Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing before surgery: A qualitative study of providers and older adults.

INTRODUCTION: Deprescribing, the collaborative process between providers and patients to streamline medication regimen, may reduce the risk of adverse events following surgery among older adults with multimorbidity. However, barriers and facilitators to deprescribing for surgery has not been explored. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study of Primary Care Providers (PCP) and patients aged 65 and older who were scheduled for surgery. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework, which informed the interview guide and analysis. RESULTS: A total of 16 participants (n=8 providers, n=8 patients) were included. Themes were regarding: 1) attitudes towards deprescribing before surgery, 2) perceived benefits of deprescribing before surgery, 3) patient-provider relationship and shared decision-making, 4) hope for surgery, 5) barriers to deprescribing before surgery, and 6) preferences for deprescribing follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our study findings regarding provider- and patient-related barriers and facilitators for deprescribing and desired processes before surgery may inform future deprescribing intervention targets before surgery.

Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Is Not Associated With a Higher Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infections and Periprosthetic Joint Infection-related Revisions After Primary THA.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (sBPH) is a potential risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), a leading cause of implant failure and revision THA. However, the available evidence is mixed on whether this is the case. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the prevalence of sBPH in male recipients of primary THA by age group? (2) Do patients with sBPH compared with those without sBPH have higher 30-day, 90-day, and 2-year odds of PJI and higher 30-day and 90-day odds of urinary catheterization, urinary tract infection (UTI), and sepsis after primary THA? (3) Do patients with sBPH compared with those without sBPH have lower survivorship free from PJI-related revision at 5 years after THA? METHODS: The PearlDiver database was used as it provided the largest sample of patients across all payer types to perform longitudinal research. Between January 2010 and April 2021, 1,056,119 patients who underwent primary THA were identified. After applying the inclusion criteria (that is, male sex, minimum age of 18, and diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis) and exclusion criteria (that is, history of asymptomatic BPH or any other joint arthroplasty), 16% (172,866) of patients remained. A further 6% (59,500) of patients were excluded as they did not meet the minimum study follow-up of 2 years, leaving 11% (113,366) for analysis. Of those, patients with sBPH were matched to those without in a 1:4 ratio by age and comorbidities, including alcohol abuse, anemia, cardiovascular disorders, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, depression, obesity, peripheral vascular disorders, renal failure, and rheumatoid arthritis. Age and comorbidities of the two groups postmatch were balanced. Logistic regression was performed to analyze the odds for 30-day, 90-day, and 2-year postoperative complications. Survivorship free from PJI-related revision at 5 years after THA was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: Among male recipients of primary THA ages 65 or older, 24% (11,319 of 47,426) had a medical history of sBPH. We found no difference in the odds of PJI at 30 days, 90 days, and 2 years after primary THA between the two groups. PJI occurred in 0.5% (62 of 11,819), 0.8% (97 of 11,819), and 1.3% (150 of 11,819) of patients with sBPH versus in 0.5% (227 of 47,103), 0.8% (360 of 47,103), and 1.2% (570 of 47,103) of those without sBPH within 30 days (OR 1.09 [95% CI 0.82 to 1.43]), 90 days (OR 1.07 [95% CI 0.85 to 1.34]), and 2 years (OR 1.05 [95% CI 0.87 to 1.25]) after THA, respectively. Patients with sBPH compared with those without had higher odds of 30-day and 90-day urinary catheterization (OR 5.00 [95% CI 3.64 to 6.88] and OR 5.36 [95% CI 4.04 to 7.13], respectively), 30-day and 90-day UTI (OR 2.18 [95% CI 1.88 to 2.54] and OR 2.55 [95% CI 2.26 to 2.87], respectively), and 30-day and 90-day sepsis (OR 1.55 [95% CI 1.11 to 2.13] and OR 1.43 [95% CI 1.10 to 1.83], respectively). We found no difference in survival free from PJI-related revision at 5 years after THA between patients with and without sBPH (98.3% [95% CI 98.1% to 98.6%] versus 98.1% [95% CI 98.1% to 98.2%]; p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: sBPH is common among THA recipients, and surgeons should be aware of the added risk of postoperative urinary complications and sepsis in this subset that could lead to additional postoperative care requirements. Surgeons may consider perioperative measures such as preoperative use of short-form questionnaires to assess urinary symptoms, urology clearance or referral, and closer follow-up to improve care of sBPH patients undergoing THA. As currently available tools for assessing sBPH are limited and lack sensitivity as well as specificity, future studies may develop validated tools that can be used to quickly assess risk in sBPH patients before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

The Effect of Preoperative Bisphosphonate Use on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) commonly have osteoporosis for which bisphosphonates (BPs) are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for treatment. Bisphosphonate use post-THA is associated with decreased periprosthetic bone loss or revisions, and increased longevity of implants. However, evidence is lacking for preoperative bisphosphonate use in THA recipients. This study investigated the association between bisphosphonate use pre-THA and outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of a national administrative claims database was conducted. Among THA recipients who had a prior diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis and osteoporosis/osteopenia, the treatment group (BP-exposed) consisted of patients who had a history of bisphosphonate use at least 1 year before THA; controls (BP-naive) comprised patients who did not have preoperative bisphosphonate use. The BP-exposed were matched to BP-naive in a 1:4 ratio by age, sex, and comorbidities. Logistic regressions were used to calculate the odds ratio for intraoperative and 1-year postoperative complications. RESULTS: The BP-exposed group had significantly higher rates of intraoperative and 1-year postoperative periprosthetic fractures (odds ratio (OR): 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23, 1.57) and revisions (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.25) compared with the BP-naive controls. BP-exposed also experienced higher rates of aseptic loosening, dislocation, periprosthetic osteolysis, and stress fracture of the femur or hip/pelvis compared to the BP-naive controls, but these values were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The use of bisphosphonates in THA patients preoperatively is associated with higher rates of intraoperative and 1-year postoperative complications. These findings may impact the management of patients undergoing THA who have a prior diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia and use of bisphosphonates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study (Level 3).