MDCT evaluation of pancreatic contour variations in head, neck, body and tail: surgical and radiological significance.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the incidence of pancreatic contour variations on multidetector CT (MDCT) for abdominal examinations. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 700 MDCT scans was performed in patients who underwent triple phase CT abdomen between October 2018 and January 2021. After excluding 176 patients, finally total of 524 patients were included in the study. For simplification, we classified the pancreatic contour variations as classified by Ross et al. and Omeri et al. Pancreatic head-neck variations was classified into Type I-anterior, Type II-posterior and Type III-horizontal variety. Pancreatic body-tail variation was divided into Type Ia-anterior projection; Ib-posterior projection and Type IIa-globular, IIb-lobulated, IIc-tapered, and IId-bifid pancreatic tail. RESULTS: The most common type of variation in the head was Type II (n = 112, 21.3%) followed by Type III (n = 37, 7%) and Type I (n = 21, 4%). The most common type of variation in the body of pancreas was Type Ia (n = 33, 6.2%) followed by Type Ib (n = 13, 2.4%). In the tail region of pancreas, the most common variation was Type IIb (n = 21, 4%) followed by Type IIa (n = 19, 3.6%). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic contour variations are not very uncommon in daily practice. Knowledge of these variations is important for surgeons, radiologists and avoids misjudgement of normal pancreatic tissue as tumor or lymph node especially on unenhanced or single phase MDCT.

Simplifying the complicated heel-an emergency imaging approach to calcaneal fractures.

The calcaneum is the most inferior and largest tarsal bone and supports the axial load of the weight of the body. Calcaneal fractures formulate 60% of the tarsal fractures and are frequently encountered in almost all trauma centres. It becomes imperative to understand and report calcaneal fractures in a structured fashion for better clinical and treatment outcomes for the patients. Radiologists should be well acquainted with calcaneal fractures and their various classifications and should develop an algorithmic approach for diagnosing and reporting heel fractures.

Combined hyperdense gallbladder wall-lumen sign: new computed tomography sign in acute gangrenous cholecystitis.

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the combined hyperdense gallbladder wall-lumen sign on computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing gangrenous cholecystitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the unenhanced CT scans of surgically proven cases of acute gangrenous (GCh) and non-gangrenous cholecystitis (nonGCh). Eleven cases of pathologically proven acute gangrenous cholecystitis and 12 consecutive cases of surgically proven acute non-gangrenous cholecystitis that underwent CT at our institute were included in the study so as to have 1 : 1 control. The Hounsfield unit (HU) value of the gallbladder wall and intraluminal bile was measured. Interobserver variability for individual CT findings was also assessed. RESULTS: The gangrenous cholecystitis group had significantly higher HU values of wall and bile (median value of 33 HU vs. 21 HU and median value of 21 HU vs. 8.5 HU, respectively, p < 0.05). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for HU lumen was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.62-0.98, p = 0.014) with an ideal cut-off at 31.5 HU, where the sensitivity was 54.5% and specificity was 91.7%. HU lumen has an even better assessment for gangrenous cholecystitis with AUC of its ROC as 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80-1.00, p = 0.001) with an ideal cut-off at 12.5 HU, where the sensitivity was 81.8% and specificity was 91.7%. The combined wall-lumen cut-off is 35 HU with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 75%. CONCLUSION: A cut-off CT density value of the gallbladder wall of more than 31.5 HU, intraluminal bile more than 12.5 HU, and combined wall-lumen HU of more than 35 can predict GCh.