ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the short and long-term benefits (the length of hospital stay, surgical complications, and early clinical improvement) of adding early ultrasound-guided drainage to broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment. METHODOLOGY: Patients undergoing tubo-ovarian abscess treatment between January 2017 and June 2022 in a tertiary hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Of the patients studied, 50 subjects were treated with antibiotics alone and 63 underwent guided drainage. Twenty-one individuals underwent early drainage within 72 hours of admission, and 42 underwent guided drainage after this period. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the length of hospital stay between the groups simultaneously, averaging 6.4 days for the controls, 5.1 days for the early drainage group, and 9.6 days for the late drainage group (p = 0.290). In the multiple linear regression with the length of hospital stay outcome and adjusting for potential confounding factors, there was an average reduction of 2.9 days in the hospital stay (p = 0.04) for the early drainage group (< 72 hours) compared to the controls. Early clinical improvement and an expected drop in CRP were more frequent in patients who underwent drainage. Length of hospital stay increases with abscess diameter: 0.4 [(95% CI 0.1 - 0.7) (p = 0.05)] days per centimeter, regardless of other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided drainage of tubo-ovarian abscesses associated with antibiotic therapy is an effective treatment, with few complications, and may lead to clinical improvement especially when performed early.
Subject(s)
Abscess , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drainage , Length of Stay , Ovarian Diseases , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Drainage/methods , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Abscess/therapy , Abscess/diagnostic imaging , Abscess/surgery , Abscess/drug therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ovarian Diseases/therapy , Ovarian Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Ovarian Diseases/drug therapy , Ovarian Diseases/surgery , Middle Aged , Conservative Treatment/methods , Fallopian Tube Diseases/therapy , Fallopian Tube Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Fallopian Tube Diseases/surgery , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Treatment Outcome , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: GBS colonization is an important risk factor for maternal and neonatal infection morbidity and mortality. Intrapartum antibiotics may prevent vertical transmission of GBS from colonized mothers to their babies. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cefazolin prophylactic regimen for GBS disease, comparing it to the established penicillin-based protocols, given the opportunity provided by the temporary unavailability of first-choice antibiotics in Brazil. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Hospital Femina Obstetrics Service between January and December 2015. Ninety-eight pregnant women received standard penicillin (70 patients) or ampicillin (28 patients) antibiotic prophylaxis, and 251 pregnant women received an alternative prophylaxis with cefazolin during the study period. Risk factor, Maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in maternal (RR = 0.71; IC 95%:0.30-1.68; p = 0.709) and neonatal (RR = 0.84; IC 95%:0.61-1.15; p = 0.271) outcomes between those patients using the alternative antibiotic prophylaxis in comparison to the standard antibiotics, with the dependent variable of maternal and neonatal outcomes grouped and controlled for potential confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: The antibiotics used as alternatives to penicillin and ampicillin for the prevention of maternal-fetal GBS disease are poorly studied, and this study indicate that cefazolin can be an optimal choice, offering safety in the use of this antibiotic in situations where penicillins are contraindicated or unavailable.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcus agalactiae/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Streptococcus agalactiae/physiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Congenital syphilis (CS) is a preventable epidemic disease for which control is hindered by socioeconomic and health system issues. Inadequately treated maternal syphilis (MaS) commonly has serious adverse obstetric outcomes. This study - which is a cross-sectional study in a Brazilian large urban public Mother and Child hospital, making use of secondary data - evaluated the occurrence of treatment of sexual partners (SP) among women with MaS. The results showed that 771 MaS cases were identified from 2007 to 2014. No information on SP treatment was available in 570 (73.9%) cases. Of the 201 cases presenting information, 25 (12.4%) SP were treated. Out of 164 women having six or more prenatal visits, 25 (15.2%) SP received treatment. Data analyzed biennially have shown a growing trend of cases without collected information, ranging from 27.2% in 2007-2008 to 87.5% in 2013-2014. No linear trend in proportions of treated SP (maximum 7.4% SP treated) was found. Thus, in this study, it has been concluded that the proportion of SP adequately treated was consistently low, and the quality of information deteriorated during the studied period. Prenatal care per se, as provided, was not effective in delivering adequate treatment of SP. Creative integrated services with SP active participation are greatly needed if CS is to be controlled.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Contact Tracing , Mothers/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Partners , Syphilis/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Syphilis/diagnosis , Syphilis/epidemiology , Syphilis/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of women presenting with acute gastroenteritis due to infection with Salmonella spp. or Shigella spp. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using data for patients with specimens positive for Shigella spp. and Salmonella spp. attending two major women's hospitals in Porto Alegre, Brazil, between January 2003 and July 2014. Women were included if they had symptoms compatible with bacterial acute diarrhea. Isolates were evaluated to determine antimicrobial susceptibility and patient clinical profile. RESULTS: Among 45 eligible patients, Salmonella spp. was identified in 32 (71%) and Shigella spp. in 13 (29%). The highest antimicrobial sensitivity rates were observed for ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone (n=44, 98% for both) whereas the greatest resistance rate was seen for ampicillin (n=20, 44%). Seven (16%) of the women were pregnant. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim are suitable choices for the treatment of bacterial acute diarrhea. However, the maternal and fetal safety profile of prescribed medications should be considered when treating pregnant patients.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Diarrhea/microbiology , Dysentery, Bacillary/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections/epidemiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Shigella/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Ampicillin/therapeutic use , Brazil , Ceftriaxone/therapeutic use , Ciprofloxacin/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dysentery, Bacillary/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Salmonella Infections/drug therapy , Sulfamethoxazole/therapeutic use , Trimethoprim/therapeutic use , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A better understanding of the uterine and endometrial vascularization in intrauterine device (IUD)-induced side effects is clearly of paramount importance in terms of both physiological and pathophysiological changes and may permit assessment for future therapeutic treatments. The aim of the study was to quantify the subendometrial microvascularization and uterine artery blood flow in IUD-induced side effects using power Doppler analysis as well as pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) in the exact midluteal phase 3 months after IUD insertion. There were 27 patients using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and 25 patients using TCu 380A. STUDY DESIGN: This study has a prospective clinical trial design. RESULTS: There is an increased subendometrial blood flow in patients with severe dysmenorrhea and/or bleeding, after controlling for IUD type, age and parity. Moreover, the PI and RI were not different in such women. CONCLUSION: The results provide new data on the bleeding patterns related to these IUD types that may be relevant during contraception use. This method could be used as a prognostic factor to better evaluate women for the risk of developing dysmenorrhea and/or bleeding after IUD insertion.
Subject(s)
Intrauterine Devices, Copper/adverse effects , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated/adverse effects , Microvessels/physiopathology , Uterus/blood supply , Adult , Amenorrhea/etiology , Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Dysmenorrhea/diagnostic imaging , Dysmenorrhea/etiology , Dysmenorrhea/physiopathology , Female , Hemorheology , Humans , Menorrhagia/diagnostic imaging , Menorrhagia/etiology , Menorrhagia/physiopathology , Microvessels/diagnostic imaging , Pulsatile Flow , Regional Blood Flow , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
During this cohort study, the copper-intrauterine device (IUD) did not modify subendometrial microvascularization. However, subendometrial blood flow increased in patients who experienced IUD-induced side effects.