/blood , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Humans , Limit of Detection , Liquid-Liquid Extraction/methods , Reproducibility of ResultsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-ß 1-42 (Aß42) is an important biomarker for Alzheimer's disease, both in diagnostics and to monitor disease-modifying therapies. However, there is a great need for standardization of methods used for quantification. To overcome problems associated with immunoassays, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has emerged as a critical orthogonal alternative. METHODS: We compared results for CSF Aß42 quantification in a round robin study performed in four laboratories using similar sample preparation methods and LC-MS instrumentation. RESULTS: The LC-MS results showed excellent correlation between laboratories (r(2) >0.98), high analytical precision, and good correlation with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (r(2) >0.85). The use of a common reference sample further decreased interlaboratory variation. DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that LC-MS is suitable for absolute quantification of Aß42 in CSF and highlight the importance of developing a certified reference material.
Subject(s)
Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid , Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Peptide Fragments/cerebrospinal fluid , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Alzheimer Disease/cerebrospinal fluid , Calibration , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards , Humans , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
Human osteopontin (hOPN) is a secreted plasma protein which is elevated in various cancers and is indicative of poor prognosis. Here we describe investigations involving an extended peptide internal standard to track an unstable signature peptide followed by further method development and validation for quantitative measurement of hOPN from plasma using microflow liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (MFLC-MS/MS). A biologically relevant tryptic peptide 'GDSVVYGLR' was used as a signature peptide for this method. The optimized method involved immunocapture of the analyte protein using hOPN specific antibodies followed by trypsin digestion to obtain the signature peptide. Analysis was carried out on a Waters IonKey/MS system using a flow rate of 2.5µL/min. Immunocapture buffer was used as a surrogate matrix for the validation studies. The method was validated over a range of 25-600ng/mL. Intra-assay and inter-assay accuracies were within ±13%. Intra-assay and inter-assay precision were within 17%. A stable isotope labeled (SIL) peptide GDSVVYGLR* and an extended SIL peptide TYDGRGDSVV*YGLRSKSKKF were evaluated as internal standards (IS) to account for signature peptide digestion instability and variability. Inherent digestion variability i.e., under controlled conditions, was within ±20% with both IS peptides. In digestion variability studies, where trypsin activity was varied (20-180%), the use of the extended SIL peptide as an internal standard limited the variability to within ±30% of the normalized response. Alternatively, when the SIL peptide was used as the internal standard, the variability ranged from -67.4% to 50.6% of the normalized response. The applicability of the validated method was demonstrated by quantification of OPN from plasma samples obtained from 10 healthy individuals and 10 breast cancer patients. The plasma OPN concentrations in healthy individuals ranged from 38 to 85ng/mL with a mean concentration of 55.4±15.3ng/mL. A 1.5-12 fold increase in OPN concentrations, ranging from 85 to 637ng/mL, was seen in breast cancer patient samples.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Isotope Labeling , Neoplasms/blood , Osteopontin/blood , Peptides/chemistry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Humans , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
Tiered approach is rapidly gaining interest in the regulated bioanalytical community. Alternative approaches to the workflows as proposed in the regulatory Guidance (US FDA, EMA) are being used in discovery and early drug development, but with a growing array of assay types and studies requiring bioanalytical support in early drug development, the bioanalytical community is discussing how to bring best value to support these studies. Recently, international industry groups like European Bioanalysis Forum and Global Bioanalysis Consortium have discussed and published on the opportunity and need to include tiered approach more systematically in the early drug development support. On the back of these discussions, the Delaware Valley Drug Metabolism Discussion Group together with the European Bioanalysis Forum organized a meeting in Langhorne (PA, USA) to discuss the hurdles and added value of tiered approach with stakeholders from the Bioanalysis, quality assurance and PK community. The discussions focused on proposing scientific validation for studies where there is currently a mixed use of regulatory and tiered approach workflows. The meeting was well attended and the presentations and panel discussions contributed to a better understanding of what the industry is proposing as future practice.
Subject(s)
Science/methods , Humans , Laboratory Personnel , Validation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
This paper highlights the recommendations of a group of industry scientists in validating regulated bioanalytical LC-MS/MS methods for protein therapeutics in a 2015 AAPSJ White Paper. This group recommends that most of the same precision and accuracy validation criteria used for ligand-binding assays (LBAs) be applied to LC-MS/MS-based assays where proteins are quantified using the LC-MS/MS signal from a surrogate peptide after proteolytic digestion (PrD-LCMS methods). PrD-LCMS methods are generally more complex than small molecule LC-MS/MS assays and may often include LBA procedures, leading to the recommendation for a combination of chromatographic and LBA validation strategies and appropriate acceptance criteria. Several key aspects of this bioanalytical approach that are discussed in the White Paper are treated here in additional detail. These topics include selectivity/specificity, matrix effect, digestion efficiency, stability and critical reagent considerations.
Subject(s)
Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Proteins/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Humans , Indicators and Reagents , Protein Stability , Proteins/metabolism , Validation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
A novel format was introduced at the recent AAPS NBC Workshop on Method Development, Validation and Troubleshooting in San Diego on 18th May 2014. The workshop format was initiated by Binodh De Silva; Marie Rock and Sherri Dudal joined the initiative to develop and chair the workshop. Questions were solicited by a variety of avenues, including a Linked-In Discussion Group. Once collated and clarified, the topics covered assay development, validation, and analysis of PK, Immunogenicity, and Biomarkers with an additional topic on alternative bioanalytical technologies. A panel of experts (workshop report co-authors) was assigned to each topic to bring forward thought-provoking aspects of each topic. The format of the workshop was developed to target the needs of bioanalytical scientists with intermediate to advanced experience in the field ranging to enable robust discussion and to delve deeper into the current bioanalytical hot topics. While the new format allowed for an interactive session with the topical discussion driven by the audience members, it did not foster equal discussion time for all of the proposed topics, especially Biomarkers and alternative LBA technologies.
Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Biomarkers/analysis , Pharmacokinetics , Humans , Ligands , Validation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
A stable isotope-labeled signature peptide, whose sequence corresponds to the human osteopontin (hOPN) specific antibody epitope, was evaluated as an internal standard to compensate for immunocapture variability during quantification of hOPN by immunoaffinity-coupled LC-MS/MS. Immunocapture variability was induced by varying the antibody amount per well from 150 to 4500 ng and analysis was carried out with internal standards added before and after the immunocapture step. The immunocapture variability ranged from -80.9 to 77.0% when the IS was added after immunocapture and from -37.5 to 20.3% when the internal standard was added before immunocapture. The lower variability demonstrates the ability of stable labeled isotope internal standard peptide to compensate for variation during immunocapture.
Subject(s)
Chromatography, Affinity/methods , Isotope Labeling , Osteopontin/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Humans , Reference StandardsABSTRACT
This paper represents the consensus views of a cross-section of companies and organizations from the USA and Canada regarding the validation and application of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods for bioanalysis of protein biotherapeutics in regulated studies. It was prepared under the auspices of the AAPS Bioanalytical Focus Group's Protein LC-MS Bioanalysis Subteam and is intended to serve as a guide to drive harmonization of best practices within the bioanalytical community and provide regulators with an overview of current industry thinking on applying LC-MS/MS technology for protein bioanalysis. For simplicity, the scope was limited to the most common current approach in which the protein is indirectly quantified using LC-MS/MS measurement of one or more of its surrogate peptide(s) produced by proteolytic digestion. Within this context, we considered a range of sample preparation approaches from simple in-matrix protein denaturation and digestion to complex procedures involving affinity capture enrichment. Consideration was given to the method validation experiments normally associated with traditional LC-MS/MS and ligand-binding assays. Our collective experience, thus far, is that LC-MS/MS methods for protein bioanalysis require different development and validation considerations than those used for small molecules. The method development and validation plans need to be tailored to the particular assay format being established, taking into account a number of important factors: the intended use of the assay, the test species or study population, the characteristics of the protein biotherapeutic and its similarity to endogenous proteins, potential interferences, as well as the nature, quality, and availability of reference and internal standard materials.
Subject(s)
Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Proteins/analysis , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Animals , Canada , Humans , United States , Validation Studies as TopicABSTRACT
The 8th GCC Closed Forum for Bioanalysis was held in Baltimore, MD, USA on 5 December 2013, immediately following the 2013 AAPS Workshop (Crystal City V): Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Validation and Implementation--The 2013 Revised FDA Guidance. This GCC meeting was organized to discuss the contents of the draft revised FDA Guidance on bioanalytical method validation that was published in September 2013 and consolidate the feedback of the GCC members. In attendance were 63 senior-level participants, from seven countries, representing 46 bioanalytical CRO companies/sites. This event represented a unique opportunity for CRO bioanalytical experts to share their opinions and concerns regarding the draft FDA Guidance, and to build unified comments to be provided to the FDA.