ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assessments of disease burden are important to inform national, regional, and global strategies and to guide investment. We aimed to estimate the drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)-attributable burden of disease for diarrhoea, acute respiratory infections, undernutrition, and soil-transmitted helminthiasis, using the WASH service levels used to monitor the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as counterfactual minimum risk-exposure levels. METHODS: We assessed the WASH-attributable disease burden of the four health outcomes overall and disaggregated by region, age, and sex for the year 2019. We calculated WASH-attributable fractions of diarrhoea and acute respiratory infections by country using modelled WASH exposures and exposure-response relationships from two updated meta-analyses. We used the WHO and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene public database to estimate population exposure to different WASH service levels. WASH-attributable undernutrition was estimated by combining the population attributable fractions (PAF) of diarrhoea caused by unsafe WASH and the PAF of undernutrition caused by diarrhoea. Soil-transmitted helminthiasis was fully attributed to unsafe WASH. FINDINGS: We estimate that 1·4 (95% CI 1·3-1·5) million deaths and 74 (68-80) million disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) could have been prevented by safe WASH in 2019 across the four designated outcomes, representing 2·5% of global deaths and 2·9% of global DALYs from all causes. The proportion of diarrhoea that is attributable to unsafe WASH is 0·69 (0·65-0·72), 0·14 (0·13-0·17) for acute respiratory infections, and 0·10 (0·09-0·10) for undernutrition, and we assume that the entire disease burden from soil-transmitted helminthiasis was attributable to unsafe WASH. INTERPRETATION: WASH-attributable burden of disease estimates based on the levels of service established under the SDG framework show that progress towards the internationally agreed goal of safely managed WASH services for all would yield major public-health returns. FUNDING: WHO and Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office.
Subject(s)
Drinking Water , Helminthiasis , Malnutrition , Respiratory Tract Infections , Humans , Sanitation , Hygiene , Helminthiasis/epidemiology , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/etiology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/etiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Global Health , Global Burden of DiseaseABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Estimates of the effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions that provide high levels of service on childhood diarrhoea are scarce. We aimed to provide up-to-date estimates on the burden of disease attributable to WASH and on the effects of different types of WASH interventions on childhood diarrhoea in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we updated previous reviews following their search strategy by searching MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and BIOSIS Citation Index for studies of basic WASH interventions and of WASH interventions providing a high level of service, published between Jan 1, 2016, and May 25, 2021. We included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials conducted at household or community level that matched exposure categories of the so-called service ladder approach of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) for WASH. Two reviewers independently extracted study-level data and assessed risk of bias using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and certainty of evidence using a modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We analysed extracted relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs using random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regression models. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42016043164. FINDINGS: 19â837 records were identified from the search, of which 124 studies were included, providing 83 water (62â616 children), 20 sanitation (40â799 children), and 41 hygiene (98â416 children) comparisons. Compared with untreated water from an unimproved source, risk of diarrhoea was reduced by up to 50% with water treated at point of use (POU): filtration (n=23 studies; RR 0·50 [95% CI 0·41-0·60]), solar treatment (n=13; 0·63 [0·50-0·80]), and chlorination (n=25; 0·66 [0·56-0·77]). Compared with an unimproved source, provision of an improved drinking water supply on premises with higher water quality reduced diarrhoea risk by 52% (n=2; 0·48 [0·26-0·87]). Overall, sanitation interventions reduced diarrhoea risk by 24% (0·76 [0·61-0·94]). Compared with unimproved sanitation, providing sewer connection reduced diarrhoea risk by 47% (n=5; 0·53 [0·30-0·93]). Promotion of handwashing with soap reduced diarrhoea risk by 30% (0·70 [0·64-0·76]). INTERPRETATION: WASH interventions reduced risk of diarrhoea in children in LMICs. Interventions supplying either water filtered at POU, higher water quality from an improved source on premises, or basic sanitation services with sewer connection were associated with increased reductions. Our results support higher service levels called for under SDG 6. Notably, no studies evaluated interventions that delivered access to safely managed WASH services, the level of service to which universal coverage by 2030 is committed under the SDG. FUNDING: WHO, Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, and National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Subject(s)
Drinking Water , Sanitation , Child , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Hand Disinfection , Humans , SoapsSubject(s)
Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Healthy Lifestyle , Noncommunicable Diseases/prevention & control , Preventive Medicine , Risk Reduction Behavior , Social Determinants of Health , Humans , Noncommunicable Diseases/epidemiology , Protective Factors , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Three large new trials of unprecedented scale and cost, which included novel factorial designs, have found no effect of basic water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions on childhood stunting, and only mixed effects on childhood diarrhea. Arriving at the inception of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals, and the bold new target of safely managed water, sanitation and hygiene for all by 2030, these results warrant the attention of researchers, policy-makers and practitioners. MAIN BODY: Here we report the conclusions of an expert meeting convened by the World Health Organization and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to discuss these findings, and present five key consensus messages as a basis for wider discussion and debate in the WASH and nutrition sectors. We judge these trials to have high internal validity, constituting good evidence that these specific interventions had no effect on childhood linear growth, and mixed effects on childhood diarrhea. These results suggest that, in settings such as these, more comprehensive or ambitious WASH interventions may be needed to achieve a major impact on child health. CONCLUSION: These results are important because such basic interventions are often deployed in low-income rural settings with the expectation of improving child health, although this is rarely the sole justification. Our view is that these three new trials do not show that WASH in general cannot influence child linear growth, but they do demonstrate that these specific interventions had no influence in settings where stunting remains an important public health challenge. We support a call for transformative WASH, in so much as it encapsulates the guiding principle that - in any context - a comprehensive package of WASH interventions is needed that is tailored to address the local exposure landscape and enteric disease burden.
Subject(s)
Diarrhea/etiology , Growth Disorders/etiology , Hygiene , Sanitation , Water/adverse effects , Child , Child Health , Humans , Poverty , Public Health/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rural PopulationABSTRACT
AbstractUnderstanding illness costs associated with diarrhea and acute respiratory infections (ARI) could guide prevention and treatment strategies. This study aimed to determine incidence of childhood diarrhea and ARI and costs of homecare, hospitalization, and outpatient treatment by practitioner type in rural Bangladesh. From each of 100 randomly selected population clusters we sampled 17 households with at least one child < 5 years of age. Childhood diarrhea incidence was 3,451 and ARI incidence was 5,849/1,000 child-years. For diarrhea and ARI outpatient care per 1,000 child-years, parents spent more on unqualified ($2,361 and $4,822) than qualified health-care practitioners ($113 and $947). For outpatient care, visits to unqualified health-care practitioners were at least five times more common than visits to qualified practitioners. Costs for outpatient care treatment by unqualified health-care practitioners per episode of illness were similar to those for qualified health-care practitioners. Homecare costs were similar for diarrhea and ARI ($0.16 and $0.24) as were similar hospitalization costs per episode of diarrhea and ARI ($35.40 and $37.76). On average, rural Bangladeshi households with children < 5 years of age spent 1.3% ($12 of $915) of their annual income managing diarrhea and ARI for those children. The majority of childhood illness management cost comprised visits to unqualified health-care practitioners. Policy makers should consider strategies to increase the skills of unqualified health-care practitioners, use community health workers to provide referral, and promote homecare for diarrhea and ARI. Incentives to motivate existing qualified physicians who are interested to work in rural Bangladesh could also be considered.
Subject(s)
Diarrhea/economics , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/economics , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Rural Population , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Infant , MaleABSTRACT
We used a prospective, longitudinal cohort enrolled as part of a program evaluation to assess the relationship between drinking water microbiological quality and child diarrhea. We included 50 villages across rural Bangladesh. Within each village field-workers enrolled a systematic random sample of 10 households with a child under the age of 3 years. Community monitors visited households monthly and recorded whether children under the age of 5 years had diarrhea in the preceding 2 days. Every 3 months, a research assistant visited the household and requested a water sample from the source or container used to provide drinking water to the child. Laboratory technicians measured the concentration of Escherichia coli in the water samples using membrane filtration. Of drinking water samples, 59% (2,273/3,833) were contaminated with E. coli. Of 12,192 monthly follow-up visits over 2 years, mothers reported that their child had diarrhea in the preceding 2 days in 1,156 (9.5%) visits. In a multivariable general linear model, the log10 of E. coli contamination of the preceding drinking water sample was associated with an increased prevalence of child diarrhea (prevalence ratio = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.23). These data provide further evidence of the health benefits of improved microbiological quality of drinking water.
Subject(s)
Diarrhea/etiology , Drinking Water/microbiology , Escherichia coli Infections/pathology , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Water Microbiology , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Rural Population , Water Quality/standardsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Renal autotransplantation is an infrequently performed procedure. It has been used to manage complex ureteral disease, vascular anomalies and chronic kidney pain. We reviewed our 27-year experience with this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational study of 51 consecutive patients who underwent renal autotransplantation, including 29 at Oregon Health and Science University between 1986 and 2013, and 22 at Virginia Mason Medical Center between 2007 and 2012. Demographics, indications, operative details and followup data were collected. Early (30 days or less) and late (greater than 30 days) complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Factors associated with complications and pain recurrence were evaluated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: The 51 patients underwent a total of 54 renal autotransplants. Median followup was 21.5 months. The most common indications were loin pain hematuria syndrome/chronic kidney pain in 31.5% of cases, ureteral stricture in 20.4% and vascular anomalies in 18.5%. Autotransplantation of a solitary kidney was performed in 5 patients. Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in 23.5% of cases. Median operative time was 402 minutes and median length of stay was 6 days. No significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative plasma creatinine (p = 0.74). Early, high grade complications (grade IIIa or greater) developed in 14.8% of patients and 12.9% experienced late complications of any grade. Two graft losses occurred. Longer cold ischemia time was associated with complications (p = 0.049). Of patients who underwent autotransplantation for chronic kidney pain 35% experienced recurrence and 2 underwent transplant nephrectomy. No predictors of pain recurrence were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The most common indications for renal autotransplantation were loin pain hematuria syndrome/chronic kidney pain, ureteral stricture and vascular anomalies in descending order. Kidney function was preserved postoperatively and 2 graft losses occurred. At a median followup of 13 months pain resolved in 65% of patients who underwent the procedure. Complication rates compared favorably with those of other major urological operations and cold ischemia time was the only predictor of postoperative complications.
Subject(s)
Kidney Diseases/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Transplantation, Autologous , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), active surveillance (AS) may produce oncologic outcomes comparable to those achieved with radical prostatectomy (RP). Health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes are important to consider, yet few studies have examined HRQoL among patients with PCa who were managed with AS. In this study, the authors compared longitudinal HRQoL in a prospective, racially diverse, and contemporary cohort of patients who underwent RP or AS for low-risk PCa. METHODS: Beginning in 2007, HRQoL data from validated questionnaires (the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and the 36-item RAND Medical Outcomes Study short-form survey) were collected by the Center for Prostate Disease Research in a multicenter national database. Patients aged ≤75 years who were diagnosed with low-risk PCa and elected RP or AS for initial disease management were followed for 3 years. Mean scores were estimated using generalized estimating equations adjusting for baseline HRQoL, demographic characteristics, and clinical patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of the patients with low-risk PCa, 228 underwent RP, and 77 underwent AS. Multivariable analysis revealed that patients in the RP group had significantly worse sexual function, sexual bother, and urinary function at all time points compared with patients in the AS group. Differences in mental health between groups were below the threshold for clinical significance at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, no differences in mental health outcomes were observed, but urinary and sexual HRQoL were worse for patients who underwent RP compared with those who underwent AS for up to 3 years. These data offer support for the management of low-risk PCa with AS as a means for postponing the morbidity associated with RP without concomitant declines in mental health.
Subject(s)
Mental Health , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Quality of Life , Watchful Waiting , Aged , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Prospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The impact of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy on erectile dysfunction remains uncertain. We examined whether transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy contributes to the development or worsening of erectile dysfunction as assessed by IIEF-5 scores in patients who underwent multiple prostate needle biopsies. METHODS: The study population consisted of 826 men who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided 10 to 12-core prostate needle biopsy for suspicion or surveillance of prostate cancer. Men were evaluated for erectile dysfunction using the IIEF-5 questionnaire. Erectile dysfunction was modeled as a categorical variable, defined as any (0 to 20), mild (16 to 20), mild to moderate (11 to 15), moderate (6 to 10) or severe (0 to 5). The impact of multiple prostate needle biopsies was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 826 men who underwent prostate needle biopsy 240 (29%) had undergone 1 or more and 168 (20%) had undergone 2 or more biopsies. Mean patient age was 63 years and mean IIEF-5 score was 16. On univariate analysis age (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.09-1.14, p <0.001), and 1 (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.06-3.03, p=0.03) or 2 (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.02-3.17, p=0.04) prior prostate needle biopsies were associated with erectile dysfunction. On multivariate analysis age alone was predictive of severe erectile dysfunction (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.12, p=0.002). A repeat prostate needle biopsy within 12 months was associated with worse erectile dysfunction (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08-2.93, p=0.02). When long-term erectile function was evaluated, prostate needle biopsy was not significant after adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSIONS: In the short term prostate needle biopsy may be important in predicting transient (less than 1 year) erectile dysfunction. However, in the long term prostate needle biopsy does not predict erectile dysfunction in aging men.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Whitaker test was conceived and developed by Roger H. Whitaker (May 25, 1939) while he was a resident at Cambridge University in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The test combines a urodynamic study with antegrade pyelography to measure the pressure differential between the renal pelvis and the bladder. The test can differentiate between patients with residual or recurrent obstruction and those with dilatation secondary to permanent changes in the musculature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We present the history of the Whitaker test and its place in modern practice. RESULTS: It is useful in evaluating patients with questionable ureteropelvic or ureterovesical junction obstruction and primary defects in the ureteral musculature. It can also be used to determine when percutaneous nephrostomy tubes can be safely discontinued in postoperative patients. CONCLUSION: The merit of the Whitaker test in comparison to other less invasive tests, specifically diuretic renography, is the subject of much debate. However, such debate erroneously presupposes that the tests are directly comparable, which they are not. The correct use for the Whitaker test is to assesses potential upper tract obstruction in equivocal cases and should only be utilized when equivocal results are obtained by other less invasive tests, obstruction is suspected in a poorly functioning kidney, a negative renogram with colic, intermittent obstruction, and percutaneous access already exists and the cause of dilatation needs investigating.
Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Urological/history , Ureteral Obstruction/diagnosis , Ureteral Obstruction/history , Urography , Dilatation, Pathologic/diagnosis , Dilatation, Pathologic/physiopathology , History, 20th Century , Humans , Kidney Pelvis/physiology , Pressure , Recurrence , Ureteral Obstruction/physiopathology , Urinary Bladder/physiology , UrodynamicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the burden of diarrhoeal diseases from exposure to inadequate water, sanitation and hand hygiene in low- and middle-income settings and provide an overview of the impact on other diseases. METHODS: For estimating the impact of water, sanitation and hygiene on diarrhoea, we selected exposure levels with both sufficient global exposure data and a matching exposure-risk relationship. Global exposure data were estimated for the year 2012, and risk estimates were taken from the most recent systematic analyses. We estimated attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by country, age and sex for inadequate water, sanitation and hand hygiene separately, and as a cluster of risk factors. Uncertainty estimates were computed on the basis of uncertainty surrounding exposure estimates and relative risks. RESULTS: In 2012, 502,000 diarrhoea deaths were estimated to be caused by inadequate drinking water and 280,000 deaths by inadequate sanitation. The most likely estimate of disease burden from inadequate hand hygiene amounts to 297,000 deaths. In total, 842,000 diarrhoea deaths are estimated to be caused by this cluster of risk factors, which amounts to 1.5% of the total disease burden and 58% of diarrhoeal diseases. In children under 5 years old, 361,000 deaths could be prevented, representing 5.5% of deaths in that age group. CONCLUSIONS: This estimate confirms the importance of improving water and sanitation in low- and middle-income settings for the prevention of diarrhoeal disease burden. It also underscores the need for better data on exposure and risk reductions that can be achieved with provision of reliable piped water, community sewage with treatment and hand hygiene.
Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Developing Countries , Diarrhea/etiology , Drinking Water/standards , Hygiene/standards , Sanitation/standards , Water Supply/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Income , Infant , Male , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Water QualityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of inadequate water and sanitation on diarrhoeal disease in low- and middle-income settings. METHODS: The search strategy used Cochrane Library, MEDLINE & PubMed, Global Health, Embase and BIOSIS supplemented by screening of reference lists from previously published systematic reviews, to identify studies reporting on interventions examining the effect of drinking water and sanitation improvements in low- and middle-income settings published between 1970 and May 2013. Studies including randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised trials with control group, observational studies using matching techniques and observational studies with a control group where the intervention was well defined were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Ottawa-Newcastle scale. Study results were combined using meta-analysis and meta-regression to derive overall and intervention-specific risk estimates. RESULTS: Of 6819 records identified for drinking water, 61 studies met the inclusion criteria, and of 12,515 records identified for sanitation, 11 studies were included. Overall, improvements in drinking water and sanitation were associated with decreased risks of diarrhoea. Specific improvements, such as the use of water filters, provision of high-quality piped water and sewer connections, were associated with greater reductions in diarrhoea compared with other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that inadequate water and sanitation are associated with considerable risks of diarrhoeal disease and that there are notable differences in illness reduction according to the type of improved water and sanitation implemented.
Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Diarrhea/etiology , Drinking Water/standards , Income , Sanitation/standards , Water Quality , Water Supply/standards , Diarrhea/prevention & control , HumansABSTRACT
Elevated concentrations of naturally-occurring fluoride in groundwater pose a serious health risk to millions of people living in the Ethiopian Rift Valley. In the absence of low-fluoride water resources of sufficient capacity, fluoride removal from drinking water is the accepted mitigation option. To date, five different community-level fluoride-removal technologies have been implemented in Ethiopia, although only a few units have been found in a functional state in the field. Which technology should be promoted and up-scaled is the subject of controversial debate amongst key stakeholders. This paper describes a multi-criteria decision analysis exercise, which was conducted with the participation of stakeholders in Ethiopia during a one-day workshop, to assess in an objective and transparent manner the available technology options. Criteria for technology comparison were selected and weighted, thus enabling the participants to assess the advantages and disadvantages of the different technologies and hear the views of other stakeholders. It was shown that there is no single most-preferable, technical solution for fluoride removal in Ethiopia. Selection of the most suitable solution depends on location-specific parameters and on the relative importance given to different criteria by the stakeholders involved. The data presented in this paper can be used as reference values for Ethiopia.
Subject(s)
Fluorides/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Purification/methods , Drinking Water/chemistry , Environmental Restoration and Remediation/methods , Ethiopia , Groundwater , Rural Population , Water Supply/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Clinical stage I seminoma can be managed with surveillance, chemotherapy or radiotherapy with similar survival rates. However, costs and side effects vary among these treatment modalities. We created a model to estimate the direct and indirect costs during the first 5 years of treatment for the 3 treatment strategies. METHODS: Markov model based analyses were conducted to compare the costs of the 3 management strategies during the first 5 years. In this model clinicians and patients were assumed to be 100% compliant with the 2012 NCCN Guidelines® for testicular cancer. Model parameters were collected from the Washington State CHARS (Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System), published literature and Medicare reimbursement amounts. A 5% annual health inflation rate was assumed. RESULTS: The model predicts an initial cost premium for carboplatin (1 cycle-$9,199.49; 2 cycles-$10,613.85) and radiotherapy ($9,532.80) compared with surveillance ($9,065.31). Radiotherapy (145.8 hours) and surveillance (123.0 hours) require more patient time than carboplatin (1 cycle-93.2 hours, 2 cycles-106.3 hours). When the direct and indirect costs are considered, the least expensive management strategy is surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance is the most cost-effective management strategy for clinical stage I seminoma during the first 5 years of treatment. Although not evaluated in this analysis, costs of late side effects associated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be considered. Due to potentially minimal late side effects and superior cost-effectiveness, surveillance represents a safe, cost-effective and time effective option for the management of stage I seminoma.
ABSTRACT
Arsenic contamination of drinking water is a serious public health threat. In Bangladesh, eight major safe water options provide an alternative to contaminated shallow tubewells: piped water supply, deep tubewells, pond sand filters, community arsenic-removal, household arsenic removal, dug wells, well-sharing, and rainwater harvesting. However, it is uncertain how well these options are accepted and used by the at-risk population. Based on the RANAS model (risk, attitudes, norms, ability, and self-regulation) this study aimed to identify the acceptance and use of available safe water options. Cross-sectional face-to-face interviews were used to survey 1,268 households in Bangladesh in November 2009 (nâ=â872), and December 2010 (nâ=â396). The questionnaire assessed water consumption, acceptance factors from the RANAS model, and socioeconomic factors. Although all respondents had access to at least one arsenic-safe drinking water option, only 62.1% of participants were currently using these alternatives. The most regularly used options were household arsenic removal filters (92.9%) and piped water supply (85.6%). However, the former result may be positively biased due to high refusal rates of household filter owners. The least used option was household rainwater harvesting (36.6%). Those who reported not using an arsenic-safe source differed in terms of numerous acceptance factors from those who reported using arsenic-safe sources: non-users were characterized by greater vulnerability; showed less preference for the taste and temperature of alternative sources; found collecting safe water quite time-consuming; had lower levels of social norms, self-efficacy, and coping planning; and demonstrated lower levels of commitment to collecting safe water. Acceptance was particularly high for piped water supplies and deep tubewells, whereas dug wells and well-sharing were the least accepted sources. Intervention strategies were derived from the results in order to increase the acceptance and use of each arsenic-safe water option.
Subject(s)
Arsenic/isolation & purification , Drinking Water/chemistry , Safety , Water Pollutants, Chemical/isolation & purification , Water Purification/methods , Adult , Attitude , Bangladesh , Demography , Drinking , Family Characteristics , Filtration , Humans , Ponds , Rain , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Water Supply/analysis , Water Wells/chemistryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: ETS-related gene (ERG) protein is present in 40-70% of prostate cancer and is correlated with TMPRSS2-ERG gene rearrangements. This study evaluated ERG expression at radical prostatectomy to determine whether it was predictive of earlier relapse or prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). METHODS: One hundred patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at Virginia Mason in Seattle between 1991 and 1997 were identified. Recurrence was confirmed by tissue diagnosis or radiographic signs. PCSM was confirmed by death certificates. Thirty-three patients with metastases or PCSM were matched to patients without recurrence at a 1:2 ratio. Paraffin embedded tissue was stained with two anti-ERG monoclonal antibodies, EPR3864 and 9FY. Nuclear expression intensity was evaluated as present/absent, on a 4-point relative intensity scale, and as a composite score (0-300). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 10.26 years. The two antibodies were highly correlated (P < 0.0001). Patients with higher ERG expression intensity and composite scores were significantly more likely to develop biochemical relapse, metastases, and PCSM. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis for the composite score of ERG expression revealed a significant association between higher ERG expression (EPR3864) and shorter PCa-specific survival (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: While the presence of ERG expression at the time of surgery was not predictive of earlier relapse or PCSM, the relative intensity and composite score for ERG expression was prognostic for the development of biochemical relapse, metastases, and PCSM. Quantitative ERG scoring may be useful to identify patients who would benefit from adjuvant treatment or closer follow-up, allowing more accurate individual patient treatment plans.
Subject(s)
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Trans-Activators/biosynthesis , Adult , Aged , Gene Rearrangement , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/genetics , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Trans-Activators/genetics , Transcriptional Regulator ERGABSTRACT
A national drinking water quality survey conducted in 2009 furnished data that were used to make an updated estimate of chronic arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. About 20 million and 45 million people were found to be exposed to concentrations above the national standard of 50 µg/L and the World Health Organization's guideline value of 10 µg/L, respectively. From the updated exposure data and all-cause mortality hazard ratios based on local epidemiological studies, it was estimated that arsenic exposures to concentrations > 50 µg/L and 10-50 µg/L account for an annual 24,000 and perhaps as many as 19,000 adult deaths in the country, respectively. Exposure varies widely in the 64 districts; among adults, arsenic-related deaths account for 0-15% of all deaths. An arsenic-related mortality rate of 1 in every 16 adult deaths could represent an economic burden of 13 billion United States dollars (US$) in lost productivity alone over the next 20 years. Arsenic mitigation should follow a two-tiered approach: (i) prioritizing provision of safe water to an estimated 5 million people exposed to > 200 µg/L arsenic, and (ii) building local arsenic testing capacity. The effectiveness of such an approach was demonstrated during the United Nations Children's Fund 2006-2011 country programme, which provided safe water to arsenic-contaminated areas at a cost of US$ 11 per capita. National scale-up of such an approach would cost a few hundred million US dollars but would improve the health and productivity of the population, especially in future generations.
Subject(s)
Arsenic Poisoning/mortality , Arsenic/analysis , Drinking Water/analysis , Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis , Water Wells/analysis , Adult , Arsenic/adverse effects , Arsenic/standards , Arsenic Poisoning/economics , Arsenic Poisoning/epidemiology , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , Cause of Death , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drinking Water/adverse effects , Drinking Water/standards , Female , Humans , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Infections/chemically induced , Infections/mortality , Maternal-Fetal Exchange/drug effects , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Neoplasms/mortality , Pregnancy , Water Pollutants, Chemical/adverse effects , Water Pollutants, Chemical/standards , Water Wells/standardsABSTRACT
Started in 2007, the Sanitation Hygiene Education and Water Supply in Bangladesh (SHEWA-B) project aims to improve the hygiene, sanitation and water supply for 20 million people in Bangladesh, and thus reduce disease among this population. This paper assesses the effectiveness of SHEWA-B on changing behaviors and reducing diarrhea and respiratory illness among children < 5 years of age. We assessed behaviors at baseline in 2007 and after 6 months and 18 months by conducting structured observation of handwashing behavior in 500 intervention and 500 control households. In addition we conducted spot checks of water and sanitation facilities in 850 intervention and 850 control households. We also collected monthly data on diarrhea and respiratory illness from 500 intervention and 500 control households from October 2007 to September 2009. Participants washed their hands with soap < 3% of the time around food related events in both intervention and control households at baseline and after 18 months. Washing both hands with soap or ash after cleaning a child's anus increased from 22% to 36%, and no access to a latrine decreased from 10% to 6.8% from baseline to 18 months. The prevalence of diarrhea and respiratory illness, among children <5 years of age were similar in intervention and control communities throughout the study. This large scale sanitation, hygiene and water improvement programme resulted in improvements in a few of its targeted behaviors, but these modest behavior changes have not yet resulted in a measurable reduction in childhood diarrhea and respiratory illness.
Subject(s)
Diarrhea/prevention & control , Health Behavior , Hygiene/standards , Respiratory Tract Diseases/prevention & control , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Sanitation/standards , Water Supply/standards , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Program Evaluation , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiologyABSTRACT
We assessed which practical handwashing indicators were independently associated with reduced child diarrhea or respiratory disease. Fieldworkers collected 33 indicators of handwashing at baseline in 498 households in 50 villages in rural Bangladesh. Community monitors visited households monthly and asked standard questions about diarrhea and symptoms of respiratory illness among children under 5 years of age. In multivariate analysis, three handwashing indicators were independently associated with less child diarrhea-mothers reporting usually washing hands with soap before feeding a child, mothers using soap when asked to show how they usually washed their hands after defecation, and children having visibly clean finger pads. Two indicators were independently associated with fewer respiratory infections-mothers allowing their hands to air dry after the handwashing demonstration and the presence of water where the respondents usually wash hands after defecation. These rapid handwashing indicators should be considered for inclusion in handwashing assessments.