Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 153
Filter
1.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 104: adv34961, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828609

ABSTRACT

Atopic diseases such as atopic dermatitis, food allergy, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and/or asthma are common. In Denmark, however, there are multiple referral pathways for these diseases in the healthcare system and they are poorly understood. To describe how children with atopic diseases navigate their way through the Danish healthcare system, a questionnaire was distributed to children aged ≤ 17 years, who were being treated for atopic diseases between August 2020 and June 2021, either by a practising specialist or a hospital department, in the Capital Region of Denmark. A total of 279 children completed the questionnaire and most were referred to a specialist or to a hospital by their general practitioner. No "common track" to hospital existed for patients with ≥ 3 atopic diseases. These patients were more often referred to a hospital compared with children with 2 atopic diseases or fewer (odds ratio [OR] 3.79; 95% CI 2.07-7.24). The primary determinants for hospital treatment were food allergy (OR 4.69; 95% CI 2.07-10.61) and asthma (OR 2.58; 95% CI 1.18-5.63). In conclusion, children with multiple atopic diseases were more likely to be referred to hospital departments than to practising specialists, mainly due to food allergies.


Subject(s)
Referral and Consultation , Humans , Denmark/epidemiology , Child , Male , Female , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Infant , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Hospital Departments
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38768899

ABSTRACT

Patch testing is the gold standard for the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis. The identification and avoidance of culprit allergen/s is essential in the treatment of this disease. Each year, new allergens are identified as emerging or important. The authors discuss allergens that are common, enduring, emergent, incompletely recognized and controversial for the practicing allergist and dermatologist. This Clinical Management Review will encompass a review of fragrances, preservatives, rubber, acrylates, metals, and medications, their common sources of exposure, controversies in diagnosis and patch testing, management and how to avoid those allergens. This review will also include practical aspects of diagnosis and management and will provide resources that can be used as guidance for physicians and patients on nickel, MCI/MI, fragrance, the most common allergens positive on patch testing.

3.
Contact Dermatitis ; 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812248

ABSTRACT

Patch testing is the only clinically applicable diagnostic method for Type IV allergy. The availability of Type IV patch test (PT) allergens in Europe, however, is currently scarce. This severely compromises adequate diagnostics of contact allergy, leading to serious consequences for the affected patients. Against this background, the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) has created a task force (TF) (i) to explore the current availability of PT substances in different member states, (ii) to highlight some of the unique characteristics of Type IV vs. other allergens and (iii) to suggest ways forward to promote and ensure availability of high-quality patch testing substances for the diagnosis of Type IV allergies throughout Europe. The suggestions of the TF on how to improve the availability of PT allergens are supported by the ESCD, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and intend to provide potential means to resolve the present medical crisis.

4.
Life (Basel) ; 14(3)2024 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38541670

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: It is an international standard to recommend patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) to use moisturizers; however, little is known about their effect on lipids in the stratum corneum (SC). METHODS: In this randomized clinical experiment of 30 Caucasian participants (15 with AD and 15 healthy controls), the superficial SC lipid profile was assessed through tape stripping non-lesional skin following treatment thrice daily for seven days with a moisturizer, and subsequently compared with untreated skin. RESULTS: No discernible disparity in superficial SC lipid quantity was evident between the AD group and the control group. However, the SC lipid composition diverged significantly, with the AD group exhibiting diminished levels of long-chain EO CERs (p = 0.024) and elevated levels of short-chain C34 CERs (p = 0.025) compared to healthy skin. Moisturizer application significantly reduced the total SC lipids and all lipid subgroups in both groups. Within the AD group, a non-significant inclination towards an augmentation in EO CERs (p = 0.053) and reduction in C34 CERs (p = 0.073) was observed. CONCLUSION: The recent identification of distinctions in SC lipid composition between AD and healthy skin was substantiated by our findings. Topical moisturizer application, despite reducing overall total lipids, indicated a potential tendency towards a healthier lipid constitution in AD skin.

5.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 186(6)2024 02 05.
Article in Danish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38327206

ABSTRACT

Topical corticosteroids are commonly used to treat inflammatory skin conditions due to their anti-inflammatory properties. However, patients with long-lasting, non-responsive eczema have to be evaluated for a complicating contact allergy to the topical product. Clinical management of allergic contact dermatitis to corticosteroids can be challenging. The preventive measures should be tailored according to the sensitization patterns and supported by currently available classification systems to avoid cross-reactivity, as argued in this review.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatologic Agents , Humans , Administration, Topical , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Glucocorticoids
7.
Occup Environ Med ; 81(3): 122-128, 2024 Mar 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38378263

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Self-reported hand eczema was previously found under-reported as an occupational disease to the authorities among Danish hairdressers graduating from 1985 to 2007. This study investigates whether self-reported hand eczema among Danish hairdressers graduating from 2008 to 2018 is under-reported as an occupational disease to the authorities. METHODS: A cross-sectional study on all Danish hairdressers graduating from 2008 to 2018 was conducted. The participants were identified using information from the Danish Hairdressers' and Beauticians' Union. In May 2020, a self-administered survey on hand eczema was sent to all hairdressers. RESULTS: A response rate of 30.7% (1485/4830) was obtained. The lifetime prevalence of self-reported hand eczema was 40.1%, and 84.1% of hairdressers with hand eczema believed it to be occupational of whom 27.0% answered it was reported as an occupational disease to the authorities. Of hairdressers believing their hand eczema was occupational, consulting a doctor and answering it was reported as an occupational disease, 94.4% had consulted a dermatologist. The main reason for not reporting was 'I would probably not gain anything from it anyway' (40.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on hairdressers' perception, occupational hand eczema still seems to be an under-reported disease which may lead to underestimation of the problem and impair prevention, diagnosis and treatment.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Occupational Exposure , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Eczema/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Denmark/epidemiology , Perception , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects
8.
BMJ Open ; 14(2): e077207, 2024 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401898

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and contact dermatitis are common chronic inflammatory skin diseases that have a significant impact on individuals and society. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Copenhagen Translational Skin Immunology Biobank and Research Programme (BIOSKIN) is a translational biobank and research study that aims to prospectively collect high-quality biological samples and clinical data from 3000 patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and contact dermatitis over a minimum period of 5 years. The longitudinal open design allows participants to enter and leave the study at different time points depending on their disease and treatment course. At every visit, the investigator collects biological samples, conducts interviews and assembles self-reported questionnaires on disease-specific and general health-related information. Clinical examination and biological sampling will be conducted at enrolment, during and after disease flare, before and after initiation of new treatment and at least once per year. The clinical examination includes dermatological verification of diagnosis, evaluation of disease severity and detailed information on phenotype. The biological samples include blood and when accessible and relevant, skin biopsies, tape strips and skin swabs. The data collected will undergo rigorous statistical analysis using appropriate analytical methods. As of December 2023, 825 patients have been enrolled in the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region (H-21032986) and the Danish Data Protection Agency. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at national and international conferences.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Dermatitis, Contact , Glucosamine , Psoriasis , Skin Diseases , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Biological Specimen Banks , Chronic Disease
9.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(4): 411-419, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38059542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccination granulomas are observed in 1% of all children vaccinated with an aluminium-adsorbed vaccine. Most children with granulomas also have aluminium contact allergy (CA). CA and atopic diseases are both highly prevalent among children and may be associated. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between vaccination granulomas and atopic dermatitis (AD), asthma and rhinitis in children. METHODS: We sourced a cohort of all Danish children born from 2009 to 2017 and conducted a nested case-control study, with cases defined as children with vaccination granulomas, matched to controls 1:10 on sex, socioeconomic class, gestational age and season of birth. All cases and controls were vaccinated with aluminium-adsorbed vaccines and followed until their second birthday. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate the odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: The study included 2171 cases with vaccination granulomas, and 21 710 controls. Children with a diagnosis of AD had a significantly higher risk of a vaccination granuloma (OR 1.50, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.25-1.80). No significant association was found between granulomas and asthma or rhinitis. The association between granulomas and AD was even higher in an additional sensitivity-analysis, following the children until their fourth birthday (OR 2.71, 95% CI 2.36-3.11). CONCLUSION: AD was significantly associated with vaccination granulomas, but not with other atopic diseases, within both the first 2 and 4 years of life.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Atopic , Rhinitis , Vaccines , Child , Humans , Case-Control Studies , Aluminum , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Vaccination/adverse effects , Asthma/epidemiology , Granuloma/chemically induced , Granuloma/epidemiology
11.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 38(6): 1101-1111, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151335

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is a highly prevalent, heterogeneous, skin disease that encompasses different aetiological and clinical subtypes. Severe CHE without atopic dermatitis has been associated with systemic inflammation; yet it remains unknown if specific CHE subtypes leave distinct, systemic, molecular signatures. OBJECTIVES: To characterize the inflammatory plasma signature of different aetiological and clinical CHE subtypes. METHODS: We assessed expression levels of 266 inflammatory and cardiovascular disease risk plasma proteins as well as filaggrin gene mutation status in 51 well-characterized CHE patients without concomitant atopic dermatitis and 40 healthy controls. Plasma protein expression was compared between aetiological and clinical CHE subgroups and controls both overall and according to clinical CHE severity. Correlation analyses for biomarkers, clinical and self-reported variables were performed. RESULTS: Very severe, chronic allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) on the hands was associated with a mixed Type 1/Type 2 systemic immune activation as compared with controls. Circulating levels of Type 1/Type 2 inflammatory biomarkers correlated positively with clinical disease severity among CHE patients with ACD. No biomarkers were found, that could discriminate between aetiological subtypes, for example, between ACD and irritant contact dermatitis. Hyperkeratotic CHE showed a distinct, non-atopic dermatitis-like, systemic footprint with upregulation of markers associated with Type 1 inflammation and tumour necrosis factor alpha, but not Type 2 inflammation. Increased levels of CCL19 and CXCL9/10 could discriminate hyperkeratotic CHE from both vesicular and chronic fissured CHE, whereas no difference was found between the latter two subtypes. CONCLUSION: Profiling of systemic biomarkers showed potential for identifying certain CHE subtypes. Peripheral blood levels of inflammatory biomarkers were associated and correlated with the clinical disease severity of chronic ACD on the hands, underlining that this is a systemic disease. We question whether hyperkeratotic CHE should be classified as eczema.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers , Eczema , Filaggrin Proteins , Hand Dermatoses , Humans , Female , Male , Eczema/blood , Middle Aged , Chronic Disease , Adult , Biomarkers/blood , Hand Dermatoses/blood , Severity of Illness Index , Case-Control Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/blood , Aged , Inflammation/blood , Dermatitis, Irritant/blood
12.
Contact Dermatitis ; 90(1): 17-22, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37750436

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema (HE) is a common inflammatory skin disease that may have serious consequences. The age of HE onset varies, but is estimated to be early- to mid-20s. However, very little is known about HE in childhood and adolescence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the epidemiology, aetiology and severity of HE among a random sample of Danish adolescents drawn from the general population. METHODS: The study was designed as a self-administered questionnaire study. An electronic questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 13 000 individuals aged 15-19 years. RESULTS: The point-prevalence, 1-year prevalence and life-time prevalence of HE among Danish adolescents was 4.9%, 12.1% and 18.3%, respectively. Among patients with a history of HE, 64.6% of cases were not associated with atopic dermatitis. Of all respondents, 60.2% were either part-time or full-time employed. Among respondents with current HE, 38.2% believed that the occupational exposures either caused or exacerbated the HE. CONCLUSION: We found a high prevalence of HE among Danish adolescents which raises concern. Knowing the potential consequences that HE may have, attention should be paid to the prevention of HE in adolescence, especially on occupational aspects and prevention of skin disease in young workers.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Atopic , Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Humans , Adolescent , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Eczema/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Denmark/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology
13.
Contact Dermatitis ; 89(5): 374-381, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37591237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fragrances are among the most common contact allergens in children. Cosmetic products are the most frequent source of skin exposure. OBJECTIVE: To investigate exposure to fragrance allergens among Danish children, based on a sample of 1179 cosmetic products marketed for children. METHODS: Information regarding cosmetic products marketed to children was obtained using a non-profit smartphone application registry, with data from December 2015 to November 2022. RESULTS: The number of validated products was 26 537, of which 1349 marketed for children. After elimination of duplicates, 1179 (4.4%) individual products remained. The majority 53.8% (634/1179) of the products were fragranced. The highest frequency of declared fragrances was found in 'Facial care'-products: 93.0% (80/86), of which 97.7% were lip balms. The highest number of labelled fragrances in one single product (n = 16) was found in a baby perfume. Fragrance mix I (FMI) or II (FMII) allergens were found in 25.3% (298/1179) of the products. Limonene and linalool were the two most frequently labelled fragrance allergens. CONCLUSION: Children can be exposed to a vast number of fragrance allergens from scented cosmetic products. Allergens from FM I and FMII are widely used in cosmetic products marketed to children. Patch testing with FMI and FMII remains relevant in children.


Subject(s)
Cosmetics , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Perfume , Child , Humans , Allergens/adverse effects , Perfume/adverse effects , Odorants , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Cyclohexenes , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Patch Tests , Denmark/epidemiology
14.
Contact Dermatitis ; 89(6): 453-463, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37634937

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of hand eczema (HE) on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) has only been sparsely studied in a general population setting, and never by use of the disease specific Quality Of Life in Hand eczema Questionnaire (QOLHEQ). OBJECTIVES: To examine the HRQoL of unselected individuals with HE using the QOLHEQ. Further, to provide prevalence estimates of severe and chronic HE (CHE), and to contrast overall health related outcomes between individuals with and without HE. METHODS: In this nationwide, cross-sectional study a questionnaire covering questions on HE related outcomes, and overall health was sent to a random sample of 100 000 Danish adults via a secure digital mailbox, linked to their unique civil registration numbers. Data on demographic characteristics were retrieved from the civil registration system. Individuals reporting HE, further answered the QOLHEQ and other disease specific questions. RESULTS: The response rate was 42.7% (n = 42 691). Total estimates of lifetime, 1-year and point prevalences of HE were 24.4%, 13.3% and 5.8%. Of individuals reporting a 1-year prevalence, 35.1% reported moderate-severe disease and 82.6% CHE. Individuals with HE were more likely to report less good or poor overall health, and sick leave (any reason), compared to those without. In the 2176 (92.5%) with current HE who completed the QOLHEQ, median QOLHEQ scores corresponded to a moderate impairment of the symptoms and treatment and prevention domains and a slight impairment overall and for the emotions and functioning domains. Factors that were strongly associated with moderate to severe HRQoL impairment included severe, chronic and occupational HE as well as female sex. CONCLUSIONS: HE is highly prevalent, bears a considerable burden on society and significantly affects the lives of impacted individuals. Our findings indicate a necessity for targeted prevention aimed at high-risk groups, and support and treatment for those most affected.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Eczema , Hand Dermatoses , Adult , Humans , Female , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Eczema/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Hand Dermatoses/psychology
15.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(6): 425-437, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36999574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: CD8+ epidermal-resident memory T (TRM ) cells play central roles in local flare-up responses to experimental contact allergens by inducing massive influx of neutrophils to the epidermis upon allergen challenge. Whether similar immunopathogenic mechanisms are involved in the responses to clinically relevant contact allergens is unknown. METHODS: The immune response to cinnamal, ρ-phenylenediamine (PPD) and methylisothiazolinone (MI) was studied in a well-established mouse model for allergic contact dermatitis that includes formation of TRM cells by ELISA, flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy analyses and cell depletion protocols. RESULTS: We show that the formation of CD4+ and CD8+ epidermal TRM cells and the inflammatory response are highly allergen-dependent. However, the magnitude of the flare-up responses correlated with the number of epidermal CD8+ TRM cells, CXCL1/CXCL2 release and recruitment of neutrophils to the epidermis. Finally, depletion of CD4+ T cells strongly enhanced the number of epidermal CD8+ TRM cells, the flare-up response and the epidermal infiltration of neutrophils for all allergens. CONCLUSION: As the first, this study demonstrates that clinically relevant contact allergens have the ability to generate pathogenic, epidermal CD8+ TRM cells that recruit neutrophils following re-exposure to the allergen, but that this normally is counteracted by the simultaneous induction of anti-inflammatory CD4+ T cells.


Subject(s)
Allergens , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Mice , Animals , Memory T Cells , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Epidermis , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Immunologic Memory
16.
Contact Dermatitis ; 88(4): 294-299, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36382619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) in the eye region caused by topical eye medications is difficult to diagnose and may be overlooked. OBJECTIVE: To study the characteristics and causative agents in patients with ACD caused by topical eye medications in a Danish tertiary dermatology department. METHODS: A retrospective study of 318 patients, patch tested between 2013 and 2021 due to suspected ACD to topical eye medications. All patients were tested with a locally developed eye medication series, some were additionally tested with suspected eye medications. Medical records were studied in patch test positive patients. RESULTS: Contact allergy to a topical eye allergen/medication was found in 12.9% (n = 41) of 318 patients, and culprit allergens were phenylephrine (6.9%), timolol (2.5%) and ketotifen (1.6%). Patch test positive patients were often previously diagnosed with cataract (29.3%) or glaucoma (24.4%), and the majority reported more than one previous reaction. Initial symptoms were oedema (56.0%), erythema (48.8%) and dermatitis (31.7%) in the eye region, and facial dermatitis was also seen. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptoms from the eye region who have been using topical eye medications should be patch tested with ingredients from commonly used eye medications supplemented by the products tested 'as is'.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Allergens , Patch Tests/adverse effects , Timolol
17.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(5): 1028-1035, 2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36478462

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to their parents, some children with aluminium contact allergy and vaccination granulomas may react to aluminium-containing foods by developing dermatitis, granuloma itch and subjective symptoms. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to determine whether oral intake of aluminium-containing pancakes can cause adverse events and/or systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) in children with vaccination granulomas and aluminium contact allergy. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 15 children aged 3-9 years (mean age, 5 years) with vaccination granulomas and positive patch-test results to aluminium chloride hexahydrate 2%/10% pet. completed a 3-week blinded randomized controlled crossover oral aluminium/placebo provocation study with pancakes. Granuloma itch and other subjective symptoms were evaluated daily on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Dermatitis was evaluated by the primary investigator, and sleep patterns were tracked with an electronic device. Aluminium bioavailability was assessed by measuring aluminium excretion in the urine. The children served as their own controls with the placebo provocations. RESULTS: All 15 children completed the study. The mean VAS scores were slightly higher during aluminium provocations compared with placebo for granuloma itch (mean VAS, 1.5 vs. 1.4, p = 0.6) but identical for other subjective symptoms (0.6 vs. 0.6, p = 1). There were no differences in sleep patterns and no significant correlation between urinary aluminium excretion and symptom severity. Three children developed a symmetrical rash on the face or buttocks on day 4 of the aluminium provocations, but not during placebo provocations. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found between oral aluminium intake and the occurrence of subjective symptoms and granuloma itch, but on a case-basis oral aluminium may be associated with the development of systemic contact dermatitis.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Immune System Diseases , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Aluminum/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Pruritus/chemically induced , Pruritus/complications , Granuloma/chemically induced , Granuloma/complications , Vaccination/adverse effects
18.
Contact Dermatitis ; 87(5): 430-438, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35778959

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aluminium-adsorbed vaccines may in some children cause severely itching nodules at the injection site, known as vaccination granulomas. OBJECTIVE: To investigate vaccine-, child- and maternal-level risk factors for the development of vaccination granulomas following immunization with aluminium-adsorbed vaccines. METHODS: A Danish population-based cohort study with 553 932 children born in Denmark from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018, vaccinated with an aluminium-adsorbed vaccine during the first year of life, followed until 31 December 2020. Poisson regression was used to estimate granuloma rate ratios according to the type of adjuvant, accumulated dose of aluminium, timing of vaccination appointments, sex, gestational age, having siblings with granulomas, maternal age and maternal ethnicity. RESULTS: We identified 1901 vaccination granuloma cases (absolute risk, 0.34%). Among vaccine level factors, revaccination (third vs. first vaccination appointment, adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.55), the specific adjuvant used (aluminium phosphate vs. hydroxide, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70) and dosage (≥1.0 mg vs. <1.0 mg, RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.52) were associated with risk of granulomas; the timing of vaccination appointments was not. Among child-level factors, female sex (vs. males, RR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.02-1.22), prematurity (vs. term birth, RR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.54-0.93) and having sibling(s) with granulomas (vs. no siblings with granulomas, RR 46.15, 95% CI, 33.67-63.26) were associated with risk of granulomas. Among maternal-level factors, non-Danish ethnicity (vs. Danish, RR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.42-0.63) and young maternal age (<20 years vs. 20-39 years, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.83) were associated with risk of granulomas. CONCLUSIONS: Several risk factors for vaccination granulomas at the vaccine, child and maternal levels, were identified. Reducing the dose of aluminium or replacing aluminium hydroxide with aluminium phosphate could reduce the risk of granulomas. However, this must be balanced against the potential for reduced immunogenicity.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Vaccines , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Adult , Aluminum/adverse effects , Aluminum Compounds , Aluminum Hydroxide , Cohort Studies , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Female , Granuloma/chemically induced , Granuloma/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Phosphates , Risk Factors , Vaccination , Vaccines/adverse effects , Young Adult
19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35805241

ABSTRACT

The safety assessment of cosmetics considers the exposure of a 'common consumer', not the occupational exposure of hairdressers. This review aims to compile and appraise evidence regarding the skin toxicity of cysteamine hydrochloride (cysteamine HCl; CAS no. 156-57-0), polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP; CAS no. 9003-39-8), PVP copolymers (CAS no. 28211-18-9), sodium laureth sulfate (SLES; CAS no. 9004-82-4), cocamide diethanolamine (cocamide DEA; CAS no. 68603-42-9), and cocamidopropyl betaine (CAPB; CAS no. 61789-40-0). A total of 298 articles were identified, of which 70 were included. Meta-analysis revealed that hairdressers have a 1.7-fold increased risk of developing a contact allergy to CAPB compared to controls who are not hairdressers. Hairdressers might have a higher risk of acquiring quantum sensitization against cysteamine HCl compared to a consumer because of their job responsibilities. Regarding cocamide DEA, the irritant potential of this surfactant should not be overlooked. Original articles for PVP, PVP copolymers, and SLES are lacking. This systematic review indicates that the current standards do not effectively address the occupational risks associated with hairdressers' usage of hair cosmetics. The considerable irritant and/or allergenic potential of substances used in hair cosmetics should prompt a reassessment of current risk assessment practices.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Hair Preparations , Occupational Exposure , Allergens/adverse effects , Cysteamine , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Hair Preparations/toxicity , Humans , Irritants , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis
20.
Occup Environ Med ; 79(10): 649-655, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35738888

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Occupational hand eczema (OHE) is common in hairdressers, and many leave the trade because of the disease. However, the exact impact of OHE on career length is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of OHE on career length and risk factors associated with leaving the trade because of OHE in hairdressers followed-up for up to 35 years. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of Danish hairdressers graduating between 1985 and 2007 (n=5219) was performed. A questionnaire was sent in 2009 and 2020. The Danish Labor Marked Supplementary Pension Scheme provided information on affiliation to the hairdressing profession. Career length was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: The median survival time was 12.0 (95% CI 11.0 to 13.0) years in graduates with OHE and 14.0 (95% CI 12.6 to 15.4) years in graduates without OHE (p<0.001). Graduates with a frequency of hand eczema (HE) of 'once', 'several times' and 'almost all the time' had a median survival time of 20.0 (95% CI 14.6 to 25.4), 12.0 (95% CI 10.7 to 13.3) and 7.0 (95% CI 5.6 to 8.4) years, respectively. Graduates with OHE that left the trade (partly) because of HE constituted 11.7% of the study population. Factors associated with leaving the trade because of HE included a history of atopic dermatitis (adjusted OR (aOR) 2.2 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.0), a history of a positive patch test (aOR 5.1 (95% CI 2.3 to 11.0) and allergy to hair dyes (aOR 9.4 (95% CI 3.4 to 25.6). CONCLUSION: Career length is reduced in hairdressers with OHE, especially if frequently relapsing or caused by contact allergy, for example, to hair dyes.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact , Dermatitis, Occupational , Eczema , Hair Dyes , Hand Dermatoses , Denmark/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Eczema/epidemiology , Hair Dyes/adverse effects , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/complications , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Humans , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...