Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Head Neck Pathol ; 18(1): 25, 2024 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38526767

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To review tumors identified as "clear cell sarcoma" in order to determine similarities to the rare EWS fusion positive jaw and salivary gland tumors clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) and clear cell carcinoma of the salivary gland (CCC). METHODS: PubMed was used to collect all reports of clear cell sarcoma (CCS). Search parameters were "clear cell sarcoma" and "CCS." References in the publications were screened and cross-referenced. Data extracted included demographic characteristics, presenting signs and symptoms, radiographic findings, histological and immunohistochemical features and known molecular/genetic aberrations. RESULTS: Clear cell sarcoma has several similarities to CCOC and CCC. All three tumor types have similar histologic appearances including the presence of clear cells, as well as similar genetic profiles in that all harbor an EWSR1-CREB family fusions. Additionally, these tumors appear in soft tissue as well as bone, and can have a prolonged clinical course. CCS can appear anywhere in the body, including the head and neck region. All three tumors appear to have a predilection to women, although CCS may have a slight younger age of onset as compared to CCOC and CCC (3rd vs 5th decade of life, respectively). CONCLUSION: Gaining a better understanding of the similarities and differences between these three tumors may lead to a better understanding of each one.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma , Odontogenic Tumors , Salivary Gland Neoplasms , Sarcoma, Clear Cell , Humans , Female , Sarcoma, Clear Cell/genetics , Sarcoma, Clear Cell/metabolism , Sarcoma, Clear Cell/pathology , RNA-Binding Protein EWS/genetics , Odontogenic Tumors/pathology , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/genetics , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics
2.
Oncologist ; 27(11): 930-939, 2022 11 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35852437

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Precision oncology relies on molecular diagnostics, and the value-proposition of modern healthcare networks promises a higher standard of care across partner sites. We present the results of a clinical pilot to standardize precision oncology workflows. METHODS: Workflows are defined as the development, roll-out, and updating of disease-specific molecular order sets. We tracked the timeline, composition, and effort of consensus meetings to define the combination of molecular tests. To assess clinical impact, we examined order set adoption over a two-year period (before and after roll-out) across all gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary (GI) malignancies, and by provider location within the network. RESULTS: Development of 12 disease center-specific order sets took ~9 months, and the average number of tests per indication changed from 2.9 to 2.8 (P = .74). After roll-out, we identified significant increases in requests for GI patients (17%; P < .001), compliance with testing recommendations (9%; P < .001), and the fraction of "abnormal" results (6%; P < .001). Of 1088 GI patients, only 3 received targeted agents based on findings derived from non-recommended orders (1 before and 2 after roll-out); indicating that our practice did not negatively affect patient treatments. Preliminary analysis showed 99% compliance by providers in network sites, confirming the adoption of the order sets across the network. CONCLUSION: Our study details the effort of establishing precision oncology workflows, the adoption pattern, and the absence of harm from the reduction of non-recommended orders. Establishing a modifiable communication tool for molecular testing is an essential component to optimize patient care via precision oncology.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/therapy , Precision Medicine/methods , Workflow , Medical Oncology/methods , Delivery of Health Care
3.
EBioMedicine ; 3: 54-66, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26870817

ABSTRACT

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion oncogene is observed in 3%-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Crizotinib and ceritinib, a next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) active against crizotinib-refractory patients, are clinically available for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients, and multiple next-generation ALK-TKIs are currently under clinical evaluation. These ALK-TKIs exhibit robust clinical activity in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients; however, the emergence of ALK-TKI resistance restricts the therapeutic effect. To date, various secondary mutations or bypass pathway activation-mediated resistance have been identified, but large parts of the resistance mechanism are yet to be identified. Here, we report the discovery of p-glycoprotein (P-gp/ABCB1) overexpression as a ceritinib resistance mechanism in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients. P-gp exported ceritinib and its overexpression conferred ceritinib and crizotinib resistance, but not to PF-06463922 or alectinib, which are next-generation ALK inhibitors. Knockdown of ABCB1 or P-gp inhibitors sensitizes the patient-derived cancer cells to ceritinib, in vitro and in vivo. P-gp overexpression was identified in three out of 11 cases with in ALK-rearranged crizotinib or ceritinib resistant NSCLC patients. Our study suggests that alectinib, PF-06463922, or P-gp inhibitor with ceritinib could overcome the ceritinib or crizotinib resistance mediated by P-gp overexpression.


Subject(s)
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Translocation, Genetic , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/antagonists & inhibitors , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/metabolism , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Middle Aged , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Radiography, Thoracic , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
4.
Sci Rep ; 5: 10641, 2015 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26073592

ABSTRACT

Lung cancer outcomes remain poor despite the identification of several potential therapeutic targets. The EPHB4 receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) has recently emerged as an oncogenic factor in many cancers, including lung cancer. Mutations of EPHB4 in lung cancers have previously been identified, though their significance remains unknown. Here, we report the identification of novel EPHB4 mutations that lead to putative structural alterations as well as increased cellular proliferation and motility. We also conducted a bioinformatic analysis of these mutations to demonstrate that they are mutually exclusive from other common RTK variants in lung cancer, that they correspond to analogous sites of other RTKs' variations in cancers, and that they are predicted to be oncogenic based on biochemical, evolutionary, and domain-function constraints. Finally, we show that EPHB4 mutations can induce broad changes in the kinome signature of lung cancer cells. Taken together, these data illuminate the role of EPHB4 in lung cancer and further identify EPHB4 as a potentially important therapeutic target.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mesothelioma/genetics , Mutation , Receptor, EphB4/genetics , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Amino Acid Sequence , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Movement , Cell Proliferation , Computational Biology , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Mesothelioma/metabolism , Mesothelioma/pathology , Models, Molecular , Molecular Sequence Annotation , Molecular Sequence Data , Phosphorylation , Protein Structure, Tertiary , RNA, Small Interfering/genetics , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Receptor, EphB4/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptor, EphB4/metabolism , Sequence Alignment , Signal Transduction , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/metabolism , Small Cell Lung Carcinoma/pathology
5.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 36(10): 1464-71, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22982889

ABSTRACT

Potential sources of error in surgical pathology include specimen misidentification, unidentified tissue, and tissue contamination of paraffin blocks and slides. Current molecular approaches to characterize unidentified or misidentified tissue include fluorescence in situ hybridization identification of sex chromosomes (XY FISH) and microsatellite analysis. Polymorphic deletion probe (PDP) FISH, a novel FISH assay based on copy number variants, can distinguish between cells and tissues from 2 individuals in situ, independent of gender. Using a panel of 3 PDPs, we compared the genotypes of potential tissue contaminants (n=19) and unidentified tissues (n=6) with patient tissues to determine the utility of PDP FISH in resolving specimen identity. XY FISH was added to increase the informative potential of the assay, and microsatellite analysis was used as a gold standard to confirm PDP FISH results. PDP FISH distinguished between putative contaminants and patient tissues in 13 of 14 cases and indicated a high likelihood of 2 tissues originating from the same source in 11 of 11 cases. The assay has a sensitivity and specificity of 86% [6/7, exact 95% confidence interval (CI): 42%, 97%] and 100% (9/9, exact 1-sided 97.5% CI: 68%, 100%), respectively, and a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 100% (6/6, exact 1-sided 97.5% CI: 54%, 100%) and 90% (9/10, exact 95% CI: 55%, 98%), respectively. PDP FISH is an accurate and practical molecular assay for the genetic characterization of potential tissue contaminants and unidentified tissues, especially in the setting of small sample size, and permits concomitant assessment of morphology.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Pathology, Surgical/methods , Polymorphism, Genetic , Specimen Handling/methods , Chromosome Aberrations , Chromosomes, Human, X , Chromosomes, Human, Y , DNA Probes , Female , Genotype , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Male , Microsatellite Repeats , Mosaicism , Paraffin Embedding , Pathology, Surgical/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Specimen Handling/standards
6.
Mod Pathol ; 20(10): 1028-35, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17673923

ABSTRACT

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number correlates with response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), a standard methodology to detect EGFR copy number abnormalities in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, is limited by instrumentation and cost. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is an emerging alternative detection technique using light microscopy, but its utility in assessing EGFR copy number in lung cancer is not established. To address the utility of CISH, we studied paraffin-embedded nonsmall cell lung carcinoma specimens from 77 Taiwanese nonsmoking women treated by surgery alone. We recorded the number of signals per tumor cell nucleus, correlated EGFR copy number by CISH with FISH results, and used receiver operating characteristics to identify cut-off points for the CISH results. Tumors were classified as adenocarcinoma (n=28), mixed adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features (n=25), bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (n=2), squamous cell carcinoma (n=15), and adenosquamous carcinoma (n=7). By FISH, 29% of cases had no amplification, 18% had low polysomy, 35% had high polysomy, and 12% had gene amplification. EGFR copy number detected by CISH highly correlated with FISH (Spearman r=0.81, P<0.0001). We determined the optimal EGFR CISH cut-off points that discriminate between no amplification and low polysomy (2.8 signals, P=0.09); no amplification plus low polysomy and high polysomy plus gene amplification (4.5 signals, P<0.0001); and high polysomy and gene amplification (7.1 signals, P=0.0003). CISH is an alternative assay to FISH in determining EGFR copy number status that may contribute to stratification of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma for clinical trials and identify a subset of patients that should be treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Gene Dosage , Genes, erbB-1 , In Situ Hybridization/methods , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/metabolism , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/pathology , Chromogenic Compounds/chemistry , Discriminant Analysis , Female , Gene Amplification , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...