Correction to: Are Clerks Proficient in the Basic Sciences? Assessment of Third-Year Medical Students' Basic Science Knowledge Prior to and at the Completion of Core Clerkship Rotations.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01249-3.].

Are Clerks Proficient in the Basic Sciences? Assessment of Third-Year Medical Students' Basic Science Knowledge Prior to and at the Completion of Core Clerkship Rotations.

Basic sciences are a cornerstone of undergraduate medical education (UME), yet research indicates that students' basic science knowledge is not well retained. Many UME curricula are increasing the integration between the basic and clinical sciences with the goal of enhancing students' knowledge levels; however, the impact of clerkship training on students' basic science knowledge remains inconclusive. Thus, using clerkship directors' expectations as framework, we aimed to assess third-year medical students' basic science knowledge during clerkship training and evaluate the influence of clerkship training on their basic science knowledge. Using concepts deemed necessary by clerkship directors, we created a basic science assessment for each clerkship rotation. Assessments were distributed to third-year medical students as a pre- and post-test to assess their basic science knowledge prior to and at the completion of each rotation. On average, students retained ≥ 60% of relevant basic science knowledge from pre-clerkship, and neither clerkship rotation order, nor the basic science discipline being assessed, impacted students' basic science knowledge levels. Post-test data revealed that students, on average, reinforced fundamental concepts during clerkship. Interestingly, even though lower-performing students demonstrated the greatest post-test improvement, they still left each rotation with knowledge deficits compared with their highest-performing peers, suggesting that the clinical experience of clerkship appears to be particularly beneficial for lower-performing students, in regard to enhancing their basic science knowledge. Overall, results indicate that earlier exposure to clinical learning in UME, along with integration of basic science education into clerkship, could promote students' basic science knowledge acquisition and retention.

Lateral subvastus approach: A cadaveric examination of its potential for total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Lateral approaches to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provide good surgical exposure and may provide greater ease of soft tissue balancing in patients with a valgus deformity; however, little is known about the versatility in non-valgus knees. The present study evaluated if a lateral subvastus approach can achieve adequate surgical exposure while maintaining less soft tissue damage compared with the medial parapatellar approach in knees without any significant deformity. METHODS: Using paired fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, the present study provides the first specimen-matched, side-by-side comparison of the lateral subvastus approach to the standard medial parapatellar approach to TKA. Ten knees were selected to undergo a lateral subvastus approach; the contralateral knee had a medial parapatellar approach as control. Incision length, surgical exposure and iatrogenic soft tissue damage were compared between the two approaches. RESULTS: The lateral subvastus approach was successfully performed using an incision length that was not different from that used in the medial parapatellar approach (p > 0.05). The resultant surgical exposure was comparable between approaches (p > 0.05). The risk of the approach included tearing of the vastus lateralis fibers, and/or abrasion of the iliotibial tract/patellar ligament. CONCLUSIONS: The lateral subvastus approach to TKA provided a comparable method to the standard medial parapatellar approach. Despite adequate exposure, the approach did risk soft tissue injury. Caution needs to be exercised to reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury to the vastus lateralis and surrounding ligaments. The successful implementation in this cadaveric study substantiates the need for further consideration of this approach in clinical practice.

Expectations and Perceptions of Students' Basic Science Knowledge: Through the Lens of Clerkship Directors.

Basic sciences are a cornerstone of undergraduate medical education (UME) as they provide a necessary foundation for the clinical sciences to be built upon and help foster trainees' competency. However, research indicates that students' basic science knowledge is not well retained, and as a result, students are ill-prepared, with respect to their basic science knowledge, when entering clerkship. One potential reason why students may not be prepared for clerkship is a lack of understanding as to which basic science concepts are critical for medical students to retain from pre-clerkship. We facilitated interviews with all core UME clerkship directors to establish which basic science concepts they expect students to know prior to each clerkship rotation, along with student's basic science strengths and areas of improvement. Interviews revealed that students are expected to have some knowledge of every basic science prior to clerkship, with pharmacology being a strong focus, as many specialties deal with common drugs and classes of drugs. Additionally, general anatomy and physiology knowledge were deemed student strengths in two rotations. Clerkship directors focused on perceived areas of improvement more than perceived strengths, with the most prevalent areas being pharmacology, microbiology, and detailed anatomy. These results represent views of clerkship directors from one Canadian institution; however, since clerks rotate through institutions across Canada, this data provides the impetus for creating a national discussion to help foster standardization of UME curricula, with the overarching goal of ensuring all graduates are proficient in the necessary fundamentals as they transition into residency.

Complete Obliteration of the Left Atrial Appendage: An Analysis of Epicardial Excision and Novel Pericardial Patch Exclusion.

OBJECTIVE: Conventional epicardial excision is believed to be the most effective method of surgically obliterating the left atrial appendage (LAA), although incomplete resection and residual LAA volume may undermine its effectiveness. We sought to compare the impact of conventional epicardial excision with a novel LAA pericardial patch exclusion on residual LAA volume. METHODS: We performed LAA obliteration using pericardial patch exclusion, followed by conventional epicardial excision, in 27 cadaveric hearts. After each procedure, residual LAA volume was measured by two different techniques and compared with baseline volume. There was no difference in baseline LAA volume between each procedure. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in all hearts. Conventional epicardial excision left a residual LAA volume of 0.95 mL (24%), as compared with pericardial patch exclusion, which left a residual volume of 0.17 mL (4%, P = 0.0001). Further analysis of fixed and fresh hearts showed that reduction of LAA volume was more pronounced in the fresh hearts, suggesting effectiveness in live patients. Neither technique resulted in any significant change in the endocardial shape of the LAA orifice or injury to the circumflex artery. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional epicardial excision of the LAA results in significantly more residual LAA volume, which may have important implications in persistent stroke risk. Pericardial patch exclusion seems to achieve near-total elimination of the LAA and may be a superior surgical option.

Development of a novel classification system for anatomical variants of the puboprostatic ligaments with expert validation.

INTRODUCTION: We propose a novel classification system with a validation study to help clinicians identify and typify commonly seen variants of the puboprostatic ligaments (PPL). METHODS: A preliminary dissection of 6 male cadavers and a prospective dataset of over 300 robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RARP) recorded on video were used to identify 4 distinct ligament types. Then the prospectively collected database of surgical videos was used to isolate images of the PPL from RARP. Over 300 surgical videos were reviewed and classified with 1 to 5 pictures saved for reference of the type of PPL. To validate the new classification system, we selected 5 independent, blinded expert robotic surgeons to classify 100 ligaments based on morphology into a 4-type system: parallel, V-shaped, inverted V-shape, and fused. One week later, a subset of 25 photographs was sent to the same experts and classified. Statistical analyses were performed to determine both the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the proposed system. RESULTS: Inverted V-shaped ligaments were noted most frequently (29.97%), parallel and V-shaped ligaments were found at 19.19% and 11.11%, respectively and fused ligaments were noted less frequently (6.06%). There was good intra-rater agreement (κ = 0.66) and inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.67) for the classification system. CONCLUSIONS: This classification system provided standardized descriptions of ligament variations that could be adopted universally to help clinicians categorize the variants. The system, validated by several blinded expert surgeons, demonstrated that surgeons were able to learn and correctly classify the variants. The system may be useful in helping to predict peri- and postoperative outcomes; however, this will require further study.