Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
2.
MMWR Surveill Summ ; 69(6): 1-14, 2020 11 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33180756

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM/CONDITION: Salmonella, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and Listeria monocytogenes are the leading causes of multistate foodborne disease outbreaks in the United States. Responding to multistate outbreaks quickly and effectively and applying lessons learned about outbreak sources, modes of transmission, and risk factors for infection can prevent additional outbreak-associated illnesses and save lives. This report summarizes the investigations of multistate outbreaks and possible outbreaks of Salmonella, STEC, and L. monocytogenes infections coordinated by CDC during the 2016 reporting period. PERIOD COVERED: 2016. An investigation was considered to have occurred in 2016 if it began during 2016 and ended on or before March 31, 2017, or if it began before January 1, 2016, and ended during March 31, 2016-March 31, 2017. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM: CDC maintains a database of investigations of possible multistate foodborne and animal-contact outbreaks caused by Salmonella, STEC, and L. monocytogenes. Data were collected by local, state, and federal investigators during the detection, investigation and response, and control phases of the outbreak investigations. Additional data sources used for this report included PulseNet, the national molecular subtyping network based on isolates uploaded by local, state, and federal laboratories, and the Foodborne Disease Outbreak Surveillance System (FDOSS), which collects information from state, local, and territorial health departments and federal agencies about single-state and multistate foodborne disease outbreaks in the United States. Multistate outbreaks reported to FDOSS were linked using a unique outbreak identifier to obtain food category information when a confirmed or suspected food source was identified. Food categories were determined and assigned in FDOSS according to a classification scheme developed by CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) in the Interagency Food Safety Analytics Collaboration. A possible multistate outbreak was determined by expert judgment to be an outbreak if supporting data (e.g., temporal, geographic, demographic, dietary, travel, or food history) suggested a common source. A solved outbreak was an outbreak for which a specific kind of food or animal was implicated (i.e., confirmed or suspected) as the source. Outbreak-level variables included number of illnesses, hospitalizations, cases of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and deaths; the number of states with illnesses; date of isolation for the earliest and last cases; demographic data describing patients associated with a possible outbreak (e.g., age, sex, and state of residence); the types of data collected (i.e., epidemiologic, traceback, or laboratory); the outbreak source, mode of transmission, and exposure location; the name or brand of the source; whether the source was suspected or confirmed; whether a food was imported into the United States; the types of regulatory agencies involved; whether regulatory action was taken (and what type of action); whether an outbreak was publicly announced by CDC via website posting; beginning and end date of the investigation; and general comments about the investigation. The number of illnesses, hospitalizations, cases of HUS, and deaths were characterized by transmission mode, pathogen, outcome (i.e., unsolved, solved with suspected source, or solved with confirmed source), source, and food or animal category. RESULTS: During the 2016 reporting period, 230 possible multistate outbreaks were detected and 174 were investigated. A median of 24 possible outbreaks was under investigation per week, and investigations were open for a median of 37 days. Of these 174 possible outbreaks investigated, 56 were excluded from this analysis because they occurred in a single state, were linked to international travel, or were pseudo-outbreaks (e.g., a group of similar isolates resulting from laboratory media contamination rather than infection in patients). Of the remaining 118 possible multistate outbreaks, 50 were determined to be outbreaks and 39 were solved (18 with a confirmed food source, 10 with a suspected food source, 10 with a confirmed animal source, and one with a suspected animal source). Sprouts were the most commonly implicated food category in solved multistate foodborne outbreaks (five). Chicken was the source of the most foodborne outbreak-related illnesses (134). Three outbreaks involved novel food-pathogen pairs: flour and STEC, frozen vegetables and L. monocytogenes, and bagged salad and L. monocytogenes. Eleven outbreaks were attributed to contact with animals (10 attributed to contact with backyard poultry and one to small turtles). Thirteen of 18 multistate foodborne disease outbreaks with confirmed sources resulted in product action, including 10 outbreaks with recalls, two with market withdrawals, and one with an FSIS public health alert. Twenty outbreaks, including 11 foodborne and nine animal-contact outbreaks, were announced to the public by CDC via its website, Facebook, and Twitter. These announcements resulted in approximately 910,000 webpage views, 55,000 likes, 66,000 shares, and 5,800 retweets. INTERPRETATION: During the 2016 reporting period, investigations of possible multistate outbreaks occurred frequently, were resource intensive, and required a median of 37 days of investigation. Fewer than half (42%) of the 118 possible outbreaks investigated were determined to have sufficient data to meet the definition of a multistate outbreak. Moreover, of the 50 outbreaks with sufficient data, approximately three fourths were solved. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION: Close collaboration among CDC, FDA, FSIS and state and local health and agriculture partners is central to successful outbreak investigations. Identification of novel outbreak sources and trends in sources provides insights into gaps in food safety and safe handling of animals, which helps focus prevention strategies. Summarizing investigations of possible multistate outbreaks can provide insights into the investigative process, improve future investigations, and help prevent illnesses. Although identifying and investigating possible multistate outbreaks require substantial resources and investment in public health infrastructure, they are important in determining outbreak sources and implementing prevention and control measures.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Listeria monocytogenes , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(10): 2319-2328, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32946367

ABSTRACT

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) cause substantial and costly illnesses. Leafy greens are the second most common source of foodborne STEC O157 outbreaks. We examined STEC outbreaks linked to leafy greens during 2009-2018 in the United States and Canada. We identified 40 outbreaks, 1,212 illnesses, 77 cases of hemolytic uremic syndrome, and 8 deaths. More outbreaks were linked to romaine lettuce (54%) than to any other type of leafy green. More outbreaks occurred in the fall (45%) and spring (28%) than in other seasons. Barriers in epidemiologic and traceback investigations complicated identification of the ultimate outbreak source. Research on the seasonality of leafy green outbreaks and vulnerability to STEC contamination and bacterial survival dynamics by leafy green type are warranted. Improvements in traceability of leafy greens are also needed. Federal and state health partners, researchers, the leafy green industry, and retailers can work together on interventions to reduce STEC contamination.


Subject(s)
Escherichia coli Infections , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli , Canada/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Food Microbiology , Lactuca , United States/epidemiology
4.
Pediatrics ; 144(4)2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31519792

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2017, we conducted a multistate investigation to determine the source of an outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O157:H7 infections, which occurred primarily in children. METHODS: We defined a case as infection with an outbreak strain of STEC O157:H7 with illness onset between January 1, 2017, and April 30, 2017. Case patients were interviewed to identify common exposures. Traceback and facility investigations were conducted; food samples were tested for STEC. RESULTS: We identified 32 cases from 12 states. Twenty-six (81%) cases occurred in children <18 years old; 8 children developed hemolytic uremic syndrome. Twenty-five (78%) case patients ate the same brand of soy nut butter or attended facilities that served it. We identified 3 illness subclusters, including a child care center where person-to-person transmission may have occurred. Testing isolated an outbreak strain from 11 soy nut butter samples. Investigations identified violations of good manufacturing practices at the soy nut butter manufacturing facility with opportunities for product contamination, although the specific route of contamination was undetermined. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation identified soy nut butter as the source of a multistate outbreak of STEC infections affecting mainly children. The ensuing recall of all soy nut butter products the facility manufactured, totaling >1.2 million lb, likely prevented additional illnesses. Prompt diagnosis of STEC infections and appropriate specimen collection aids in outbreak detection. Child care providers should follow appropriate hygiene practices to prevent secondary spread of enteric illness in child care settings. Firms should manufacture ready-to-eat foods in a manner that minimizes the risk of contamination.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli O157 , Foodborne Diseases/epidemiology , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli , Soy Foods/microbiology , Adolescent , Aged , Child , Child Day Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Fast Foods/adverse effects , Fast Foods/microbiology , Female , Food Handling , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/epidemiology , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/microbiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Product Recalls and Withdrawals , Soy Foods/adverse effects , United States/epidemiology
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(37): 1032-1035, 2018 Sep 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30235182

ABSTRACT

Campylobacter causes an estimated 1.3 million diarrheal illnesses in the United States annually (1). In August 2017, the Florida Department of Health notified CDC of six Campylobacter jejuni infections linked to company A, a national pet store chain based in Ohio. CDC examined whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data and identified six isolates from company A puppies in Florida that were highly related to an isolate from a company A customer in Ohio. This information prompted a multistate investigation by local and state health and agriculture departments and CDC to identify the outbreak source and prevent additional illness. Health officials from six states visited pet stores to collect puppy fecal samples, antibiotic records, and traceback information. Nationally, 118 persons, including 29 pet store employees, in 18 states were identified with illness onset during January 5, 2016-February 4, 2018. In total, six pet store companies were linked to the outbreak. Outbreak isolates were resistant by antibiotic susceptibility testing to all antibiotics commonly used to treat Campylobacter infections, including macrolides and quinolones. Store record reviews revealed that among 149 investigated puppies, 142 (95%) received one or more courses of antibiotics, raising concern that antibiotic use might have led to development of resistance. Public health authorities issued infection prevention recommendations to affected pet stores and recommendations for testing puppies to veterinarians. This outbreak demonstrates that puppies can be a source of multidrug-resistant Campylobacter infections in humans, warranting a closer look at antimicrobial use in the commercial dog industry.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Campylobacter jejuni/drug effects , Disease Outbreaks , Dogs/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Campylobacter Infections/drug therapy , Campylobacter Infections/prevention & control , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Child , Child, Preschool , Contact Tracing , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Feces/microbiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult , Zoonoses
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(4): 493-501, 2018 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617951

ABSTRACT

Background: During the 2014-2015 US influenza season, 320 cases of non-mumps parotitis (NMP) among residents of 21 states were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). We conducted an epidemiologic and laboratory investigation to determine viral etiologies and clinical features of NMP during this unusually large occurrence. Methods: NMP was defined as acute parotitis or other salivary gland swelling of >2 days duration in a person with a mumps- negative laboratory result. Using a standardized questionnaire, we collected demographic and clinical information. Buccal samples were tested at the CDC for selected viruses, including mumps, influenza, human parainfluenza viruses (HPIVs) 1-4, adenoviruses, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) 1 and 2, and human herpes viruses (HHVs) 6A and 6B. Results: Among the 320 patients, 65% were male, median age was 14.5 years (range, 0-90), and 67% reported unilateral parotitis. Commonly reported symptoms included sore throat (55%) and fever (48%). Viruses were detected in 210 (71%) of 294 NMP patients with adequate samples for testing, ≥2 viruses were detected in 37 samples, and 248 total virus detections were made among all samples. These included 156 influenza A(H3N2), 42 HHV6B, 32 EBV, 8 HPIV2, 2 HPIV3, 3 adenovirus, 4 HSV-1, and 1 HSV-2. Influenza A(H3N2), HHV6B, and EBV were the most frequently codetected viruses. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, in addition to mumps, clinicians should consider respiratory viral (influenza) and herpes viral etiologies for parotitis, particularly among patients without epidemiologic links to mumps cases or outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Parotitis/virology , Viruses/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Mumps , Parotitis/epidemiology , Pharyngitis/virology , Seasons , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(4): 485-492, 2018 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29617957

ABSTRACT

Background: During the 2014-2015 influenza season in the United States, 256 cases of influenza-associated parotitis were reported from 27 states. We conducted a case-control study and laboratory investigation to further describe this rare clinical manifestation of influenza. Methods: During February 2015-April 2015, we interviewed 50 cases (with parotitis) and 124 ill controls (without parotitis) with laboratory-confirmed influenza; participants resided in 11 states and were matched by age, state, hospital admission status, and specimen collection date. Influenza viruses were characterized using real-time polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing. We compared cases and controls using conditional logistic regression. Specimens from additional reported cases were also analyzed. Results: Cases, 73% of whom were aged <20 years, experienced painful (86%), unilateral (68%) parotitis a median of 4 (range, 0-16) days after onset of systemic or respiratory symptoms. Cases were more likely than controls to be male (76% vs 51%; P = .005). We detected influenza A(H3N2) viruses, genetic group 3C.2a, in 100% (32/32) of case and 92% (105/108) of control specimens sequenced (P = .22). Influenza B and A(H3N2) 3C.3 and 3C.3b genetic group virus infections were detected in specimens from additional cases. Conclusions: Influenza-associated parotitis, as reported here and in prior sporadic case reports, seems to occur primarily with influenza A(H3N2) virus infection. Because of the different clinical and infection control considerations for mumps and influenza virus infections, we recommend clinicians consider influenza in the differential diagnoses among patients with acute parotitis during the influenza season.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human/complications , Parotitis/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Infant , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Male , Middle Aged , Parotitis/diagnosis , Parotitis/epidemiology , Seasons , United States , Young Adult
8.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 21(12): 2135-40, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26583382

ABSTRACT

Newly emerged highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A H5 viruses have caused outbreaks among birds in the United States. These viruses differ genetically from HPAI H5 viruses that previously caused human illness, most notably in Asia and Africa. To assess the risk for animal-to-human HPAI H5 virus transmission in the United States, we determined the number of persons with self-reported exposure to infected birds, the number with an acute respiratory infection (ARI) during a 10-day postexposure period, and the number with ARI who tested positive for influenza by real-time reverse transcription PCR or serologic testing for each outbreak during December 15, 2014-March 31, 2015. During 60 outbreaks in 13 states, a total of 164 persons were exposed to infected birds. ARI developed in 5 of these persons within 10 days of exposure. H5 influenza virus infection was not identified in any persons with ARI, suggesting a low risk for animal-to-human HPAI H5 virus transmission.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza in Birds/transmission , Influenza, Human/transmission , Animals , Birds/virology , Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases/transmission , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza in Birds/pathology , Influenza in Birds/virology , United States/epidemiology
9.
J Travel Med ; 22(5): 306-11, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26031322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During spring 2014, two large influenza outbreaks occurred among cruise ship passengers and crew on trans-hemispheric itineraries. METHODS: Passenger and crew information for both ships was obtained from components of the ship medical records. Data included demographics, diagnosis of influenza-like illness (ILI) or acute respiratory illness (ARI), illness onset date, passenger cabin number, crew occupation, influenza vaccination history, and rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) result, if performed. RESULTS: In total, 3.7% of passengers and 3.1% of crew on Ship A had medically attended acute respiratory illness (MAARI). On Ship B, 6.2% of passengers and 4.7% of crew had MAARI. In both outbreaks, passengers reported illness prior to the ship's departure. Influenza activity was low in the places of origin of the majority of passengers and both ships' ports of call. The median age of affected passengers on both ships was 70 years. Diagnostic testing revealed three different co-circulating influenza viruses [influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, influenza A(H3N2), and influenza B] on Ship A and one circulating influenza virus (influenza B) on Ship B. Both ships voluntarily reported the outbreaks to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and implemented outbreak response plans including isolation of sick individuals and antiviral treatment and prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Influenza activity can become widespread during cruise ship outbreaks and can occur outside of traditional influenza seasons. Comprehensive outbreak prevention and control plans, including prompt antiviral treatment and prophylaxis, may mitigate the impact of influenza outbreaks on cruise ships.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/organization & administration , Ships , Travel , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Quarantine/methods , Sanitation/methods , United States
10.
J Infect Dis ; 212(10): 1592-9, 2015 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25948864

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2012, one third of cases in a multistate outbreak of variant influenza A(H3N2) virus ([H3N2]v) infection occurred in Ohio. We conducted an investigation of (H3N2)v cases associated with agricultural Fair A in Ohio. METHODS: We surveyed Fair A swine exhibitors and their household members. Confirmed cases had influenza-like illness (ILI) and a positive laboratory test for (H3N2)v, and probable cases had ILI. We calculated attack rates. We determined risk factors for infection, using multivariable log-binomial regression. RESULTS: We identified 20 confirmed and 94 probable cases associated with Fair A. Among 114 cases, the median age was 10 years, there were no hospitalizations or deaths, and 82% had swine exposure. In the exhibitor household cohort of 359 persons (83 households), we identified 6 confirmed cases (2%) and 40 probable cases (11%). An age of <10 years was a significant risk factor (P < .01) for illness. One instance of likely human-to-human transmission was identified. CONCLUSIONS: In this (H3N2)v outbreak, no evidence of sustained human-to-human (H3N2)v transmission was found. Our risk factor analysis contributed to the development of the recommendation that people at increased risk of influenza-associated complications, including children aged <5 years, avoid swine barns at fairs during the 2012 fair season.


Subject(s)
Crowding , Disease Outbreaks , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/classification , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Occupational Exposure , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Female , Humans , Infant , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Ohio/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Swine , Young Adult
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(4): 111, 2015 Feb 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25654614

ABSTRACT

During December 15, 2014-January 16, 2015, the U.S. Department of Agriculture received 14 reports of birds infected with Asian-origin, highly pathogenic avian influenza A (HPAI) (H5N2), (H5N8), and (H5N1) viruses. These reports represent the first reported infections with these viruses in U.S. wild or domestic birds. Although these viruses are not known to have caused disease in humans, their appearance in North America might increase the likelihood of human infection in the United States. Human infection with other avian influenza viruses, such as HPAI (H5N1) and (H5N6) viruses and (H7N9) virus, has been associated with severe, sometimes fatal, disease, usually following contact with poultry.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype , Influenza A Virus, H5N2 Subtype , Influenza A virus , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Animals , Animals, Wild , Birds , Humans , Influenza in Birds/virology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Poultry , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Poultry Diseases/virology , United States/epidemiology
12.
J Infect Dis ; 210(4): 535-44, 2014 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24731959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few data exist describing healthcare-seeking behaviors among persons with influenza-like illness (ILI) or adherence to influenza antiviral treatment recommendations. METHODS: We analyzed adult responses to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System in 31 states and the District of Columbia (DC) and pediatric responses in 25 states and DC for January-April 2011 by demographics and underlying health conditions. RESULTS: Among 75 088 adult and 15 649 child respondents, 8.9% and 33.9%, respectively, reported ILI. ILI was more frequent among adults with asthma (16%), chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD; 26%), diabetes (12%), heart disease (19%), kidney disease (16%), or obesity (11%). Forty-five percent of adults and 57% of children sought healthcare for ILI. Thirty-five percent of adults sought care ≤ 2 days after ILI onset. Seeking care ≤ 2 days was more frequent among adults with COPD (48%) or heart disease (55%). Among adults with a self-reported physician diagnosis of influenza, 34% received treatment with antiviral medications. The only underlying health condition with a higher rate of treatment was diabetes (46%). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with underlying health conditions were more likely to report ILI, but the majority did not seek care promptly, missing opportunities for early influenza antiviral treatment.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Seasons , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(1): 7-11, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24183534

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza is responsible for more than 200,000 hospitalizations each year in the United States. Although hospital-onset (HO) influenza contributes to morbidity and mortality among these patients, little is known about its overall epidemiology. OBJECTIVE: We describe patients with HO influenza in the United States during the 2010-2011 influenza season and compare them with community-onset (CO) cases to better understand factors associated with illness. METHODS: We identified laboratory-confirmed, influenza-related hospitalizations using the Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET), a network that conducts population-based surveillance in 16 states. CO cases had laboratory confirmation ≤ 3 days after hospital admission; HO cases had laboratory confirmation > 3 days after admission. RESULTS: We identified 172 (2.8%) HO cases among a total of 6,171 influenza-positive hospitalizations. HO and CO cases did not differ by age (P = .22), sex (P = .29), or race (P = .25). Chronic medical conditions were more common in HO cases (89%) compared with CO cases (78%) (P < .01), and a greater proportion of HO cases (42%) than CO cases (17%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (P < .01). The median length of stay after influenza diagnosis of HO cases (7.5 days) was greater than that of CO cases (3 days) (P < .01). CONCLUSION: HO cases had greater length of stay and were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit or die compared with CO cases. HO influenza may play a role in the clinical outcome of hospitalized patients, particularly among those with chronic medical conditions.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/mortality , Community-Acquired Infections/pathology , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/mortality , Cross Infection/pathology , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Influenza, Human/mortality , Influenza, Human/pathology , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Analysis , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
14.
Clin Infect Dis ; 57(12): 1703-12, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24065322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Variant influenza virus infections are rare but may have pandemic potential if person-to-person transmission is efficient. We describe the epidemiology of a multistate outbreak of an influenza A(H3N2) variant virus (H3N2v) first identified in 2011. METHODS: We identified laboratory-confirmed cases of H3N2v and used a standard case report form to characterize illness and exposures. We considered illness to result from person-to-person H3N2v transmission if swine contact was not identified within 4 days prior to illness onset. RESULTS: From 9 July to 7 September 2012, we identified 306 cases of H3N2v in 10 states. The median age of all patients was 7 years. Commonly reported signs and symptoms included fever (98%), cough (85%), and fatigue (83%). Sixteen patients (5.2%) were hospitalized, and 1 fatal case was identified. The majority of those infected reported agricultural fair attendance (93%) and/or contact with swine (95%) prior to illness. We identified 15 cases of possible person-to-person transmission of H3N2v. Viruses recovered from patients were 93%-100% identical and similar to viruses recovered from previous cases of H3N2v. All H3N2v viruses examined were susceptible to oseltamivir and zanamivir and resistant to adamantane antiviral medications. CONCLUSIONS: In a large outbreak of variant influenza, the majority of infected persons reported exposures, suggesting that swine contact at an agricultural fair was a risk for H3N2v infection. We identified limited person-to-person H3N2v virus transmission, but found no evidence of efficient or sustained person-to-person transmission. Fair managers and attendees should be aware of the risk of swine-to-human transmission of influenza viruses in these settings.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Contact Tracing , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Infant , Influenza, Human/transmission , Male , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 57 Suppl 1: S12-5, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23794726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thirteen human infections with an influenza A(H3N2) variant (H3N2v) virus containing a combination of gene segments not previously associated with human illness were identified in the United States from August 2011 to April 2012. Because laboratory confirmation of influenza virus infection is only performed for a minority of ill persons and routine clinical tests may not identify H3N2v virus, the count of laboratory-confirmed H3N2v virus infections underestimates the true burden of illness. METHODS: To account for this underascertainment, we adapted a multiplier model created at the beginning of the influenza A(H1N1) 2009 pandemic to estimate the true burden of H3N2v illness. Data to inform each of these parameters came from the literature and from special projects conducted during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic and the 2010-2011 influenza season. The multipliers were calculated as the simple inverses of the proportions at each step, and we accounted for variability and uncertainty in model parameters by using a probabilistic or Monte Carlo approach. RESULTS: We estimate that the median multiplier for children was 200 (90% range, 115-369) and for adults was 255 (90% range, 152-479) and that 2055 (90% range, 1187-3800) illnesses from H3N2v virus infections may have occurred from August 2011 to April 2012, suggesting that the new virus was more widespread than previously thought. CONCLUSIONS: Illness from this variant influenza virus was more frequent than previously thought. Continued surveillance is needed to ensure timely detection and response to H3N2v virus infections.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Adult , Animals , Child , Female , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza, Human/transmission , Male , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/transmission , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Population Surveillance , Swine , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine Diseases/transmission , United States/epidemiology
16.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(7): 717-22, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23739076

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of infection control among staff in a residential care facility for children and young adults with neurologic and neurodevelopmental conditions. DESIGN: Self-administered survey. SETTING: Residential care facility (facility A). PARTICIPANTS: Facility A staff ([Formula: see text]). METHODS: We distributed a survey to staff at facility A. We classified staff with direct care responsibilities as clinical (ie, physicians, nurses, and therapists) or nonclinical (ie, habilitation assistants, volunteers, and teachers) and used χ(2) tests to measure differences between staff agreement to questions. RESULTS: Of 248 surveys distributed, 200 (81%) were completed; median respondent age was 36 years; 85% were female; and 151 were direct care staff (50 clinical, 101 nonclinical). Among direct care staff respondents, 86% agreed they could identify residents with respiratory symptoms, 70% stayed home from work when ill with respiratory infection, 64% agreed that facility administration encouraged them to stay home when ill with respiratory infection, and 72% reported that ill residents with respiratory infections were separated from well residents. Clinical and nonclinical staff differed in agreement about using waterless hand gel as a substitute for handwashing (96% vs 78%; [Formula: see text]) and whether handwashing was done after touching residents (92% vs 75%; [Formula: see text]). CONCLUSIONS: Respondents' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding infection control could be improved, especially among nonclinical staff. Facilities caring for children and young adults with neurologic and neurodevelopmental conditions should encourage adherence to infection control best practices among all staff having direct contact with residents.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Residential Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Child , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Health Care Surveys , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Nervous System Diseases/therapy , Workforce , Young Adult
17.
J Infect Dis ; 207(7): 1135-43, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23303809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because pneumococcal pneumonia was prevalent during previous influenza pandemics, we evaluated invasive pneumococcal pneumonia (IPP) rates during the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic. METHODS: We identified laboratory-confirmed, influenza-associated hospitalizations and IPP cases (pneumococcus isolated from normally sterile sites with discharge diagnoses of pneumonia) using active, population-based surveillance in the United States. We compared IPP rates during peak pandemic months (April 2009-March 2010) to mean IPP rates in nonpandemic years (April 2004-March 2009) and, using Poisson models, to 2006-2008 influenza seasons. RESULTS: Higher IPP rates occurred during the peak pandemic month compared to nonpandemic periods in 5-24 (IPP rate per 10 million: 48 vs 9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-13), 25-49 (74 vs 53 [CI, 41-65]), 50-64 (188 vs 114 [CI, 85-143]), and ≥65-year-olds (229 vs 187 [CI, 159-216]). In the models with seasonal influenza rates included, observed IPP rates during the pandemic peak were within the predicted 95% CIs, suggesting this increase was not greater than observed with seasonal influenza. CONCLUSIONS: The recent influenza pandemic likely resulted in an out-of-season IPP peak among persons ≥5 years. The IPP peak's magnitude was similar to that seen during seasonal influenza epidemics.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Confidence Intervals , Databases, Factual , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza, Human/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pneumonia, Pneumococcal/virology , Poisson Distribution , Population Surveillance , Risk Factors , Seasons , Severity of Illness Index , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Streptococcus pneumoniae/pathogenicity , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 7(5): 761-5, 2013 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23279922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Influenza-associated lower respiratory tract hemorrhage (LRTH) has been reported in previous pandemics and is a rare complication of seasonal influenza virus infection. We describe patients with LRTH associated with 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) (pH1N1) virus infection identified from April 2009 to April 2010 in the United States. METHODS: We ascertained patients with pH1N1-associated LRTH through state and local surveillance, the Emerging Infections Program, and CDCs Infectious Diseases Pathology Branch. All patients had influenza A, evidence of pneumonia, and evidence of LRTH. RESULTS: We identified 44 cases; the median number of days from illness onset to clinical signs of LRTH was one. Hemoptysis or respiratory tract bleeding was documented in 40% of pH1N1-associated LRTH cases, often present early during the course of illness. Twenty-one (48%) patients with LRTH had no other hemorrhagic diatheses. Seven (23%) patients with LRTH received antiviral treatment within two days of illness onset. CONCLUSIONS: During influenza season, clinicians should consider influenza infection in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with hemoptysis or other signs or symptoms of LRTH. While the impact of timing of antiviral therapy on this complication has not been studied, the rapid progression of LRTH may support use of early empiric therapy. Continued investigation is necessary to betterdefine the clinical spectrum of both seasonal influenza- and pH1N1-associated LRTH.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhage/etiology , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/complications , Respiratory System/blood supply , Respiratory Tract Diseases/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Humans , Infant , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/physiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Respiratory Tract Diseases/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
19.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 18(12): 1937-44, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23171635

ABSTRACT

During August 2011, influenza A (H3N2) variant [A(H3N2)v] virus infection developed in a child who attended an agricultural fair in Pennsylvania, USA; the virus resulted from reassortment of a swine influenza virus with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. We interviewed fair attendees and conducted a retrospective cohort study among members of an agricultural club who attended the fair. Probable and confirmed cases of A(H3N2)v virus infection were defined by serology and genomic sequencing results, respectively. We identified 82 suspected, 4 probable, and 3 confirmed case-patients who attended the fair. Among 127 cohort study members, the risk for suspected case status increased as swine exposure increased from none (4%; referent) to visiting swine exhibits (8%; relative risk 2.1; 95% CI 0.2-53.4) to touching swine (16%; relative risk 4.4; 95% CI 0.8-116.3). Fairs may be venues for zoonotic transmission of viruses with epidemic potential; thus, health officials should investigate respiratory illness outbreaks associated with agricultural events.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/classification , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Swine , Young Adult
20.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 6(6): e169-77, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22805001

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: From April to July 2009, the United States experienced a wave of influenza A (H1N1)pdm09 virus (H1N1pdm09) infection. The majority of the deaths during that period occurred in persons <65 years of age with underlying medical conditions. OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of H1N1pdm09-associated deaths in the US during the fall of 2009. METHODS: We collected demographic, medical history, and cause of death information on a nationally representative, stratified random sample of 323 H1N1pdm09-associated deaths that occurred during September 1-October 31, 2009. RESULTS: Data were available for 302/323 (93%) deaths. Most cases (74%) were 18-64 years of age and had ≥ 1 underlying medical condition (72%). Among cases aged <18 years, 16/43 (37%) had a chronic lung disease, and 15/43 (35%) a neurological disorder; among cases aged ≥ 18 years, 94/254 (37%) had a chronic lung disease and 84/254 (33%) had a metabolic disorder. The median number of days between symptom onset and death was six among children (range, 1-48) and 12 among adults (range, 0-109). Influenza antiviral agents were prescribed for 187/268 (70%) of cases, but only 48/153 (31%) received treatment within 2 days of illness onset. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of H1N1pdm09 deaths identified during the fall of 2009 were similar to those occurring April-July 2009. While most cases had conditions that were known to increase the risk for severe outcomes and were recommended to receive antiviral therapy, a minority of cases received antivirals early in the course of illness.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Influenza, Human/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...