Medicaid Expansion Is Associated With Increases in Medicaid-Funded Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Existing literature presents competing views concerning the impact of Medicaid expansion on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) utilizations. While some reports demonstrate that expansion does not increase Medicaid acceptance by surgeons, others show increases in Medicaid-funded TJA via limited analyses. We conducted a nationwide, multi-insurance, econometric study to determine if Medicaid-funded and all-funding-source total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilizations increased following expansion. METHODS: This study examined 999,015 THA and 2,099,975 TKA from 2010 to 2017 using a commercially available national payer database. Difference-in-differences analyses, econometric regression methods used to assess the impact of policy change, were used to examine the impact of Medicaid expansion on TJA utilizations, and event analyses were used to confirm the parallel trends assumption, which helps to ensure that the estimated effect is not a result of existing differences in trends between treatment and nontreatment groups. RESULTS: Event analyses confirmed parallel trends in the pre-expansion period. Difference-in-differences analyses found a persistent increase in Medicaid-funded THA (40.4%, P = .001, confidence interval [CI]: 12.7, 62.1%), but not THA from all funding sources (4.6%, P = .128, CI: -1.3, 10.8%). Medicaid-funded TKA (35.8%, P < .001, CI: 17.4, 68.0%) increased, but not TKA from all funding sources (3.4%, P = .321, CI: -3.1, 10.1%). CONCLUSION: While the number of Medicaid-funded TJAs increased, expansion had no significant effect when examining all funding sources. This suggests that Medicaid expansion primarily affected source of TJA funding, not overall volume. Further research is needed to examine state-specific predictors of response to Medicaid expansion.

Spinal Cord Stimulators and Intrathecal Pain Pump Removal Versus Retention During Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine risks associated with posterior lumbar arthrodesis after spinal cord stimulator (SCS) and intrathecal pain pump (IPP) insertion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SCS and IPPs aid in the management of chronic back and radicular pain. Little is known regarding the risks of subsequent fusion with these devices in place. METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner database was queried for spinal fusion between 2010 and 2020. Study groups were created for indwelling SCS or IPP and matched to a separate cohort without SCS or IPP. Subgroups were created for those who had their device removed and those who retained their device at the time of surgery. Complications up to 2 years postoperatively were reviewed and confounding variables were controlled using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred three patients had an indwelling SCS/IPP and underwent posterior lumbar fusion. Compared with patients without history of an SCS/IPP, patients undergoing a lumbar fusion with an SCS/IPP which was removed or retained had higher rates of revision surgery at 1 year [7.3% vs. 5.0%, odds ratio (OR) =1.48, P <0.001] and 2 year (10.8% vs. 7.0%, OR =1.59, P <0.001). For all time intervals, there were higher odds of instrumentation failure (2 y: OR =1.65, P <0.001), and pulmonary complications (2 y: OR =1.18, P <0.001). At 2 years, there were higher odds of surgical site complications (OR 1.15, P =0.02) and urinary complications (OR=1.07, P =0.04). There were no differences in complications up to 2 years postoperatively in patients with an SCS/IPP who had their devices retained or removed ( P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of spinal cord stimulators and intrathecal pain pumps are at increased risk of mechanical complications and revision fusion compared with patients without these devices. Patients with an SCS or IPP have similar rates of complications during lumbar fusion whether the device is removed or retained.

Treatment of Osteoporosis With Anabolic Agents and the Risk of Primary Bone Cancers: A Study of 44,728 Patients Treated With Teriparatide and Abaloparatide.

INTRODUCTION: Bone anabolic agents can benefit orthopaedic patients perioperatively and improve outcomes after fragility fractures. However, preliminary animal data raised concern for the potential development of primary bony malignancies after treatment with these medications. METHODS: This investigation examined 44,728 patients older than 50 years who were prescribed teriparatide or abaloparatide and compared them with a matched control group to evaluate risk of primary bone cancer development. Patients younger than 50 years with a history of cancer or other risk factors of bony malignancy were excluded. A separate cohort of 1,241 patients prescribed an anabolic agent with risk factors of primary bone malignancy, along with 6,199 matched control subjects, was created to evaluate the effect of anabolic agents. Cumulative incidence and incidence rate per 100,000 person-years were calculated as were risk ratios and incidence rate ratios. RESULTS: The overall risk of primary bone malignancy development for risk factor-excluded patients in the anabolic agent-exposed group was 0.02%, compared with 0.05% in the nonexposed group. The incidence rate per 100,000 person-years was calculated at 3.61 for the anabolic-exposed patients and 6.46 for control subjects. A risk ratio of 0.47 ( P = 0.03) and incidence rate ratio of 0.56 ( P = 0.052) were observed for the development of primary bone malignancies in patients undergoing treatment with bone anabolic agents. Among high-risk patients, 5.96% of the anabolic-exposed cohort developed primary bone malignancies and 8.13% of nonexposed patients developed primary bone malignancy. The risk ratio was 0.73 ( P = 0.01), and the incidence rate ratio was 0.95 ( P = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Teriparatide and abaloparatide can safely be used for osteoporosis and orthopaedic perioperative management without increased risk of development of primary bone malignancy.

Underweight Patients are at Increased Risk for Complications following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Given the prevalence of obesity in the United States, much of the adult reconstruction literature focuses on the effects of obesity and morbid obesity. However, there is little published data on the effect of being underweight on postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to examine the risk of low body mass index (BMI) on complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A large national database was queried between 2010 and 2020 to identify patients who had THAs. Using International Classification of Disease codes, patients were grouped into the following BMI categories: morbid obesity (BMI>40), obesity (BMI 30 to 40), normal BMI (BMI 20 to 30), and underweight (BMI<20). There were 58,151 patients identified, including 2,484 (4.27%) underweight patients, 34,710 (59.69%) obese patients, and 20,957 (36.04%) morbidly obese patients. Control groups were created for each study group, matching for age, sex, and a comorbidity index. Complications that occurred within 1 year postoperatively were isolated. Subanalyses were performed to compare complications between underweight and obese patients. Statistical analyses were performed using Pearson Chi-squares. RESULTS: Compared to their matched control group, underweight patients showed increased odds of THA revision (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.32, P = .04), sepsis (OR = 1.51, P = .01), and periprosthetic fractures (OR = 1.63, P = .01). When directly comparing underweight and obese patients (BMI 30 and above), underweight patients had higher odds of aseptic loosening (OR = 1.62, P = .03), sepsis (OR = 1.34, P = .03), dislocation (OR = 1.84, P < .001), and periprosthetic fracture (OR = 1.46, P = .01). CONCLUSION: Morbidly obese patients experience the highest odds of complications, although underweight patients also had elevated odds for several complications. Underweight patients are an under-recognized and understudied high risk arthroplasty cohort and further research is needed.

Body Mass Index and Risk of Complications After Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Matched Cohort Analysis Investigating Underweight and Obese Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have demonstrated that obesity is associated with increased complications after lumbar fusion. However, there are little published data on the effect of being underweight on lumbar fusion outcomes. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effect of being underweight versus obese on outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion. METHODS: Lumbar spinal fusion patients were identified through the PearlDiver Mariner database between 2010 and 2020. Study groups were created using International Classification of Diseases codes to identify preoperative body mass index (BMI) category as morbid obesity (BMI > 40), obesity (BMI 30 to 40), normal BMI (BMI 20 to 30), and underweight (BMI < 20) cohorts. Complications that occurred within 1 year postoperatively in this study and matched control groups were then isolated. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Pearson chi square method. RESULTS: A total of 62,616 patients were identified in this analysis. This included 1,258 underweight patients (4.0%), 17,996 obese patients (57.5%), and 12,054 morbidly obese patients (38.5%). The number of patients to experience any postoperative complication was 766 (60.9%), 9,440 (52.4%), and 6,982 (57.9%) for the underweight, obese, and morbidly obese cohorts, respectively. Underweight patients showed an increased likelihood of complications related to instrumentation (odds ratio [OR] 1.85, P = 0.0237), revision fusion (OR 1.34, P = 0.04061), pulmonary complications (OR 1.43, P < 0.001), and sepsis (OR 1.91, P < 0.001). Obese patients with BMI 30 to 40 showed increased odds of the following complications: hemorrhages and hematomas (OR 1.20, P = 0.02634), surgical site complications (OR 1.27, P < 0.001), thromboembolism (OR 1.78, P < 0.001), and urinary complications (OR 1.08, P < 0.001). Morbidly obese patients with BMI > 40 showed increased odds of all complications analyzed in this study. CONCLUSION: This investigation indicates that both underweight and obese patients are at elevated risk of complications after lumbar fusion. Similar to obese patients, underweight patients may benefit from preoperative optimization by nutrition counseling to avoid potential complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Does Research Training lead to Academic Success in Orthopedic Surgery? An Analysis of U.S Academic Orthopedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Academic surgeons are invaluable for scientific advancement and training the next generation of orthopedic surgeons. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe a cohort of academic orthopedic surgeons currently in practice with common academic metrics. METHODS: ACGME-accredited orthopedic surgery programs with a university affiliation were identified. The primary independent variable in this study was formal research training as defined by a research fellowship or attainment of a PhD. Outcomes included academic rank, h-index attained, number of publications, and funding by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). RESULTS: 1641 orthopedic surgeons were identified across 73 programs. 116 surgeons (7.07%) received formal academic research training. The academic training group and non-academic training group had a similar completion rate of clinical fellowship programs (93.97% vs 93.77%, p=0.933), attainment of other advanced degrees (10.34% vs 8.46%, p=0.485), and years since completion of training (17.49-years vs 16.28-years, p=0.284). Surgeons completing academic research training had a significantly higher h-index (18.46 vs 10.88, p<0.001), higher publication number (67.98 vs 37.80, p<0.001), and more likely to be NIH funded (16.38% vs 3.15%, p<0.001). Surgeons completing academic training were more likely to be associate professors (34.48% vs 25.77%), professors (25.00% vs 22.82%), and endowed professors (10.34% vs 2.43%) (p<0.001). On regression analysis, formalized research training was independently associated with h-index and NIH funding (p<0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: Formalized research training, either as a research fellowship or PhD, is associated with an increased h-index and likelihood of NIH funding, although this association was not found for academic rank after adjusted regression analysis.

Prostate Cancer History and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis Investigating Venous Thromboembolism and Anticoagulation.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common cancer among men in the United States. While malignancy is a known cause of venous thromboembolism (VTE), little is known about the effect of PCa history on postoperative complications after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to evaluate the risk of hematologic complications in patients with a history of PCa taking common postoperative anticoagulants. Methods: THA patients were identified through the PearlDiver Mariner database. Patients with a history of PCa were placed in one of the following cohorts based on postoperative anticoagulant prescription: aspirin, warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin, direct Xa inhibitor, or any anticoagulant. PCa cohorts were matched 1:3 to patients without a history of PCa with the same anticoagulant prescription based on age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Postoperative complications were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 74,744 patients that underwent THA were included. PCa patients taking any anticoagulant were found to have increased risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (odds ratio: 1.25, lower 99% confidence interval: 1.09, upper 99% confidence interval: 1.43, P value <.001). PCa patients taking warfarin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and direct Xa inhibitors additionally showed increased risk of postoperative DVT. Patients taking aspirin did not have an increased risk of postoperative DVT. Conclusions: Our results suggest postoperative aspirin prophylaxis may not increase VTE complication risk when compared to other anticoagulants. Surgeons should be aware that PCa history may be an independent risk factor for VTE, and these patients may benefit from medical optimization.

Management of patients with cervical myelopathy and normal pressure hydrocephalus: Epidemiology, medical and surgical complications.

OBJECTIVE: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) can each lead to gait dysfunction and urinary incontinence and may occur concurrently in some patients. In patients presenting with NPH and DCM, there is a paucity of literature describing the medical and surgical complications of treatment and the potential consequences of the sequence of surgical procedures. The aim of this study is to evaluate patients with DCM, NPH, and dual pathology to determine epidemiology and how the order of surgical intervention for both conditions may impact complications and patient outcomes. METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner database was queried between 2010 and 2020 to identify patients by their diagnosis of NPH, DCM, or both. Additional groups were created to identify cohorts of patients who underwent ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting, DCM surgery, or both surgeries, as determined by the CPT, ICD9, and ICD10 codes included in the dataset. Overall demographics were reported for these cohorts of patients including age, gender, and region. Multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, was used to calculate odds ratios for the rates of perioperative complications within 1 year of initial ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt and/or DCM surgery. RESULTS: A total of 825,989 patients were identified with DCM and/or NPH: 725,433 (87.8%) had myelopathy alone, 96, 411 (11.7%), had NPH alone, and 4145 patients (0.5%) had both NPH and DCM. Of all patients with NPH, 4.8% underwent DCM surgery. Of all patients with DCM, 0.08% underwent VP shunting. Compared to NPH only patients who underwent VP shunting, patients with both pathologies undergoing VP shunting had higher odds of revision at 1-year (OR: 1.33, p-value: 0.04) and 5-years (OR: 1.36, p-value: 0.011), as well as spinal cord injury (OR: 7.77, p-value 0.016), dysphonia (OR: 2.88, p-value: 0.004), cervicalgia (OR: 2.95, p-value: 0.004), cervical kyphosis (OR: 17.49, p-value: 0.004), and limb paralysis (OR: 2.02, p-value: 0.002). Compared to DCM only patients who underwent DCM surgery, patients with both pathologies undergoing DCM surgery had higher odds of cardiac complications (OR: 1.12, p-value: 0.002), dural tear (OR: 1.66, p-value: 0.029), and dysphagia (OR: 1.28, p-value: <0.001). Patients who underwent VP shunting prior to DCM surgery had higher odds of revision shunting surgery at 1-year (OR:1.61, p-value:0.03) and 5- years (OR:2.16, p-value: <0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date examining patients with dual cervical myelopathy and normal pressure hydrocephalus. Surgeons should carefully consider the order of VP shunting and DCM surgery, as complication rates differ depending on the order in which these surgeries are performed. Shunt revision is more common when VP shunting is performed prior to spinal decompression.

Malnutrition, Body Mass Index, and Associated Risk of Complications After Posterior Lumbar Spine Fusion: A 3:1 Matched Cohort Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of malnutrition on outcomes after posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) remains understudied. This study analyzes the effect of malnutrition across a comprehensive range of body mass index (BMI) on complications after PLF. METHODS: The Pearldiver Mariner database was queried between 2010 and 2020 using International Classification of Diseases (Ninth and Tenth Revisions) codes for malnutrition and Current Procedural Terminology codes for PLF. Patients were identified with preoperative BMI diagnosis codes and partitioned into one of the following BMI cohorts: underweight (BMI <20), normal (BMI 19-30), obese (BMI 30-40), and morbidly obese (BMI >40). An additional all-BMI cohort was created using patients with any BMI code. All cohorts were matched 1:3 to control patients within the same BMI group without malnutrition based on age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index. Complication rates were calculated using the Pearson χ2 method with statistical significance set to P < 0.05. RESULTS: The number of patients in each cohort were 1106 (all-BMI), 227 (underweight), 808 (normal), 667 (obese), and 449 (morbidly obese). Statistical analysis showed that the all-BMI cohort had greater odds of complications related to instrumentation (odds ratio [OR]: 2.28; P < 0.001), need for revision fusion (OR: 2.04; P < 0.001), pulmonary complications (OR: 1.45; P < 0.001), sepsis (OR: 2.89; P < 0.001), surgical site complications (OR: 1.87; P < 0.001), and urinary complications (OR: 1.41; P < 0.001). No difference was noted between the BMI-specific cohorts for complication risk. CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicates that malnutrition may independently increase PLF complication risk. Surgeons may consider preoperative optimization for malnutrition patients to reduce complication risk.

Managing intergroup silos to improve patient flow.

BACKGROUND: Health care managers face the critical challenge of overcoming divisions among the many groups involved in patient care, a problem intensified when patients must flow across multiple settings. Surprisingly, however, the patient flow literature rarely engages with its intergroup dimension. PURPOSE: This study explored how managers with responsibility for patient flow understand and approach intergroup divisions and "silo-ing" in health care. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: We conducted in-depth interviews with 300 purposively sampled senior, middle, and frontline managers across 10 Canadian health jurisdictions. We undertook thematic analysis using sensitizing concepts drawn from the social identity approach. RESULTS: Silos, at multiple levels, were reported in every jurisdiction. The main strategies for ameliorating silos were provision of formal opportunities for staff collaboration, persuasive messages stressing shared values or responsibilities, and structural reorganization to redraw group boundaries. Participants emphasized the benefits of the first two but described structural change as neither necessary nor sufficient for improved collaboration. CONCLUSION: Silos, though an unavoidable feature of organizational life, can be managed and mitigated. However, a key challenge in redefining groups is that the easiest place to draw boundaries from a social identity perspective may not be the best place from one of system design. Narrowly defined groups forge strong identities more easily, but broader groups facilitate coordination of care by minimizing the number of boundaries patients must traverse. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: A thoughtfully designed combination of strategies may help to improve intergroup relations and their impact on flow. It may be ideal to foster a "mosaic" identity that affirms group allegiances at multiple levels.

How Do Health Systems Address Patient Flow When Services Are Misaligned With Population Needs? A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Patient flow through health services is increasingly recognized as a system issue, yet the flow literature has focused overwhelmingly on localized interventions, with limited examination of system-level causes or remedies. Research suggests that intractable flow problems may reflect a basic misalignment between service offerings and population needs, requiring fundamental system redesign. However, little is known about health systems' approaches to population-capacity misalignment, and guidance for system redesign remains underdeveloped. METHODS: This qualitative study, part of a broader investigation of patient flow in urban Western Canada, explored health-system strategies to address or prevent population-capacity misalignment. We conducted in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of managers in 10 jurisdictions across 4 provinces (N = 300), spanning all healthcare sectors and levels of management. We used the constant comparative method to develop an understanding of relevant strategies and derive principles for system design. RESULTS: All regions showed evidence of pervasive population-capacity misalignment. The most superficial level of response - mutual accommodation (case-by-case problem solving) - was most prevalent; capacity (re)allocation occurred less frequently; population redefinition most rarely. Participants' insights yielded a general principle: Define populations on the basis of clusters of co-occurring need. However, defining such clusters demands a difficult balance between narrowness/rigidity and breadth/flexibility. Deeper analysis suggested a further principle: Populations that can be divided into homogeneous subgroups experiencing similar needs (eg, surgical patients) are best served by narrow/ rigid models; heterogeneous populations featuring diverse constellations of need (eg, frail older adults) require broad/ flexible models. CONCLUSION: To remedy population-capacity misalignment, health system planners should determine whether clusters of population need are separable vs. fused, select an appropriate service model for each population, allocate sufficient capacity, and only then promote mutual accommodation to address exceptions. Overreliance on case-by-case solutions to systemic problems ensures the persistence of population-capacity misalignment.

The "hard, relentless, never-ending" work of focusing on discharge: a qualitative study of managers' perspectives.

PURPOSE: Interventions to hasten patient discharge continue to proliferate despite evidence that they may be achieving diminishing returns. To better understand what such interventions can be expected to accomplish, the authors aim to critically examine their underlying program theory. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Within a broader study on patient flow, spanning 10 jurisdictions across Western Canada, the authors conducted in-depth interviews with 300 senior, middle and frontline managers; 174 discussed discharge initiatives. Using thematic analysis informed by a Realistic Evaluation lens, the authors identified the mechanisms by which discharge activities were believed to produce their impacts and the strategies and context factors necessary to trigger the intended mechanisms. FINDINGS: Managers' accounts suggested a common program theory that applied to a wide variety of discharge initiatives. The chief mechanism was inculcation of a sharp focus on discharge; reinforcing mechanisms included development of shared understanding and a sense of accountability. Participants reported that these mechanisms were difficult to produce and sustain, requiring continual active management and repeated (re)introduction of interventions. This reflected a context in which providers, already overwhelmed with competing demands, were unlikely to be able (or perhaps even willing) to sustain a focus on this particular aspect of care. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The finding that "discharge focus" emerged as the core mechanism of discharge interventions helps to explain why such initiatives may be achieving limited benefit. There is a need for interventions that promote timely discharge without relying on this highly problematic mechanism.

Can facility-based transitional care improve patient flow? Lessons from four Canadian regions.

Units providing transitional, subacute, or restorative care represent a common intervention to facilitate patient flow and improve outcomes for lower acuity (often older) inpatients; however, little is known about Canadian health systems' experiences with such "transition units." This comparative case study of diverse units in four health regions (48 interviews) identified important success factors and pitfalls. A fundamental requirement for success is to clearly define the unit's intended population and design the model around its needs. Planners must also ensure that the unit be resourced and staffed to deliver truly restorative care. Finally, streamlined processes must be developed to help patients access and move through the unit. Units that were perceived as more effective appeared to have satisfactorily addressed these population, capacity, and process issues, whereas those perceived as less effective continued to struggle with them. Findings suggest principles to support optimal design and implementation of transition units.

"Working Against Gravity": The Uphill Task of Overcapacity Management.

While most health systems have implemented interventions to manage situations in which patient demand exceeds capacity, little is known about the long-term sustainability or effectiveness of such interventions. A large multi-jurisdictional study on patient flow in Western Canada provided the opportunity to explore experiences with overcapacity management strategies across 10 diverse health regions. Four categories of interventions were employed by all or most regions: overcapacity protocols, alternative locations for emergency patients, locations for discharge-ready inpatients, and meetings to guide redistribution of patients. Two mechanisms undergirded successful interventions: providing a capacity buffer and promoting action by inpatient units by increasing staff accountability and/or solidarity. Participants reported that interventions demanded significant time and resources and the ongoing active involvement of middle and senior management. Furthermore, although most participants characterized overcapacity management practices as effective, this effectiveness was almost universally experienced as temporary. Many regions described a context of chronic overcapacity, which persisted despite continued intervention. Processes designed to manage short-term surges in demand cannot rectify a long-term mismatch between capacity and demand; solutions at the level of system redesign are needed.

The effect of incorporating guidelines into a computerized order entry system for diagnostic imaging.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this collaborative evaluation of the Manitoba Demonstration Project in Demand-Side Control for Diagnostic Imaging were to determine the impacts of both the computerized order entry and decision support components of the intervention, identify barriers to implementation, and provide insight into quantitative findings. METHODS: Mixed methodology was used. A stakeholder committee guided project implementation and evaluation and assisted in interpreting findings. Orders placed through the software (July 2006 to August 2007) were analyzed in conjunction with qualitative data from semistructured interviews, focus groups, consultations, and observational methods. Data were collected before implementation, after the introduction of the computerized ordering system, after the introduction of decision support prompts, and at project completion. Analysis was conducted simultaneously with data collection. RESULTS: Although the process change of computerized provider order entry was well accepted, there was low acceptance of the practice change of decision support. Of 8,757 orders placed after guidelines were activated, 1,678 (19.2%) had relevant guidelines and 957 (10.9%) were inappropriate according to the guidelines. In only 19 (2%) of these cases did the physician follow the advice given. Contributing factors included setting, implementation of only a subsection of the Canadian Association of Radiologists guidelines, implementation issues, physician perspectives on usefulness of decision support, the timing of advice, a lack of integration with existing patient information systems, and software limitations. Setting predicted satisfaction with ordering time. The potential for computerized provider order entry to decrease useful information accompanying orders was identified. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the importance of ensuring both appropriate timing of decision support and integration with patient information systems. Implementation evaluation, as well as impact evaluation, is needed to assess new system adoption; early engagement of users can support this process. Further research is needed to determine the actual extent of inappropriate ordering.

Adverse events among Winnipeg Home Care clients.

Patient safety research has focused almost exclusively on hospitals, with few studies investigating the safety of other healthcare sectors, including home care. Before measuring patient safety in home care, this study first sought to translate hospital-focused patient safety definitions and concepts to home care. A context-appropriate approach to measuring adverse events (AEs) in home care was developed using chart reviews prompted by a mixed screening process. These methods were then applied to measure the incidence, type, severity, cause, preventability and ameliorability of AEs among Winnipeg Home Care clients.