Comparative Efficacy of Drug Interventions for Keloids: A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Keloids are common benign skin lesions originating from a disorganized fibroproliferative collagen response; these lesions often lead to both physical and psychological problems. The optimal treatment for keloids is yet to be standardized. Intralesional injection, which is simple and nontraumatic, is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for these lesions. In this study, we compared 5 different drugs (intralesional injections) for the treatment of keloids in terms of efficacy. METHODS: We systemically searched relevant studies on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Randomized clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), botulinum toxin A (BTA), verapamil, and bleomycin were included in this study. RESULTS: This network meta-analysis included a total of 1114 patients from 20 randomized controlled trials. Botulinum toxin A alone and TAC plus 5-FU exhibited significantly better efficacy than did 5-FU, TAC, and verapamil. No significant difference in efficacy between BTA alone and TAC combined with 5-FU was observed. No significant differences were noted in the adverse event rate between BTA, TAC plus 5-FU, 5-FU, and TAC. Furthermore, we performed surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses to predict the rank of each intervention (by efficacy and adverse event rate). The predicted ranking by efficacy was as follows: TAC plus 5-FU, BTA, bleomycin, TAC, 5-FU, and verapamil; the predicted ranking by adverse events was as follows: TAC, 5-FU, TAC plus 5-FU, and BTA. Funnel plot analysis revealed no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin A and TAC plus 5-FU appear to have outstanding therapeutic efficacy for keloids. The rate of adverse events was similar among BTA, TAC, 5-FU, and TAC plus 5-FU. Nonetheless, additional reviews of rigorous, large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted for further validation of our findings.

Using Treg, Tr1, and Breg Expression Levels to Predict Clinical Responses to csDMARD Treatment in Drug-naive Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Regulatory T cells (Treg) play a crucial role in maintaining immune tolerance and preventing autoimmune diseases. Recent data also indicate that type 1 regulatory T (Tr1) and regulatory B (Breg) cells play an inhibitory (i.e., protective) role in autoimmune diseases. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) are a first-line therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and our aim was to predict clinical responses of this treatment using immunophenotyping. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We first detected the presence of immune cells in fresh blood from 16 healthy controls (HC) and 26 patients with RA (14 drug-naive and 12 csDMARD-experienced). Then, we recorded immunophenotypic changes in 14 drug-naive RA (naive RA) patients prior to csDMARD treatment (i.e., day 0) and after receiving treatment for 6 months. The observed changes were also compared with other clinical indicators, including the presence of anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), rheumatoid factor (RF) levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. RESULTS: Naive RA patients had significantly lower Tregs than HC and csDMARD-experienced patients (both p<0.0001) and the number of Tregs correlated with the diagnosis of RA and therapeutic efficacy of csDMARD treatment. Furthermore, lower baseline levels of Treg, memory Treg, Tr1, and higher PD-1+ Marginal B, Breg cells were significantly associated with decreased development of the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) (all p<0.05), revealing better medical response. Multiple regression and principal component analysis identified Treg, Tr1, and Breg as potential predictors of csDMARD responses (Area under curve: 0.9; Accuracy: 92.86%). Furthermore, elevated Treg, Tr1, and Breg cells were associated with decreased DAS28, ESR, and CRP (all p<0.05); changes in Treg and Breg cell expression were also more pronounced among double negative anti-CCP and RF in RA patients with better outcomes (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Immunophenotyping can be an adjunct clinical tool to identify patients who are poor candidates for csDMARD therapy. Alternative therapeutic interventions in the early stages of disease should be formulated for these patients.