Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Glob Health ; 8(Suppl 8)2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37813445

ABSTRACT

Fiscal policies to improve diet are a promising strategy to address the increasing burden of non-communicable disease, the leading cause of death globally. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes are the most implemented type of fiscal policy to improve diet. Yet taxes on food, if appropriately structured and applied across the food supply, may support a larger population-level shift towards a healthier diet. Designing these policies and guiding them through the legislative process requires evidence. Equity-oriented cost-effectiveness analyses that estimate the distribution of potential health and economic gains can provide this critical evidence. Taxes on less healthy foods are rarely modelled in low-income and middle-income countries.We describe considerations for modelling the effect of a food tax, which can provide guidance for food tax policy design. This includes describing issues related to the availability, reliability and level of detail of national data on dietary habits, the nutrient content of foods and food prices; the structure of the nutrient profile model; type of tax; tax rate; pass-through rate and price elasticity. Using the Philippines as an example, we discuss considerations for using existing data to model the potential effect of a tax, while also taking into account the political and food policy context. In this way, we provide a modelling framework that can help guide policy-makers and advocates in designing a food policy to improve the health and well-being of future generations in the Philippines and elsewhere.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Food , Humans , Philippines , Reproducibility of Results , Taxes
2.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 122(8): 1455-1464.e5, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35182788

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the National Salt and Sugar Reduction Initiative (NSSRI) released voluntary sugar reduction targets for packaged foods and drinks in the United States. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to describe trends in added sugar intake from NSSRI foods and beverages among children and youth and estimate possible reductions if industry were to meet the targets. DESIGN: This study consisted of cross-sectional and trend analyses of demographic and 24-hour dietary recall data from eight survey cycles (2003-2004 to 2017-2018) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: The study sample included 23,248 children and youth (aged 2 to 19 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was the percent of daily calories from added sugar for foods and beverages in NSSRI categories. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Foods and beverages reported by participants were mapped to one of the NSSRI's categories or coded as a non-NSSRI item. Trends over time in added sugar intake were assessed using regression models. To assess possible reductions in added sugar intake if industry were to meet the targets, sales-weighted mean percent reductions for 2023 and 2026 targets were applied to NSSRI items in the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Suvey data. Results were examined overall and by demographic characteristics. RESULTS: From 2003-2004 to 2017-2018, added sugar intake from NSSRI foods and beverages declined, but consumption remained high. During 2017-2018, NSSRI categories accounted for 70% of US child and youth added sugar intake. If industry met the NSSRI targets, US children and youth would consume 7% (2023 targets) to 21% (2026 targets) less added sugar. CONCLUSIONS: Although added sugar intake from NSSRI foods and drinks has declined over the past decade, added sugar intake from all sources remains high and consumption of added sugar from certain NSSRI categories has remained steady over time. If met, the NSSRI targets are expected to result in meaningful reductions in added sugar intake for US children and youth.


Subject(s)
Energy Intake , Sugars , Adolescent , Beverages/analysis , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet , Humans , Nutrition Surveys , United States
3.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 13: E77, 2016 06 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27281392

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitals serve millions of meals and snacks each year; however, hospital food is often unhealthy. Hospitals are ideal settings for modeling healthy eating, but few programs have sought to improve nutrition in all venues where food is served. COMMUNITY CONTEXT: The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene created the Healthy Hospital Food Initiative (HHFI) to improve the healthfulness of food served in hospitals. The HHFI built on prior work implementing mandatory nutrition standards for patient meals and vending in public hospitals. Public hospitals joined the HHFI by voluntarily adopting standards for cafeterias and cafés. Private hospitals joined by implementing nutrition standards for patient meals, food and beverage vending machines, and cafeterias and cafés. METHODS: Hospitals were recruited from 2010 through 2014 and provided technical assistance from health department staff. Implementation in each of the 4 areas was monitored through on-site assessments and menu review. Twenty-eight hospital cafeterias and cafés were evaluated at baseline and at the end of the HHFI to assess changes. OUTCOME: Sixteen public hospitals and 24 private hospitals joined the HHFI. Most (n = 18) private hospitals implemented standards in at least 2 areas. In cafeterias, most hospitals introduced a healthy value meal (n = 19), removed unhealthy items from the entrance and checkout (n = 18), increased whole grains to at least half of all grains served (n = 17), and reduced calories in pastries and desserts (n = 15). INTERPRETATION: Most New York City hospitals joined the HHFI and voluntarily adopted rigorous nutrition standards. Partnerships between hospitals and local government are feasible and can lead to significant improvements in hospital food environments.


Subject(s)
Beverages , Food Service, Hospital/standards , Meals , Nutritional Status , Food Dispensers, Automatic , Guidelines as Topic , Hospitals , New York City
4.
J Acad Nutr Diet ; 115(11): 1847-54, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26320410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most hospital patient meals are considered regular-diet meals; these meals are not required to meet comprehensive nutrition standards for a healthy diet. Although programs exist to improve nutrition in hospital food, the focus is on retail settings such as vending machines and cafeterias vs patient meals. New York City's Healthy Hospital Food Initiative (HHFI) provides nutrition standards for regular-diet meals that hospitals can adopt, in addition to retail standards. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe regular-diet patient menus before and after implementation of the HHFI nutrition standards. DESIGN: The study involved pre- and post- menu change analyses of hospitals participating in the HHFI between 2010 and 2014. PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Eight New York City hospitals, selected based on voluntary participation in the HHFI, were included in the analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nutritional content of regular-diet menus were compared with the HHFI nutrition standards. STATISTICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED: Nutrient analysis and exact Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for the analysis of the data. RESULTS: At baseline, no regular-diet menu met all HHFI standards, and most exceeded the daily limits for percentage of calories from fat (n=5), percentage of calories from saturated fat (n=5), and milligrams of sodium (n=6), and they did not meet the minimum grams of fiber (n=7). Hospitals met all key nutrient standards after implementation, increasing fiber (25%, P<0.01) and decreasing sodium (-19%, P<0.05), percentage of calories from fat (-24%, P<0.01), and percentage of calories from saturated fat (-21%, P<0.05). A significant increase was seen in fresh fruit servings (667%, P<0.05) and decreases in full-fat and reduced-fat milk servings (-100%, P<0.05), refined grain servings (-35%, P<0.05), and frequency of desserts (-92%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Regular diet menus did not comply with the HHFI nutrition standards at baseline. Using the HHFI framework, hospitals significantly improved the nutritional quality of regular-diet patient menus. The standards were applied across hospitals of varying sizes, locations, menu types, and food service operations, indicating feasibility of this framework in a range of hospital settings.


Subject(s)
Diet/standards , Food Service, Hospital/standards , Meals , Nutritive Value , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Dietary Fiber , Energy Intake , Fruit , Menu Planning/standards , New York City , Nutrition Policy , Nutritional Status , Recommended Dietary Allowances , Sodium, Dietary , Vegetables , Whole Grains
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...