The impact of hyperandrogenemia on pregnancy complications and outcomes in patients with PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a metabolic and reproductive disorder. Current research findings present conflicting views on the effects of different PCOS phenotypes on outcomes in pregnancy and for newborns. METHODS: This research study followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A thorough search of literature was carried out using the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases from their start to December 2023. The search focused on studies examining the links between hyperandrogenic and non-hyperandrogenic PCOS phenotypes and risks in pregnancy and neonatology. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using either a fixed-effects or random-effects model. RESULTS: Our analysis incorporated 10 research studies. Expectant mothers with a hyperandrogenic PCOS subtype had increased ORs for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and preeclampsia (PE) compared to those with a non-hyperandrogenic PCOS subtype, with respective values of 2.14 (95% CI, 1.18-3.88, I2 = 0%) and 2.04 (95% CI, 1.02-4.08, I2 = 53%). Nevertheless, no notable differences were detected in ORs for outcomes like preterm birth, live birth, miscarriage, cesarean delivery, pregnancy-induced hypertension, small for gestational age babies, large for gestational age newborns, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions between pregnant women with hyperandrogenic PCOS phenotype and those without. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis highlights that the presence of hyperandrogenism heightens the risks of GDM and PE within the PCOS population. Healthcare providers ought to be aware of this connection for improved patient management.

Anti-hypertensive therapy for preeclampsia: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy disorder that represents a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. METHODS: This network meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO. We searched the PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov. and Embase databases for studies published from inception to the 31st of March 2023. RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for direct meta-analysis (DMA) statistical analysis. Funnel maps, network meta-analysis (NMA), the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to rank the different interventions and publication bias were generated by STATA 17.0 software. RESULTS: We included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1192 women with PE; two studies were of high quality and six were of moderate quality. Eight interventions were addressed in the NMA. In the DMA, we found that blood pressure in the Ketanserin group were significantly higher than those in the Nicardipine group. NMA showed that blood pressure in the Dihydralazine group was significantly higher than that in the Methyldopa, Labetalol, Nicardipine and Diltiazem groups. And the blood pressure in the Labetalol group was significantly lower than that in the Nicardipine group. SUCRA values showed that Diltiazem was more effective in lowering blood pressure than other drugs looked at in this study. CONCLUSION: According to the eight RCTs included in this study, Diltiazem was the most effective in reducing blood pressure in PE patients; Labetalol and Nicardipine also had good effects. Diltiazem is preferred for the treatment of patients with severe PE and high blood pressure.