Social support and suicidality during the COVID-19 pandemic among Brazilian healthcare workers: a longitudinal assessment of an online repeated cross-sectional survey.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at an increased risk of suicide compared to non-healthcare workers. This study aims to investigate the association between social support and suicidal ideation and behavior (SIB) during the COVID-19 pandemic among Brazilian HCWs. METHODS: This study utilizes data from 10,885 participants who answered the first (time point 1 - between May and June of 2020) and second (time point 2 - between December 2020 and February 2021) assessments of an online repeated cross-sectional survey for evaluating mental health and quality of life of HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between social support as the independent variable (time point 1) and SIB as the outcomes (time point 2). RESULTS: Higher social support was associated with a significantly lower chance of reporting SIB in the month prior to follow-up assessment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.71, CI 95% 0.66 - 0.76 and AOR 0.61, CI 95% 0.54 - 0.68, respectively). These associations were independent of sex, age, feelings of loneliness, and self-reported psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSION: Social support is associated with a lower chance of suicidality among HCWs, a protective role that is probably more evident for suicidal behavior.

Decision-making styles during stressful scenarios: The role of anxiety in COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Decision-making is not purely rational but highlighted by the influence of intuitive and emotional processes. Recently, researchers have focused more attention on understanding which environmental and personal features influence decision-making processes, and how. Objective and methods: On this study, we investigate whether Trait Anxiety moderates the impact of Post-Traumatic Stress (PTS) symptoms reported during COVID-19 pandemic on decision-making styles. Results: The study included 1,358 Brazilian participants (80% women) aged between 20 and 74 (M = 41.11; SD = 11.23) who responded to an online survey between May and August of the year 2021 of COVID-19 pandemic to The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, The Decisions Styles Scale, The Impact of Event Scale - Revised and questions related to COVID-19. Through moderation analysis, we observed that experiencing PTS is associated with a higher tendency to biased/heuristic decision-making processes. Discussion: Trait Anxiety seems to influence how people respond to PTS symptoms on decision-making related processes. Subjects with higher Trait Anxiety reported lower tendency to appeal to rationality, especially under higher reported levels of PTS. Meanwhile, lower Trait Anxiety subjects exhibited more reason-based decision-making under higher rates of PTS. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay among environmental and individual differences on decision-making styles and helps to identify factors of vulnerability for poorer cognitive functioning on stressful scenarios.

Longitudinal invariance and validity of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised under COVID-19 pandemic in a Brazilian sample.

Although the Impact Event Scale-Revised is widely used, its factor structure is still controversial. In addition, its longitudinal measurement invariance (LMI) remains uninvestigated. In this sense, we carried out three studies to investigate its psychometric properties. In Study 1, we evaluated the factorial structure of the scale comparing the different models existing in the literature in Brazilian samples who responded to the instrument during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Study 2, we provide support for a five-factor model throughout convergent validity with psychological distress and sleep problems, and criterion validity between people with diagnostic of mental disorders. Finally, we evaluated the LMI over a 6-month interval. The results indicated that the five-factor model has excellent goodness of fit and holds strict longitudinal invariance. Additionally, internal consistency and stability coefficients indicate that the scale is appropriate to measure posttraumatic stress symptomatology) in nonclinical samples across multiple assessments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Increased risk of health professionals to feel traumatized during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Health professionals may be a vulnerable group to posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. To investigate how health professionals who experienced a traumatic event are expressing PTSS and factors related to risk for higher PTSS symptomatology can inform how health professionals are facing their role in this crisis. This was an Internet cross-sectional survey. Participants were 49,767 Brazilian health professionals who have ever faced a traumatic event, which was about 25.9% of an initial sample of health professionals. PTSS symptoms were assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and latent profile analysis (LPA) explored subpopulations within participants based on their scores. Distinct profiles were compared for psychological distress (e.g., depression and anxiety) and quality of life. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between IES-R profiles and COVID-19 related experiences, thoughts, and perceptions. A two-profile model was the most appropriate for the IES-R data pointing out a group with a high level of PTSS (named high-PTSS; n = 10,401, 20.9%) and another expressing a low level of symptoms (named low-PTSS; n = 39,366, 79.1%). The high-PTSS profile demonstrated worse psychological scores (global psychological distress, somatization, depression, and anxiety) and worse quality of life (physical, psychological, social, and environmental) with moderate magnitudes. Small but significant predictors of the high-PTSS profile included sociodemographic characteristics and COVID-19 related experiences, thoughts, and perceptions. Most individuals who experienced a traumatic event were not in the high-PTSS profile. For those who were, however, psychological and quality of life measures were much worse. During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, several characteristics emerged as risks to report trauma.

Preditores de sofrimento psicológico e prevalência de transtornos mentais autodeclarados em profissionais de saúde e na população em geral durante a pandemia de Covid-19 no Brasil / Predictors of psychological distress and prevalence of self-reported mental disorders in health care professionals and in the general population during the Covid-19 pandemic in Brazil

O fardo dos transtornos mentais pode aumentar durante a pandemia de Covid-19. Por isso, é estratégico caracterizar a saúde mental da população. Analisamos dados coletados pela Internet de 164.881 profissionais de saúde e 5.635 participantes da população geral. O Índice de Gravidade Global (GSI) do Inventário Breve de Sintomas, diagnóstico autodeclarado de transtornos mentais, características sociodemográficas, estado de saúde física, história de contato com a Covid-19, percepções e preocupações e medidas preventivas adotadas foram comparados entre as amostras. Análises de regressão múltipla foram usadas para investigação de fatores associados ao GSI. O distresse psicológico foi classificado como alto ou muito alto em 13,4% dos profissionais de saúde e em 31,4% dos participantes da população geral. A prevalência de transtornos mentais ao longo da vida foi 36% para profissionais de saúde e 44,7% para a população geral, sendo os mais frequentes transtornos depressivos e ansiedade generalizada. Entre os profissionais de saúde, ser do sexo feminino e mais jovem foi associado à maior distresse psicológico. Para a população geral foram preditores de distresse a classe econômica e um domicílio com mais pessoas. Foram significativamente associados ao GSI sintomas de Covid-19, sentir-se menos produtivo no trabalho, medo de transmitir o vírus para a família, medo de dificuldades financeiras e sentir que os relacionamentos em casa pioraram. A prevalência de transtornos mentais atinge parte relevante da população brasileira. Fatores sociodemográficos, aspectos familiares e instabilidade financeira devem ser considerados no entendimento do distresse psicológico durante a pandemia.(AU)

BACKGROUND: The burden of mental disorders is likely to increase during the Covid-19 pandemic. Knowing the rate of psychological distress and mental disorders, its severity, and factors associated with psychological distress is strategical. METHOD: We analyzed online cross-sectional data from 164,881 health professionals and from 5,635 participants from the general population in Brazil. The Global Severity Index (GSI) from the Brief Symptom Inventory, self-reported diagnosis of mental disorders, sociodemographic characteristics, and factors related to Covid-19, such as physical health status, diagnosis and contact history, perceptions and concerns, and precautionary measures were compared between samples. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate factors related to GSI scores. RESULTS: Psychological distress was high or very high in 13.4% of health professionals and in 31.4% of the general population. Health professionals reported a lower rate of current or previous history of mental disorders (36%) than participants from the general population (44.7%). Age (younger) and gender (female) predicted higher psychological distress for health professionals and economic class (lower) and household size (more members) for the general population. People with higher GSI scores reported to have experienced more physical symptoms associated with Covid-19, feeling less productive at work, being afraid of transmitting the coronavirus to the family, fear of financial difficulties, and feeling that home relations were worse during the pandemic outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress at the first wave of Covid-19 was associated with sociodemographic features and an anxious perception of physical symptoms, virus transmission to loved ones, disruption of family relations, and financial situation.(AU)

INTRODUCCIÓN: Es probable que la carga de los trastornos mentales aumente durante la pandemia de Covid-19. Conocer la tasa de malestar psicológico y de los trastornos mentales, su gravedad y los factores asociados al malestar psicológico es estratégico. MÉTODO: Se analizaron datos transversales en línea de 164.881 profesionales de la salud y 5.635 participantes de la población general de Brasil. Se compararon entre las muestras el Índice de Gravedad Global (GSI) del Inventario Breve de Síntomas, el diagnóstico auto declarado de trastornos mentales, las características sociodemográficas y los factores relacionados con la Covid-19. Se utilizó un análisis de regresión múltiple para investigar los factores relacionados con las puntuaciones del GSI. RESULTADOS: El malestar psicológico era alto o muy alto en 13,4% de los profesionales de la salud y en 31,4% de la población general. Los profesionales de la salud declararon tasa de 36% de trastornos mentales y la población general de 44,7%. La edad (más joven) y el sexo (femenino) predijeron un mayor malestar psicológico para los profesionales de la salud y la clase económica (más baja) y el tamaño de la familia (más miembros) para la población general. Las personas con puntuaciones más altas en el GSI declararon haber experimentado más síntomas físicos asociados a la Covid-19, sentirse menos productivos en el trabajo, tener miedo de transmitir el coronavirus a la familia, temer dificultades económicas y sentir que las relaciones domésticas empeoraron. CONCLUSIONES: La angustia psicológica se asoció a las características sociodemográficas y a la percepción ansiosa de los síntomas físicos, la transmisión del virus a los seres queridos, la perturbación de las relaciones familiares y la situación económica.(AU)

Desordens temporomandibulares e psicologia da saúde: uma intervenção interdisciplinar / Temporomandibular disorders and health psychology: a multidisciplinary intervention

O presente artigo visa apresentar a psicologia da saúde como método relevante na compreensão e intervenção das desordens temporomandibulares (DTMs). Através da psicologia da saúde o cirurgião-dentista pode articular melhor as variáveis subjetivas e comportamentais de pacientes em tratamento das DTMs, bem como, conhecer a relevância de uma atuação multidisciplinar pautada no diálogo entre os profissionais de saúde possibilitando a elaboração de melhores diagnósticos e uma intervenção mais efetiva e eficiente

This article has the goal of presenting Health Psychology as a relevant method in understanding and interfering in TMJ (Temporomandibular disorders). Through Health Psychology, the dentist can articulate a better administration of subjective and behaviour variable in patients under TMJ treatment, as well as, to know the relevance of a multidisciplinary performance based on the dialogue between health professionals, enabling the elaboration of better diagnostics and a more effective and efficient intervention