ABSTRACT
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal brain tumor with limited treatment options. O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status is the central molecular biomarker linked to both the response to temozolomide, the standard chemotherapy drug employed for GBM, and to patient survival. However, MGMT status is captured on tumor tissue which, given the difficulty in acquisition, limits the use of this molecular feature for treatment monitoring. MGMT protein expression levels may offer additional insights into the mechanistic understanding of MGMT but, currently, they correlate poorly to promoter methylation. The difficulty of acquiring tumor tissue for MGMT testing drives the need for non-invasive methods to predict MGMT status. Feature selection aims to identify the most informative features to build accurate and interpretable prediction models. This study explores the new application of a combined feature selection (i.e., LASSO and mRMR) and the rank-based weighting method (i.e., MGMT ProFWise) to non-invasively link MGMT promoter methylation status and serum protein expression in patients with GBM. Our method provides promising results, reducing dimensionality (by more than 95%) when employed on two large-scale proteomic datasets (7k SomaScan® panel and CPTAC) for all our analyses. The computational results indicate that the proposed approach provides 14 shared serum biomarkers that may be helpful for diagnostic, prognostic, and/or predictive operations for GBM-related processes, given further validation.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Humans , Glioblastoma/genetics , Proteomics , Temozolomide/therapeutic use , Blood Proteins , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase , DNA Modification Methylases/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics , DNA Repair Enzymes/geneticsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This manuscript will update prior reviews of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in light of basic science, translational, and clinical discoveries in the field of cancer immunology and aging. RECENT FINDINGS: ICIs have led to significant advancements in the treatment of cancer. Landmark trials of ICIs have cited the efficacy and toxicity experienced by older patients, but most trials are not specifically designed to address outcomes in older patients. Underlying mechanisms of aging, like cellular senescence, affect the immune system and may ultimately alter the host's response to ICIs. Validated tools are currently used to identify older adults who may be at greater risk of developing complications from their cancer treatment. We review changes in the aging immune system that may alter responses to ICIs, report outcomes and toxicities in older adults from recent ICI clinical trials, and discuss clinical tools specific to older patients with cancer.
Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Aged , Aging/immunology , Geriatrics/methods , Medical Oncology/methods , Immunotherapy/methodsABSTRACT
Background: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is commonly mutated (mIDH) in gliomas, and this mutant enzyme produces the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG). 2HG promotes gliomagenesis and is implicated in epileptogenesis. Ivosidenib (IVO), a small molecule oral mIDH1 inhibitor, is FDA-approved for mIDH1 newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Moreover, IVO has efficacy in clinical trials for recurrent mIDH1 gliomas. Given the lack of targeted treatments for gliomas, we initiated off-label IVO for mIDH glioma patients in October 2020. Methods: Retrospectively, we sought to assess early outcomes in our patients and describe their experience on IVO from October 2020 through February 2022. Our objective was to report on the following variables of off-label use of IVO: radiographic response, seizure control, tolerability, and access to the medication. All patients initially received single-agent IVO dosed at 500 mg orally once daily. Results: The cohort age range was 21-74 years. Tumor types included astrocytoma (n = 14) and oligodendroglioma (n = 16), with most being grade 2 (n = 21). The best radiographic response in nonenhancing disease (n = 22) was 12 stable diseases, 5 minor responses, 3 partial responses, and 2 progressive diseases. Seizure frequency was stable to improved for most patients (70%, n = 21). IVO was well-tolerated, with the most common toxicities being diarrhea, elevated creatine kinase, and QTc interval prolongation. Most patients (66.7%, n = 20) received drugs via the patient assistance program, with insurance initially covering a third of patients and with ongoing use, later covering 60%. Conclusions: Targeted therapies like IVO are options for mIDH glioma patients and can provide positive oncologic and neurological outcomes.
ABSTRACT
Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) are rare and highly malignant CNS neoplasms primarily affecting children. Adult cases are extremely uncommon, with only approximately 92 reported. Spinal AT/RT in adults is particularly rare. Here, we present the case of a 50-year-old patient diagnosed with AT/RT of the spine. Initially, they were diagnosed and treated for a spinal ependymoma. However, after 10 years, a recurrence was detected through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the tumor was reclassified as AT/RT. We discuss the significance of SMARCB1 gene mutations in diagnosing AT/RT and describe our unique treatment approach involving surgery, radiation and anti-PD1 therapy in this patient.
Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) are rare and serious cancers that affect the brain and spine, and mostly occur in children. AT/RT are rare in adults, with only about 92 cases reported. Our article tells the story of a 50-year-old patient, who was diagnosed with a spinal tumor, initially classified as an ependymoma. Ten years later, the tumor recurred, and was found on routine surveillance imaging. After pathological examination of the recurrent tumor, it was diagnosed as AT/RT. The initial tissue was re-examined, and the original tumor was reclassified as an AT/RT. We explain why a gene called SMARCB1 is important for diagnosing AT/RT. Additionally, we share details about the treatments utilized: including surgery, radiation, and medicines that stimulate the immune system to kill cancer cells. This case highlights the challenges and treatments for this rare cancer in adults.
Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Neoplasms , Rhabdoid Tumor , Teratoma , Humans , Middle Aged , Rhabdoid Tumor/diagnostic imaging , Rhabdoid Tumor/genetics , Rhabdoid Tumor/therapy , SMARCB1 Protein/genetics , Teratoma/diagnostic imaging , Teratoma/genetics , Teratoma/surgeryABSTRACT
The lack of treatments with durable response in neuro-oncology highlights the critical need for clinical trials to advance patient care. The intersection of relatively low incidence, evolving classification schema, and entrenched community, healthcare provider, and organizational factors have been historic challenges against successful trial enrollment and implementation. The additional need for multidisciplinary, often tertiary-level care, further magnifies latent national and international health inequities with rural and under-served populations. The COVID-19 pandemic both unveiled fundamental weaknesses in historical approaches and prompted the necessity of new approaches and systems for conducting clinical trials. Here, we provide an overview of traditional barriers to clinical trial enrollment in neuro-oncology, the effect of COVID-19 on these barriers, and the discovery of additional systemic weaknesses. Finally, we discuss future directions by reflecting on lessons learned with strategies to broaden access of care and streamline clinical trial integration into clinical practice.