Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(1): e18-e21, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37639645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative recovery from severe auricular lacerations varies significantly. However, few studies have sought to clarify the risk factors associated with the prognosis of severe auricular lacerations, and little attention has been paid to the intraoperative management of severe auricular lacerations and early postoperative intervention. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk factors that may affect the prognosis of severe auricular lacerations. METHODS: Case data and imaging data of patients with severe auricular lacerations treated in our department between January 2018 and September 2022 were collected. A total of 90 patients (90 severe auricular lacerations) were included in the analysis and were divided into good group (68 cases) and poor group (22 cases) according to postoperative recovery, which was defined as poor postoperative recovery when postoperative auricular blood supply disorders required interventional treatment or second stage plastic surgery. RESULTS: The percentage of ventral tissue pedicles in the poor recovery group was 77.3% ( P <0.001). The proportion of ventral tissue pedicle was significantly higher in the poor postoperative group than in the good postoperative group, and ventral tissue pedicle [odds ratio (OR)=12.22, P =0.002] was an independent risk factor for poor postoperative recovery from severe auricular laceration. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of patients with severe auricular lacerations differs between the different tissue pedicle locations, and prophylactic treatment of patients with ventral tissue pedicles is beneficial. In addition, patients with ventral tissue pedicles should be informed in advance of their increased risk of surgical failure.


Subject(s)
Lacerations , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , Lacerations/surgery , Risk Factors
2.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 936, 2023 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36650225

ABSTRACT

The causal association between education and cervical spondylosis may be mediated partly through risk factors of cardiovascular disease. The identification of the protective effect of education and the evaluation of risk factors will help to optimize disease prevention at both clinical and public health levels. In this study, we applied several different Mendelian randomization (MR) methods to identify which cardiovascular factors underlie the clustering of cervical spondylosis with cardiovascular disease, and the degree to which these mediate an effect of education. Univariable MR analyses provided evidence supporting a protective effect of genetically predicted education on cervical spondylosis risk, and MVMR further identified the direct effect of education level. Our results also provided evidence supporting the detrimental effects of BMI and smoking on cervical spondylosis risk, with evidence that the effect of education is mediated through BMI and smoking. The proportions of the effect of education mediated through BMI and smoking were 12% and 3%, respectively. These findings highlight education, obesity, and smoking as common mechanisms underlying the clustering of cervical spondylosis with risk factors of cardiovascular disease, which might represent clinical and public health targets for reducing multi-morbidity and the burden of these common conditions.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Spondylosis , Humans , Risk Factors , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Educational Status , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Spondylosis/epidemiology , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Genome-Wide Association Study
3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 1043840, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36425105

ABSTRACT

Keloid is a common benign skin tumor in the outpatient department, and patients are often accompanied by itching and pain. Since the pathogenesis is unknown, the effect of single method treatment is unsatisfactory, and therefore the recurrence rate is high. Therefore, comprehensive treatment is mostly used in clinical treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy is currently one of the most effective treatments for keloid. After long-term clinical practice, brachytherapy and electron beam radiotherapy has increasingly become the gold standard of treatment, because brachytherapy provides more focused radiation treatment to focal tissue to significantly reduce recurrence rate, and better preserve normal tissue. With the development of new radiotherapy techniques, more options for the treatment of keloid. Currently, adjuvant radiotherapy has been widely recognized, but there is no consensus on the optimal protocol for adjuvant radiotherapy for keloids. This review provides a review of published treatment options and new radiotherapy techniques for adjuvant radiotherapy of keloids and gives a comprehensive evaluation for clinical treatment.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...