ABSTRACT
Introduction: Cerebral contusions (CCs) are common traumatic brain injuries known for their propensity to progress. Understanding their mechanical pathogenesis and predictive factors for progression is crucial for optimal management. Research question: To provide an overview of current knowledge on CCs, including pathomechanisms, predictive factors of contusion progression, and management strategies. Material and methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus and ISI web of knowledge focused on articles in English with the words "cerebral contusion" together with the words "traumatic brain injury", "pathomechanism", "progression of contusion", "predictive factors" and "management" alone or in combination. Results: The management of CCs has evolved alongside the advances in neurointensive care, yet there is no consensus. Evidence on the effectiveness of early surgery, importantly, for the group which has the potential to expand, is limited. Some predictive factors for contusion progression have been identified, including age, injury mechanism, coagulopathy and initial contusion volume which could help to guide decision-making. Discussion and conclusion: While various theories exist on pathomechanisms and several predictive factors for progression have been proposed, consensus on optimal management remains elusive. Individualized care guided by the predictive factors is essential. Challenges posed by antithrombotic medications highlight the need for early intervention strategies.Decompressive craniectomy could serve as a potential tool in severe traumatic brain injury management including contusions. Conducting large cohort studies to refine predictive models and harmonizing management approaches would help to improve outcomes of patients with CCs.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with complex shunt-related problems and varying diagnoses of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disturbance can present with headache and clinical symptoms that may be difficult to relate to underdrainage or overdrainage. Telemetric intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring may assist in evaluating individual patients and assessing shunt function and adjustment. We report a case series of patients receiving a Miethke M.scio sensor. METHODS: Between June 2016 and August 2021, 14 patients older than 18 years with different diagnoses underwent ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery and received a Miethke M.scio sensor. RESULTS: Patients had idiopathic intracranial hypertension (n = 3), obstructive hydrocephalus caused by tumors (n = 4), and malformations (n = 5). Headaches (71%) and visual impairment (50%) were the most common symptoms before surgery and 65% of the symptoms were improved after surgery. In total, 25 measurements were made and 11 of these led to changes in the shunt settings. Postoperative measurements were taken in 8 patients and the most common indication of ICP measurement was headache and/or control of the shunt settings. CONCLUSIONS: The Miethke M.scio is a safe and valuable device to use in shunt-treated patients, in particular those expected to need assessment of ICP monitoring postoperatively. Repeated ICP measurements can also assist in personalized adjustment of the shunt setting to optimize CSF flow in this diverse patient group. Future studies should include a standardized protocol with ICP measurements correlated to the symptoms and cause of CSF disturbances to provide better understanding of the dynamics of the ICP in each patient.