Analysis of the value of potential biomarker S100-A8 protein in the diagnosis and pathogenesis of spinal tuberculosis.

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the value of S100-A8 protein as a diagnostic marker for spinal tuberculosis and to explore its role in the potential pathogenesis of spinal tuberculosis (STB). Methods: The peripheral blood of 100 spinal tuberculosis patients admitted to the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from September 2018 to June 2021 were collected as the observation group, and the peripheral blood of 30 healthy medical examiners were collected as the control group. Three samples from the observation group and three samples from the control group were selected for proteomics detection and screening of differential proteins. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes (KEGG) was used to enrich and analyze related signaling pathways to confirm the target protein. The serum expression levels of the target proteins were determined and compared between the two groups using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Statistical methods were used to evaluate the value of target protein as a diagnostic marker for STB. A macrophage model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection was constructed and S100-A8 small interfering RNA was used to investigate the molecular mechanism of the target protein. Results: S100-A8 protein has the value of diagnosing spinal tuberculosis (AUC = 0.931, p < 0.001), and the expression level in the peripheral blood of the observation group (59.04 ± 19.37 ng/mL) was significantly higher than that of the control group (43.16 ± 10.07 ng/mL) (p < 0.05). S100-A8 protein expression showed a significant positive correlation with both CRP and ESR values (p < 0.01). Its AUCs for combined bacteriological detection, T-SPOT results, diagnostic imaging, antacid staining results, and pathological results were 0.705 (p < 0.05), 0.754 (p < 0.01), 0.716 (p < 0.01), 0.656 (p < 0.05), and 0.681 (p < 0.01), respectively. Lack of S100-A8 leads to a significant decrease in the expression levels of TLR4 and IL-17A in infected macrophages. Conclusion: S100-A8 protein is differentially expressed in the peripheral blood of patients with spinal tuberculosis and healthy individuals and may be a novel candidate biomarker for the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis. The feedback loop on the S100-A8-TLR4-IL-17A axis may play an important role in the inflammatory mechanism of spinal tuberculosis.

Analysis of the Value of Serum Biomarker LBP in the Diagnosis of Spinal Tuberculosis.

Objective: To investigate the correlation between the expression of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in peripheral blood of spinal tuberculosis and clinical diagnosis and to evaluate its value as a diagnostic marker of spinal tuberculosis. Methods: In the experimental group, clinical history data and peripheral blood were collected from 100 patients with spinal tuberculosis who were admitted to the Department of Spine Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from May 2017 to May 2020, and peripheral blood was collected from 30 healthy volunteers in the control group. Screening of differential LBP expression by proteomics and ELISA to verify its expression in peripheral blood of spinal tuberculosis patients. t-test, Spearman analysis, linear regression and ROC curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of LBP in peripheral blood for spinal tuberculosis. Results: The expression of LBP protein in peripheral blood is significantly higher in patients with spinal tuberculosis than in the normal population; LBP assay values were significantly and positively correlated with CRP and ESR values (P < 0.01); the AUC of LBP in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis for pathological examination, bacteriological culture, T-cell spot test for tuberculosis infection (T-SPOT), imaging diagnosis, and acid fast bacillus were, respectively, 0.677 (P < 0.01), 0.707 (P < 0.01), 0.751 (P < 0.01), 0.714 (P < 0.01), and 0.656 (P < 0.05), and there was a correlation between LBP and the diagnostic evaluation of spinal tuberculosis. Conclusion: LBP could be a new candidate biomarker for the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis.

Pathological features of Brucella spondylitis: A single-center study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the pathological features of Brucella spondylitis (BS) under the optical microscope, thus providing pathological references for the diagnosis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 70 BS patients (42 males and 28 females, mean age 52.01 ± 10.77 [20-74] years) admitted in the Department of Spine Surgery, the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, from January 2013 to December 2020. Their medical history, clinical manifestations, laboratory test results, imaging findings and bacteriological culture results were collected. Among them, 5, 5, 43, 4 and 13 cases demonstrated involvement into the cervical vertebra, thoracic vertebra, lumbar vertebra, thoracolumbar vertebra and lumbosacral vertebra, respectively. Notably, L4 showed pathology in 32 cases. Pathological features of BS were analyzed by H&E staining of granulation tissues, sclerotic bones, sequestrums, and intervertebral discs. RESULTS: 42 cases underwent bacterial culture, of which 4 were positive, and the positive rate of bacterial culture was only 9.5%. The highest Vas score was 7, the lowest was 4, and the average was 5.76 ± 0.89. The highest CRP was 153 mg/L, the lowest was 0.98 mg/L, and the average was 30.98 ± 33.79 mg/L. The highest ESR is 112 mm/h, the lowest is 5 mm/h, and the average is 49.34 ± 27.73 mm/h. Under the optical microscope, BS manifested acute or chronic inflammation. Acute inflammatory features included neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration, necrosis, and abscesses, while chronic inflammatory features included lymphocyte, plasma cell, fibrous tissue and monocyte infiltration, hyaline degeneration, angiogenesis and hyperplasia of other tissues. Other features included vasodilation, hemorrhage, granulomas and multinucleated giant cell infiltration. In the present study, chronic inflammation was observed in 25 cases, in-acute-phase chronic inflammation in 45 cases, and acute inflammation in no cases. Pathological features of BS under the microscope included foam cell reaction in 46 cases, histiocytic reaction in 24 cases and eosinophilic abscesses in 6 cases. Eosinophil infiltration was observed in 45 cases (mainly during the acute phase of chronic inflammation) and massive eosinophilic abscesses in 6 cases. Granulation tissue hyperplasia followed inflammatory repair in 25 BS cases, and was generally boosted in the acute phase of chronic inflammation. Multinucleated giant cell infiltration and granulomas were less observed in BS cases, which differed from pathological features of spinal tuberculosis. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic inflammation or in-acute-phase chronic inflammation is the main pathological feature of BS, while the single acute inflammation is less observed in BS cases. Foam cell reaction and histiocytic reaction scale up during the acute phase of chronic inflammation, and some BS patients may develop massive eosinophilic abscesses. Granulation tissue hyperplasia, rather than multinucleated giant cell infiltration and granulomas, serve as pathological reference for the differential diagnosis of BS and spinal tuberculosis.