Omission of axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients with three or more positive sentinel lymph nodes.

PURPOSE: The ACOSOG Z0011 (Z11) trial assessed the benefit of axillary dissection (ALND) for breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases; however, Z11 excluded patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. We analyzed trends in ALND omission in patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. METHODS: Women with ≥ 3 positive SLNs who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy between 2018 and 2020 in the National Cancer Database were included using SLN codes initiated in 2018. Patients with stage IV disease, recurrent breast cancer, and who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to determine the proportion who received ALND and factors associated with ALND omission. A subgroup analysis was performed among patients who met the remainder of the Z11 inclusion criteria (BCS, T1/T2 breast cancer). RESULTS: We identified 3654 patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs. ALND was omitted in 37% of patients, and omission significantly increased from 2018 to 2020 (29% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). Older age, lower grade tumors, no radiation, non-academic facility, BCS, more SLNs examined and fewer positive SLNs were significantly associated with ALND omission. 942 patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs met the remainder of the Z11 inclusion criteria. ALND was omitted in 49% of these patients, and omission increased from 2018 to 2020 (44% vs. 49%, p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs do not undergo ALND; omission of ALND increased from 2018 to 2020. Studies assessing oncologic outcomes of patients with ≥ 3 positive SLNs who do and do not receive ALND are required.

Feasibility of laparoscopic microwave ablation of caudate tumors: a case series.

Microwave ablation of liver tumors allows preservation of liver parenchyma with good oncologic outcomes. However, ablation of tumors in the caudate lobe is particularly challenging. Adjacent critical anatomy, particularly the biliary hilum, has led to caudate location being considered a relative contraindication to ablation. To date, no series have described laparoscopic microwave ablation of caudate tumors of the liver. We describe our early experience with laparoscopic microwave ablation of caudate tumors. In this retrospective review of a prospectively maintained single-institution database, six patients with six primary or secondary caudate tumors underwent laparoscopic microwave ablation with no complications. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, five out of six patients are free of caudate recurrence. Laparoscopic microwave ablation of caudate tumors is feasible. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine if local recurrence risk is higher than in other anatomical segments.

Chemotherapy refusal and subsequent survival in healthy older women with high genomic risk estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), and high-risk 21-gene recurrence score (RS) results benefit from chemotherapy. We evaluated chemotherapy refusal and survival in healthy older women with high-RS, ER-positive BC. METHODS: Retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2010-2017) identified women ≥ 65 years of age, with ER-positive, HER2-negative, high-RS (≥ 26) BC. Patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 1, stage III/IV disease, or incomplete data were excluded. Women were compared by chemotherapy receipt or refusal using the Cochrane-Armitage test, multivariable logistical regression modeling, the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox's proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: 6827 women met study criteria: 5449 (80%) received chemotherapy and 1378 (20%) refused. Compared to women who received chemotherapy, women who refused were older (71 vs 69 years), were diagnosed more recently (2014-2017, 67% vs 61%), and received radiation less frequently (67% vs 71%) (p ≤ 0.05). Refusal was associated with decreased 5-year OS for women 65-74 (92% vs 95%) and 75-79 (85% vs 92%) (p ≤ 0.05), but not for women ≥ 80 years old (84% vs 91%; p = 0.07). On multivariable analysis, hazard of death increased with refusal overall (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.2); but, when stratified by age, was not increased for women ≥ 80 years (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.80-1.51). CONCLUSIONS: Among healthy women with high-RS, ER-positive BC, chemotherapy refusal was associated with decreased OS for women ages 65-79, but did not impact the OS of women ≥ 80 years old. Genomic testing may have limited utility in this population, warranting prudent shared decision-making and further study.

A Review of Resection and Surgical Ablation for Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers.

The surgical management of primary and secondary liver tumors is constantly evolving. Patient selection, particularly with regard to determining resectability, is vital to the success of programs directed toward invasive treatments of liver tumors. Particular attention should be paid toward determining whether patients are best served with surgical resection or ablative therapies. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to provide optimal care to patients with liver malignancy.

The Addition of Chemoradiation to Adjuvant Chemotherapy is Associated With Improved Survival Following Upfront Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Cancer With Nodal Metastases.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the addition of chemoradiation (CRT) to adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) following upfront resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) provides any benefit. While some studies have suggested a benefit to combined modality therapy (CMT) (adjuvant CT plus CRT), it is not clear if this benefit was related to increased CT usage in patients who received CMT. We sought to clarify the use of CMT in patients who underwent upfront resection of PDAC. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic PDAC were retrospectively identified from the linked SEER-Medicare database. Those who underwent upfront resection were identified and divided into two cohorts - patients who received adjuvant CT and patients who received adjuvant CMT. Cohorts were compared. Univariate analysis described patient characteristics. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to estimate overall survival (OS). RESULTS: 3555 patients were identified; 856 (24%) received CT and 573 (16%) received CMT. The median number of CT doses was 11 for both groups. Patients who received CMT were younger, diagnosed in the earlier time frame, and had fewer comorbidities. The median OS was 21 months and 18 months for those treated with CMT and CT (P < .0001), respectively, but when stratified by nodal status, the association with improved OS in the CMT cohort was only observed in node-positive patients. On multivariable analysis, receipt of CMT and removal of >15 lymph nodes decreased the risk of death (P < .05). DISCUSSION: Receipt of CMT following upfront resection for PDAC was associated with improved survival, which was confined to node-positive patients. The role of adjuvant CMT in PDAC with nodal metastases warrants further study.

Surgical microwave ablation of otherwise non-resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: Expanding opportunities for long term survival.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are the most common extra-lymphatic metastases in colorectal cancers, however, only 15-20% of these patients are candidates for resection. We reviewed our institutional experience with 135 surgical ablations for unresectable CRLM. METHODS: Retrospective review of surgically ablated CRLM from 2009 to 2018. Patient-specific variables were obtained from the medical record. Kaplan-Meier modeling was performed for survival analyses. RESULTS: We ablated 135 CRLM in 36 patients over 40 procedures. Median age was 52 years and 58% of patients were male. All patients received systemic chemotherapy. The ablation procedure was completed laparoscopically in 68% of procedures. Median number of ablated lesions per patient was 2 (range 1-15). Median maximum diameter of ablated lesions was 1.9 cm (range 0.5-12.2). Median follow up of the study was 28 months. In this time, median disease-free survival was not reached. Of the 135 lesions ablated, the per-lesion recurrence rate was 6/135 (4.4%). Median overall survival was 81 months. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ablation of CRLM can provide excellent local control and long-term survival outcomes in patients who may otherwise not be candidates for other liver-directed therapies.

Surgical microwave ablation for multifocal non-resectable liver metastases: a single institution experience treating five or more liver lesions.

BACKGROUND: Thermal ablation is an effective treatment for patients with metastatic colon and rectal cancer and allows surgeons to offer curative intent therapy to patients who are otherwise not candidates for resection. We aimed to report outcomes of a single institution experience using microwave ablation (MWA) with or without resection to treat five or more liver metastases. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the University of Minnesota Division of Surgical Oncology liver surgery database was queried to identify all patients who underwent thermal ablation of five or more colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) between 2012-2018. We reviewed patient, disease, and tumor characteristics and measured local, intrahepatic, and extrahepatic recurrence (EHR) rates. We also calculated median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Ten patients identified had five or more (range, 5-18) tumors ablated with or without combined liver and bowel resection. Median age was 50, and most patients were male (70%) and Caucasian (90%). Four patients received ablation alone (5-12 lesions), while six had combined resection and ablation (5-18 lesions). Ablation was performed laparoscopically in six patients, and four had ablations without resection. All patients received pre- and post-operative chemotherapy. A median of 7 tumors were ablated per patient. Median follow-up was 2.3 years. Among 75 tumors ablated, ablation site recurrence (ASR) (within 1 cm of ablation site) was seen in three with a per-lesion recurrence rate of 4%. Intrahepatic recurrence (IHR) occurred in 6 (60%) patients and EHR in 1 (10%). Five patients underwent retreatment of IHR during follow-up. Median OS was 3 years and DFS was 7.1 months. At the time of last follow up, 6 patients were disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal ablation can provide acceptable DFS and OS, even with high volume metastatic colorectal cancers. Future efforts should be focused on defining selection criteria for those most likely to benefit from this aggressive approach.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: approaching clinical practice consensus?

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare with limited evidence-based guidelines. This retrospective study evaluates the use of chemotherapy in patients with resected ICC. METHODS: The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program database was used to identify patients with resected ICC. Patients were stratified by date of diagnosis (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014), T, and N stage. Multivariable logistic regression models identified predictors of chemotherapy use. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify survival trends. RESULTS: One thousand and two hundred twenty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Chemotherapy utilization increased over time (33% to 41%, P≤0.05). Chemotherapy use increased in lymph node (LN) positive patients [32% to 60% in 2010-2014; (P≤0.05) and T3/T4 disease (40% to 60% in 2010-2014; P≤0.01], but not in patients with LN negative or T1/T2 disease. LN positivity was associated with utilization of chemotherapy in 2005-2009 and 2010-2014. Overall survival increased from 32 to 41 months (P≤0.05). In LN positive patients, chemotherapy was associated with a decreased hazard ratio of death (P≤0.05) and T3/T4 disease was associated with an increased hazard ratio of death (P≤0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy use in ICC has increased. More LN positive or patients with T3/T4 tumors are receiving chemotherapy, which may explain the improvement in overall survival.

Genomic expression assay testing among American Indian and Alaska Native women with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality for all women, including American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women. The use of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) appears to be predictive of the benefit of chemotherapy for women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The objective of the current study was to compare RS testing between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women with breast cancer. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program was used to identify women with ER-positive breast cancer from 2004 through 2015. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with RS use, with high-risk RS, and with chemotherapy use among those with a high-risk RS. RESULTS: A total of 363,387 NHW patients and 1951 AI/AN patients with ER-positive breast cancer were identified. AI/AN women were found to be less likely to undergo RS testing and, when tested, were more likely to have a high-risk RS. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, AI/AN women were found to be significantly more likely to have a high-risk RS (odds ratio,1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.66). Among untested women, chemotherapy use was higher for AI/AN women; however, the use of chemotherapy was not found to be significantly different between the groups with a high-risk RS. Using Cox proportional hazards models, AI/AN race was found to be significantly associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: AI/AN women were less likely to undergo RS testing compared with NHW women and were more likely to have a high-risk RS. Reversing the disparity in genomic expression assay testing is critical to ensure guideline-based breast cancer treatment and improve survival rates for AI/AN women with breast cancer.

The addition of chemoradiation to adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in lymph node-positive gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: In the ARTIST trial, chemoradiation did not improve disease-free survival (DFS) in gastric cancer patients treated with curative-intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis suggested chemoradiation improved DFS in patients with lymph node (LN) metastases, but the role of adjuvant chemoradiation remains uncertain. This study sought to determine the role of adjuvant chemoradiation using population-based methods. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked data from 2004 to 2013 was used to identify patients aged 66 and older with LN-positive gastric adenocarcinoma. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated factors associated with receipt of chemoradiation. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to evaluate overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 2409 patients with LN-positive gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent upfront surgical resection were identified; 309 (13%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and 407 (17%) received adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation. Among all patients, median OS was 15 months. Median OS was 20 months for patients who received chemotherapy alone and 27 months for patients who received chemotherapy and chemoradiation (p < 0.05). Recent diagnosis, older age, tumor stage T3 or T4, and Charleston Comorbidity Index were associated with an increased hazard ratio for death (p < 0.05). Receipt of chemoradiation was associated with a decreased hazard ratio for death (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LN-positive gastric adenocarcinoma, the addition of chemoradiation to adjuvant chemotherapy after upfront surgical resection was associated with improved survival irrespective of the extent of lymphadenectomy. These data suggest chemoradiation should be considered in patients with LN-positive gastric adenocarcinoma.

Failure to administer multimodality therapy leads to sub-optimal outcomes for patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Lymph node-positive biliary tract cancers have poor overall survival. Surgical resection followed by systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. We sought to assess the delivery of multimodality therapy in the United States. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database was used to identify patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers without distant metastases from 2000 to 2014. Patients were stratified by disease subtype (gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or hilar cholangiocarcinoma) and treatment received (surgery alone, chemotherapy alone, or surgery + chemotherapy). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS: A total of 3226 patients with node-positive biliary tract cancers were identified. Of 2837 patients who underwent surgical resection, 1386 (49%) received no systemic chemotherapy following surgery, while 1451 (51%) received surgery + chemotherapy. A total of 389 patients (12%) received chemotherapy alone. Median overall survival was longer for patients who underwent surgery + chemotherapy (19 months, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in survival for those who received surgery alone versus chemotherapy alone (10 months for both, p = NS). Receipt of surgery + chemotherapy was independently associated with survival on Cox proportional hazard ratio modeling compared to surgery alone (HR for mortality 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87, p < 0.0001) or chemotherapy alone (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.46-1.92, p < 0.0001). These trends were consistent across all disease subtypes. DISCUSSION: Optimal survival for node-positive biliary tract cancers depends on multimodality therapy. Following surgery, a substantial proportion of patients do not receive guideline recommended adjuvant therapy.

Systemic therapy without radiation may be appropriate as neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreas cancer.

BACKGROUND: The utility of neoadjuvant treatment for resectable pancreas cancer is yet to be determined, but has commonly included chemoradiation. We evaluated outcomes in patients with radiographically resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy without chemoradiation. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients in our institutional pancreatic cancer registry was performed, which identified 36 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2012 and 2016. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 66.3 years. Chemotherapy regimens included gemcitabine (n=17), gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (n=8), or 5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) (n=11). Surgical resection was performed in 69% of patients (n=25), with an R0 resection rate of 92% (n=23 patients). During chemotherapy, distant disease became apparent in 19% of patients (n=7), while no patients had evidence of local progression. Resection rates were similar between chemotherapy regimens (single agent =59%, multiple agent =79%). Median overall survival for all patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 30.3 and 34.4 months for those who underwent surgical resection. There was no difference in median survival for patients treated with gemcitabine (31.3 months) or multi-agent chemotherapy (29.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: A short course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy without chemoradiation may improve patient selection prior to surgical resection for pancreas cancer. Further, local disease progression did not limit surgical resection in this small series.

Minimally invasive microwave ablation provides excellent long-term outcomes for otherwise inaccessible hepatocellular cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Thermal ablation can be used as a bridge to transplant or with curative intent for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We report our experience with laparoscopic ablation of HCC in patients deemed inaccessible by the percutaneous approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of surgical ablations from 2009 to 2017. Patient demographics, disease and treatment characteristics, and outcomes were abstracted from the medical record. Kaplan-Meier modeling was performed for survival and recurrence. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included with a median age of 62 (interquartile range [IQR], 57-67). Most patients were male (76%) and Caucasian (70%). Ninety-seven percent had underlying cirrhosis. Median model for end stage liver disease-sodium was 9.5 (IQR, 8-12). The median maximal diameter of ablated lesions was 2.6 cm (IQR, 1.8-3.0). Thirty-nine lesions were ablated; 97% were completed laparoscopically. The median maximal diameter of the ablation zone was 4.8 cm (IQR, 3.8-5.7) with a median difference of ablation zone to the tumor of 2.0 cm (IQR, 1.5-2.75). Twelve patients received additional treatment. Median disease-free survival was 66.7 months and median follow-up 42.9 months. Disease recurrence occurred in 13 patients (39%)-systemic recurrence in 6%, intrahepatic recurrence in 27% and local recurrence in 6%. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic thermal ablation of HCC is safe and provides good oncologic outcomes for otherwise inaccessible tumors.

Patterns of Treatment and Survival among American Indian and Alaska Native Women with Breast Cancer, 2000-2015.

We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to examine trends in breast cancer treatment and survival among a large sample of American Indian and Alaska Native women diagnosed from 2000-2015. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate survival. Alaska Natives were more likely to undergo mastectomy (48% compared with 39% of American Indians and 36% of non-Hispanic Whites) and were less likely to receive breast reconstruction following mastectomy (9% compared with 17% of American Indians and 28% of non-Hispanic Whites). Alaska Natives had both lower overall (HR: 1.40 95% CI: 1.19-1.65) and breast-cancer specific (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.63) survival compared with non-Hispanic Whites. Survival differences across the three racial groups varied significantly by age. Efforts to improve survival among American Indian and Alaska Native populations will need to address barriers to access among these vulnerable populations.